Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology

, Volume 67, Issue 8, pp 1339–1344

Increased behavioural lateralization in parasitized coral reef fish

  • Dominique G. Roche
  • Sandra A. Binning
  • Laura E. Strong
  • Jaclyn N. Davies
  • Michael D. Jennions
Original Paper


Preferential use of one side of the body for cognitive or behavioural tasks (lateralization) is common in many animals, including humans. However, few studies have demonstrated whether lateralization is phenotypically plastic, and varies depending on the ecological context. We studied lateralization (measured as a turning preference) in the bridled monocle bream (Scolopsis bilineatus). This coral reef fish is commonly infected by a large, ectoparasitic isopod (Anilocra nemipteri) that attaches to the left or right side of its host’s head. Fish that were parasitized showed no turning bias with respect to the side on which the parasite had attached. On average, however, parasitised fish were significantly more lateralized (i.e. had a strong side bias) than unparasitized fish. The extent of lateralization declined significantly when we experimentally removed the parasite. Our results indicate that lateralization can vary with the ecological context. One possible explanation is that lateralization shortens the response time until fish flee after encountering a predator. A stronger side bias might be advantageous for parasitized individuals to overcome their recently documented lower maximum swimming speed.


Behavioural side bias Cymothoid isopod parasite Great Barrier Reef Handedness Laterality Morphological asymmetry Scolopsis bilineatus 


