Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology

, Volume 67, Issue 11, pp 1719–1730 | Cite as

Same-sex sexual behavior in insects and arachnids: prevalence, causes, and consequences

Review

Abstract

Same-sex sexual (SSS) behavior represents an evolutionary puzzle: whilst associated costs seem obvious, positive contributions to fitness remain unclear. Various adaptive explanations have been proposed and thorough reviews exist for vertebrates, but a thorough synthesis of causes for SSS behavior in invertebrates is lacking. Here we provide evidence for such behavior in ~110 species of insects and arachnids. Males are more frequently involved in SSS behavior in the laboratory than in the field, and isolation, high density, and exposure to female pheromones increase its prevalence. SSS behavior is often shorter than the equivalent heterosexual behavior. Most cases can be explained via mistaken identification by the active (courting/mounting) male. Adaptive explanations, such as sperm transfer of the mounting male via the mounted one or gaining experience by young males, are of limited general significance. The passive (being courted/mounted) male is sometimes responsible for this “mistake” by releasing sex pheromones or carrying female pheromones that were attached to his cuticle during prior mating activity. Passive males often resist courting/mating attempts. SSS behavior in arthropods is predominantly based on mistaken identification and is probably maintained because the cost of rejecting a valid opportunity to mate with a female is greater than that of mistakenly mating with a male. Many species exhibiting SSS behavior also mate with related species, another case of mistaken identification. Future research should focus on uncovering the situations/contexts in which mistaken identification is more or less costly for males.

Keywords

Homosexual Intra-sexual Reproductive interference Male–male Mating costs 

Supplementary material

265_2013_1610_MOESM1_ESM.xls (120 kb)
ESM 1(XLS 119 kb)

References

  1. Abramsky Z, Strauss E, Subach A, Kotler BP, Riechman A (1996) The effect of barn owls (Tyto alba) on the activity and microhabitat selection of Gerbillus allenbyi and G. pyramidum. Oecologia 105:313–319Google Scholar
  2. Aiken RB (1981) The relationship between body weight and homosexual mounting in Palmacorixa nana Walley (Heteroptera: Corixidae). Fla Entomol 64:267–271Google Scholar
  3. Al-Wahaibi AK, Owen AK, Morse JG (2005) Description and behavioural biology of two Ufens species (Hymenoptera: Trichogrammatidae), egg parasitoids of Homalodisca species (Hemiptera: Cicadellidae) in southern California. B Entomol Res 95:275–288Google Scholar
  4. Arnaud L, Haubruge E (1999) Mating behaviour and male mate choice in Tribolium castaneum (Coleoptera, Tenebrionidae). Behaviour 136:67–77Google Scholar
  5. Bagemihl B (1999) Biological exuberance: animal homosexuality and natural diversity. St. Martin, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  6. Bailey NW, French N (2012) Same-sex sexual behaviour and mistaken identity in male field crickets, Teleogryllus oceanicus. Anim Behav 84:1031–1038Google Scholar
  7. Bailey NW, Zuk M (2009) Same-sex sexual behavior and evolution. Trends Ecol Evol 24:439–446PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Bailey NW, Hoskins JL, Green J, Ritchie MG (2013) Measuring same-sex sexual behavior: the influence of the male social environment. Anim Behav 86:91–100Google Scholar
  9. Baker TC (1983) Variations in male oriental fruit moth courtship patterns due to male competition. Experientia 39:112–114Google Scholar
  10. Barrows EM, Gordh G (1978) Sexual behavior in the Japanese beetle Popillia japonica, and comparative notes on sexual behavior of other scarabs (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae). Behav Biol 23:341–354Google Scholar
  11. Benelli G, Canale A (2012) Do Psyttalia concolor (Hymenoptera: Braconidae) males gain in mating competitiveness from being courted by other males while still young? Entomol Sci 15:257–260Google Scholar
  12. Benz G (1973) Role of sex pheromone, and its insignificance for heterosexual and homosexual behaviour of larch bud moth. Experientia 29:553–554Google Scholar
  13. Blanckenhorn WU, Preziosi RF, Fairbairn DJ (1995) Time and energy constraints and the evolution of sexual size dimorphism—to eat or to mate? Evol Ecol 9:369–381Google Scholar
  14. Bland RG (1991) Mating behavior of Phaulacridium vittatum Sjöstedt (Orthoptera: Acrididae). J Aust Entomol Soc 30:221–229Google Scholar
  15. Burdfield-Steel ER, Shuker DM (2011) Reproductive interference. Current Biol 21:R450–R451Google Scholar
  16. Burgevin L, Friberg U, Maklakov AA (2013) Intersexual correlation for same-sex sexual behaviour in an insect. Anim Behav 85:759–762Google Scholar
  17. Caballero-Mendieta N, Cordero C (2012) Enigmatic liaisons in Lepidoptera: a review of same-sex courtship and copulation in butterflies and moths. J Insect Sci 12:138PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Carroll SP (1988) Contrasts in reproductive ecology between temperate and tropical populations of Jadera haematoloma, a mate-guarding Hemipteran (Rhopalidae). Ann Entomol Soc Am 81:54–63Google Scholar
  19. Castro L, Toro MA, Lopez-Fanjul C (1994) The genetic properties of homosexual copulation behavior in Tribolium castaneum: artificial selection. Genet Sel Evol 26:361–367Google Scholar
  20. Chittka L, Skorupski P, Raine NE (2009) Speed-accuracy tradeoffs in animal decision making. Trends Ecol Evol 24:400–407PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Ciani AC, Cermelli P, Zanzotto G (2008) Sexually antagonistic selection in human male homosexuality. PLoS One 3:e2282Google Scholar
  22. Connell SD (2000) Is there safety-in-numbers for prey? Oikos 88:527–532Google Scholar
  23. Curcillo PG, Tompkins L (1987) The ontogeny of sex appeal in Drosophila melanogaster males. Behav Genet 17:81–86PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Day MD, Zalucki MP (2000) Effect of density on spatial distribution, pit formation and pit diameter of Myrmeleon acer Walker, (Neuroptera: Myrmeleontidae): patterns and processes. Austral Ecol 25:58–64Google Scholar
  25. Dukas R (2008) Evolutionary biology of insect learning. Annu Rev Entomol 53:145–160PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Dukas R (2010) Causes and consequences of male-male courtship in fruit flies. Anim Behav 80:913–919Google Scholar
  27. Dunning DC, Byers JA, Zanger CD (1979) Courtship in two species of periodical cicadas, Magicicada septendecim and Magicicada cassini. Anim Behav 27:1073–1090Google Scholar
  28. Fedina TY (2007) Cryptic female choice during spermatophore transfer in Tribolium castaneum (Coleoptera: Tenebrionidae). J Insect Physiol 53:93–98PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Field SA, Keller MA (1993) Alternative mating tactics and female mimicry as post-copulatory mate-guarding behaviour in the parasitic wasp Cotesia rubecula. Anim Behav 46:1183–1189Google Scholar
