Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology

, Volume 67, Issue 8, pp 1285–1293 | Cite as

Vivid birds respond more to acoustic signals of predators

  • Lexi Journey
  • Jonathan P. Drury
  • Michael Haymer
  • Kate Rose
  • Daniel T. Blumstein
Original Paper

Abstract

Because conspicuous morphology such as colorful plumage may increase predation risk, we aimed to see if variation in plumage coloration could explain variation in avian anti-predator behavior. We included several measures of plumage coloration: human perception of vividness from images in field guides, total intensity from reflectance spectra of museum skins, contrasts calculated from physiological models of these spectra parameterized for both raptors and humans, chroma, and spectral saturation. We investigated how well these measurements predicted risk assessment in ten species of birds in St. John, U.S. Virgin Islands. We quantified how each species responded to playbacks of a predator’s calls and compared this response to that elicited by songs from a non-predatory, sympatric bird. We found that human-determined measures of vividness best predicted anti-predator responses of birds—more vividly colored species responded more to predators than duller species. No spectrophotometric variable explained variation in species reactions to a predator call. Our results suggest that vivid birds may compensate for their conspicuousness by being more responsive to the sound of predators and that more work is needed to better evaluate how animal coloration is quantified in comparative studies.

Keywords

Anti-predator behavior Coloration Spectrophotometry Playback Behavioral plasticity Plumage vividness 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We thank the UCLA Office of Instructional Development, and the Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology for partial support. We thank Greg Grether and Neil Losin for lending equipment and support for the spectrometry analyses, Kathy Molina at the UCLA Dickey Collection for generous assistance in lending and processing specimens, Kimball Garrett at the Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County, David Willard at the Field Museum of Natural History, S. Cardiff and J. Remsen at the Museum of Natural Science at Louisiana State University for lending specimens. We also thank Rafe Boulon for facilitating our field research permits, the staff at Virgin Islands Environmental Resource Station (VIERS) for providing such great hospitality, and the students of the field biology quarter for taking plumage surveys. Thanks also to the Grether lab, Esteban Fernández-Juricic, and three anonymous reviewers for many valuable comments. An NSF Graduate Research Fellowship supported JPD during this study; DTB is supported by the NSF.

Ethical standards

This study was conducted under UCLA ARC Protocol no. 2000-147-31, and permits from the National Park Service (no. VIIS-2009-SCI-0028). All experiments comply with the current laws of the country in which they were performed.

Supplementary material

265_2013_1556_MOESM1_ESM.doc (250 kb)
ESM 1(DOC 250 kb)
265_2013_1556_MOESM2_ESM.doc (171 kb)
ESM 2(DOC 171 kb)

