A comparison of problem-solving success between urban and rural house sparrows
Behavioural flexibility is an important component of adaptation because it can help animals to exploit new or diverse habitats. Due to abundance of novel objects and resources provided by humans, urban environments may select for behavioural flexibility, but empirical evidence for this hypothesis is controversial. In this study, we compared urban and rural house sparrows (Passer domesticus) in four foraging problem-solving tasks. In the most difficult task, urban birds with large body mass were faster than others. Urban and rural birds performed similarly in the three easier tasks and did not differ in their learning efficiency. Individuals successful in one task tended to be successful in other tasks, and the repeatability of performance did not differ between urban and rural birds. Individuals that attempted to access food more frequently solved the problem faster in all tasks, but urban and rural birds did not differ in the frequency of attempts. These results suggest that the effects of urbanization on problem-solving success are weak and context-dependent in house sparrows. We propose that while urban animals may be better at exploiting some aspects of novel environments than rural conspecifics, such differences may be modulated by other habitat effects such as reduced nestling development and adult body mass in urban sparrows, which might influence some long-term determinants of innovativeness such as cognitive capacity or physical skills.
KeywordsUrbanization Problem solving Learning House sparrow
We thank Gábor Seress for help with capturing birds. The Zoo of Veszprém provided facilities for bird housing. The study was financed by the Hungarian Scientific Research Fund (OTKA, K84132). During the study, AL was supported by a Marie Curie Intra-European Fellowship. During the preparation of the manuscript, we were also supported by the European Union, with the co-funding of the European Social Fund (SP, BP, and EV by TÁMOP-4.2.2.A-11/1/KONV-2012-0064, and VB by TÁMOP-4.2.4.A/ 2-11/1-2012-0001 ‘National Excellence Program’).
Conflict of interest
The authors of this manuscript declare to have no conflict of interest.
All procedures were in accordance with ASAB’s ethical guidelines and Hungarian laws, licensed by the Middle Transdanubian Inspectorate for Environmental Protection, Natural Protection and Water Management (permission number: 31559/2011).
- Cooper RM, Zubek JP (1958) Effects of enriched and restricted early environments on the learning ability of bright and dull rats. Can J Psychology 12:159–164Google Scholar
- Gonzalez G, Sorci G, Smith LC (2001) Testosterone and sexual signalling in male house sparrows (Passer domesticus). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 50:557–562Google Scholar
- Griffin AS, Guez D (2014) Innovation and problem solving: A review of common mechanisms. Behav Process (published online, doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2014.08.027)
- Heij CJ, Moeliker CW (1990) Population dynamics of Dutch House sparrows in urban, suburban and rural habitats. In: Pinowski J, Summers-Smith JD (eds) Granivorous birds in the agricultural landscape. PWN, Polish Scientific Publishers, WarsawGoogle Scholar
- Lessells CM, Boag PT (1987) Unrepeatable repeatabilities: a common mistake. Auk 104: 116–121Google Scholar
- Matzel LD, Wass C, Kolata S (2011) Individual differences in animal intelligence: learning, reasoning, selective attention and inter-species conservation of a cognitive trait. Int J Comp Psychol 24:36–59Google Scholar
- R Core Team (2012) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna (Austria): R foundation for statistical computing. Available from: http://www.r-project.org/
- Ramsey G, Bastian ML, van Schaik C (2007) Animal innovation defined and operationalized. Behav Brain Sci 30:393–407Google Scholar
- Reader SM, Laland KN (2003) Animal innovation. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
- Rowe C, Healy SD (2014) Measuring variation in cognition. Behav Ecol (published online,doi: 10.1093/beheco/aru090)
- Sol D, Bacher S, Reader SM, Lefebvre L (2008) Brain size predicts the success of mammal species introduced into novel environments. Am Nat 172:63–71Google Scholar
- Suárez-Rodríguez M, López-Rull I, Garcia CM (2013) Incorporation of cigarette butts into nests reduces nest ectoparasite load in urban birds: new ingredients for an old recipe? Biol Lett 9:15–18Google Scholar
- Vincze E, Papp S, Preiszner B, Seress G, Liker A, Bókony V (2014) Does urbanization facilitate individual recognition of humans by house sparrows? Anim Cogn (published online,doi: 10.1007/s10071-014-0799-z)