  30. Gailey DA, Jackson FR, Siegel RW (1982) Male courtship in Drosophila: the conditioned response to immature males and its genetic control. Genetics 102:771–782PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Gaskin T, Futerman P, Chapman T (2002) Increased density and male-male interactions reduce male longevity in the medfly, Ceratitis capitata. Anim Behav 63:121–129Google Scholar
  32. Gillespie RG (1991) Homosexual mating behavior in male Doryonychus raptor (Araneae, Tetragnathidae). J Arachnol 19:229–230Google Scholar
  33. Graur D, Wool D (1982) Dynamics and genetics of mating behavior in Tribolium castaneum (Coleoptera, Tenebrionidae). Behav Genet 12:161–179PubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Gröning J, Hochkirch A (2008) Reproductive interference between animal species. Q Rev Biol 83:257–282PubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Grosjean Y, Grillet M, Augustin H, Ferveur J-F, Featherstone DE (2008) A glial amino-acid transporter controls synapse strength and homosexual courtship in Drosophila. Nat Neurosci 11:54–61PubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Guershon M, Ayali A, Golenser E, Pener MP (2012) A Juvenile Hormone analogue enhances homosexual behaviour in female-deprived males of the migratory locust. Physiol Entomol 37:291–294Google Scholar
  37. Hall DR, Cork A, Lester R, Nesbitt BF, Zagatti P (1987) Sex pheromones of rice moth, Corcyra cephalonica Stainton. II. Identification and role of female pheromone. J Chem Ecol 13:1575–1589Google Scholar
  38. Hanus R, Luxova A, Sobotnik J, Kalinova B, Jiros P, Krecek J, Bourguignon T, Bordereau C (2009) Sexual communication in the termite Prorhinotermes simplex (Isoptera, Rhinotermitidae) mediated by a pheromone from female tergal glands. Insect Soc 56:111–118Google Scholar
  39. Harari AR, Brockmann HJ, Landolt PJ (2000) Intrasexual mounting in the beetle Diaprepes abbreviatus (L.). Proc R Soc Lond B 267:2071–2079Google Scholar
  40. Harris VE, Todd JW (1980) Temporal and numerical patterns of reproductive behavior in the southern Green stink bug, Nezara viridula (Hemiptera: Pentatomidae). Entomol Exp Appl 27:105–116Google Scholar
  41. Haubruge E, Arnaud L, Mignon J, Gage MJG (1999) Fertilization by proxy: rival sperm removal and translocation in a beetle. Proc R Soc Lond B 266:1183–1187Google Scholar
  42. He XZ (2008) Reproductive behavior of Aphidius ervi Haliday (Hymenoptera: Aphidiidae). PhD Thesis, Massey University, Palmerston NorthGoogle Scholar
  43. Hemptinne J-L, Lognay G, Dixon AFG (1998) Mate recognition in the two-spot ladybird beetle, Adalia bipunctata: role of chemical and behavioural cues. J Insect Physiol 44:1163–1171Google Scholar
  44. Henry CS, Wells MLM (2009) Sexually dimorphic intrasexual duetting in an otherwise monomorphic green lacewing (Neuroptera, Chrysopidae, Chrysoperla plorabunda): sexual selection or sex recognition? J Insect Behav 22:289–312Google Scholar
  45. Henry CS, Brooks SJ, Johnson JB, Duelli P (1996) Chrysoperla lucasina (Lacroix): a distinct species of green lacewing, confirmed by acoustical analysis (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae). Syst Entomol 21:205–218Google Scholar
  46. Hoikkala A, Suvanto L (1999) Male courtship song frequency as an indicator of male mating success in Drosophila montana. J Insect Behav 12:599–609Google Scholar
  47. Hoikkala A, Crossley S, Castillo-Melendez C (2000) Copulatory courtship in Drosophila birchii and D. serrata, species recognition and sexual selection. J Insect Behav 13:361–373Google Scholar
  48. Iguchi Y (1996) Sexual behavior of the horned beetle, Allomyrina dichotoma septentrionalis (Coleoptera, Scarabaeidae). Jpn J Entomol 64:870–875Google Scholar
