Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology

, Volume 67, Issue 5, pp 837–849 | Cite as

Dissecting the mechanisms underlying old male mating advantage in a butterfly

Original Paper


Selection is expected to maximize an individual’s own genetic reward regardless of the potential fitness consequences for its sexual partners, which may cause sexual conflict. Although performance in holometabolous insects typically diminishes with age, old male mating advantage has been documented in a few species. Whether this pattern arises from female preference for older males based on, e.g., pheromone blends (intersexual selection), or from increased eagerness to mate in older compared to younger males is currently debated. We explore the mechanistic basis of old male mating advantage, using a series of experiments including behavioral as well as manipulative approaches, in the tropical butterfly Bicyclus anynana. Consistent with the residual reproductive value hypothesis, old male mating advantage was associated with a greater eagerness to mate, evidenced by a two times higher flying and courting activity in older than in younger males. In contrast, we found only limited support for a contribution of female preference for older males based on pheromone composition, although male sex pheromones clearly do play a role in mating success. Our results suggest that male behavior may play a primary role in old male mating advantage, and that pheromones are likely of secondary importance only. Male mating success was related to higher overall pheromone titers rather than variation in a single component. A dominant importance of male behavior in determining mating success may result in sexual conflict.


Female choice Intersexual selection Male mating success Male sex pheromones Residual reproductive value 


