Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology

, Volume 67, Issue 7, pp 1131–1139 | Cite as

Mate with the young, kill the old: reversed sexual cannibalism and male mate choice in the spider Micaria sociabilis (Araneae: Gnaphosidae)

Article

Abstract

Female mate choice is regarded as a strong selective force that significantly affects male mating success. In extreme cases, mate rejection can result in sexual cannibalism. However, males may choose between their partners as well. The killing of potential female mates, i.e. reversed form of sexual cannibalism, may be related to male mate choice. We examined male mate choice in the spider Micaria sociabilis, focusing on the roles of female mating status (virgin/mated), size and age. Reversed cannibalism reached its highest frequency in the period of generation overlap, i.e. when young males from the summer generation met old(er) females from the spring generation. These results suggest discrimination against old(er) females. The frequency of cannibalism was not affected by female mating status or female size. However, larger males from the summer generation were more cannibalistic than smaller males from the spring generation. We conclude that reversed sexual cannibalism might be an adaptive mate choice mechanism and can be explained in the context of the aggressive spillover hypothesis.

Keywords

Cannibalism Reversed Female age Selective males 

References

  1. Aisenberg A, Viera C, Costa FG (2009) Daring females, devoted males, and reversed sexual size dimorphism in the sand-dwelling spider Allocosa brasiliensis (Araneae, Lycosidae). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 62:29–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aisenberg A, Costa FG, Gonzáles M (2011) Male sexual cannibalism in a sand-dwelling wolf spider with sex role reversal. Biol J Linn Soc 103:68–75CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Andersson M, Iwasa Y (1996) Sexual selection. Trends Ecol Evol 11:53–58PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Arnqvist G, Henriksson S (1997) Sexual cannibalism in fishing spider and a model for the evolution of sexual cannibalism based on genetic constraints. Evol Ecol 11:255–273CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Austad SN (1982) First male sperm priority in the bowl and doily spider, Frontinella pyramitela (Walckenaer). Evolution 36:777–785CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bel-Venner MC, Dray S, Allainé D, Menu F, Venner S (2008) Unexpected male choosiness for mates in a spider. Proc R Soc Lond B 275:77–82CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bonduriansky R (2001) The evolution of male mate choice in insects: a synthesis of ideas and evidence. Biol Rev 76:305–339PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cross FR, Jackson RR, Pollard SD (2007) Male and female mate-choice decisions by Evarcha culicivora, an east African jumping spider. Ethology 113:90–908CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cross FR, Jackson RR, Pollard SD (2008) Complex display behaviour of Evarcha culicivora, an East African mosquito-eating jumping spider. N Z J Zool 35:151–187CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Dick JTA (1995) The cannibalistic behaviour of two Gammarus species (Crustacea, Amphipoda). J Zool 236:697–706CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Eberhard WG (2004) Why study spider sex: special traits of spiders facilitate studies of sperm competition and cryptic female choice. J Arachnol 32:545–556CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Eberhard WG, Guzman-Gomez S, Catley KM (1993) Correlation between spermathecal morphology and mating systems in spiders. Biol J Linn Soc 50:197–209CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Elgar MA (1992) Sexual cannibalism in spiders and other invertebrates. In: Elgar MA, Crespi BJ (eds) Cannibalism: ecology and evolution among diverse taxa. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 128–155Google Scholar
  14. Elgar MA (1998) Sperm competition and sexual selection in spiders and other arachnids. In: Birkhead T, Møeller AP (eds) Sperm competition and sexual selection. Academic, New York, pp 307–339CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Elgar MA, Nash DR (1988) Sexual cannibalism in the garden spider Araneus diadematus. Anim Behav 36:1511–1517CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Elgar MA, Schneider JM (2004) The evolutionary significance of sexual cannibalism. Adv Study Behav 34:135–163Google Scholar
  17. Foelix RF (1996) The biology of spiders, 2nd edn. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  18. Gaskett AC, Herberstein ME, Downes BJ, Elgar MA (2004) Changes in male mate choice in a sexually cannibalistic orb-web spider (Araneae: Araneidae). Behaviour 141:1197–1210CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Gwynne DT (1991) Sexual competition among females: What causes courtship-role reversal? Trends Ecol Evol 6:118–121PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Haddon M (1995) Avoidance of post-coital cannibalism in the brachyurid paddle crab Ovalipes catharus. Oecologia 104:256–258CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Head G (1995) Selection on fecundity and variation in the degree of sexual size dimorphism among spider species (Class Araneae). Evolution 49:776–781CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Herberstein ME, Schneider JM, Elgar MA (2002) Costs of courtship and mating in a sexually cannibalistic orb-web spider: female mating strategies and their consequences for males. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 51:440–446CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Huber BA (2005) Sexual selection research on spiders: progress and biases. Biol Rev 80:363–385PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Jackson RR (1982) The behaviour of communicating in jumping spiders. In: Witt PN, Rovner JS (eds) Spider communication: mechanisms and ecological significance. Princeton University Press, Princeton, pp 213–247Google Scholar