  49. Ings TC, Chittka L (2008) Speed-accuracy tradeoffs and false alarms in bee responses to cryptic predators. Curr Biol 18:1520–1524PubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. Jones JC (1975) Non-heterosexual behavior in mosquitoes. Biol Bull 149:365–372PubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. Jones TM, McNamara KB, Colvin PGR, Featherston R, Elgar MA (2006) Mating frequency, fecundity and fertilization success in the hide beetle, Dermestes maculatus. J Insect Behav 19:357–371Google Scholar
  52. Kant R, Minor MA, Trewick SA (2012) Reproductive strategies of Diaeretiella rapae (Hymenoptera: Aphidiinae) during fluctuating temperatures of spring season in New Zealand. Biocontrol Sci Techn 22:1–9Google Scholar
  53. Kawecki TJ (2010) Evolutionary ecology of learning: insights from fruit flies. Popul Ecol 52:15–25Google Scholar
  54. Keeping MG, Lipschitz D, Crewe RM (1986) Chemical mate recognition and release of male sexual behavior in Polybiine wasp, Belonogaster petiolata (DeGeer) (Hymenoptera: Vespidae). J Chem Ecol 12:773–779Google Scholar
  55. Kuba H, Koyama J (1985) Mating behavior of wild melon flies, Dacus cucurbitae Coquillett (Diptera: Tephritidae) in a field cage: courtship behavior. Appl Entomol Zool 20:365–372Google Scholar
  56. Kureck IM, Neumann A, Foitzik S (2011) Wingless ant males adjust mate-guarding behavior to the competitive situation in the nest. Anim Behav 82:339–346Google Scholar
  57. Lawniczak MKN, Barnes AI, Linklater JR, Boone JM, Wigby S, Chapman T (2007) Mating and immunity in invertebrates. Trends Ecol Evol 22:48–55PubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. Leal WS, Kuwahara S, Shi X, Higuchi H, Marino CEB, Ono M, Meinwald J (1998) Male-released sex pheromone of the stink bug Piezodorus hybneri. J Chem Ecol 24:1817–1829Google Scholar
  59. Levan KE, Fedina TY, Lewis SM (2009) Testing multiple hypotheses for the maintenance of male homosexual copulatory behaviour in flour beetles. J Evol Biol 22:60–70PubMedGoogle Scholar
  60. Liu T, Dartvelle L, Yuan C, Wei H, Wang Y, Ferveur J-F, Guo A (2008) Increased dopamine level enhances male–male courtship in Drosophila. J Neurosci 28:5539–5546PubMedGoogle Scholar
  61. Livingstone D, Ramani R (1978) Studies on the reproductive biology. Proc Indian Acad Sci B 87:229–247Google Scholar
  62. Lynn SK, Cnaani J, Papaj DR (2005) Peak shift discrimination learning as a mechanism of signal evolution. Evolution 59:1300–1305PubMedGoogle Scholar
  63. Magnhagen C (1991) Predation risk as a cost of reproduction. Trends Ecol Evol 6:183–186PubMedGoogle Scholar
  64. Maklakov AA, Bonduriansky R (2009) Sex differences in survival costs of homosexual and heterosexual interactions: evidence from a fly and a beetle. Anim Behav 77:1375–1379Google Scholar
  65. Matsuura K, Kuno E, Nishida T (2002) Homosexual tandem running as selfish herd in Reticulitermes speratus: novel antipredatory behavior in termites. J Theor Biol 214:63–70PubMedGoogle Scholar
  66. McLain DK, Pratt AE (1999) The cost of sexual coercion and heterospecific sexual harassment on the fecundity of a host-specific, seed-eating insect (Neacoryphus bicrucis). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 46:164–170Google Scholar
  67. McNamara JM, Houston AI (1987) Partial preferences and foraging. Anim Behav 35:1084–1099Google Scholar
  68. McRobert SP, Tompkins L (1988) Two consequences of homosexual courtship performed by Drosophila melanogaster and Drosophila affinis males. Evolution 42:1093–1097Google Scholar
