Skip to main content
Log in

Differential breeding investment in bridled and non-bridled common guillemots (Uria aalge): morph of the partner matters

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Polymorphism is the coexistence of two or more phenotypically distinct and genetically determinate forms in a population and implies a selective balance between the alternative morphs to permanently exist. Common guillemots Uria aalge occur in two genetically distinct morphs—a non-bridled and a bridled—the latter with white eye rings and a well-defined stripe behind the eyes. In this study, we investigated differences between the morphs with regard to reproductive parameters. We used a detailed family-based sample providing data on mother, father, and chick over three breeding seasons. The mating between morphs was random but pure non-bridled and pure bridled pairs produced smaller chicks at age 15 days than the two mixed pair compositions. Body mass of the adults showed much the same pattern; pure pairs having lower body mass than mixed pairs. There were no differences between the two morphs in reproductive parameters without considering the morph of the partner. This suggests that reproductive decisions in some way not only depend on the morph but also on the tactic of the partner. Different reproductive strategies between morph family groups as found in this study may contribute to the understanding of the existence of a balanced polymorphism in common guillemots. The overall breeding conditions during the years of this study were good. However, over time in a variable environment, we suggest that tactics of different family groups may have different success stabilizing the frequency of non-bridled and bridled birds over time.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Barrett RT (2013) No difference in chick-provisioning by bridled and non-bridled common guillemots Uria aalge. Seabird 26:1–7

    Google Scholar 

  • Benowitz-Fredericks ZM, Kitaysky AS, Thompson CW (2006) Growth and allocation in captive common murre (Uria aalge) chicks. Auk 123:722–734

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Birkhead TR (1984) Distribution of the bridled form of the common guillemot Uria aalge in the North Atlantic. J Zool 202:165–176

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Birkhead TR, Lock AR (1980) Changes in the proportion of bridled murres in Northern Labrador. Condor 82:473–474

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Birkhead TR, Biggins JD, Nettleship DN (1980) Nonrandom, intra-colony distribution of bridled guillemots Uria aalge. J Zool 192:9–16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brazill-Boast J, Griffith SC, Pryke SR (2013) Morph-dependent resource acquisition and fitness in a polymorphic bird. Evol Ecol 27:1189–1198

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bugge J, Barrett RT, Pedersen T (2011) Optimal foraging in chick-raising common guillemots Uria aalge. J Ornithol 152:253–259

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burnham KP, Anderson DR (2002) Model selection and multimodel inference: a practical information-theoretic approach, 2nd edn. Springer, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Camphuysen CJ (2002) Post-fledging dispersal of Common Guillemots Uria aalge guarding chicks in the North Sea: the effect of predator presence and prey availability at sea. Ardea 90:103–119

    Google Scholar 

  • Elliott KH, Gaston AJ, Crump D (2010) Sex-specific behavior by a monomorphic seabird represents risk partitioning. Behav Ecol 21:1024–1032

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Erikstad KE, Asheim M, Fauchald P, Dahlhaug L, Tveraa T (1997) Adjustment of parental effort in the puffin; the roles of adult body condition and chick size. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 40:95–100

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Erikstad KE, Sandvik H, Fauchald P, Tveraa T (2009) Short- and long-term consequences of reproductive decisions: an experimental study in the puffin. Ecology 90:3197–3208

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Erikstad KE, Reiertsen TK, Barrett R, Vikebø F, Sandvik H (2013) Seabird-fish interactions: the fall and rise of a common guillemot Uria aalge population. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 475:267–276

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fisher R (1930) The genetic theory of natural selection. Clarendon, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Galeotti P, Rubolini D (2004) The niche variation hypothesis and the evolution of colour polymorphism in birds: a comparative study of owls, nightjars and raptors. Biol J Linn Soc 82:237–248

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Galeotti P, Rubolini D, Dunn PO, Fasola M (2003) Colour polymorphism in birds: causes and functions. J Evol Biol 16:635–646

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Galeotti P, Rubolini D, Sacchi R, Fasola M (2009) Global changes and animal phenotypic responses: melanin-based plumage redness of scops owls increased with temperature and rainfall during the last century. Biol Lett 5:532–534

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Galeotti P, Sacchi R, Pellitteri-Rosa D, Bellati A, Cocca W, Gentilli A, Scali S, Fasola M (2013) Colour polymorphism and alternative breeding strategies: effects of parent’s colour morph on fitness traits in the common wall lizard. Evol Biol 40:385–394

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grandjean P (1972) Some morphological observations on the guillemot (Uria aalge aalge Pont.) on Ellidaey, Westmann Islands. Dansk Orn For Tidsskr 66:51–56

    Google Scholar 

  • Gray SM, McKinnon JS (2007) Linking color polymorphism maintenance and speciation. Trends Ecol Evol 22:71–79

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Griffiths R, Double MC, Orr K, Dawson RJG (1998) A DNA test to sex most birds. Mol Ecol 7:1071–1075

