Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology

, Volume 68, Issue 3, pp 485–497 | Cite as

What are the strengths and limitations of direct and indirect assessment of dispersal? Insights from a long-term field study in a group-living bird species

  • Michael Griesser
  • Peter Halvarsson
  • Tobias Sahlman
  • Jan Ekman
Original Paper

Abstract

Molecular methods of assessing dispersal have become increasingly powerful and have superseded direct methods of studying dispersal. Although now less popular, direct methods of studying dispersal remain important tools for understanding the evolution of dispersal. Here, we use data from Siberian jays Perisoreus infaustus, a group-living bird species, to compare natal dispersal distances and rates using visual mark–recapture, radio-tracking and microsatellite data. Siberian jays have bimodal natal dispersal timing; socially dominant offspring remain with their parents for up to 5 years (delayed dispersers), while they force their subordinate brood mates to leave the parental territory at independence (early dispersers). Early dispersers moved about 9,000 m (visual mark–recapture, radio-tracking) before settling in a group as a non-breeder. In contrast, delayed dispersers moved about 1,250 m (visual mark–recapture only) and mainly moved to a breeding opening. Dispersal distances were greater in managed habitat compared to natural habitat for both early and delayed dispersers. Molecular estimates based on 23 microsatellite loci and geographical locations supported distance estimates from the direct methods. Our study shows that molecular methods are at least 22 times cheaper than direct methods and match estimates of dispersal distance from direct methods. However, molecular estimates do not give insight into the behavioural mechanisms behind dispersal decisions. Thus, to understand the evolution of dispersal, it is important to combine direct and indirect methods, which will give insights into the behavioural processes affecting dispersal decisions, allowing proximate dispersal decisions to be linked to the ultimate consequences thereof.

Keywords

Natal dispersal Neighbourhood size Philopatry Biased dispersal Genetic population structure 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to Folke and May Lindgren for sharing dispersal data and their knowledge of Siberian jays with us, and to the late Gunnar Pavval for his hospitality at Lappugglan. We are thankful to Sönke Eggers, Magdalena Nystrand and Katya Dobrovolskaya for help in the field, to Szymon M. Drobniak for statistical advice, and to and Andreas Rudh for help in the lab. Ben Hatchwell, Jacob Höglund, Yang Liu, Tania Jenkins, Carles Vilà, Simone Webber, Mario Pesendorfer and an anonymous reviewer gave much appreciated advice in the lab or comments on the manuscript. Lantmäteriet provided aerial photographs for Fig. 1 under Uppsala University licence i2012/921.

Ethical standards

The experiments comply with the current laws and were done under the licence of the Umeå Ethics Board (licence number A80-99 and A45-04).

Supplementary material

265_2013_1663_MOESM1_ESM.docx (13 kb)
ESM 1 (DOCX 12 kb)

References

  1. Akaike H (1974) New look at statistical-model identification. IEEE T Automat Contr AC 19:716–723CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alcaide M, Serrano D, Tella JL, Negro JJ (2009) Strong philopatry derived from capture–recapture records does not lead to fine-scale genetic differentiation in lesser kestrels. J Anim Ecol 78:468–475PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Aspi J, Roininen E, Ruokonen M, Kojola I, Vila C (2006) Genetic diversity, population structure, effective population size and demographic history of the Finnish wolf population. Mol Ecol 15:1561–1576PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Baker M, Nur N, Geupel GR (1995) Correcting biased estimates of dispersal and survival due to limited study site area - theory and an application using wrentits. Condor 97:663–674CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Barton N, Slatkin M (1986) A quasi-equilibrium theory of the distribution of rare alleles in a subdivided population. Heredity 56:409PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bassam BJ, Caetanoanolles G, Gresshoff PM (1991) Fast and sensitive silver staning of DNA in polyacrylamide gels. Anal Biochem 196:80–83PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Beck NR, Peakall R, Heinsohn R (2008) Social constraint and an absence of sex-biased dispersal drive fine-scale genetic structure in white-winged choughs. Mol Ecol 17:4346–4358PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bossart JL, Prowell DP (1998) Genetic estimates of population structure and gene flow: limitations, lessons and new directions. Trends Ecol Evol 13:202–206PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Broquet T, Petit EJ (2009) Molecular estimation of dispersal for ecology and population genetics. Annu Rev Ecol Evol S 40:193–216CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Catry I, Dias MP, Catry T, Afanasyev V, Fox J, Franco AMA, Sutherland WJ (2011) Individual variation in migratory movements and winter behaviour of Iberian Lesser Kestrels Falco naumanni revealed by geolocators. Ibis 153:154–164CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Clobert J, Baguette M, Benton TG, Bullock JM (2012) Dispersal ecology and evolution. Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
  12. Clobert J, Danchin E, Donth AA, Nichols J (2001) Dispersal. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  13. Clutton-Brock T, Sheldon BC (2010) Individuals and populations: the role of long-term, individual-based studies of animals in ecology and evolutionary biology. Trends Ecol Evol 25:562–573PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Conner JK, Hartl DL (2004) A primer of ecological genetics. Sinauer Associates Inc, Sunderland, MAGoogle Scholar
  15. Cooper CB, Daniels SJ, Walters JR (2008) Can we improve estimates of juvenile dispersal distance and survival? Ecology 89:3349–3361PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Coulon A, Fitzpatrick JW, Bowman R, Lovette IJ (2010) Effects of habitat fragmentation on effective dispersal of Florida scrub-jays. Conserv Biol 24:1080–1088PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Coulon A, Fitzpatrick JW, Bowman R, Lovette IJ (2012) Mind the gap: genetic distance increases with habitat gap size in Florida scrub jays. Biol Lett 8:582–585PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Coulon A, Fitzpatrick JW, Bowman R, Stith BM, Makarewich CA, Stenzler LM, Lovette IJ (2008) Congruent population structure inferred from dispersal behaviour and intensive genetic surveys of the threatened Florida scrub-jay (Aphelocoma coerulescens). Mol Ecol 17:1685–1701PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Doerr ED, Doerr VAJ (2005) Dispersal range analysis: quantifying individual variation in dispersal behaviour. Oecologia 142:1–10PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Doerr ED, Doerr VAJ (2006) Comparative demography of treecreepers: evaluating hypotheses for the evolution and maintenance of cooperative breeding. Anim Behav 72:147–159CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Double MC, Peakall R, Beck NR, Cockburn A (2005) Dispersal, philopatry, and infidelity: dissecting local genetic structure in superb fairy-wrens (Malurus cyaneus). Evolution 59:625–635PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Eggers S, Griesser M, Nystrand M, Ekman J (2006) Predation risk induces changes in nest-site selection and clutch size in the Siberian jay. Proc R Soc Lond B 273:701–706CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Ekman J, Bylin A, Tegelström H (1999) Increased lifetime reproductive success for Siberian jay (Perisoreus infaustus) males with delayed dispersal. Proc R Soc Lond B 266:911–915CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Ekman J, Eggers S, Griesser M (2002) Fighting to stay: the role of sibling rivalry for delayed dispersal. Anim Behav 64:453–459CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Ekman J, Eggers S, Griesser M, Tegelström H (2001) Queuing for preferred territories: delayed dispersal of Siberian jays. J Anim Ecol 70:317–324CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Ekman J, Sklepkovych B, Tegelström H (1994) Offspring retention in the Siberian jay (Perisoreus infaustus) - The prolonged brood care hypothesis. Behav Ecol 5:245–253CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Fridolfsson AK, Ellegren H (1999) A simple and universal method for molecular sexing of non-ratite birds. J Avian Biol 30:116–121CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Greenwood PJ, Harvey PH (1982) The natal and breeding dispersal of birds. Annu Rev Ecol Evol S 13:1–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Griesser M (2003) Nepotistic vigilance behavior in Siberian jay parents. Behav Ecol 14:246–250CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Griesser M (2013) Do warning calls boost survival of signal recipients? Evidence from a field experiment in a group-living bird species. Front Zool 10Google Scholar
  31. Griesser M, Ekman A (2004) Nepotistic alarm calling in the Siberian jay, Perisoreus infaustus. Anim Behav 67:933–939CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Griesser M, Ekman J (2005) Nepotistic mobbing behaviour in the Siberian jay, Perisoreus infaustus. Anim Behav 69:345–352CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Griesser M, Lagerberg S (2012) Long-term effects of forest management on territory occupancy and breeding success of an open-nesting boreal bird species, the Siberian jay. Forest Ecol Manag 271:58–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Griesser M, Nystrand M, Eggers S, Ekman J (2007) Impact of forestry practices on fitness correlates and population productivity in an open-nesting bird species. Cons Biol 21:767–774CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Griesser M, Nystrand M, Eggers S, Ekman J (2008) Social constraints limit dispersal and settlement decisions in a group-living bird species. Behav Ecol 19:317–324CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Griesser M, Nystrand M, Ekman J (2006) Reduced mortality selects for family cohesion in a social species. Proc R Soc Lond B 273:1881–1886CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Griffiths R, Double MC, Orr K, Dawson RJG (1998) A DNA test to sex most birds. Mol Ecol 7:1071–1075PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Hahne J, Jenkins T, Halle S, Heckel G (2011) Establishment success and resulting fitness consequences for vole dispersers. Oikos 120:95–105CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Hamilton WD, May RM (1977) Dispersal in stable habitats. Nature 269:578–581CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Hanski IA, Gilpin ME (1999) Metapopulation Biology: Ecology, Genetics, and Evolution. Academic Press, LondonGoogle Scholar
  41. Hardy OJ, Vekemans X (2002) SPAGeDi: a versatile computer program to analyse spatial genetic structure at the individual or population levels. Mol Ecol Notes 2:618–620CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Hardy OJ, Vekemans X (2013) SPAGeDi 1.4 a program for Spatial Pattern Analysis of Genetic Diversity User's Manual http://ebe.ulb.ac.be/ebe/SPAGeDi_files/Manual_SPAGeDi%20_1-4.pdf
  43. Hazlitt SL, Eldridge MDB, Goldizen AW (2004) Fine-scale spatial genetic correlation analyses reveal strong female philopatry within a brush-tailed rock-wallaby colony in southeast Queensland. Mol Ecol 13:3621–3632PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Hewett Ragheb EL, Walters JR (2011) Favouritism or intrabrood competition? Access to food and the benefits of philopatry for red-cockaded woodpeckers. Anim Behav 82:329–338CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Hirsch BT, Visser MD, Kays R, Jansen PA (2012) Quantifying seed dispersal kernels from truncated seed-tracking data. Methods Ecol Evol 3:595–602CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Jaari S, Valimäki K, Merilä J (2008) Isolation and characterization of 100 polymorphic microsatellite loci for the Siberian jay (Perisoreus infaustus). Mol Ecol Resour 8:1469–1474PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Kissling DW, Pattemore DE, Hagen M (2013) Challenges and prospects in the telemetry of insects. Biol Rev (published online, doi: 10.1111/brv.12065)
  48. Koenig WD, Haydock J (2004) Incest and incest avoidance. In: Koenig WD, Dickinson JL (eds) Ecology and Evolution of Cooperative Breeding in Birds. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Koenig WD, VanVuren D, Hooge PN (1996) Detectability, philopatry, and the distribution of dispersal distances in vertebrates. Trends Ecol Evol 11:514–517PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Kokko H, Ekman J (2002) Delayed dispersal as a route to breeding: territorial inheritance, safe havens, and ecological constraints. Am Nat 160:468–484PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Kokko H, Lopez-Sepulcre A (2006) From individual dispersal to species ranges: perspectives for a changing world. Science 313:789–791PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Lenz J, Fiedler W, Caprano T, Friedrichs W, Gaese BH, Wikelski M, Böhning-Gaese K (2011) Seed-dispersal distributions by trumpeter hornbills in fragmented landscapes. Proc R Soc Lond B 278:2257–2264CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Loiselle BA, Sork VL, Nason J, Graham C (1995) Spatial genetic-structure of a tropical understory shrub, Psychotria officinalis (Rubiaceae). Am J Bot 