Skip to main content

Behavioral transitions with the evolution of cooperative nest founding by harvester ant queens

Abstract

Research on the evolution of cooperative groups tends to explore the costs and benefits of cooperation, with less focus on the proximate behavioral changes necessary for the transition from solitary to cooperative living. However, understanding what proximate changes must occur, as well as those pre-conditions already in place, is critical to understanding the origins and evolution of sociality. The California harvester ant Pogonomyrmex californicus demonstrates population-level variation in colony founding over a close geographic range. In adjacent populations, queens either found nests as single individuals (haplometrosis) or form cooperative groups of nonrelatives (pleometrosis). We compared aggregation, aggression, and tolerance of queens from one pleometrotic and two haplometrotic populations during nest initiation, to determine which behaviors show an evolutionary shift and which are present at the transition to pleometrosis. Surprisingly, within-nest aggregative behavior was equally present among all populations. In nesting boxes with multiple available brood-rearing sites, both queen types readily formed and clustered around a single common brood pile, suggesting that innate attraction to brood (offspring) facilitates the transition to social aggregation. In contrast, queens from the three populations differed in their probabilities of attraction on the ground to nest sites occupied by other queens and in levels of aggression. Our results suggest that some key behavioral mechanisms facilitating cooperation in P. californicus are in place prior to the evolution of pleometrosis and that the switch from aggression to tolerance is critical for the evolution of stable cooperative associations.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

References

  • Altmann J (1974) Observational study of behavior: sampling methods. Behaviour 49:227–267

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Aron S, Steinhauer N, Fournier D (2009) Influence of queen phenotype, investment and maternity apportionment on the outcome of fights in cooperative foundations of the ant Lasius niger. Anim Behav 77:1067–1074

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aviles L (2002) Solving the freeloaders paradox: genetic associations and frequency-dependent selection in the evolution of cooperation among nonrelatives. Proc Natl Acad Sci 99:14268–14273

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Baker P, Robertson C, Funk S, Harris S (1998) Potential fitness benefits of group living in the red fox, Vulpes vulpes. Anim Behav 56:1411–1424

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Balas MT, Adams ES (1996) The dissolution of cooperative groups: mechanisms of queen mortality in incipient fire ant colonies. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 38:391–399

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beauchamp G, Belisle M, Giraldeau L (1997) Influence of conspecific attraction on the spatial distribution of learning foragers in a patchy habitat. J Anim Ecol 66:671–682

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bernasconi G, Strassmann JE (1999) Cooperation among unrelated individuals: the ant foundress case. Trends Ecol Evol 14:477–482

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bono JM, Crespi BJ (2006) Costs and benefits of joint colony founding in Australian acacia thrips. Insect Soc 53:489–495

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cahan SH, Fewell JH (2004) Division of labor and the evolution of task sharing in queen associations of the harvester ant Pogonomyrmex californicus. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 56:9–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cahan S, Helms KR, Rissing SW (1998) An abrupt transition in colony founding behaviour in the ant Messor pergandei. Anim Behav 55:1583–1594

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Clutton-Brock T (2002) Breeding together: kin selection and mutualism in cooperative vertebrates. Science 296:69–72

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cole B (2009) The ecological setting of social evolution: the demography of ant populations. In: Gadau J, Fewell JH (eds) Organization of insect societies: from genome to sociocomplexity. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, pp 74–105

    Google Scholar 

  • Costa JT, Ross KG (2003) Fitness effects of group merging in a social insect. Proc R Soc B 270:1697–1702

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cowan D (1987) Group living in the European rabbit (Oryctolagus cuniculus): mutual benefit or resource localization? J Anim Ecol 56:779–795

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fletcher RJ (2006) Emergent properties of conspecific attraction in fragmented landscapes. Am Nat 168:207–219

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Helms KR, Helms Cahan S (2012) Large-scale regional variation in cooperation and conflict among queens of the desert ant Messor pergandei. Anim Behav 84:499–507

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hölldobler B, Wilson EO (1977) The number of queens: an important trait in ant evolution. Naturwissenschaften 64:8–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hölldobler B, Wilson EO (1990) The ants. Harvard University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hölldobler B, Wilson EO (2009) The superorganism: the beauty, elegance, and strangeness of insect societies. Norton, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunt J (2007) The evolution of social wasps. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hunt J (2012) A conceptual model for the origin of worker behaviour and adaptation of eusociality. J Evol Biol 25(1):1–19

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jakob E (1991) Costs and benefits of group living for pholcid spiderlings: losing food, saving silk. Anim Behav 41:711–722

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jeanson R, Deneubourg JL (2007) Conspecific attraction and shelter selection in gregarious insects. Am Nat 170:47–58

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jeanson R, Fewell J (2008) Influence of the social context on division of labor in ant foundress associations. Behav Ecol 19:567–574

