Skip to main content

Foraging bumblebees do not rate social information above personal experience

Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology volume 68, pages 1145–1150 (2014)Cite this article

Abstract

Foraging animals can acquire new information about food sources either individually or socially, but they can also opt to rely on information that they have already acquired, termed “personal information”. Although social information can provide an adaptive shortcut to new resources, recent theory predicts that investing too much time in acquiring new information can be detrimental. Here, we investigate whether foraging bumblebees (Bombus terrestris) strategically prioritize personal information unless there is evidence of environmental change. All bees in our study had personal information that one species of artificial flower was rewarding, and bees in the scent group then experienced social information about an alternative-scented species inside the nest, while a control group did not. On their next foraging bout, bees in both groups overwhelmingly used personal information when deciding where to forage. When bees subsequently learnt that the rewards offered by their preferred species had dwindled, bees that had social information were no quicker to abandon their personal information than control bees, but once they had sampled the alternative flowers, they showed greater commitment to that species than control bees. Thus, we found no evidence that social information is particularly important when personal information fails to produce rewards (a “copy when established behaviour is unproductive” strategy). Instead, bees used social information specifically to complement personal information.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Access options

Buy single article

Instant access to the full article PDF.

USD 39.95

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

References

  • Boyd R, Richerson P (1985) Culture and the evolutionary process. University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyd R, Richerson P (1988) An evolutionary model of social learning: the effects of spatial and temporal variation. In: Zentall TR, Galef BG (eds) Social learning: psychological and biological perspectives. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, pp 29–48

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyd R, Richerson P (1995) Why does culture increase human adaptability? Ethol Sociobiol 16:125–143

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chittka L, Thomson JD (eds) (2001) Cognitive ecology of pollination. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Couvillon MJ, Riddell Pearce FC, Harris-Jones EL, Kuepfer AM, Mackenzie-Smith sJ, Rozario LA, Schürch R, Ratnieks FLW (2012) Intra-dance variation among waggle runs and the design of efficient protocols for honey bee dance decoding. Biology Open. ISSN 2046-6390

  • Crawley MJ (2007) The R book. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., Chichester

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Czaczkes TJ, Grüter C, Jones SM, Ratnieks FLW (2011) Synergy between social and personal information increases foraging efficiency in ants. Biol Lett 7(4):521–524. doi:10.1098/rsbl.2011.0067

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dawson EH, Chittka L (2014) Bees use social information as an indicator of safety in dangerous environments. Proc Roy Soc B (in press)

  • Dawson EH, Avargues-Weber A, Chittka L, Leadbeater E (2013) Learning by observation emerges from simple associations in an insect model. Curr Biol 23:727–730

    Google Scholar 

  • Dornhaus A, Chittka L (1999) Evolutionary origins of bee dances. Nature 401:38

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dornhaus A, Chittka L (2001) Food alert in bumblebees (Bombus terrestris): possible mechanisms and evolutionary implications. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 50(6):570–576

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dornhaus A, Chittka L (2004) Information flow and regulation of foraging activity in bumble bees (Bombus spp.). Apidologie 35(2):183–192

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Enquist M, Eriksson K, Ghirlanda S (2007) Critical social learning: a solution to Rogers’s paradox of nonadaptive culture. Am Anthropol 109(4):727–234

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farina WM, Gruter C, Diaz PC (2005) Social learning of floral odours inside the honeybee hive. Proc R Soc Lond B 272(1575):1923–1928

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farina WM, Gruter C, Acosta L, Mc Cabe S (2007) Honeybees learn floral odors while receiving nectar from foragers within the hive. Naturwissenschaften 94(1):55–60

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Frisch V (1967) The dance language and orientation of bees. Harvard University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Goulson D, Hawson SA, Stout JC (1998) Foraging bumblebees avoid flowers already visited by conspecifics or by other bumblebee species. Anim Behav 55:199–206

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Grüter C, Ratnieks FLW (2011) Honeybee foragers increase the use of waggle dance information when personal information becomes unrewarding. Anim Behav 81(5):949–954. doi:10.1016/j.anbehav.2011.01.014

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grüter C, Balbuena MS, Farina WM (2008) Informational conflicts created by the waggle dance. Proc R Soc B 275:1321–1327

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Grüter C, Leadbeater E, Ratnieks FLW (2010) Social learning: the importance of copying others. Curr Biol 20(16):R683–R685. doi:10.1016/j.cub.2010.06.052

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Grüter C, Czaczkes TJ, Ratnieks FLW (2011) Decision making in ant foragers (Lasius niger) facing conflicting personal and social information. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 65(2):141–148. doi:10.1007/s00265-010-1020-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grüter C, Segers FHID, Ratnieks FLW (2013) Social learning strategies in honey bee foragers: do the costs of using personal information affect the use of social information? Anim Behav 85:1443–1449

