Advertisement

Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology

, Volume 67, Issue 4, pp 699–707 | Cite as

Measuring facial symmetry in the wild: a case study in Olive Baboons (Papio anubis)

  • Rebecca A. Boulton
  • Caroline RossEmail author
Methods

Abstract

Individuals under stress and those of intrinsically low quality may have insufficient resources to invest in developing equally on both sides. Such individuals may thus display higher levels of fluctuating asymmetry (FA)—small, random departures from perfect bilateral symmetry. These small deviations from symmetry are often less than 1 % of trait size, similar to variation in symmetry generated by measurement error. Studies regarding FA must thoroughly assess measurement error if reliable conclusions regarding FA and fitness parameters are to be drawn. Although many studies regarding facial symmetry in humans have been conducted, few have been carried out on non-human primates. The primary aim of this study was to assess whether facial FA in a non-human primate, the olive baboon (Papio anubis) can be reliably measured from digital photographs. Facial FA was measured in three sets of bilaterally symmetrical landmarks from digital images of 35 olive baboons at Gashaka-Gumti National Park, Nigeria. Measurement error was found to be low indicating a high level of reliability based on comparisons of values from two photos of the same individual (r = 0.85). Measurement error was found to be related to the size of the face. This suggests that orientation error increases in large faces and could potentially influence FA scores. These findings highlight the need for FA studies to measure and control error caused by orientation and position of subjects if FA is to be of utility to behavioural ecology and conservation (e.g. if FA reflects whether individuals in a population are suffering from environmental or genetic stress).

Keywords

Developmental stability Fluctuating asymmetry Facial asymmetry Measurement error Papio anubis 

