Variation in individual worker honey bee behavior shows hallmarks of personality
- 1.6k Downloads
The existence of personalities has been explored in various invertebrates, but a comprehensive investigation of personality differences across individuals in a eusocial insect has not yet been conducted. The study of personality differences across individuals within the same behavioral caste may contribute to an understanding of how social insects divide labor within the nest. Here, we define and investigate three dimensions of personality within the worker caste of a model social insect, the honey bee Apis mellifera, as follows: (1) consistent individual behavioral differences over time, (2) consistent individual behavioral differences across contexts, and (3) the presence of correlated suites of behaviors. To test whether honey bee workers exhibit dimensions 1 and 2, we repeatedly assessed responses of groups of same-age bees in cages to stimuli that are relevant to bee life history. To test for dimension 3, we examined behavior within a colony context by using observation hives to record the behaviors of individual bees across their lifetimes. Our results provide some evidence for all three dimensions of personality in honey bee workers. In particular, our data suggest some individuals may be more likely to be highly interactive with other workers (e.g., engaging in food sharing), while other individuals are consistently less interactive. These findings expand upon and contribute to previous models for the organization of worker division of labor in honey bees, suggesting that consistent behavioral differences (personalities) of workers within a behavioral caste have the potential to contribute to subcaste division of labor.
Behavioral ecologists have become increasingly interested in animal personalities, individual behavioral differences that are consistent over time and in different contexts, with recent focus on understanding the occurrence of personalities across taxa and their adaptive value. The existence and function of personality differences among individuals in complex societies, such as eusocial insects, remain understudied. Here, we provide the first comprehensive investigation of whether workers of the highly eusocial honey bee show hallmarks of personality. Although these workers demonstrate well-documented behavioral changes as they age, we uncovered some aspects of their behavior, in particular, their tendency to physically interact with other bees, remain somewhat consistent even as they age and change roles within the colony. We suggest that individual-level personality differences have the potential to contribute to colony division of labor by creating variation in individual tendencies to perform different tasks.
KeywordsHoney bee Personality Individual variation Division of labor
We would like to thank the members of the Toth lab for the helpful suggestions on these experiments and feedback on the manuscript. We would like to thank Kate Hunter for the assistance with behavioral observations and Eric Gangloff for the guidance on statistical analyses.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
- Benjamini Y, Hochberg Y (1995) Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. J Roy Stat Soc B 289-300Google Scholar
- Chapman BB, Thain H, Coughlin J, Hughes WO (2011) Behavioural syndromes at multiple scales in Myrmica ants. Anim Behav 82(2):391–397Google Scholar
- Leoncini I, Le Conte Y, Costagliola G, Plettner E, Toth AL, Wang M, Huang Z, Bécard J-M, Crauser D, Slessor KN, Robinson GE (2004) Regulation of behavioral maturation by a primer pheromone produced by adult worker honey bees. PNAS 101(50):17559-17564Google Scholar
- Mather JA, Logue DM (2013) The bold and the spineless: invertebrate personalities. In: Carere C, Maestripieri D (eds) Animal personalities: behavior, physiology, and evolution. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp 13–35Google Scholar
- Oksanen J, Blanchet FG, Kindt R, Legendre P, Minchin PR, O’Hara RB et al (2013) Package ‘vegan’. R Package ver 254, 20-8Google Scholar
- Oster GF, Wilson EO (1978) Caste and ecology in the social insects. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
- Page RE Jr, Erber J (2002) Levels of behavioral organization and the evolution of division of labor. Naturwissenschaften 89(3):91–106Google Scholar
- Page RE Jr, Mitchell SD (1990) Self organization and adaptation in insect societies. In PSA: Proceedings of the biennial meeting of the philosophy of science association. Philosophy of Science Association, pp 289–298Google Scholar
- Pankiw T, Page RE Jr (1999) The effect of genotype, age, sex, and caste on response thresholds to sucrose and foraging behavior of honey bees (Apis mellifera L.). J Comp Physiol A 185(2):207–213Google Scholar
- Pankiw T, Waddington KD, Page RE Jr (2001) Modulation of sucrose response thresholds in honey bees (Apis mellifera L.): influence of genotype, feeding, and foraging experience. J Comp Physiol A 187(4):293–301Google Scholar
- Rasmussen EM, Amdam, GV (2015) Cytosine modifications in the honey bee (Apis mellifera) worker genome. Frontiers in genetics 6Google Scholar
- Revelle W (2014) psych: procedures for personality and psychological research, Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois, USA, http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=psych Version = 1.4.8
- Rittschof CC, Coombs CB, Frazier M, Grozinger CM, Robinson GE (2015). Early-life experience affects honey bee aggression and resilience to immune challenge. Sci Rep 5Google Scholar
- Robinson GE, Page RE Jr (1988) Genetic determination of guarding and undertaking in honey-bee colonies. Nature 333(6171):356–358Google Scholar
- Williams GR, Alaux C, Costa C, Csáki T, Doublet V, Eisenhardt D, Fries I, Kuhn R, McMahon DP, Medrzycki P, Murray TE (2013) Standard methods for maintaining adult Apis mellifera in cages under in vitro laboratory conditions. J Apic Res 52(1):1-36Google Scholar
- Wilson EO (1971) The insect societies. Harvard University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
- Winston ML (1987) The biology of the honey bee. Harvard University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar