Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology

, Volume 68, Issue 2, pp 333–342 | Cite as

Great spotted cuckoo fledglings are disadvantaged by magpie host parents when reared together with magpie nestlings

  • Manuel Soler
  • Liesbeth de Neve
  • Gianluca Roncalli
  • Elena Macías-Sánchez
  • Juan Diego Ibáñez-Álamo
  • Tomás Pérez-Contreras
Original Paper

Abstract

The post-fledging period is a critical phase for juvenile survival, and parental care provided during this period is a key component of avian reproductive performance. Very little is known about the relationships between foster parents and fledglings of brood parasites. Here, we present the results of a 5-year study about the relationships between fledglings of the non-evictor brood parasitic great spotted cuckoo (Clamator glandarius) and its magpie (Pica pica) foster parents. Sometimes, great spotted cuckoo and magpie nestlings from the same nest can fledge successfully, but most often parasitic nestlings outcompete host nestlings and only cuckoos leave the nest. We have studied several aspects of cuckoo post-fledging performance (i.e. feeding behaviour, parental defence and fledgling survival) in experimental nests in which only cuckoos or both magpie and cuckoo nestlings survived until leaving the nest. The results indicate that great spotted cuckoo fledglings reared in mixed broods together with magpie nestlings were disadvantaged by magpie adults with respect to feeding patterns. Fledgling cuckoos reared in mixed broods were fed less frequently than those reared in only cuckoo broods, and magpie adults approached less frequently to feed cuckoos from mixed broods than cuckoos from only cuckoo broods. These results imply that the presence of host's own nestlings for comparison may be a crucial clue favouring the evolution of fledgling discrimination; and furthermore, that the risk of discrimination at the fledgling stage probably is an important selection pressure driving the evolution of the arms race between brood parasites and their hosts.

Keywords

Brood parasitism Clamator glandarius Fledgling discrimination Fledgling period Non-evictor brood parasitic chicks Pica pica 

