Abstract
Animals gather noisy information about the world and then process it to trigger appropriate behavioural responses. To identify the best action to take, both the costs and benefits associated with each action should be taken into account. Social insects are known to be good at solving such trade-offs, since they rely on the ‘wisdom of the crowd’. In other words, by pooling the decisions of many individuals, they can reach an optimal collective decision. However, this process can lead to the assumption that adaptive flexibility in decision-making resides entirely at the colony level, whereas decision-making by individuals is constrained by their limited cognitive capacities. Here, we show that ant colonies are able to respond flexibly and adaptively to their environment when making decisions and that this feature is accomplished by individuals also showing such flexibility. We presented Temnothorax albipennis colonies with the opportunity to move to a better home and measured how emigration dynamics were affected by varying the value of both current and target nests. Colonies take less time to commit to a new nest when the value difference between current and target nest is bigger, i.e. greater benefit. Furthermore, this is accomplished by individuals manipulating their recruitment speed either by moving faster or recruiting sooner. This observation indicates that, regardless of the degree of difficulty of the choice, an individual that has sufficient time and information can make good decisions that will ultimately confer its group the ability to solve more complicated dilemmas.




Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles and news from researchers in related subjects, suggested using machine learning.References
Conradt L, Roper TJ (2005) Consensus decision making in animals. Trends Ecol Evol 20:449–456. doi:10.1016/j.tree.2005.05.008
Conradt L, Roper TJ (2007) Democracy in animals: the evolution of shared group decisions. Proc Biol Sci 274:2317–2326. doi:10.1098/rspb.2007.0186
Couzin I (2007) Collective minds. Nature 445:715. doi:10.1038/445715a
Couzin ID (2009) Collective cognition in animal groups. Trends Cogn Sci 13:36–43. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2008.10.002
Davies NB, Krebs JR, West SA (2012) An introduction to behavioural ecology, 4th edn. Wiley-Blackwell, Chichester, p 520
Deneubourg J, Goss S (1989) Collective patterns and decision-making. Ethol Ecol Evol 1:295–311. doi:10.1080/08927014.1989.9525500
Doran C, Pearce T, Connor A et al (2013) Economic investment by ant colonies in searches for better homes. Biol Lett 9:20130685. doi:10.1098/rsbl.2013.0685
Dornhaus A, Franks NR (2008) Individual and collective cognition in ants and other insects (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Myrmecological News 11:215–226
Dornhaus A, Franks NR, Hawkins RM, Shere HNS (2004) Ants move to improve: colonies of Leptothorax albipennis emigrate whenever they find a superior nest site. Anim Behav 67:959–963. doi:10.1016/j.anbehav.2003.09.004
Edwards SC, Pratt SC (2009) Rationality in collective decision-making by ant colonies. Proc Biol Sci 276:3655–3661. doi:10.1098/rspb.2009.0981
Franks NR, Richardson T (2006) Teaching in tandem-running ants. Nature 439:153. doi:10.1038/439153a
Franks NR, Pratt SC, Mallon EB et al (2002) Information flow, opinion polling and collective intelligence in house-hunting social insects. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 357:1567–1583. doi:10.1098/rstb.2002.1066
Franks NR, Dornhaus A, Fitzsimmons JP, Stevens M (2003a) Speed versus accuracy in collective decision making. Proc R Soc B Biol Sci 270:2457–2463. doi:10.1098/rspb.2003.2527
Franks NR, Mallon EB, Bray HE et al (2003b) Strategies for choosing between alternatives with different attributes: exemplified by house-hunting ants. Anim Behav 65:215–223. doi:10.1006/anbe.2002.2032
Gardner A, Grafen A (2009) Capturing the superorganism: a formal theory of group adaptation. J Evol Biol 22:659–671. doi:10.1111/j.1420-9101.2008.01681.x
Hölldobler B, Wilson EO (2009) The superorganism: the beauty, elegance, and strangeness of insect societies. W.W. Norton, London p 522
IBM Corp. (2012) IBM SPSS statistics for windows, version 21.0. Armonk, New York
Langridge EA, Sendova-Franks AB, Franks NR (2007) How experienced individuals contribute to an improvement in collective performance in ants. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 62:447–456. doi:10.1007/s00265-007-0472-5
Langridge EA, Sendova-Franks AB, Franks NR (2008) The behaviour of ant transporters at the old and new nests during successive colony emigrations. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 62:1851–1861. doi:10.1007/s00265-008-0614-4
Mark J, Marley AA (2006) Extending the bounds of rationality: evidence and theories of preferential choice. J Econ Lit XLIV:631–661
Marshall JA, Bogacz R, Dornhaus A et al (2009) On optimal decision-making in brains and social insect colonies. J R Soc Interface 6:1065–1074. doi:10.1098/rsif.2008.0511
McNamara JM, Houston AI (1996) State-dependent life histories. Nature 380(6571):215–221
Moglich M (1978) Social organization of nest emigration in Leptothorax (Hym., Form.). Insect Soc 25:205–225
Mori Y, Nakata K (2008) Optimal foraging and information gathering: how should animals invest in repeated foraging bouts within the same patch? Evol Ecol Res 10:823–834
Pelé M, Sueur C (2013) Decision-making theories: linking the disparate research areas of individual and collective cognition. Anim Cogn 16:543–556. doi:10.1007/s10071-013-0631-1
Planqué R, Dechaume-Moncharmont F-X, Franks NR et al (2007) Why do house-hunting ants recruit in both directions? Naturwissenschaften 94:911–918. doi:10.1007/s00114-007-0273-8
Pratt S, Mallon E, Sumpter D, Franks N (2002) Quorum sensing, recruitment, and collective decision-making during colony emigration by the ant Leptothorax albipennis. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 52:117–127. doi:10.1007/s00265-002-0487-x
R Development Core Team (2015) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. RFoundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria
Sasaki T, Pratt SC (2011) Emergence of group rationality from irrational individuals. Behav Ecol 22:276–281. doi:10.1093/beheco/arq198
Sasaki T, Pratt SC (2012) Groups have a larger cognitive capacity than individuals. Curr Biol 22:R827–R829. doi:10.1016/j.cub.2012.07.058
Schuck-Paim C, Pompilio L, Kacelnik A (2004) State-dependent decisions cause apparent violations of rationality in animal choice. PLoS Biol 2:e402. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.0020402
Seeley TD (1997) Honey bee colonies are group-level adaptive units. Am Nat 150:S22–S41. doi:10.1086/286048
Sendova-Franks A, Franks NR (1993) Task allocation in ant colonies within variable environments (a study of temporal polyethism: experimental). Bull Math Biol 55:75–96
Stroeymeyt N, Robinson EJH, Hogan PM et al (2011) Experience-dependent flexibility in collective decision making by house-hunting ants. Behav Ecol 22:535–542. doi:10.1093/beheco/arr007
Sumpter DJT, Pratt SC (2009) Quorum responses and consensus decision making. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 364:743–753. doi:10.1098/rstb.2008.0204
Acknowledgments
We thank Ana Sendova-Franks, Jamie Freeman and Tim Fawcett for their comments on the manuscript and help with statistical analysis. We thank all the members of the lab for their assistance with experiments. Carolina Doran thanks the Fundação para a Ciência e Tecnologia, Portugal (grant SFRH/BI/51712/2011).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Communicated by W. O. H. Hughes
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Doran, C., Newham, Z.F., Phillips, B.B. et al. Commitment time depends on both current and target nest value in Temnothorax albipennis ant colonies. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 69, 1183–1190 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-015-1932-y
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-015-1932-y


