Abstract
Consistent individual differences in behavior exist for many behavioral traits. Several evolutionary hypotheses regarding the maintenance of this variation have been proposed, but they all rest on the relatively untested question of whether this variation has a genetic basis and if so, exactly what genetic mechanisms may be involved. We tested for heritability and the effects of heterozygosity on two measures of parental care behavior (nestling provisioning rate and the likelihood of provisioning with large food items) in a population of wild house sparrows (Passer domesticus), where both behaviors display consistent individual differences across a wide range of contexts. We found no evidence of significant heritability in either measure of parental care behavior. However, in a subset of 46 female sparrows, the likelihood of bringing large food items to the nest, but not provisioning rate, was positively correlated with genetic heterozygosity estimated from 18 polymorphic microsatellite markers. Despite these findings, individual identity continued to explain a significant proportion of the variation in parental care behavior. Our results imply that while the effects of directional selection on traits associated with parental care may be limited in this population, genetic heterozygosity appears to play a role in the maintenance of phenotypic diversity in at least one aspect of parental care behavior.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Agudo R, Carrete M, Alcaide M, Rico C, Hiraldo F, Antonio J (2012) Genetic diversity at neutral and adaptive loci determines individual fitness in a long-lived territorial bird. Proc R Soc Lond B 279:3241–3249
Amos W, Worthington Wilmer J, Fullard K, Burg TM, Croxall JP, Bloch D, Coulson T (2001) The influence of parental relatedness on reproductive success. Proc R Soc Lond B 268:2021–2027
Anderson TR (2006) Biology of the ubiquitous house sparrow: from genes to populations. Oxford Univ Press, New York
Angelier F, Chastel O (2009) Stress, prolactin and parental investment in birds: a review. Gen Comp Endocrinol 163:142–148
Aparicio JM, Ortego J, Cordero PJ (2006) What should we weigh to estimate heterozygosity, alleles or loci? Mol Ecol 15:4659–4665
Bell AM, Hankison SJ, Laskowski KL (2009) The repeatability of behaviour: a meta-analysis. Anim Behav 77:771–783
Bonneaud C, Mazuc J, Chastel O, Westerdahl H, Sorci G (2004) Terminal investment induced by immune challenge and fitness traits associated with major histocompatibility complex in the house sparrow. Evolution 58:2823–2830
Breitwisch R, Merritt PG, Whitesides GH (1986) Parental investment by the northern mockingbird: male and female roles in feeding nestlings. Auk 103:152–159
Chapman JR, Nakagawa S, Coltman DW, Slate J, Sheldon BC (2009) A quantitative review of heterozygosity-fitness correlations in animal populations. Mol Ecol 18:2746–2765
Charmantier A, Réale D (2005) How do misassigned paternities affect the estimation of heritability in the wild? Mol Ecol 14:2839–2850
Clutton-Brock TH (1991) The evolution of parental care. Princeton Univ Press, Princeton
Coltman DW, Pilkington JG, Smith JA, Pemberton JM (1999) Parasite-mediated selection against inbred soay sheep in a free-living, island population. Evolution 53:1259–1267
Curio E (1988) Relative realized life span and delayed cost of parental care. Am Nat 131:825–836
Dall SRX, Houston AI, McNamara JM (2004) The behavioral ecology of personality: consistent individual differences from an adaptive perspective. Ecol Lett 7:734–739
Darwin C (1876) The effects of cross and self fertilization in the vegetable kingdom, 1st edn. John Murray, London
David P (1998) Heterozygosity-fitness correlations: new perspectives on old problems. Heredity 80:531–537
David P, Pujol B, Viard F, Castella V, Goudet J (2007) Reliable selfing rate estimates from imperfect population genetic data. Mol Ecol 16:2474–2487