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Harding AMA, Kitaysky AS, Hall ME, Welcker J, Karnovsky NJ, Talbot SL, Hamer KC, Grémillet D (2009) Flexibility in the parental effort of an Arctic-breeding seabird. Funct Ecol 23:348–358

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harding AMA, Welcker J, Steen H, Hamer KC, Kitaysky AS, Fort J, Talbot SL, Cornick LA, Karnovsky NJ, Gabrielsen GW, Grémillet D (2011) Adverse conditions may impact body mass and survival of a High Arctic seabird. Oecologia 167:49–59

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Harris MP, Wanless S (1986) A comparison of the biology of the normal and bridled forms of the common guillemot Uria aalge at a single colony. J Zool 210:121–130

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harris MP, Halley DJ, Wanless S (1992) The post-fledging survival of young guillemots Uria aalge in relation to hatching date and growth. Ibis 134:335–339

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harris MP, Rothery P, Wanless S (2003) Increase in frequency of the bridled morph of the common guillemot Uria aalge on the Isle of May, 1946–2000: a return to former levels? Ibis 145:22–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hedgren S (1981) Effects of fledging weight and time of fledging on survival of guillemot Uria aalge chicks. Omis Scand 12:51–54

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hirschenhauser K (2012) Testosterone and partner compatibility: evidence and emerging questions. Ethology 118:799–811

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hugall AF, Stuart-Fox D (2012) Accelerated speciation in colour-polymorphic birds. Nature 485:631–634

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Huxley J (1955) Morphism in birds. Acta Int Congr Ornithol XI:309–328

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobs SR, Elliott KH, Gaston AHJ (2013) Parents are a drag: long-lived birds share the cost of increased foraging effort with their offspring, but males pass on more of the costs than females. PLoS ONE 8:e54594

    Article  PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Jefferies DJ, Parslow JLF (1976) The genetics of bridling in guillemots from a study of hand-reared birds. J Zool 179:411–420

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kristensen DL, Erikstad KE, Reiertsen TK, Moum T, Barrett RT, Jenni-Eiermann S (2013) Are female offspring from a single-egg seabird more costly to raise? Behav Ecol 24:136–143

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morrison KW, Hipfner JM, Gjerdrum C, Green DJ (2009) Wing length and mass at fledging predict local juvenile survival and age at first return in tufted puffins. Condor 111:433–441

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Myksvoll M, Erikstad KE, Barrett RT et al (2013) Climate-driven ichthyoplankton drift model predicts growth of top predator young. PLoS ONE 8:e79225

    Article  PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Navarro J, González-Solís J (2007) Experimental increase of flying costs in a pelagic seabird: effects on foraging strategies, nutritional state and chick condition. Oecologia 151:150–160

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nettleship DN, Birkhead TR (eds) (1985) The Atlantic Alcidae. Academic, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Pryke SR, Griffith SC (2009) Postzygotic genetic incompatibility between sympatric color morphs. Evolution 63:793–798

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pryke SR, Griffith SC (2010) Maternal adjustment of parental effort in relation to mate compatibility affects offspring development. Behav Ecol 21:226–232

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reiertsen TK, Erikstad KE, Barrett RT, Sandvik H, Yoccoz NG (2012) Climate fluctuations and differential survival of bridled and non-bridled Common Guillemots Uria aalge. Ecosphere 3:52

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roulin A (2004) The evolution, maintenance and adaptive function of genetic colour polymorphism in birds. Biol Rev 79:815–848

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Roulin A, Bize P, Ravussin P-A, Broch L (2004) Genetic and environmental effects on the covariation between colour polymorphism and a life-history trait. Evol Ecol Res 6:1253–1260

    Google Scholar 

  • Seutin G, White BN, Boag PT (1991) Preservation of avian blood and tissue samples for DNA analyses. Can J Zool 69:82–90

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Southern HN (1951) Change in status of the bridled guillemot after ten years. Proc Zool Soc London 121:657–671

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Southern HN (1962) Survey of the bridled guillemots, 1959–60. Proc Zool Soc London 138:455–472

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This study is funded by the Norwegian Research Council (Project No 216547/E40 to KEE) and the SEAPOP program (www.seapop.no). The Norwegian Coastal Administration is thanked for the use of the lighthouse at Hornøya as a base for the fieldwork. We also acknowledge Robert T. Barrett and Hanno Sandvik for comments and discussion.

Ethical standards

Access to Hornøya was approved by the government of Finnmark, Norway. Capturing, handling, ringing, and blood sampling birds were licensed by the Norwegian Directorate for Nature Management (to KEE). Collection of samples was conducted according to Norwegian ethics regulations and European Council guidelines for Laboratory Animal Science.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kjell Einar Erikstad.

Additional information

Communicated by C. R. Brown

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

ESM 1

DOCX 66 kb

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kristensen, D.L., Erikstad, K.E., Reiertsen, T.K. et al. Differential breeding investment in bridled and non-bridled common guillemots (Uria aalge): morph of the partner matters. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 68, 1851–1858 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-014-1794-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-014-1794-8

Keywords

Navigation