Social learning drives handedness in nectar-robbing bumblebees
- 600 Downloads
Bumblebees have been found to observe and copy the behaviour of others with regard to floral choices, particularly when investigating novel flower types. They can also learn to make nectar-robbing holes in flowers as a result of encountering them. Here, we investigate handedness in nectar-robbing bumblebees feeding on Rhinanthus minor, a flower that can be robbed from either the right-hand side or the left-hand side. We studied numerous patches of R. minor spread across an alpine landscape; each patch tended to be robbed on either the right or the left. The intensity of side bias increased through the season and was strongest in the most heavily robbed patches. We suggest that bees within patches learn robbing strategies (including handedness) from one another, either by direct observation or from experience with the location of holes, leading to rapid frequency-dependent selection for a common strategy. Primary robbing was predominantly carried out not only by a specialist robbing species, Bombus wurflenii, but also by Bombus lucorum, a widespread generalist. Both species adopted the same handedness within particular flower patches, providing the first evidence for social learning crossing the species boundary in wild insects.
KeywordsBombus Foraging behaviour Floral larceny Learning Apidae Hymenoptera
We would like to thank E. Marín, G.C. Lye, M. Hall, C. Coates and L. Woodall for their assistance during data collection and discussion and Lars Chittka and two anonymous reviewers for their comments on the manuscript.
- Baayen RH (2011) languageR: data sets and functions with “Analyzing linguistic data: a practical introduction to statistics”. R package version 1.4. Available at http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=languageR
- Bates D, Maechler M, Bolker B (2011) lme4: linear mixed-effects models using S4 classes. R package version 0.999375-42. Available at http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=lme4
- Cavalli-Sforza L, Feldman MW (1981) Cultural transmission and evolution: a quantitative approach. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
- Chittka L (1998) Sensorimotor learning in bumblebees: long-term retention and reversal training. J Exp Biol 201:515–524Google Scholar
- Darwin C (1872) The effects of cross and self fertilisation in the vegetable kingdom. Murray, LondonGoogle Scholar
- Giraldeau LA, Caraco T (2000) Social foraging theory. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
- Goulson D (2010) Bumblebees; their behaviour, ecology and conservation. Oxford University Press, Oxford, p 317Google Scholar
- Kwak MM (1979) Effects of bumblebee visits on the seed set of Pedicularis, Rhinanthus and Melampyrum (Scrophulariaceae) in the Netherlands. Acta Botanica Neerlandica 28:177–195Google Scholar
- R Development Core Team (2011) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. ISBN 3-900051-07-0. Available at http://www.R-project.org/
- Sherry DF (2008) Social Learning: Nectar Robbing Spreads Socially in Bumble Beessource: Current Biol 18:R608–R610Google Scholar