Male coalitions and female behaviour affect male mating success independent of dominance rank and female receptive synchrony in wild Barbary macaques
- 636 Downloads
Dominant mammalian males should gain a reproductive advantage due to their greater fighting abilities. However, the extent to which they can monopolise access to females varies across species. In primates and recently other mammalian species, the Priority of Access (PoA) model is commonly used to measure the degree to which male rank and female receptive synchrony affect mating skew. Few studies have examined the factors which lead to deviations from the expectations of the model. Here, we investigate male mating skew in wild Barbary macaques (Macaca sylvanus). We examined four of the main factors which affect male mating success: the roles of male rank, female receptive synchrony, coalitionary activity and female behaviour. We found that male mating was skewed up the hierarchy, but there was a large deviation from the PoA model's expectations with high-ranked males not gaining as big a share as expected. Females frequently initiated sexual encounters, predominantly with mid-ranked males, increasing their mating success. Male coalitionary activity independently increased mating success. Frequent associations with females were costly to males as they were the targets of bridging coalitions, decreasing future mating opportunities for the targets. High-ranking males did not increase their mating success directly through bridging coalitions but acted to dilute the effects of female behaviour. By examining different factors affecting mating skew, we are able to show that alternative male and female mating strategies are effective in reducing the monopolisation potential of the dominant male.
KeywordsPriority of Access model Mating skew Coalition Female mate choice Reproductive strategies Macaca sylvanus
The authors are grateful to Professor Mohamed Qarro (Ecole Nationale Forestière d’Ingénieurs, Morocco) for his support in the field and the Haut Commissariat aux Eaux et Forêts et à la Lutte Contre la Désertification of Morocco for research permission. We would also like to thank Michael Madole, Dave Thomas, Sofia Santos, Maria Thunström, Tom Smith, Josephine Msindai and Carrie Miller for assistance in the field and Laëtitia Maréchal, Cédric Girard-Buttoz, Ines Fürtbauer and Mathias Franz for helpful comments. Furthermore, we would like to thank Dr. Elise Huchard and two anonymous referees for useful comments to significantly improve the manuscript. Financial support was provided by the Max Planck Society, the Christian Vogel Fonds and Georg-August University Göttingen through funds from the German Initiative of Excellence.
This study complies with Moroccan, German and British regulations regarding the ethical treatment of research subjects.
Conflicts of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
- Alberts S (2012) Magnitude and sources of variation in male reproductive performance. In: Mitani JC, Call J, Kappeler PM, Palombit RA, Silk JB (eds) The evolution of primate societies. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp 412–431Google Scholar
- Bates D, Maechler M, Bolker B (2012) lme4: linear mixed effects models using S4 classes. In: R package version 0.999999-0. http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=lme4
- Borries C (2000) Male dispersal and mating season influxes in Hanuman langurs living in multi-male groups. In: Kappeler PM (ed) Primate males: causes and consequences of variation in group composition. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 146–158Google Scholar
- Bowerman B, O'Connell R (1990) Linear statistical models: an applied approach, 2nd edn. Duxbury, BelmontGoogle Scholar
- Cords M (2000) The number of males in guenon groups. In: Kappeler PM (ed) Primate males: causes and consequences of variation in group composition. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 84–96Google Scholar
- Dixson AF (1998) Primate sexuality: comparative studies of the Prosimians, monkeys, apes, and human beings. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
- Field A (2005) Discovering statistics using SPSS. Sage, LondonGoogle Scholar
- Fox J, Weisberg HS (2010) An R companion to applied regression. Sage, Thousand OaksGoogle Scholar
- Heistermann M, Möhle U, Vervaecke H, van Elsacker L, Hodges JK (1996) Application of urinary and fecal steroid measurements for monitoring ovarian function and pregnancy in the Bonobo (Pan paniscus) and evaluation of perineal swelling patterns in relation to endocrine events. Biol Reprod 55:844–853PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Janson C (1984) Female choice and mating system of the brown capuchin monkey Cebus apella (primates: Cebidae). Z Tierpsychol 65:177–200Google Scholar
- Kappeler P (2012) Mate choice. In: Mitani JC, Call J, Kappeler P, Palombit RA, Silk JB (eds) The evolution of primate societies. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp 367–386Google Scholar
- Mayers R (1990) Classical and modern regression with applications, 2nd edn. Duxbury, BostonGoogle Scholar
- Muller MN, Wrangham RW (2009) Sexual coercion in primates and humans: an evolutionary perspective on male aggression against females. Harvard University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
- Noë R (1992) Alliance formation among male baboons: shopping for profitable partners. In: Harcourt A, De Waal F (eds) Coalitions and alliances in humans and other animals. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 285–322Google Scholar
- Noldus Information Technology (2003) MatMan, reference manual, version 1.1.4 WageningenGoogle Scholar
- Paul A, Kuester J (1988) Life-history patterns of Barbary macaques (Macaca sylvanus) at Affenberg Salem. In: Fa JE, Southwick CH (eds) Ecology and behavior of food-enhanced primate groups. Alan R. Liss, New York, pp 199–228Google Scholar
- Rasmussen KLR (1985) Changes in the activity budgets of yellow baboons (Papio cynocephalus) during sexual consortships. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 17:161–170Google Scholar
- Setchell JM (2003) The evolution of alternative reproductive morphs in male primates. In: Jones C (ed) Sexual selection and reproductive competition in primates: New perspectives and directions, vol 3, Special topics in primatology. Norman, American Society of Primatologists, pp 413–435Google Scholar
- Trivers RL (1972) Parental investment and sexual selection. In: Campbell B (ed) Sexual selection and the descent of man, 1871–1971. Heinemann, London, pp 136–179Google Scholar
- van Noordwijk MA, van Schaik CP (2004) Sexual selection and the careers of primate males: paternity concentration, dominance-acquisition tactics and transfer decisions. In: Kappeler PM, van Schaik CP (eds) Sexual selection in primates—new and comparative perspectives. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 208–229CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- van Schaik CP, Pradhan GR, van Noordwijk MA (2004b) Mating conflict in primates: Infanticide, sexual harrassment and female sexuality. In: Kappeler PM, van Schaik CP (eds) Sexual selection in primates: New and comparative perspectives. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 131–150CrossRefGoogle Scholar