  1. Adlard R, Lester R (1994) Dynamics of the interaction between the parasitic isopod, Anilocra pomacentri, and the coral reef fish, Chromis nitida. Parasitology 109:311–324PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Binning SA, Roche DG, Layton C (2013) Ectoparasites increase swimming costs in a coral reef fish. Biol Lett 9:20120927PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bisazza A, Dadda M (2005) Enhanced schooling performance in lateralized fishes. Proc R Soc Lond B 272:1677–1681CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bisazza A, Cantalupo C, Vallortigara G (1997a) Lateral asymmetries during escape behavior in a species of teleost fish (Jenynsia lineata). Physiol Behav 61:31–35PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bisazza A, Pignatti R, Vallortigara G (1997b) Detour tests reveal task- and stimulus-specific behavioural lateralization in mosquitofish (Gambusia holbrooki). Behav Brain Res 89:237–242PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bisazza A, Facchin L, Pignatti R, Vallortigara G (1998) Lateralization of detour behaviour in poeciliid fish: the effect of species, gender and sexual motivation. Behav Brain Res 91:157–164PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Brown C, Gardner C, Braithwaite VA (2004) Population variation in lateralized eye use in the poeciliid Brachyraphis episcopi. Proc R Soc Lond B 271:S455–S457CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Dadda M, Bisazza A (2006a) Does brain asymmetry allow efficient performance of simultaneous tasks? Anim Behav 72:523–529CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Dadda M, Bisazza A (2006b) Lateralized female topminnows can forage and attend to a harassing male simultaneously. Behav Ecol 17:358–363CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Dadda M, Zandonà E, Agrillo C, Bisazza A (2009) The costs of hemispheric specialization in a fish. Proc R Soc Lond B 276:4399–4407CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Dadda M, Koolhaas WH, Domenici P (2010) Behavioural asymmetry affects escape performance in a teleost fish. Biol Lett 6:414–417PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Domenici P (2002) The visually mediated escape response in fish: predicting prey responsiveness and the locomotor behaviour of predators and prey. Mar Freshw Behav Physiol 35:87–110CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Domenici P, Allan B, McCormick MI, Munday PL (2012) Elevated carbon dioxide affects behavioural lateralization in a coral reef fish. Biol Lett 8:78–81PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Eaton RC, Lee RKK, Foreman MB (2001) The Mauthner cell and other identified neurons of the brainstem escape network of fish. Prog Neurobiol 63:467–485PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Farrell AP (2007) Cardiorespiratory performance during prolonged swimming tests with salmonids: a perspective on temperature effects and potential analytical pitfalls. Philos T Roy Soc B 362:2017–2030CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Fogelman RM, Kuris AM, Grutter AS (2009) Parasitic castration of a vertebrate: effect of the cymothoid isopod, Anilocra apogonae, on the five-lined cardinalfish, Cheilodipterus quinquelineatus. Int J Parasitol 39:577–583PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Geuze RH, Schaafsma SM, Lust JM, Bouma A, Schiefenhövel W, Groothuis TGG (2012) Plasticity of lateralization: schooling predicts hand preference but not hand skill asymmetry in a non-industrial society. Neuropsychologia 50:612–620PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Gotanda KM, Turgeon K, Kramer DL (2009) Body size and reserve protection affect flight initiation distance in parrotfishes. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 63:1563–1572CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Grutter AS (1994) Spatial and temporal variations of the ectoparasites of seven reef fish species from Lizard Island and Heron Island, Australia. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 115:21–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Heatwole SJ, Fulton CJ (2012) Behavioural flexibility in reef fishes responding to a rapidly changing wave environment. Mar Biol 160:677–689CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hori M (1993) Frequency-dependent natural selection in the handedness of scale-eating cichlid fish. Science 260:216–219PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Jozet-Alves C, Viblanc VA, Romagny S, Dacher M, Healy SD, Dickel L (2012) Visual lateralization is task and age dependent in cuttlefish, Sepia officinalis. Anim Behav 83:1313–1318CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Lee HJ, Kusche H, Meyer A (2012) Handed foraging behavior in scale-eating cichlid fish: its potential role in shaping morphological asymmetry. PLoS One 7:e44670PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Mandel JT, Ratcliffe JM, Cerasale DJ, Winkler DW (2008) Laterality and flight: concurrent tests of side-bias and optimality in flying tree swallows. PLoS One 3:e1748PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Östlund-Nilsson S, Curtis L, Nilsson GE, Grutter AS (2005) Parasitic isopod Anilocra apogonae, a drag for the cardinal fish Cheilodipterus quinquelineatus. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 287:209–216CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Plaut I (2001) Critical swimming speed: its ecological relevance. Comp Biochem Physiol A Mol Integr Physiol 131:41–50PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. R Development Core Team (2010) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. ( Accessed 22 Apr 2010
  28. Reddon AR, Balshine S (2010) Lateralization in response to social stimuli in a cooperatively breeding cichlid fish. Behav Process 85:68–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Reddon AR, Hurd PL (2009) Individual differences in cerebral lateralization are associated with shy–bold variation in the convict cichlid. Anim Behav 77:189–193CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Roche DG, Strong LE, Binning SA (2013a) Prevalence of the parasitic cymothoid isopod Anilocra nemipteri on its fish host at Lizard Island, Great Barrier Reef. Aust J Zool 60:330–333CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Roche DG, Binning SA, Bosiger Y, Johansen JL, Rummer JL (2013b) Finding the best estimates of metabolic rates in a coral reef fish. J Exp Biol 216:2103–2110PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Rogers LJ, Andrew RJ (2002) Comparative vertebrate lateralization. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Rogers LJ, Zucca P, Vallortigara G (2004) Advantages of having a lateralized brain. Proc R Soc Lond B 271:S420–S422CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Schaafsma SM, Riedstra BJ, Pfannkuche KA, Bouma A, Groothuis TGG (2009) Epigenesis of behavioural lateralization in humans and other animals. Philos T Roy Soc B 364:915–927CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Sovrano VA, Dadda M, Bisazza A (2005) Lateralized fish perform better than nonlateralized fish in spatial reorientation tasks. Behav Brain Res 163:122–127PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Stewart WJ, Cardenas GS, McHenry MJ (2013) Zebrafish larvae evade predators by sensing water flow. J Exp Biol 216:388–398PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Svendsen JC, Tudorache C, Jordan AD, Steffensen JF, Aarestrup K, Domenici P (2010) Partition of aerobic and anaerobic swimming costs related to gait transitions in a labriform swimmer. J Exp Biol 213:2177–2183PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Takeuchi Y, Hori M, Myint O, Kohda M (2010) Lateral bias of agonistic responses to mirror images and morphological asymmetry in the Siamese fighting fish (Betta splendens). Behav Brain Res 208:106–111PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Vallortigara G, Rogers LJ (2005) Survival with an asymmetrical brain: advantages and disadvantages of cerebral lateralization. Behav Brain Sci 28:575–633PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Dominique G. Roche
    • 1
    • 2
  • Sandra A. Binning
    • 1
    • 2
  • Laura E. Strong
    • 3
  • Jaclyn N. Davies
    • 4
  • Michael D. Jennions
    • 1
  1. 1.Division of Evolution, Ecology and Genetics, Research School of BiologyAustralian National UniversityCanberraAustralia
  2. 2.Australian Research Council Centre of Excellence for Coral Reef StudiesCanberraAustralia
  3. 3.Department of BiologyUniversity of Puget SoundTacomaUSA
  4. 4.School of Marine and Tropical BiologyJames Cook UniversityTownsvilleAustralia

Personalised recommendations