  69. O’Hanlon JC (2011) Intraspecific interactions and their effect on habitat utilization by the praying mantid Ciulfina biseriata (Mantodea: Liturgusidae). J Ethol 29:47–54Google Scholar
  70. O’Neil KM (1994) The male mating strategy of the ant Formica subpolita Mayr (Hymenoptera: Formicidae): swarming, mating, and predation risk. Psyche 101:93–108Google Scholar
  71. Otsuka K, Kon M, Hidaka T (1986) The mating system of Tokunagayusurika akamusi (Diptera; Chironomidae): II. Experimental analysis of male mating behaviour at the resting place. J Ethol 4:147–152Google Scholar
  72. Palaniswamy P, Seabrook WD, Ross RJ (1979) Precopulatory behavior of males and perception of a potential male pheromone in spruce budworm, Choristoneura fumiferana. Ann Entomol Soc Am 72:544–551Google Scholar
  73. Papadopoulos NT, Liedo P, Müller HG, Wang JL, Molleman F, Carey JR (2010) Cost of reproduction in male medflies: the primacy of sexual courting in extreme longevity reduction. J Insect Physiol 56:283–287PubMedGoogle Scholar
  74. Parker GA (1968) The sexual behaviour of the blowfly, Protophormia terrae-novae R.-D. Behaviour 32:291–308PubMedGoogle Scholar
  75. Pereira R, Sivinski J, Teal P, Brockmann J (2010) Enhancing male sexual success in a lekking fly (Anastrepha suspensa Diptera:Tephritidae) through a juvenile hormone analog has no effect on adult mortality. J Insect Physiol 56:1552–1557PubMedGoogle Scholar
  76. Peschke K (1987) Cuticular hydrocarbons regulate mate recognition, male aggression, and female choice of the rove beetle, Aleochara curtula. J Chem Ecol 13:1993–2008Google Scholar
  77. Post DC, Jeanne RL (1983) Venom: source of a sex pheromone in the social wasp Polistes fuscatus (Hymenoptera: Vespidae). J Chem Ecol 9:259–266Google Scholar
  78. Preston-Mafham K (2006) Post-mounting courtship and the neutralizing of male competitors through “homosexual” mountings in the fly Hydromyza livens F. (Diptera: Scatophagidae). J Nat Hist 40:101–105Google Scholar
  79. Radwan J, Czyz M, Konior M, Kolodziejczyk M (2000) Aggressiveness in two male morphs of the bulb mite Rhizoglyphus robini. Ethology 106:53–62Google Scholar
  80. Rasa OAE (1995) Ecological factors influencing burrow location, group size and mortality in a nocturnal fossorial Kalahari detritivore, Parastizopus armaticeps Peringuey (Coleoptera: Tenebrionidae). J Arid Environ 29:353–365Google Scholar
  81. Reinhardt K (2007) Evolutionary consequences of sperm cell aging. Q Rev Biol 82:375–393PubMedGoogle Scholar
  82. Reinhardt K, Harney E, Naylor R, Gorb S, Siva-Jothy MT (2007) Female-limited polymorphism in the copulatory organ of a traumatically inseminating insect. Am Nat 170:931–935PubMedGoogle Scholar
  83. Robertson HM (1985) Female dimorphism and mating behaviour in a damselfly, Ischnura ramburi: females mimicking males. Anim Behav 33:805–809Google Scholar
  84. Ruther J, Steiner S (2008) Costs of female odour in males of the parasitic wasp Lariophagus distinguendus (Hymenoptera: Pteromalidae). Naturwissenschaften 95:547–552PubMedGoogle Scholar
  85. Ryne C (2009) Homosexual interactions in bed bugs: alarm pheromones as male recognition signals. Anim Behav 78:1471–1475Google Scholar
  86. Sandi C, Pinelo-Nava MT (2007) Stress and memory: behavioral effects and neurobiological mechanisms. Neural Plast 2007:78970PubMedGoogle Scholar
  87. Saur M (1990) Mate discrimination in Littorina littorea (L.) and L. saxatilis (Olivi) (Mollusca: Prosobranchia). Hydrobiologia 193:261–270Google Scholar
