Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology

, Volume 67, Issue 3, pp 373–381 | Cite as

Fitness benefits of coalitionary aggression in male chimpanzees

  • Ian C. Gilby
  • Lauren J. N. Brent
  • Emily E. Wroblewski
  • Rebecca S. Rudicell
  • Beatrice H. Hahn
  • Jane Goodall
  • Anne E. Pusey
Original Paper

Abstract

Coalitionary aggression occurs when at least two individuals jointly direct aggression at one or more conspecific targets. Scientists have long argued that this common form of cooperation has positive fitness consequences. Nevertheless, despite evidence that social bond strength (which is thought to promote coalition formation) is correlated with fitness in primates, cetaceans, and ungulates, few studies have directly examined whether coalitionary aggression improves reproductive success. We tested the hypothesis that among free-ranging chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes schweinfurthii), participation in coalitionary aggression increases reproductive output. Using 14 years of genetic and behavioral data from Gombe National Park, Tanzania, we found that coalitionary aggression increased a male’s chances of (A) siring offspring, compared to other males of similar dominance rank, and (B) ascending in rank, a correlate of future reproductive output. Because male chimpanzees form coalitions with many others within a complex network, we used social network analysis to identify the types of connections correlated with these fitness benefits. The beneficiaries of coalitionary aggression were males with the highest “betweenness”—that is, those who tended to have coalition partners who themselves did not form coalitions with each other. This suggests that beyond simply recognizing third-party relationships, chimpanzees may use this knowledge to choose coalition partners. If so, this is a significant step forward in our knowledge of the adaptive value of social intelligence. Regardless of mechanism, however, this is the first evidence of genetic benefits of coalitionary aggression in this species, and therefore has important implications for understanding the evolution of cooperation.

Keywords

Coalition Chimpanzee Social network analysis Cooperation Paternity Dominance rank Social bonds 

Supplementary material

265_2012_1457_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (436 kb)
ESM 1(PDF 435 kb)