  25. Jackson RR, Pollard SD (1990) Intraspecific interactions and the function of courtship in mygalomorph spiders: a study of Porrhothele antipodiana (Araneae: Hexathelidae) and a literature review. N Z J Zool 17:499–526CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Johnson JC (2001) Sexual cannibalism in fishing spiders (Dolomedes triton): an evaluation of two explanations for female aggression towards potential mates. Anim Behav 61:905–914CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Johnson JC, Sih A (2005) Pre-copulatory sexual cannibalism in fishing spiders (Dolomedes triton): a role for behavioral syndromes. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 58:390–396CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Kralj-Fišer S, Schneider JM, Justinek Ž, Kalin S, Gregorič M, Pekár S, Kuntner M (2012) Mate quality, not aggressive spillover, explains sexual cannibalism in a size-dimorphic spider. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 66:145–151CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Kvarnemo C, Ahnesjö I (1996) The dynamics of operational sex ratios and competition for mates. Trends Ecol Evol 11:404–408PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Mangel M, Heimpel GE (1998) Reproductive senescence and dynamic oviposition behaviour in insects. Evol Ecol 12:871–879CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Morse DH, Hu HH (2004) Age affects the risk of sexual cannibalism in male crab spiders (Misumena vatia). Am Midl Nat 151(2):318–325CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Moya-Laraño J (2002) Senescence and food limitation in a slowly ageing spider. Funct Ecol 16(6):734–741CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Newman JA, Elgar MA (1991) Sexual cannibalism in orb-weaving spiders: an economic model. Am Nat 138:1372–1395CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Pekár S, Brabec M (2009) Modern analysis of biological data. 1. Generalised Linear Models in R. Scientia, Prague (in Czech)Google Scholar
  35. Pekár S, Brabec M (2012) Modern analysis of biological data. 2. Linear models with correlations in R. Scientia, Prague (in Czech)Google Scholar
  36. Pekár S, Jarab M (2011) Life-history constraints in inaccurate Batesian myrmecomorphic spiders (Araneae: Corinnidae, Gnaphosidae). Eur J Entomol 108(2):255–260Google Scholar
  37. Persons MH, Uetz GW (2005) Sexual cannibalism and mate choice decisions in wolf spiders: influence of male size and secondary sexual characters. Anim Behav 69:83–94CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Prenter J, Macneil C, Elwood RW (2006) Sexual cannibalism and mate choice. Anim Behav 71:481–490CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Pruitt JN, Riechert SE (2009) Male mating preference is associated with risk of pre-copulatory cannibalism in a socially polymorphic spider. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 63:1573–1580CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Pruitt JN, Riechert SE, Harris DJ (2011) Reproductive consequences of male body mass and aggressiveness depend on females’ behavioral types. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 65:1957–1966CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. R Development Core Team (2010) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, ViennaGoogle Scholar
  42. Rittschof CC (2011) Mortality risk affects mating decisions in the spider Nephila clavipes. Behav Ecol 22:350–357CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Rittschof CC, Hilber SA, Tudor MS, St. Mary CM (2012) Modeling male reproductive strategies and optimal mate number in an orb-web spider. Behav Ecol 23:1–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Roggenbuck H, Pekar S, Schneider JM (2011) Sexual cannibalism in the European garden spider Araneus diadematus: the role of female hunger and mate size dimorphism. Anim Behav 81:749–755CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Rutowski RL (1982) Epigamic selection by males as evidenced by courtship partner preferences in the checkered white butterfly (Pieris protodice). Anim Behav 30:108–112CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Schneider JM, Lubin Y (1998) Intersexual conflict in spiders. Oikos 83:496–506CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Schütz D, Taborsky M (2005) Mate choice and sexual conflict in the size dimorphic water spider Argyroneta aquatica (Araneae, Argyronetidae). J Arachnol 33:767–775CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Stoltz JA, McNeil JN, Andrade MCB (2007) Male assess chemical signals to discriminate just-mated females from virgins in redback spiders. Anim Behav 74:1669–1674CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Tsai ML, Dai CF (2003) Cannibalism within mating pairs of the parasitic isopod, Ichthyoxenus fushanensis. J Crustac Biol 23:662–668CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Uhl G, Nessler SH, Schneider JM (2010) Securing paternity in spiders? A review on occurrence and effects of mating plugs and male genital mutilation. Genetica 138:75–104PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Wilder SM, Rypstra AL, Elgar MA (2009) The importance of ecological and phylogenetic conditions for the occurrence and frequency of sexual cannibalism. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 40:21–39CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Botany and Zoology, Faculty of ScienceMasaryk UniversityBrnoCzech Republic

Personalised recommendations