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jeanson R, Rivault C, Deneubourg JL, Blanco S, Fournier R, Jost C, Theraulaz G (2005) Self-organized aggregation in cockroaches. Anim Behav 69:169–180

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson R (2004) Colony founding by pleometrosis in the semiclaustral seed-harvester ant Pogonomyrmex californicus (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Anim Behav 68:1189–1200

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keller L (1995) Social life: the paradox of multiple-queen colonies. Trends Ecol Evol 10:355–360

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kellner K, Trindl A, Heinze J, D’Etorre P (2007) Polygyny and polyandry in small ant societies. Mol Ecol 16:2363–2369

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Macdonald D (1983) The ecology of carnivore social behaviour. Nature 301:379–384

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manly BFJ (2006) Randomization, bootstrap and Monte Carlo methods in biology, 3rd edn. Chapman and Hall/CRC, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Mas F, Kölliker M (2008) Maternal care and offspring begging in social insects: chemical signalling, hormonal regulation and evolution. Anim Behav 76:1121–1131

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mas F, Haynes KF, Kölliker M (2009) A chemical signal of offspring quality affects maternal care in a social insect. Proc R Soc B 276:2847–2853

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Morel L, Vander Meer RK (1988) Do ant brood pheromones exist? Ann Entomol Soc Am 81:705–710

    Google Scholar 

  • Muller KL (1998) The role of conspecifics in habitat settlement in a territorial grasshopper. Anim Behav 56:479–485

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nonacs P (1992) Queen condition and alate density affect pleometrosis in the ant Lasius pallitarsis. Insect Soc 39:3–13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Overson RP (2011) Causes and consequences of queen-number variation in the California harvester ant Pogonomyrmex californicus. Dissertation, Arizona State University

  • Parrish JK, Hamner WM (1997) Animal groups in three dimensions. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Payton ME, Greenstone MH, Schenker N (2003) Overlapping confidence intervals or standard error intervals: what do they mean in terms of statistical significance? J Insect Sci 3:34

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rissing SW, Pollock GB (1987) Queen aggression, pleometrotic advantage and brood raiding in the ant Veromessor pergandei (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Anim Behav 35:975–981

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rissing SW, Johnson RA, Martin JW (2000) Colony founding behavior of some desert ants: geographic variation in metrosis. Psyche 103:95–105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosengaus R, Maxmen A, Coates L, Traniello J (1998) Disease resistance: a benefit of sociality in the dampwood termite Zootermopsis angusticollis (Isoptera: Termopsidae). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 44:125–134

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sachs JL, Mueller UG, Wilcox TP, Bull JJ (2004) The evolution of cooperation. Q Rev Biol 79:135–160

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Seeley T, Morse R (1978) Nest site selection by the honey bee, Apis mellifera. Insect Soc 25:323–337

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sommer K, Holldobler B (1995) Colony founding by queen association and determinants of reduction in queen number in the ant Lasius niger. Anim Behav 50:287–294

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stamps JA (1988) Conspecific attraction and aggregation in territorial species. Am Nat 131:329–347

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Szathmáry E, Smith JM (1995) The major evolutionary transitions. Nature 374:227–232

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Toth AL, Varala K, Newman TC, Miguez FE, Hutchison SK, Willoughby DA, Simons JF, Egholm M, Hunt JH, Hudson ME (2007) Wasp gene expression supports an evolutionary link between maternal behavior and eusociality. Science 318:441–444

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tschinkel WR (1998) An experimental study of pleometrotic colony founding in the fire ant, Solenopsis invicta: what is the basis for association? Behav Ecol Sociobiol 43:247–257

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tschinkel WR, Howard DF (1983) Colony founding by pleometrosis in the fire ant, Solenopsis invicta. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 12:103–113

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Uetz G, Hieber C (1997) Colonial web-building spiders: balancing the costs and benefits of group-living. In: Choe J, Crespi B (eds) Social behavior in insects and arachnids. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 458–475

  • Visscher P, Morse R, Seeley T (1985) Honey bees choosing a home prefer previously occupied cavities. Insect Soc 32:217–220

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson EO (1975) Sociobiology: the new synthesis. Belknap, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank Benjamin Allen, Tresa Marchi, and Ti Eriksson for behavioral observations and Adam Dolezal and Josh Gibson for collecting queens. Tate Holbrook and James Waters made valuable contributions and comments to discussions and the manuscript. This work was made possible in part by NSF award IOS-0446415 to JHF.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jennifer H. Fewell.

Additional information

Communicated by J. Heinze

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Overson, R., Gadau, J., Clark, R.M. et al. Behavioral transitions with the evolution of cooperative nest founding by harvester ant queens. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 68, 21–30 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-013-1618-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-013-1618-2

Keywords

  • Pleometrosis
  • Cooperation
  • Sociality
  • Foundress associations
  • Proximate mechanisms
  • Aggression
  • Aggregation
  • Clustering
  • Pre-adaptation
  • Harvester ant
  • Social dynamics