de Villemereuil P (2012) Tutorial: Estimation of a biological trait heritability using the animal model: how to use the MCMCglmm R package, http://devillemereuil.legtux.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/12/tuto_en.pdf, Accessed 1 August 2014
Dingemanse NJ, Both C, Drent PJ, van Oers K, van Noordwijk AJ (2002) Repeatability and heritability of exploratory behaviour in great tits from the wild. Anim Behav 64:929–938
Dingemanse NJ, Kazem AJN, Réale D, Wright J (2010) Behavioural reaction norms: animal personality meets individual plasticity. Trends Ecol Evol 25:81–89
Dingemanse NJ, Barber I, Wright J, Brommer JE (2012) Quantitative genetics of behavioural reaction norms: genetic correlations between personality and behavioural plasticity vary across stickleback populations. J Evol Biol 25:485–496
Dor R, Lotem A (2010) Parental effort and response to nestling begging in the house sparrow: repeatability, heritability and parent-offspring co-evolution. J Evol Biol 23:1605–1612
Eggers S, Griesser M, Ekman J (2005) Predator-induced plasticity in nest visitation rates in the Siberian jay (Perisoreus infaustus). Behav Ecol 16:309–315
Excoffier L, Lischer HEL (2010) Arlequin suite ver 3.5: a new series of programs to perform population genetics analyses under Linux and Windows. Mol Ecol Resour 10:564–567
Falconer DS, Mackay TFC (1996) Introduction to quantitative genetics, 4th edn. Longman, Essex
Foerster K, Delhey K, Johnsen A, Lifjeld JT, Kempenaers B (2003) Females increase offspring heterozygosity and fitness through extra-pair matings. Nature 425:714–717
Forstmeier W, Schielzeth H, Mueller JC, Ellegren H, Kempenaers B (2012) Heterozygosity-fitness correlations in zebra finches: microsatellite markers can be better than their reputation. Mol Ecol 21:3237–3249
Fossøy F, Johnsen A, Lifjeld JT (2008) Multiple genetic benefits of female promiscuity in a socially monogamous passerine. Evolution 62:145–156
Freeman-Gallant CR, Rothstein MD (1999) Apparent heritability of parental care in Savannah sparrows. Auk 116:1132–1136
García-Navas V, Ortego J, Sanz JJ (2009) Heterozygosity-based assortative mating in blue tits (Cyanistes caeruleus): implications for the evolution of mate choice. Proc R Soc Lond B 276:2931–2940
Grieco F (2002) Time constraint on food choice in provisioning blue tits, Parus caeruleus: the relationship between feeding rate and prey size. Anim Behav 64:517–526
Hadfield JD (2010) MCMC methods for multi-response generalized linear mixed models: the MCMCglmm R package. J Stat Softw 33:1–22
Hansson B, Westerberg L (2002) On the correlation between heterozygosity and fitness in natural populations. Mol Ecol 11:2467–2474
Hansson B, Bensch S, Hasselquist D, Åkesson M (2001) Microsatellite diversity predicts recruitment of sibling great reed warblers. Proc R Soc Lond B 268:1287–1291
Hatch MI (2003) Parental care as a life history trait in house sparrows Passer domesticus. PhD dissertation. University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky
Hawley DM, Sydenstricker KV, Kollias GV, Dhondt AA (2005) Genetic diversity predicts pathogen resistance and cell-mediated immunocompetence in house finches. Biol Lett 1:326–329
Houle D (1992) Comparing evolvability and variability of quantitative traits. Genetics 130:195–204
Houle D, Morikawa B, Lynch M (1996) Comparing mutational variabilities. Genetics 143:1467–1483
Keller SR, Fields PD, Berard AE, Taylor DR (2014) Recent admixture generates heterozygosity-fitness correlations during the range expansion of an invading species. J Evol Biol 27:616–627
Knowles SCL, Palinauskas V, Sheldon BC (2010) Chronic malaria infections increase family inequalities and reduce parental fitness: experimental evidence from a wild bird population. J Evol Biol 23:557–569
Kruuk LEB, Hadfield JD (2007) How to separate genetic and environmental causes of similarity between relatives. J Evol Biol 20:1890–1903