References

  1. Adams JL, Camelio KW, Orique MJ, Blumstein DT (2006) Does information of predators influence general wariness? Behav Ecol Sociobiol 60:742–747CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Andersson S, Örnborg J, Andersson M (1998) Ultraviolet sexual dimorphism and assortative mating in blue tits. Proc R Soc Lond B 265:445–450CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Armenta JK, Dunn PO, Whittingham LA (2008) Quantifying avian sexual dichromatism: a comparison of methods. J Exp Biol 211:2423–2430PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Baker RR, Parker GA (1979) The evolution of bird coloration. Philos T Roy Soc B 287:63–130CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bennett ATD, Cuthill IC, Norris KJ (1994) Sexual selection and the mismeasure of color. Am Nat 144:848–860CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Blumstein DT (2006) Developing an evolutionary ecology of fear: how life history and natural history traits affect disturbance tolerance in birds. Anim Behav 71:389–399CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Blumstein DT, Daniel JC (2007) Quantifying behavior the JWatcher way. Sinauer, Sunderland, MAGoogle Scholar
  8. Blumstein DT, Cooley L, Winternitz J, Daniel JC (2008) Do yellow-bellied marmots respond to predator vocalizations? Behav Ecol Sociobiol 62:457–468CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Brodie ED (1989) Genetic correlations between morphology and antipredator behaviour in natural populations of the garter snake Thamnophis ordinoides. Nature 343:542–543CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Burkhardt D (1989) UV vision: a bird’s eye view of feathers. J Comp Physiol A 164:787–796CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Burns KJ, Shultz AJ (2012) Widespread cryptic dichromatism and ultraviolet reflectance in the largest radiation of neotropical songbirds: implications of accounting for avian vision in the study of plumage evolution. Auk 129:211–221CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cabido C, Galan P, Lopez P, Martin J (2008) Conspicuousness-dependent antipredatory behavior may counteract coloration differences in Iberian rock lizards. Behav Ecol 20:362–370CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Caro T (2005) Antipredator defenses in birds and mammals. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  14. Castilla AM, Bauwens D (1991) Observations on the natural history, present status, and conservation of the insular 1izard Podarcis hispanica atrata on the Columbretes Archipelago, Spain. Biol Conserv 58:69–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Cott HB (1940) Adaptive colouration in animals. Methuen, LondonGoogle Scholar
  16. Cott HB (1946) The edibility of birds: illustrated by five years’ experiments and observations (1941–1945) on the food preferences of the hornet, cat and man; and considered with special reference to the theories of adaptive coloration. Proc Zool Soc London 116:371–524CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Cuadrado M, Martin J, Lopez P (2001) Camouflage and escape decisions in the common chameleon Chamaeleo chamaeleon. Biol J Linn Soc 72:547–554CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Cuthill IC, Bennett ATD, Partridge JC, Maier EJ (1999) Plumage reflectance and the objective assessment of avian sexual dichromatism. Am Nat 153:183–200CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Darwin C (1859) On the origin of species by means of natural selection. John Murray, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  20. Darwin C (1871) The descent of man: and selection in relation to sex. John Murray, Washington, DCCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Doucet SM, Hill GE (2009) Do museum specimens accurately represent wild birds? A case study of carotenoid, melanin, and structural colours in long-tailed manikins Chiroxiphia linearis. J Avian Biol 40:146–156CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Dunn J, Alderfer J (2006) National geographic field guide to the birds of North America, 5th edn. National Geographic Books, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  23. Dunning JB (2008) CRC handbook of avian body masses, 2nd edn. CRC Press, Boca RatonGoogle Scholar
  24. Eaton MD (2005) Human vision fails to distinguish widespread sexual dichromatism among sexually “monochromatic” birds. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 102:10942–10946PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Eaton MD (2007) Avian visual perspective on plumage coloration confirms rarity of sexually monochromatic North American passerines. Auk 124:155–161CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Endler JA (1990) On the measurement and classification of colour in studies of animal colour patterns. Biol J Linn Soc 41:315–352CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Endler JA (1993) The color of light in forests and its implications. Ecol Monogr 63:1-27Google Scholar
  28. Endler JA, Paul W, Mielke J ( 2005) Comparing entire colour patterns as birds see them. Biol J Linnean Soc 86:405–431Google Scholar
  29. Felsenstein J (2004) Inferring phylogenies. Sinauer, SunderlandGoogle Scholar
  30. Fernández-Juricic E, Beauchamp G, Treminio R, Hoover M (2011) Making heads turn: association between head movements during vigilance and perceived predation risk in brown-headed cowbird flocks. Anim Behav 82:573–577CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Fernández-Juricic E, Deisher M, Stark A, Randolet J (2012) Predator detection is limited in microhabitats with high light intensity: An experiment with brown-headed cowbirds. Ethology 118:341–350CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Fjeldså J, Krabbe N (1990) Birds of the high Andes. University of Coopenhagen, Copenhagen Zoological Museum, CoopenhagenGoogle Scholar
  33. Forsman A, Appelqvist S (1998) Visual predators impose correlational selection on prey color pattern and behavior. Behav Ecol 9:409–413CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Gomez D (2006) AVICOL, a program to analyse spectrometric data. http://sites.google.com/site/avicolprogram/. Accessed Oct 2011