  88. Scarbrough AG (1978) Ethology of Cerotainia albipilosa Curran (Diptera: Asilidae) in Maryland: courtship, mating and oviposition. Proc Entomol Soc Washington 80:179–190Google Scholar
  89. Schafer R (1977) The nature and development of sex attractant specificity in cockroaches of the genus Periplaneta. J Exp Zool 199:73–84Google Scholar
  90. Scharf I, Pamminger T, Foitzik S (2011) Differential response of ant colonies to intruders: attack strategies correlate with potential threat. Ethology 117:731–739Google Scholar
  91. Scharf I, Ovadia O, Foitzik S (2012) The advantage of alternative tactics of prey and predators depends on the spatial pattern of prey and social interactions among predators. Popul Ecol 54:187–196Google Scholar
  92. Scharf I, Peter F, Martin OY (2013) Reproductive trade-offs and direct costs for males in arthropods. Evol Biol 40:169–184Google Scholar
  93. Schlein Y, Galun R, Ben-Eliahu MN (1981) Abstinons: male-produced deterrents of mating in flies. J Chem Ecol 7:285–290Google Scholar
  94. Schmeider-Wenzel C, Schruft G (1990) Courtship behaviour of the European grape berry moth, Eupoecilia ambiguella Hb. (Lep., Tortricidae) in regard to pheromonal and tactile stimuli. J Appl Entomol 109:341–346Google Scholar
  95. Schultz JK, Switzer PV (2001) Pursuit of heterospecific targets by territorial amberwing dragonflies (Perithemis tenera Say): a case of mistaken identity. J Insect Behav 14:607–620Google Scholar
  96. Seidelmann K, Ferenz HJ (2002) Courtship inhibition pheromone in desert locusts, Schistocerca gregaria. J Insect Physiol 48:991–996PubMedGoogle Scholar
  97. Serrano JM, Castro L, Toro MA, Lopez-Fanjul C (2000) Inter- and intraspecific sexual discrimination in the flour beetles Tribolium castaneum and Tribolium confusum. Heredity 85:142–146PubMedGoogle Scholar
  98. Shah NK, Singer MC, Syna DR (1986) Occurrence of homosexual mating pairs in a Checkerspot butterfly. J Res Lepid 24:393Google Scholar
  99. Sharma RP (1977) Light-dependent homosexual activity in males of a mutant of Drosophila melanogaster. Experientia 33:171–173PubMedGoogle Scholar
  100. Shimomura K, Mimura T, Ishikawa S, Yajima S, Ohsawa K (2010) Variation in mate recognition specificities among four Callosobruchus seed beetles. Entomol Exp Appl 135:315–322Google Scholar
  101. Sih A, Bell A, Johnson JC (2004) Behavioral syndromes: an ecological and evolutionary overview. Trends Ecol Evol 19:372–378PubMedGoogle Scholar
  102. Sivinski J (1984) Sexual conflict and choice in a phoretic fly, Borborillus frigipennis (Sphaeroceridae). Ann Entomol Soc Am 77:232–235Google Scholar
  103. Smith DC, Prokopy RJ (1982) Mating behavior of Rhagoletis mendax (Diptera: Tephritidae) flies in nature. Ann Entomol Soc Am 75:388–392Google Scholar
  104. Sokoloff A (1974) The biology of Tribolium with special emphasis on genetic aspects. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  105. Solensky MJ (2004) The effect of behavior and ecology on male mating success in overwintering Monarch butterflies (Danaus plexippus). J Insect Behav 17:723–743Google Scholar
  106. Sommer V, Vasey PL (2006) Homosexual behaviour in animals: an evolutionary perspective. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  107. Spratt EC (1980) Male homosexual behaviour and other factors influencing adult longevity in Tribolium castaneum (Herbst) and T. confusum Duval. J Stored Prod Res 16:109–114Google Scholar
  108. Steiner S, Steidle JLM, Ruther J (2005) Female sex pheromone in immature insect males—a case of pre-emergence chemical mimicry? Behav Ecol Sociobiol 58:111–120Google Scholar