  1. Arnqvist G, Rowe L (2005) Sexual conflict. Princeton University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  2. Bergmann M, Gotthard K, Wiklund C (2011) Mate acquisition by females in a butterfly: the effects of mating status and age on female mate-locating behaviour. Anim Behav 81:225–229CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Brakefield PM (1997) Phenotypic plasticity and fluctuating asymmetry as responses to environmental stress in the butterfly Bicyclus anynana. In: Bijlsma RR, Loeschcke V (eds) Environmental stress: adaptation and Evolution. Birkhäuser, Basel, pp 65–78CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Brakefield PM, Reitsma N (1991) Phenotypic plasticity, seasonal climate and the population biology of Bicyclus butterflies (Satyridae) in Malawi. Ecol Entomol 16:291–303CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Brooks R, Kemp DJ (2001) Can old males deliver the good genes? Trends Ecol Evol 16:308–313PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cameron PJ, Wallace AR, Madhusudhan VV, Wigley PJ, Qureshi MS, Walker GP (2005) Mating frequency in dispersing potato tuber moth, Phthorimaea operculella, and its influence on the design of refugia to manage resistance in Bt transgenic crops. Entomol Exp Appl 115:323–332CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Chambers GM, Klowden MJ (2001) Age of Anopheles gambiae Giles male mosquitoes at time of mating influences female oviposition. J Vector Ecol 26:196–201PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Chapman T (2001) Seminal fluid-mediated fitness traits in Drosophila. Heredity 87:511–521PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Chapman T, Liddle LF, Kalb JM, Wolfner MF, Partridge P (1995) Cost of mating in Drosophila melanogaster is mediated by male accessory gland products. Nature 373:241–244PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Chapman T, Takahisa M, Smith HK, Partridge P (1998) Interactions of mating, egg production and death rates in females of the Mediterranean fruit fly, Ceratitis capitata. Proc R Soc Lond B 265:1879–1894CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Conner J (1989) Older males have higher insemination success in a beetle. Anim Behav 39:503–509CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Costanzo K, Monteiro A (2007) The use of chemical and visual clues in female choice in the butterfly Bicyclus anynana. Proc R Soc Lond B 274:845–851CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Enquist M, Leimar O (1990) The evolution of fatal fighting. Anim Behav 39:1–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Ferkau C, Fischer K (2006) Costs of reproduction in male Bicyclus anynana and Pieris napi butterflies: effects of mating history and food limitation. Ethology 112:1117–1127CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Fischer K (2006) Reduced male mating vigor in selection lines of the butterfly Bicyclus anynana. J Insect Behav 19:657–668CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Fischer K (2007) Control of female reproduction and a survival cost to mating in a butterfly. Ecol Entomol 32:674–681CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Fischer K, Bot ANM, Brakefield PM, Zwaan BJ (2003) Fitness consequences of temperature-mediated egg size plasticity in a butterfly. Funct Ecol 17:803–810CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Fischer K, Perlick J, Galetz T (2008) Residual reproductive value and male mating success: older males do better. Proc R Soc Lond B 275:1517–1524CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Fricke C, Maklakow AA (2007) Male age does not affect female fitness in a polyandrous beetle Callosobruchus maculatus. Anim Behav 74:541–555CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Geister TL, Fischer K (2007) Testing the beneficial acclimation hypothesis: cool males – hot love? Behav Ecol 18:658–664CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Geister TL, Lorenz MW, Meyering-Vos M, Hoffmann KH, Fischer K (2008) Effects of temperature on reproductive output, egg provisioning, juvenile hormone and vitellogenin titres in the butterfly Bicyclus anynana. J Insect Physiol 54:1253–1260PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Harari AR, Zahavi T, Thiéry T (2011) Fitness cost of pheromone production in signaling female moth. Evolution 65:1572–1582PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Janowitz SA, Fischer K (2010) Costing reproduction: effects of mating opportunity on mating success in male Bicyclus anynana butterflies. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 64:1999–2006CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Janowitz SA, Fischer K (2012) Polyandry in Bicyclus anynana butterflies results from sexual conflict over mating. Ethology 118:1140–1148CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Johnstone RA, Rands SA, Evans MR (2009) Sexual selection and condition-dependence. J Evol Biol 22:2387–2394PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Judge KA (2011) Do male field crickets, Gryllus bimaculatus, signal their age? Anim Behav 81:185–194CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Karl I, Fischer K (2009) Altitudinal and environmental variation in lifespan in the Copper butterfly Lycaena tityrus. Funct Ecol 23:1132–1138CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Karl I, Fischer K (2013) Old male mating advantage results from sexual conflict in a butterfly. Anim Behav 85:143–149CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Karlsson B (1994) Feeding habits and change of body compositions with age in three nymphalid butterflies species. Oikos 69:224–230CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Kemp DJ (2002) Butterfly contests and flight physiology: why do older males fight harder? Behav Ecol 213:456–461CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Kemp DJ (2006) Ageing, reproductive value, and the evolution of lifetime fighting behaviour. Biol J Linn Soc 88:565–578CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Kemp DJ, Rutowski RL (2004) A survival cost to mating in a polyandrous butterfly, Colias eurytheme. Oikos 105:65–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Kemp DJ, Wiklund C (2001) Fighting without weaponry: a review of male-male contest competition in butterflies. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 49:429–442CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Kuijper B, Stewart AD, Rice WR (2006) The cost of mating rises nonlinearly with copulation frequency in a laboratory population of Drosophila melanogaster. J Evol Biol 19:1795–1802PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Lappin AK, Brandt Y, Husak JF, Makedonia JM, Kemp DJ (2006) Gaping displays reveal and amplify a mechanistically based index of weapon performance. Am Nat 168:100–113PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Larsen TB (1991) The butterflies of Kenya and their natural history. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  37. Marden JH, Waage JK (1990) Escalated damselfly territorial contests are energetic wars of attrition. Anim Behav 39:954–959CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Mays HL, Hill GE (2004) Choosing mates: good genes versus genes that are a good fit. Trends Ecol Evol 19:554–559PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Milonas PG, Andow DA (2010) Virgin male age and mating success in Ostrinia nubilalis (Lepidoptera: Crambidae). Anim Behav 79:509–514CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Nieberding CM, de Vos H, Schneider MV, Lassance J-M, Estramil N, Andersson J, Bång J, Hedenström E, Löfstedt C, Brakefield PM (2008) Male sex pheromones in the butterfly Bicyclus anynana: towards an evolutionary analysis. PLoS One 3:e2751PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Nieberding C, Fischer K, Saastamoinen M, Allen CE, Wallin EA, Hedenström E, Brakefield PM (2012) Cracking the olfactory code of a butterfly: the scent of ageing. Ecol Lett 5:415–424CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Parker GA (1974) Assessment strategy and the evolution of fighting behaviour. J Theor Biol 47:223–243PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Paukku S, Kotiaho JS (2005) Cost of reproduction in Callosobruchus maculatus: effects of mating on male longevity and the effect of male mating status on female longevity. J Insect Physiol 51:1220–1226PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Perez-Staplez D, Martínez-Hernández MG, Aluja M (2010) Male age and experience increases mating success but not female fitness in the Mexican fruit fly. Ethology 116:778–786Google Scholar
  45. Rivero A, Alatalo RV, Kotiaho JS, Mappes J, Parri S (2000) Acoustic signalling in a wolf spider: can signal characteristics predict male quality? Anim Behav 60:187–194PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Robertson KA, Monteiro A (2005) Female Bicyclus anynana butterflies choose males on the basis of their dorsal UV-reflective eyespot pupils. Proc R Soc Lond B 272:1541–1546CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Ryan MJ (1988) Energy, calling and selection. Am Zool 28:885–898Google Scholar
  48. Schneider JM, Lesmono K (2009) Courtship raises male fertilization through post mating sexual selection in a spider. Proc R Soc Lond B 276:3105–3111CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Simmons LW, Zuk M (1991) Variability in call structure and pairing success of male field crickets, Gryllus bimaculatus: the effects of age, size, and parasite load. Anim Behav 44:1145–1152CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Srivastava S, Omkar (2004) Age-specific mating and reproductive senescence in the seven-spotted ladybird, Coccinella septempunctata. J Appl Entomol 128:452–458CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Trivers RL (1972) Parental investment and sexual selection. In: Campell B (ed) Sexual selection and the descent of man. Chicago Press, Chicago, pp 136–179Google Scholar
  52. Vahed K (1998) The function of nuptial feeding in insects — review of empirical studies. Biol Rev 73:43–78CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Velando A, Beamonte-Barrientos R, Torres R (2006) Pigment-based skin colour in the blue-footed booby: an honest signal of current condition used by females to adjust reproductive investment. Oecologia 149:535–542PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Walther BH, Clayton DH (2005) Elaborate ornaments are costly to maintain: evidence for high maintenance handicaps. Behav Ecol 16:89–95CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Wedell N, Karlsson B (2003) Paternal investment directly affects female reproductive effort in an insect. Proc R Soc Lond B 270:2065–2071CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Wyatt TD (2003) Pheromones and animal behavior. Communication by smell and taste. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Zuk M (1988) Parasite load, body size, and age of wild-caught male field crickets (Orthoptera: Gryllidae): effects on sexual selection. Evolution 42:969–976CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Isabell Karl
    • 1
  • Stéphanie Heuskin
    • 2
  • Klaus Fischer
    • 1
  1. 1.Zoological Institute and MuseumUniversity of GreifswaldGreifswaldGermany
  2. 2.Evolutionary Ecology and Genetics Group, Biodiversity Research Centre, Earth and Life InstituteUniversité catholique de LouvainLouvain-la-NeuveBelgium

Personalised recommendations