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heinrich B (1979) Bumblebee economics. Harvard University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Heyes (1994) Social learning in animals: categories and mechanisms. Biol Rev 69:207–231

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hölldobler B, Wilson EO (1990) The ants. Springer-Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kendal RL, Coolen I, Laland KN (2004) The role of conformity in foraging when personal and social information conflict. Behav Ecol 15(2):269–277

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kendal RL, Coolen I, van Bergen Y, Laland KN (2005) Trade-offs in the adaptive use of social and asocial learning. Adv Stud Behav 35:333–379

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kendal RL, Coolen I, Laland KN (2009) Adaptive trade-offs in the use of social and personal information. Cognitive ecology II

  • Laland KN (2004) Social learning strategies. Learn Behav 32(1):4–14

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Leadbeater E, Chittka L (2005) A new mode of information transfer in foraging bumblebees? Curr Biol 15(12):R447–R448

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Leadbeater E, Chittka L (2007a) Social learning in insects: from miniature brains to consensus building. Curr Biol 17(16):R703–R713

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Leadbeater E, Chittka L (2007b) The dynamics of social learning in an insect model (Bombus terrestris). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 61:1789–1796

    Google Scholar 

  • Molet M, Chittka L, Raine NE (2009) How floral odours are learned inside the bumblebee (Bombus terrestris) nest. Naturwissenschaften 96(2):213–219. doi:10.1007/s00114-008-0465-x

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rendell L, Boyd R, Cownden D, Enquist M, Eriksson K, Feldman MW, Fogarty L, Ghirlanda S, Lillicrap T, Laland KN (2010) Why copy others? Insights from the social learning strategies tournament. Science 328(5975):208–213. doi:10.1126/science.1184719

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rendell L, Fogarty L, Hoppitt W, Morgan T, Webster M, Laland K (2011) Cognitive culture: theoretical and empirical insights into social learning strategies. Trends Cogn Sci 15:68–76

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rieucau G, Giraldeau L-A (2011) Exploring the costs and benefits of social information use: an appraisal of current experimental evidence. Philos Trans R Soc B 366(1567):949–957. doi:10.1098/rstb.2010.0325

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rogers AR (1988) Does biology constrain culture? Am Anthropol 90(4):819–831

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seeley TD (1998) Thoughts on information and integration in honey bee colonies. Apidologie 29(1–2):67–80

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seeley TD, Visscher PK (1988) Assessing the benefits of co-operation in honeybee foraging- search costs, forage quality and competitive ability. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 22(4):229–237. doi:10.1007/bf00299837

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tanner DA, Visscher PK (2010) Adaptation or constraint? Reference-dependent scatter in honey bee dances. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 64(7):1081–1086. doi:10.1007/s00265-010-0922-3

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor BJ, Schalk DR, Jeanne RL (2010) Yellowjackets use nest-based cues to differentially exploit higher-quality resources. Naturwissenschaften 97:1041–1046

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Terkel J (1996) Cultural transmission of feeding behaviour in the black rat (Rattus rattus). In: Heyes CM, Galef BG Jr (eds) Social learning in animals: the roots of culture. Academic Press, San Diego, pp p17–p48

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Thornton A, McAuliffe K (2006) Teaching in wild meerkats. Science 313:227–229

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Van Bergen Y, Coolen I, Laland KN (2004) Foraging nine-spined stickleback exploit the most reliable source when public and private information conflict. Proc R Soc Lond B 271:957–962

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Webster M, Laland K (2008) Social learning strategies and predation risk: minnows copy only when using personal information would be costly. Proc R Soc Lond B 275(1653):2869–2876

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wenner AM, Wells PH, Johnson DL (1969) Honeybee recruitment to food sources- olfaction or language? Science 164:84–86

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Ellouise Leadbeater is supported by a Leverhulme Trust Early Career Fellowship. We are grateful to two anonymous reviewers for helpful comments on the manuscript.

Author information

Author notes

  1. Ellouise Leadbeater

    Present address: School of Biological Sciences, Royal Holloway University of London, Egham, Surrey, TW20 0EX, UK

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institute of Zoology, Zoological Society of London, Regent’s Park, London, NW1 4RY, UK

    Ellouise Leadbeater & Claire Florent

  2. School of Life and Medical Sciences, University College London, Gower St, London, WC1E 6BT, UK

    Claire Florent

Authors
  1. Ellouise Leadbeater
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Claire Florent
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ellouise Leadbeater.

Additional information

Communicated by M. Beekman

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Leadbeater, E., Florent, C. Foraging bumblebees do not rate social information above personal experience. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 68, 1145–1150 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-014-1725-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-014-1725-8

Keywords

  • Social information use
  • Social learning strategies
  • Bumblebees