References

  1. Baker RR (1993) The function of post-fledging exploration: a pilot study of three species of passerines ringed in Britain. Ornis Scand 24:71–79CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Beecher MD, Beecher I, Hahn S (1981) Parent–offspring recognition in bank swallows. II. Development and acoustic basis. Anim Behav 29:95–101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Britton NF, Planque R, Franks NR (2007) Evolution of defence portfolios in exploiter–victim systems. Bull Math Biol 69:957–988PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Buitron D (1988) Female and male specialization in parental care and its consequences in black-billed magpies. Condor 90:29–39CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Davies NB (1976) Parental care and the transition to independent feeding in the young spotted flycatcher (Muscicapa striata). Behaviour 59:280–295CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Davies NB (1978) Parental meanness and offspring independence: an experiment with hand-reared great tits Parus major. Ibis 120:509–514CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Davies NB (2000) Cuckoos, cowbirds and other cheats. T & AD Poyser, LondonGoogle Scholar
  8. Davies NB, Brooke ML (1988) Cuckoos versus reed warblers: adaptations and counteradaptations. Anim Behav 36:262–284CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. De Mársico MC, Gantchoff MG, Reboreda JC (2012) Host–parasite coevolution beyond the nestling stage? Mimicry of host fledglings by the specialist screaming cowbird. Proc R Soc Lond B 279:3401–3408CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Eastzer D, Chu RR, King AP (1980) The young cowbird: average or optimal nestling? Condor 82:417–423CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Field J, Brace S (2004) Pre-social benefits of extended parental care. Nature 428:650–652PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Fraga RM (1998) Interactions of the parasitic screaming and shiny cowbirds (Molothrus rufoaxillaris and M. bonariensis) with a shared host, the bay-winged cowbird (M. badius). In: Rothstein SI, Robinson SK (eds) Parasitic birds and their hosts: studies in coevolution. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 173–193Google Scholar
  13. Grim T (2006a) The evolution of nestling discrimination by hosts of parasitic birds: why is rejection so rare? Evol Ecol Res 8:785–802Google Scholar
  14. Grim T (2006b) Low virulence of brood parasitic chicks: adaptation or constraint? Ornithol Sci 5:237–242Google Scholar
  15. Grim T, Rutila J, Cassey P, Hauber ME (2009) Experimentally constrained virulence is costly for common cuckoo chicks. Ethology 115:14–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Grüebler MU, Naef-Daenzer B (2010) Survival benefits of post-fledging care: experimental approach to a critical part of avian reproductive strategies. J Anim Ecol 79:334–341PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hannon SJ, Wilson S, McCallum CA (2009) Does cowbird parasitism increase predation risk to American redstart nests? Oikos 118:1035–1043CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hauber ME (2003) Hatching asynchrony, nestling competition, and the cost of interspecific brood parasitism. Behav Ecol 14:227–235CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hauber ME, Moskát C (2008) Shared parental care is costly for nestlings of common cuckoos and their great reed warbler hosts. Behav Ecol 19:79–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hauber ME, Ramsey CK (2003) Honesty in host–parasite communication signals: the case for begging by fledgling brown-headed cowbirds, Molothrus ater. J Avian Biol 34:339–344CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hill IF, Cresswell BH, Kenward RE (1999) Field-testing the suitability of a new back-pack harness for radio-tagging passerines. J Avian Biol 30:135–142CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hodge SJ, Flower TP, Clutton-Brock TH (2007) Offspring competition and helper associations in cooperative meerkats. Anim Behav 74:957–964CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Honza M, Procházka P, Šicha V, Požgayová M (2010) Nest defence in a cuckoo host: great reed warblers risk themselves equally for their own and parasitic chicks. Behaviour 147:741–756CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hoover JP (2003) Multiple effects of brood parasitism reduce the reproductive success of prothonotary warblers, Protonotaria citrea. Anim Behav 65:923–934CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Husby M, Slgasvold T (1992) Post-fledging behaviour and survival in male and female magpies Pica pica. Ornis Scand 23:483–490CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Ibáñez-Álamo JD, Arco L, Soler M (2012) Experimental evidence for a predation cost of begging using active nests and real chicks. J Ornithol 153:801–807CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Kershner EL, Walk JW, Warner RE (2004) Postfledging movements and survival of juvenile eastern meadowlarks (Sturnella magna) in Illinois. Auk 121:1146–1154Google Scholar
  28. Kilner RM (2005) The evolution of virulence in brood parasites. Ornithol Sci 4:55–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Kilner RM, Noble DG, Davies NB (1999) Signals of need in parent–offspring communication and their exploitation by the common cuckoo. Nature 397:667–672CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Kilner RM, Madden JR, Hauber ME (2004) Brood parasitic cowbirds use host young to procure food. Science 305:877–879PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Lessells CM, Coulthard ND, Hodgson PJ, Krebs JR (1991) Chick recognition in European bee-eaters: acoustic playback experiments. Anim Behav 42:1031–1033CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Levréro F, Durand L, Vignal C, Blanc A, Mathevon N (2009) Begging calls support offspring individual identity and recognition by zebra finches. C R Biol 332:579–589PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Lotem A (1993) Learning to recognize nestlings is maladaptive for cuckoo Cuculus canorus hosts. Nature 362:743–745CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Martin TE (1996) Life history evolution in tropical and south temperate birds: what do we really know? J Avian Biol 27:263–272CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Martín-Gálvez D, Soler M, Soler JJ, Martín-Vivaldi M, Palomino JJ (2005) Food acquisition by common cuckoo chicks in rufous bush robin nests and the advantage of eviction behaviour. Anim Behav 70:1313–1321CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Matthysen E, Van Overveld T, Van de Casteele T, Adriaensen F (2010) Family movements before independence influence natal dispersal in a territorial songbird. Oecologia 162:591–597PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. McGowan KJ, Woolfenden GE (1990) Contributions to fledgling feeding in the Florida scrub-jay. J Anim Ecol 59:691–707CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Medvin M, Stoddard PK, Beecher MD (1993) Signals for parents–offspring recognition: a comparative analysis of the begging calls of cliff swallows and barn swallows. Anim Behav 45:841–850CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Moreno J (1984) Parental care of fledged young, division of labor, and the development of foraging techniques in the Northern wheatear (Oenanthe oenanthe L.). Auk 101:741–752CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Naef-Daenzer B, Widmer F, Nuber M (2001) Differential post-fledging survival of great and coal tits in relation to their condition and fledging date. J Anim Ecol 70:730–738CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Payne RB, Payne LL (1998) Brood parasitism by cowbirds: risks and effects on reproductive success and survival in indigo buntings. Behav Ecol 9:64–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Rappole JH, Tipton AR (1991) New harness design for attachment of radio transmitters to small passerines. J Field Ornithol 62:335–337Google Scholar