82:1420–1425CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Nelson Flower MJ, Hockey PA, O’Ryan C, Ridley AR (2012) Inbreeding avoidance mechanisms: dispersal dynamics in cooperatively breeding southern pied babblers. J Anim Ecol 81:876–883PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Nystrand M, Griesser M, Eggers S, Ekman J (2010) Habitat-specific demography and source-sink dynamics in a population of Siberian jays. J Anim Ecol 79:266–274PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Paxton RJ, Thoren PA, Tengo J, Estoup A, Pamilo P (1996) Mating structure and nestmate relatedness in a communal bee, Andrena jacobi (Hymenoptera, Andrenidae), using microsatellites. Mol Ecol 5:511–519PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Peacock MM, Ray C (2001) Dispersal in pikas (Ochotona princeps): combining genetic and demographic approaches to reveal spatial and temporal patterns. In: Clobert J, Danchin E, Dhondt AA, Nichols JD (eds) Dispersal. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 43–56Google Scholar
  58. Prugnolle F, de Meeus T (2002) Inferring sex-biased dispersal from population genetic tools: a review. Heredity 88:161–165PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Raymond M, Rousset F (1995) GENEPOP (version-1.2) - Population-genetics software for exact tests and ecumenicism. J Hered 86:248–249Google Scholar
  60. Rollins LA, Browning LE, Holleley CE, Savage JL, Russell AF, Griffith SC (2012) Building genetic networks using relatedness information: a novel approach for the estimation of dispersal and characterization of group structure in social animals. Mol Ecol 21:1727–1740PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Roshier DA, Doerr VAJ, Doerr ED (2008) Animal movement in dynamic landscapes: interaction between behavioural strategies and resource distributions. Oecologia 156:465–477PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Rousset F (2000) Genetic differentiation between individuals. J Evol Biol 13:58–62CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Rousset F (2008) genepop’007: a complete re-implementation of the genepop software for Windows and Linux. Mol Ecol Resour 8:103–106PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Rutz C, Burns ZT, James R, Ismar SM, Burt J, Otis B, Bowen J, St Clair JJ (2012) Automated mapping of social networks in wild birds. Curr Biol 22:R669–R671PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. SAS (2006) The GLIMMIX Procedure. SAS Institute Inc, Cary, NC, USAGoogle Scholar
  66. Slatkin M (1985) Gene flow in natural populations. Annu Rev Ecol Evol S 16:393–430CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Stevens VM, Turlure C, Baguette M (2010) A meta-analysis of dispersal in butterflies. Biol Reviews 85:625–642Google Scholar
  68. Stutchbury BJM, Tarof SA, Done T, Gow E, Kramer PM, Tautin J, Fox JW, Afanasyev V (2009) Tracking long-distance songbird migration by using geolocators. Science 323:896–896PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Sumner J, Rousset F, Estoup A, Moritz C (2001) 'Neighbourhood' size, dispersal and density estimates in the prickly forest skink (Gnypetoscincus queenslandiae) using individual genetic and demographic methods. Mol Ecol 10:1917–1927PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Svensson L (2006) Identification Guide to European Passerines, 4th edn. British Trust for Ornithology, ThetfordGoogle Scholar
  71. van Oosterhout C, Hutchinson WF, Wills DP, Shipley P (2004) Micro-checker: software for identifying and correcting genotyping errors in microsatellite data. Mol Ecol Notes 4:535–538CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Vandewoestijne S, Baguette M (2004) Demographic versus genetic dispersal measures. Pop Ecol 46:281–285CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Vekemans X, Hardy OJ (2004) New insights from fine-scale spatial genetic structure analyses in plant populations. Mol Ecol 13:921–935PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Watts PC, Rousset F, Saccheri IJ, Leblois R, Kemp SJ, Thompson DJ (2007) Compatible genetic and ecological estimates of dispersal rates in insect (Coenagrion mercuriale: Odonata: Zygoptera) populations: analysis of 'neighbourhood size' using a more precise estimator. Mol Ecol 16:737–751PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Wright S (1931) Statistical methods in biology. J Am Stat Assoc 26:155–163Google Scholar
  76. Wright S (1943) Isolation by distance. Genetics 28:114–138PubMedGoogle Scholar
  77. Wright S (1951) The genetical structure of populations. Ann Eugenic 15:323–354CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Wright S (1969) Evolution and the genetics of populations: The theory of gene frequencies. Chicago University Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  79. Zollner PA, Lima SL (1999) Search strategies for landscape-level interpatch movements. Ecology 80:1019–1030CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Michael Griesser
    • 1
    • 2
  • Peter Halvarsson
    • 2
  • Tobias Sahlman
    • 2
  • Jan Ekman
    • 2
  1. 1.Anthropological Institute and MuseumUniversity of ZurichZurichSwitzerland
  2. 2.Animal Ecology, Department of Ecology and Evolution, Evolutionary Biology CentreUppsala UniversityUppsalaSweden

Personalised recommendations