  109. Stojkovic B, Jovanovic DS, Tucic B, Tucic N (2010) Homosexual behaviour and its longevity cost in females and males of the seed beetle Acanthoscelides obtectus. Physiol Entomol 35:308–316Google Scholar
  110. Svensson EI, Råberg L (2010) Resistance and tolerance in animal enemy-victim coevolution. Trends Ecol Evol 25:267–274PubMedGoogle Scholar
  111. Switzer PV, Forsythe PS, Escajeda K, Kruse KC (2004) Effects of environmental and social conditions on homosexual pairing in the Japanese beetle (Popillia japonica Newman). J Insect Behav 17:1–16Google Scholar
  112. Takada Y (1995) Seasonal migration promoting assortative mating in Littorina brevicula on a boulder shore in Japan. Hydrobiologia 309:151–159Google Scholar
  113. Tatarnic NJ, Cassis G, Hochuli DF (2006) Traumatic insemination in the plant bug genus Coridromius Signoret (Heteroptera: Miridae). Biol Lett 2:58–61PubMedGoogle Scholar
  114. Tauber MJ, Toschi CA (1965) Bionomics of Euleia fratria (Leow) (Diptera: Tephritidae). Can J Zool 43:369–379Google Scholar
  115. Thornhill R (1979) Adaptive female-mimicking behavior in a scorpionfly. Science 205:412–414PubMedGoogle Scholar
  116. Thornhill R, Alcock J (1983) The evolution of insect mating systems. Harvard University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  117. Tigreros N, South A, Fedina T, Lewis S (2009) Does fertilization by proxy occur in Tribolium beetles? A replicated study of a novel mechanism of sperm transfer. Anim Behav 77:555–557Google Scholar
  118. Torres-Vila LM, Jennions MD (2005) Male mating history and female fecundity in the Lepidoptera: do male virgins make better partners? Behav Ecol Sociobiol 57:318–326Google Scholar
  119. Tsukamoto L, Kuki K, Tojo S (1994) Mating tactics and constraints in the gregarious insect Parastrachia japonensis (Hemiptera: Cydnidae). Ann Entomol Soc America 87:962–971Google Scholar
  120. Van Gossum H, De Bruyn L, Stoks R (2005) Reversible switches between male–male and male–female mating behaviour by male damselflies. Biol Lett 1:268–270PubMedGoogle Scholar
  121. Vasey PL, Sommer V (2006) Homosexual behaviour in animals: topics, hypotheses and research trajectories. In: Sommer V, Vasey PL (eds) Homosexual behaviour in animals: an evolutionary perspective. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 3–42Google Scholar
  122. Wang Q, Chen LY, Li JS, Yin XM (1996) Mating behavior of Phytoecia rufiventris Gautier (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae). J Insect Behav 9:47–60Google Scholar
  123. Weldon CW (2005) Mass-rearing and sterilisation alter mating behaviour of male Queensland fruit fly, Bactrocera tryoni (Froggatt) (Diptera: Tephritidae). Aust J Entomol 44:158–163Google Scholar
  124. Wen P, Ji BZ, Liu SW, Liu C, Sillam-Dusses D (2012) Sex-pairing pheromone in the Asian termite pest species Odontotermes formosanus. J Chem Ecol 38:566–575PubMedGoogle Scholar
  125. Wendelken PW, Barth RH (1985) On the significance of pseudofemale behavior in the neotropical cockroach general Blaberus, Archimandrita and Byrsotria. Psyche 92:493–503Google Scholar
  126. Wool D (1967) Some observations on mating frequencies in Tribolium castaneum strains. Tribolium Inform Bull 10:182–186Google Scholar
  127. Zuk M, Stoehr AM (2002) Immune defense and host life history. Am Nat 160:S9–S22PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Zoology, Faculty of Life SciencesTel Aviv UniversityTel AvivIsrael
  2. 2.Experimental Ecology, Institute of Integrative Biology IBZETH ZurichZurichSwitzerland

Personalised recommendations