  43. Rasmussen JL, Sealy SG (2006) Hosts feeding only brown-headed cowbird fledglings: where are the host fledglings? J Field Ornithol 77:269–279CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Redondo T, Carranza J (1989) Offspring reproductive value and nest defense in the magpie. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 25:369–378CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Röell A, Bossema I (1982) A comparison of nest defence by jackdaws, rooks, magpies and crows. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 11:1–6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Roldán M, Soler M (2011) Parental care parasitism: how unrelated offspring attain acceptance by foster parents? Behav Ecol 22:679–691CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Rothstein SI (1990) A model system for coevolution: avian brood parasitism. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 21:481–508CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Royama T (1966) Factors governing feeding rate, food requirements and brood size of nestling great tit Parus major. Ibis 108:313–347CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Royle NJ, Smiseth PT, Kölliker M (2012) The evolution of parental care. Oxford University Press, OxfordCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Russell EM, Yom-Tov Y, Geffen E (2004) Extended parental care and delayed dispersal: northern, tropical and southern passerines compared. Behav Ecol 15:831–838CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Skutch AF (1976) Parent birds and their young. Texas University Press, AustinGoogle Scholar
  52. Skutch AF (1996) Orioles, blackbirds, and their kin: a natural history. University of Arizona Press, Tucson, AZGoogle Scholar
  53. Soler M (1990) Relationships between the great spotted cuckoo Clamator glandarius and its corvid hosts in a recently colonized area. Ornis Scand 21:212–223CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Soler M (2002) Breeding strategy and begging intensity: influences on food delivery by parents and host selection by parasitic cuckoos. In: Wright J, Leonard ML (eds) The evolution of begging. Competition, cooperation and communication. Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht, pp 413–427Google Scholar
  55. Soler M (2009) Co-evolutionary arms race between brood parasites and their hosts at the nestling stage. J Avian Biol 40:237–240CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Soler M, de Neve L (2012) Great spotted cuckoo nestlings but not magpie nestlings starve in experimental age-matched broods. Ethology 118:1036–1044CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Soler M, de Neve L (2013) Brood mate eviction or brood mate acceptance by brood parasitic nestlings? An experimental study with the non-evictor great spotted cuckoo and its magpie host. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 67:601–607CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Soler M, Soler JJ (1999) Innate versus learned recognition of conspecifics in great spotted cuckoos Clamator glandarius. Anim Cogn 2:97–102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Soler M, Palomino JJ, Martínez JG, Soler JJ (1994) Activity, survival, independence and migration of fledgling great spotted cuckoos. Condor 96:802–805CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Soler M, Martínez JG, Soler JJ, Møller AP (1995a) Preferential allocation of food by magpies Pica pica to great spotted cuckoo Clamator glandarius chicks. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 37:7–13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Soler M, Palomino JJ, Martínez JG, Soler JJ (1995b) Communal parental care by monogamous magpie hosts of fledgling great spotted cuckoos. Condor 97:804–810CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Soler M, Soler JJ, Martínez JG (1995c) Chick recognition and acceptance: a weakness in magpies exploited by the parasitic great spotted cuckoo. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 37:243–248CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Soler M, Martínez JG, Soler JJ (1996) Effects of brood parasitism by the great spotted cuckoo on the breeding success of the magpie host: an experimental study. Ardeola 43:87–96Google Scholar
  64. Soler M, Soler JJ, Martínez JG (1998) Duration of sympatry and coevolution between the great spotted cuckoo (Clamator glandarius) and its primary host, the magpie (Pica pica). In: Rothstein SI, Robinson SK (eds) Parasitic birds and their hosts: studies in coevolution. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 113–128Google Scholar
  65. Soler M, Martínez JG, Soler JJ (1999a) Nest defence by magpies (Pica pica) and the brood parasitic great spotted cuckoos (Clamator glandarius) in parasitized and unparasitized nests. J Ornithol 140:199–205CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Soler M, Soler JJ, Martínez JG, Moreno J (1999b) Begging behaviour and its energetic cost in great spotted cuckoo and magpie host chicks. Can J Zool 77:1794–1800Google Scholar
  67. Sullivan KA (1989) Predation and starvation: age-specific mortality in juvenile juncos (Junco phaenotus). J Anim Ecol 58:275–286CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Tanaka KD, Ueda K (2005) Horsfield's hawk–cuckoo nestlings simulate multiple gapes for begging. Science 308:653PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Tarwater CE, Brawn JD (2010) The post-fledging period in a tropical bird: patterns of parental care and survival. J Avian Biol 41:479–487CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Thompson AM, Ridley AR (2013) Do fledglings choose wisely? An experimental investigation into social foraging behaviour. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 67:69–78CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Woodward PW (1983) Behavioral ecology of fledgling brown-headed cowbirds and their hosts. Condor 85:151–163CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Woodward PW, Woodward JC (1979) Survival of fledgling brown-headed cowbirds. Bird Band 50:66–68CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Wyllie J (1981) The cuckoo. B Y Batsford Ltd, LondonGoogle Scholar
  74. Yackel Adams AA, Skagen SK, Savidge JA (2006) Modeling post-fledging survival of lark buntings in response to ecological and biological factors. Ecology 87:178–188PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Zann R, Runciman D (1994) Survivorship, dispersal and sex ratios of zebra finches Taeniopygia guttata in southeast Australia. Ibis 136:136–146CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Manuel Soler
    • 1
    • 2
  • Liesbeth de Neve
    • 1
    • 3
  • Gianluca Roncalli
    • 1
  • Elena Macías-Sánchez
    • 1
  • Juan Diego Ibáñez-Álamo
    • 1
  • Tomás Pérez-Contreras
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Departamento de Zoología, Facultad de CienciasUniversidad de GranadaGranadaSpain
  2. 2.Grupo Coevolución, Unidad Asociada al CSICUniversidad de GranadaGranadaSpain
  3. 3.Department of Biology, Terrestrial Ecology UnitGhent UniversityGentBelgium

Personalised recommendations