Notes

Acknowledgements

Field work benefited from a permit by the Nigerian National Parks Service to the GPP, which receives its core funding from the Chester Zoo Nigeria Biodiversity Programme. NCF/WWF-UK provided logistical support. We thank Volker Sommer for his work as Director of the GPP and for all the help and support he has given us. Thanks also to our field assistant Ibrahim Usman, his help with identification and sample collection was vital, and to Halidi Ilyusu who is a pivotal member of our team carrying out long-term monitoring of the baboons. This paper was improved by constructive comments from two referees and from Elise Huchard; we thank all of them for this. Many thanks also to Balbir Josen, Mary McKenzie and Amanda Morgan for their technical advice and assistance. RB also thanks her family and friends for their advice and support. This is a GPP publication.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Alonso-Alvarez C, Bertrand S, Faivre B, Chastel O, Sorci G (2007) Testosterone and oxidative stress: the oxidation handicap hypothesis. Proc R Soc Lond B 274:819–825CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Beardmore J (1960) Developmental stability in constant and fluctuating temperatures. Heredity 14:411–422CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Breuer T, Robbins MM, Boesch C (2007) Using photogrammetry and color scoring to assess sexual dimorphism in wild western gorillas (Gorilla gorilla). Am J Phys Anthropol 134:369–382PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Clarke G, McKenzie J (1992) Fluctuating asymmetry as a quality control indicator for insect mass rearing projects. J Econ Entomol 85:2045–2050Google Scholar
  5. Cuervo JJ, Dhaoui M, Espeso G (2011) Fluctuating asymmetry and blood parameters in three endangered gazelle species. Mammal Biol 76:489–505Google Scholar
  6. Fleagle J (1999) Primate adaptation and evolution. Elsevier, LondonGoogle Scholar
  7. Folstad I, Karter A (1992) Parasites, bright males and the immunocompetence handicap. Am Nat 139:603–622CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Gangestad S, Bennett K, Thornhill R (2001) a latent variable model of developmental instability in relation to men's sexual behaviour. Proc R Soc Lond B 268:1677–1684CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Grammer K, Thornhill R (1994) Human (Homo sapiens) facial attractiveness and sexual selection: the role of symmetry and averageness. J Comp Psychol 108:233–242PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Halgrimsson B, Wilmore K, Hall B (2002) Canalization, developmental stability, and morphological integration in primate limbs. Yearb Phys Anthropol 45:131–158CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Higham J, Warren Y, Adanu J, Umaru B, Maclarnon A, Sommer V et al (2009) Living on the edge: life-history of olive baboons at Gashaka-Gumti National Park, Nigeria. Am J Primatol 71:1–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Klingenberg C (2003) A developmental perspective on developmental instability: theory, models, and mechanisms. In: Polak M (ed) Developmental instability: causes and consequences, 1st edn. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 14–34Google Scholar
  13. Lagesen K, Folstad I (1998) Antler asymmetry and immunity in reindeer. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 44:135–142CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Lalumiere M, Harris G, Rice M (1999) Birth order and fluctuating asymmetry: a first look. Proc R Soc Lond B 266:2351–2354CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Leamy L (1993) Morphological integration of fluctuating asymmetry in the mouse mandible. Genetica 89:139–153CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Leary R, Allendorf F (1989) Fluctuating asymmetry as an indicator of stress: implications for conservation biology. Trends Ecol Evol 4:214–217PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Leigh S (1992) Patterns of variation in the ontogeny of primate body size dimorphism. J Hum Evol 23:27–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Lessels CM, Boag PT (1987) Unrepeatable repeatabilities: a common mistake. Auk 104:116–121CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Leung B, Forbes M, Houle D (2000) Fluctuating asymmetry as a bioindicator of stress: comparing efficacy of analyses involving multiple traits. Am Nat 155:101–115PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Little A, Benedict C, Jones C, Waitt B, Tiddeman D, Feinberg D (2008) Symmetry is related to sexual dimorphism in faces: data across culture and species. PLoS One 3:e2106PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Little AC, Paukner A, Woodward RA, Suomi SJ (2012) Facial asymmetry is negatively related to condition in female macaque monkeys. Behav Ecol Sociobiol. doi: 10.1007/s00265-012-1386-4
  22. Manning J, Chamberlain A (1993) Fluctuating asymmetry, sexual selection and canine teeth in primates. Proc R Soc Lond B 251:83–87CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Manning J, Chamberlain A (1994) Fluctuating asymmetry in gorilla canines: a sensitive indicator of environmental stress. Proc R Soc Lond B 255:189–193Google Scholar
  24. Mather K (1953) Genetic control of stability in development. Heredity 7:297–336CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Møller A (1990) Fluctuating asymmetry in male sexual ornaments may reliably reversal male quality. Anim Behav 40:1185–1187CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Møller A (1999) Asymmetry as a predictor of growth, fecundity and survival. Ecol Lett 2:149–156CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Møller A, Hoglund J (1991) Patterns of fluctuating asymmetry in avian feather ornaments: implications for models of sexual selection. Proc R Soc Lond B 245:1–5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Møller A, Pomiankowski A (1993) Fluctuating asymmetry and sexual selection. Genetica 89:267–279CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Møller A, Swaddle J (1997) Asymmetry, developmental stability, and evolution. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  30. Özener B, Fink B (2010) Facial symmetry in young girls and boys from a slum and a control area of Ankara, Turkey. Evol Hum Behav 31:436–441CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Palmer A (2000) Quasireplication and the contract of error: lessons from sex ratios, heritabilities and fluctuating asymmetry. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 31:441–480CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Palmer A, Strobeck C (1986) Fluctuating asymmetry: measurement, analysis, patterns. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 17:391–421CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Palmer A, Strobeck C (2003) Fluctuating asymmetry analyses revisited. In: Polak M (ed) Developmental instability: causes and consequences. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 279–319Google Scholar
  34. Rhodes G, Zebrowitz L, Clark A, Kalick S, Hightower A, McKay R (2001) Do facial averageness and symmetry signal health? Evol Hum Behav 22:31–46PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Richtsmeier J, Deleon V, Lele S (2003) The promise of geometric morphometrics. Yearb Phys Anthropol 45:63–91Google Scholar
  36. Rohlf FJ (2006) TPSdig2.1. State University of New York, Stony Brook. Available from http://life.bio.sunysb.edu/morph
  37. Ross C, Warren Y, Maclarnon AM, Higham JP (2011) How different are Gashaka’s baboons? Forest and open country populations compared. In: Sommer V, Ross C (eds) The primates of Gashaka: socioecology and conservation in Nigeria's biodiversity hotspot. Springer, London, pp 385–411Google Scholar
  38. Scheib J, Gangestad S, Thornhill R (1999) Facial attractiveness, symmetry and cues of good genes. Proc R Soc Lond B 266:1913–1917CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Sefcek JA, King JE (2007) Chimpanzee facial symmetry: a biometric measure of chimpanzee health. Am J Primatol 69:1257–1263PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Shackelford TK, Larsen RJ (1997) Facial asymmetry as an indicator of psychological, emotional, and physiological distress. J Pers Soc Psychol 72:456–466PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Simmons LW, Rhodes G, Peters M, Koelher N (2004) Are human preferences for facial symmetry focused on signals of developmental instability? Behav Ecol 15:864–871CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. SPSS Statistics (2009) version 17.0. SPSS, IL, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  43. Swaddle J, Witter M, Cuthill I (1994) The analysis of fluctuating asymmetry. Anim Behav 48:986–989CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Tomkins J, Simmons L (2003) Fluctuating asymmetry and sexual selection: paradigm shifts, publication bias and observer expectation. In: Polak M (ed) Developmental stability: causes and consequences. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 231–261Google Scholar
  45. Van Valen L (1962) A study of fluctuating asymmetry. Evolution 16:125–142CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Waitt C, Little A (2006) Preferences for symmetry in conspecific facial shape among Macaca mulatta. Int J Primatol 27:133–145CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Warren Y (2003) Olive baboons (Papio cynocephalus anubis): behaviour, ecology and human conflict in Gashaka Gumti National Park, Nigeria. Ph.D thesis, Roehampton UniversityGoogle Scholar
  48. Warren Y, Higham J, Maclarnon A, Ross C (2011) Crop-raiding and commensalism in olive baboons: the costs and benefits of living with humans. In: Sommer V, Ross C (eds) The primates of Gashaka: socioecology and conservation in Nigeria's biodiversity hotspot. Springer, London, pp 307–332Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Centre for Research in Evolutionary Anthropology, Department of Life SciencesRoehampton UniversityLondonUK
  2. 2.BryherUK

Personalised recommendations