Lieutentant-Gosselin M, Bernatchez L (2006) Local heterozygosity-fitness correlations with global positive effects on fitness in threespine stickleback. Evolution 60:1658–1668
Low M, Makan T, Castro I (2012) Food availability and offspring demand influence sex-specific patterns and repeatability of parental provisioning. Behav Ecol 23:25–34
Lynch M, Walsh B (1998) Genetic analysis of quantitative traits. Sinauer, Sunderland
MacColl ADC, Hatchwell BJ (2003) Heritability of parental effort in a passerine bird. Evolution 59:2191–2195
McGhee KE, Travis J (2013) Heritable variation underlies behavioural types in the mating context in male bluefin killifish. Anim Behav 86:513–518
Merilä J, Sheldon BC (2000) Lifetime reproductive success and heritability in nature. Am Nat 155:301–310
Meunier J, Kölliker M (2012) Parental antagonism and parent-offspring co-adaptation interact to shape family life. Proc R Soc Lond B 279:3981–3988
Mitton JB, Schuster WSF, Cothran EG, De Fries JC (1993) Correlation between the individual heterozygosity of parents and their offspring. Heredity 71:59–63
Mousseau TA, Roff DA (1987) Natural selection and the heritability of fitness components. Heredity 59:181–197
Nakagawa S, Gillespie DOS, Hatchwell BJ, Burke T (2007) Predictable males and unpredictable females: sex difference in repeatability of parental care in a wild bird population. J Evol Biol 20:1674–1681
Neff BD, Pitcher TE (2008) Mate choice for non-additive genetic benefits: a resolution to the lek paradox. J Theor Biol 254:147–155
Nicholls JA, Double MC, Rowell DM, Magrath RD (2000) The evolution of cooperative and pair breeding in thornbills Acanthiza (Pardalotidae). J Avian Biol 31:165–176
Nietlisbach P, Keller LF, Postma E (2015) Genetic variance components and heritability of multiallelic heterozygosity under inbreeding. Heredity (published online, doi: 10.1038/hdy.2015.59)
Olano-Marin J, Mueller JC, Kempenaers B (2011) Correlations between heterozygosity and reproductive success in the blue tit (Cyanistes caeruleus): an analysis of inbreeding and single locus effects. Evolution 65:3175–3194
Ortego J, Calabuig G, Bonal R, Muñoz A, Aparicio JM, Cordero PJ (2009) Temporal variation of heterozygosity-based assortative mating and related benefits in a lesser kestrel population. J Evol Biol 22:2488–2495
Palmer AR (2000) Quasireplication and the contract of error: lessons from sex ratios, heritabilities and fluctuating asymmetry. Annu Rev Ecol Evol S 31:441–480
Richardson DS, Komdeur J, Burke T (2004) Inbreeding in the Seychelles warbler: environment-dependent maternal effects. Evolution 58:2037–2048
Ringsby TH, Berge T, Saether B, Jensen H (2009) Reproductive success and individual variation in feeding frequency of house sparrows (Passer domesticus). J Ornithol 150:469–481
Rousset F (2008) GENEPOP’007: a complete re-implementation of the GENEPOP software for Windows and Linux. Mol Ecol Resour 8:103–106
Rymer T, Pillay N (2011) Transmission of parental care behavior in African striped mice, Rhabdomys pumilio. J Exp Zool Part A 315:631–638
Schrey AW, Grispo M, Awad M et al (2011) Broad-scale latitudinal patterns of genetic diversity among native European and introduced house sparrow (Passer domesticus) populations. Mol Ecol 20:1133–1143
Schuelke M (2000) An economic method for the fluorescent labeling of PCR fragments. Nat Biotechnol 18:233–234
Schwagmeyer PL, Mock DW (2003) How consistently are good parents good parents? Repeatability of parental care in the house sparrow, Passer domesticus. Ethology 109:303–313
Schwagmeyer PL, Mock DW (2008) Parental provisioning and offspring fitness: size matters. Anim Behav 75:291–298
Seddon N, Amos W, Mulder RA, Tobias JA (2004) Male heterozygosity predicts territory size, song structure and reproductive success in a cooperatively breeding bird. Proc R Soc Lond B 271:1823–1829