  35. Götmark F (1993) Coloration in male birds is favoured by predation in some species and disfavoured in others. Proc R Soc Lond B 253:143–146CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Guilford T (1986) How do ‘warning colours’ work? Conspicuousness may reduce recognition errors in experienced predators. Anim Behav 34:286–288CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Hackett SJ, Kimball RT, Reddy S, Bowie RCK, Braun EL et al (2008) A phylogenomic study of birds reveals their evolutionary history. Science 320:1763–1768PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Håstad O, Ödeen A (2008) Different ranking of avian colors predicted by modeling of retinal function in humans and birds. Am Nat 171:831–838PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Hedrick A (2000) Crickets with extravagant mating songs compensate for predation risk with extra caution. Proc R Soc London, Ser B 267:671–675CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Huhta E, Rytkönen S, Solonen T (2003) Plumage brightness of prey increases predation risk: an among species comparison. Ecology 84:1793–1799CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Husak J, Macedonia J, Fox S, Sauceda R (2006) Predation cost of conspicuous male coloration in collared lizards (Crotaphytus collaris): an experimental test using clay-covered model lizards. Ethology 112:572–580CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Husak JF, Rouse MN (2006) Population variation in escape behavior and limb morphology of collared lizards (Crotaphytus collaris) in Oklahoma. Herpatologica 62:156–163CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Johnsgard PA (1986) Birds of the Rocky Mountains: with particular reference to national parks in the Northern Rocky Mountain region. Colorado Associated University Press, BoulderGoogle Scholar
  44. Jønsson KA, Fjeldså J (2006) A phylogenetic supertree of oscine passerine birds (Aves: Passeri). Zool Scr 35:149–186CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Kramer DL, McLaughlin RL (2001) The behavioral ecology of intermittent locomotion. Am Zool 41:137–153CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Lind J, Cresswell W (2005) Determining the fitness consequences of antipredation behavior. Behav Ecol 16:945–956CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Magrath RD, Pitcher BJ, Dalziell AH (2007) How to be fed but not eaten: nestling responses to parental food calls and the sound of predator’s footsteps. Anim Behav 74:1117–1129CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Maier EJ, Bowmaker JK (1993) Color-vision in the passeriform bird, Leiothrix lutea—correlation of visual pigment absorbency and oil droplet transmission with spectral sensitivity. J Comput Phys A 172:395–301Google Scholar
  49. McAdam AG, Kramer DL (1998) Vigilance as a benefit of intermittent locomotion in small mammals. Anim Behav 55:109–117PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. McNett GD, Marchetti K (2005) Ultraviolet degradation in carotenoid patches: live versus museum specimens of wood warblers (Parulidae). Auk 122:793–802CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Merilata S (1999) Optimization of cryptic coloration in heterogeneous habitats. Biol J Linn Soc 67:151–161CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Merilata S, Lind J (2005) Background-matching and disruptive coloration, and the evolution of cryptic coloration. Proc R Soc London, Ser B 272:665–670CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Miller C, Bee M (2012) Receiver psychology turns 20: is it time for a broader approach? Anim Behav 83:331–343CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Montgomerie R (2006) Analyzing colors. In: Hill EG, McGraw KJ (eds) Bird coloration, vol 1, Mechanism and measurements. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, pp 90–147Google Scholar
  55. National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior (2008) Virgin Islands. GPO:2008-339-126/80073Google Scholar
  56. Neal OJ (2009) Responses to the audio broadcasts of predator vocalizations by eight sympatric primates in Suriname, South America. MSc thesis, Kent State University, Kent, OhioGoogle Scholar
  57. Oberle MW (2008) Caribbean Bird Song: Puerto Rico south to Grenada, with the Bahamas, Caymans, San Andrés. Compact Disc. Cornell Laboratory of Ornithology, Ithaca, NYGoogle Scholar
  58. Ödeen A, Håstad O (2003) Complex distribution of avian color vision systems revealed by sequencing the SWS1 opsin from total DNA. Mol Biol Evol 20:855–861Google Scholar
  59. Paradis E, Claude J, Strimmer K (2004) APE: analyses of phylogenetics and evolution in R language. Bioinforma 20:289–290CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Pohland G, Mullen P (2006) Preservation agents influence UV-coloration of plumage in museum bird skins. J Ornithol 147:464–467CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. QuestionPro (2009) <http://www.questionpro.com/> Survey Analytics LLC, Seattle, WA. Accessed 8 May 2013
  62. Raffaele H (1989) Birds of Puerto Rico and the Virgin Islands. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  63. Raffaele HA, Wiley J, Garrido O, Keith A, Raffaele J (2003) Birds of the West Indies. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  64. Ridgely RS, Gwynne JA (1989) A guide to the birds of Panama: with Costa Rica, Nicaragua, and Honduras. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  65. Rusch DH, Phillip DD (1972) Broad-winged hawk nesting and food habits. Auk 89:139–145CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Scudder RM, Burghardt GM (1983) A comparative study of defensive behavior in three sympatric species of water snakes (Nerodia). Z Tierpsychol 63:17–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Searcy YM, Caine NG (2003) Hawk calls elicit alarm and defensive reactions in captive Geoffroy’s marmosets (Callithrix geoffroyi). Folia Primatol 74:115–125PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Seddon N, Tobias JA, Eaton M, Ödeen A (2010) Human vision can provide a valid proxy for avian perception of sexual dichromatism. Auk 127:283–292CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Shettleworth SJ (1998) Cognition, Evolution, and Behavior. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  70. Sibley DA (2000) The Sibley guide to birds. Alfred A Knopf Inc, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  71. Stiles FG, Skutch AF (1989) A guide to the birds of Costa Rica. Cornell University Press, IthacaGoogle Scholar
  72. Stockman A, MacLeod D, Johnson N (1993) Spectral sensitivities of the human cones. J Optic Soc Am A 10:2491–2520CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Stuart-Fox D, Moussalli A, Marshall N, Owens I (2003) Conspicuous males suffer higher predation risk: visual modeling and experimental evidence from lizards. Anim Behav 56:451–460Google Scholar
  74. Underwood R (1982) Vigilance behaviour in grazing African antelopes. Behaviour 79:81–107CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Vorobyev M, Osorio D, Bennett AT, Marshall NJ, Cuthill IC (1998) Tetrachromacy, oil droplets and bird plumage colours. J Comput Physiol A 183:621–633CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Woodland DJ, Jaafar Z, Knight M (1980) The “pursuit deterrent” function of alarm signals. Am Nat 115:748–753CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Zinner H (1985) On behavioral and sexual dimorphism of Telescopus dhara Forscal 1776 (Reptilia: Serpentes, Colubridae). J Herpetol Assoc Afr 31:5–6Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Lexi Journey
    • 1
  • Jonathan P. Drury
    • 1
  • Michael Haymer
    • 1
  • Kate Rose
    • 1
  • Daniel T. Blumstein
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Ecology and Evolutionary BiologyUniversity of CaliforniaLos AngelesUSA

Personalised recommendations