Sheldon BC, Kruuk LEB, Merilä J (2003) Natural selection and inheritance of breeding time and clutch size in the collared flycatcher. Evolution 57:406–420
Shull GH (1952) Beginnings of the heterosis concept. In: Gowen JW (ed) Heterosis. Iowa State College Press, Ames, pp 14–48
Stewart IRK, Hanschu RD, Burke T, Westneat DF (2006) Tests of ecological, phenotypic, and genetic correlates of extra-pair paternity in the house sparrow. Condor 108:399–413
Szulkin M, Bierne N, David P (2010) Heterozygosity-fitness correlations: a time for reappraisal. Evolution 64:1202–1217
Tomiuk J, Stauss M, Segelbacher G, Fietz J, Kömpf J, Bachmann L (2007) Female genetic heterogeneity affects the reproduction of great tits (Parus major L., 1758) in low-quality woodlands. J Zool Syst Evol Res 45:144–150
van de Pol M, Wright J (2009) A simple method for distinguishing within- versus between-subject effects using mixed models. Anim Behav 77:753–758
van Oosterhout C, Hutchinson WF, Willis DPM, Shipley P (2004) MICRO-CHECKER: software for identifying and correcting genotyping errors in microsatellite data. Mol Ecol Notes 4:535–538
Walling CA, Stamper CE, Smiseth PT, Moore AJ (2008) The quantitative genetics of sex differences in parenting. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 105:18430–18435
Westneat DF, Stewart IRK, Hatch MI (2009) Complex interactions among temporal variables affect the plasticity of clutch size in a multi-brooded bird. Ecology 90:1162–1174
Westneat DF, Hatch MI, Wetzel DP, Ensminger AL (2011) Individual variation in parental care reaction norms: integration of personality and plasticity. Am Nat 178:652–667
Wetzel DP, Stewart IRK, Westneat DF (2012) Heterozygosity predicts clutch and egg size but not plasticity in a house sparrow population with no evidence of inbreeding. Mol Ecol 21:406–420
Wilson AJ, Réale D, Clements MN, Morrissey MM, Postma E, Walling CA, Kruuk LEB, Nussey DH (2010) An ecologist’s guide to the animal model. J Anim Ecol 79:13–26
Wolf M, Weissing FJ (2010) An explanatory framework for adaptive personality differences. Philos T Roy Soc B 365:3959–3968
Wright J, Cuthill I (1989) Manipulation of sex differences in parental care. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 25:171–181
Acknowledgments
Funding for this study was provided by the National Science Foundation (IOS #1110440), American Ornithologists’ Union, Animal Behavior Society, Kentucky Ornithological Society, Sigma Xi, UK Dept. of Biology Ribble Research Fund and Kuehne Scholarship Fund, and the UK Graduate School. We thank the managers and staff at UK’s Maine Chance and Spindletop Farms for access to the sparrows. The UK AGTC (especially Abbe Kesterson) provided invaluable assistance running the fragment analysis. We thank Ian Stewart, Sarah Barney, Lizzy Burnett, and Ashely Ginn-Dillon for their help collecting field data, and Patricia Hartman and Melissa Keinath for their help in the lab. We appreciate comments on earlier drafts of this manuscript provided by P. Crowley, C. Fox, A. Pilastro, C. Sargent, T. Zentall, and two anonymous reviewers.
Ethical standards
All applicable United States and University of Kentucky guidelines for the care and use of animals were followed. This study was conducted with approval from the University of Kentucky (IACUC #2007-0227). The authors declare they have no conflicts of interest.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Communicated by A. Pilastro
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
ESM 1
(DOCX 51 kb)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Wetzel, D.P., Hatch, M.I. & Westneat, D.F. Genetic sources of individual variation in parental care behavior. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 69, 1933–1943 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-015-2006-x
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-015-2006-x