References

  1. Boesch C, Boesch-Achermann H (2000) The chimpanzees of the Taï Forest. Oxford University Press, Oxford, Behavioural Ecology and EvolutionGoogle Scholar
  2. Borgatti S (2002) Netdraw network visualization. Analytic Technologies, Harvard, MAGoogle Scholar
  3. Borgatti S, Everett M, Freeman L (2002) UCINET for Windows: software for social network analysis. Analytic Technologies, Harvard, MAGoogle Scholar
  4. Brent LJN, Lehmann J, Ramos-Fernández G (2011) Social network analysis in the study of nonhuman primates: a historical perspective. Am J Primatol 73:720–730PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bygott D (1979) Agonistic behaviour, dominance and social structure in wild chimpanzees of the Gombe National Park. In: Hamburg DA, McCown ER (eds) The great apes. Benjamin/Cummings, Menlo Park, CA, pp 405–427Google Scholar
  6. Cameron EZ, Setsaas TH, Linklater WL (2009) Social bonds between unrelated females increase reproductive success in feral horses. P Natl Acad Sci USA 106:13850–13853CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Chapais B (1992) The role of alliances in the social inheritance of rank among female primates. In: Harcourt AH, de Waal FBM (eds) Coalitions and alliances in humans and other animals. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 29–59Google Scholar
  8. Cheney DL (2011) Extent and limits of cooperation in animals. P Natl Acad Sci USA 108:10902–10909CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cheney DL, Seyfarth RM (2007) Baboon metaphysics: the evolution of a social mind. Chicago University Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  10. Christakis NA, Fowler JH (2007) The spread of obesity in a large social network over 32 years. New Engl J Med 357:370–379PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Connor RC, Smolker RA, Richards AF (1992) Two levels of alliance formation among male bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops sp.). P Natl Acad Sci USA 89:987–990CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Croft DP, James R, Krause J (2008) Exploring animal social networks. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  13. de Vries H (1995) An improved test of linearity in dominance hierarchies containing unknown or tied relationships. Anim Behav 50:1375–1389CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. de Waal FBM (1982) Chimpanzee politics: power and sex among apes. Harper & Row, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  15. Diggle PJ, Heagerty PJ, Liang K-Y, Zeger SL (2002) Analysis of longitudinal data, 2nd edn. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  16. Duffy KG, Wrangham RW, Silk JB (2007) Male chimpanzees exchange political support for mating opportunities. Curr Biol 17:R586–R587PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Dunbar RIM, Shultz S (2007) Evolution in the social brain. Science 317:1344–1347PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Feh C (1999) Alliances and reproductive success in Camargue stallions. Anim Behav 57:705–713PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Flack JC, Girvan M, de Waal FBM, Krakauer DC (2006) Policing stabilizes construction of social niches in primates. Nature 439:426–429PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Frère CH, Krützen M, Mann J, Connor RC, Bejder L, Sherwin WB (2010) Social and genetic interactions drive fitness variation in a free-living dolphin population. P Natl Acad Sci USA 107:19949–19954CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Girvan M, Newman MEJ (2002) Community structure in social and biological networks. P Natl Acad Sci USA 99:7821–7826CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Goodall J (1986) The chimpanzees of Gombe: patterns of behavior. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  23. Harcourt AH, de Waal FBM (1992) Coalitions and alliances in humans and other animals. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  24. Higham JP, Maestripieri D (2010) Revolutionary coalitions in male rhesus macaques. Behaviour 147:1889–1908CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Jennings DJ, Carlin CM, Hayden TJ, Gammell MP (2011) Third-party intervention behaviour during fallow deer fights: the role of dominance, age, fighting and body size. Anim Behav 81:1217–1222CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Kalinowski ST, Taper ML, Marshall TC (2007) Revising how the computer program CERVUS accommodates genotyping error increases success in paternity assignment. Mol Ecol 16:1099–1106PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Krützen M, Barré LM, Connor RC, Mann J, Sherwin WB (2004) ‘O father: where art thou?’—paternity assessment in an open fission–fusion society of wild bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops sp.) in Shark Bay, Western Australia. Mol Ecol 13:1975–1990PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Lusseau D, Newman MEJ (2004) Identifying the role that animals play in their social networks. Biol Lett 271:477–481Google Scholar
  29. Marshall TC, Slate J, Kruuk L, Pemberton JM (1998) Statistical confidence for likelihood-based paternity in natural populations. Mol Ecol 7:639–655PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. McDonald DB (2007) Predicting fate from early connectivity in a social network. P Natl Acad Sci USA 104:10910–10914CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Mitani JC (2009) Male chimpanzees form enduring and equitable social bonds. Anim Behav 77:633–640CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Mitani JC, Watts DP, Pepper JW, Merriwether DA (2002) Demographic and social constraints on male chimpanzee behaviour. Anim Behav 64:727–737CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Muller MN, Mitani JC (2005) Conflict and cooperation in wild chimpanzees. Adv Stud Behav 35:275–331CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Newton-Fisher NE (1999) Association by male chimpanzees: a social tactic? Behaviour 136:705–730CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Newton-Fisher NE (2002) Relationships of male chimpanzees in the Budongo Forest, Uganda. In: Boesch C, Hohmann G, Marchant L (eds) Behavioural diversity in chimpanzees and bonobos. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 112–124Google Scholar
  36. Nishida T (1983) Alpha status and agonistic alliance in wild chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes schweinfurthii). Primates 24:318–336CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Nishida T, Hosaka K (1996) Coalition strategies among adult male chimpanzees of the Mahale Mountains, Tanzania. In: McGrew WC, Marchant L, Nishida T (eds) Great ape societies. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 114–134CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Nishida T, Zamma K, Matsusaka T, Inaba A, McGrew WC (2010) Chimpanzee behavior in the wild: an audio-visual encyclopedia. Springer, TokyoCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Noë R (1992) Alliance formation among male baboons: shopping for profitable partners. In: Harcourt AH, de Waal FBM (eds) Coalitions and alliances in humans and other animals. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 285–321Google Scholar
  40. Riss D, Goodall J (1977) The recent rise to the alpha-rank in a population of free-living chimpanzees. Folia Primatol 27:134–151PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Schülke O, Bhagavatula J, Vigilant L, Ostner J (2010) Social bonds enhance reproductive success in male macaques. Curr Biol 20:2207–2210PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Seyfarth RM (1977) A model of social grooming among adult female monkeys. J Theor Biol 65:671–698PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Silk JB (2002) Kin selection in primate groups. Int J Primatol 23:849–875CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Silk JB (2007) Social components of fitness in primate groups. Science 317:1347–1351PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Silk JB, Alberts SC, Altmann J (2003) Social bonds of female baboons enhance infant survival. Science 302:1231–1234PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Silk JB, Beehner JC, Bergman TJ, Crockford C, Engh AL, Moscovice LR, Wittig RM, Seyfarth RM, Cheney DL (2010) Strong and consistent social bonds enhance the longevity of female baboons. Curr Biol 20:1359–1361PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Smith JE, Van Horn RC, Powning KS, Cole AR, Graham KE, Memenis SK, Holekamp KE (2010) Evolutionary forces favoring intragroup coalitions among spotted hyenas and other animals. Behav Ecol 21:284–303CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Tabachnick B, Fidell L (2007) Using multivariate statistics, 5th edn. Allyn & Bacon, Boston, MAGoogle Scholar
  49. Wasserman S, Faust K (1994) Social network analysis: methods and applications. Structural analysis in the social sciences. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Watts DP (1998) Coalitionary mate guarding by male chimpanzees at Ngogo, Kibale National Park, Uganda. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 44:43–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Wroblewski EE, Murray CM, Keele BF, Schumacher-Stankey JC, Hahn BH, Pusey AE (2009) Male dominance rank and reproductive success in chimpanzees, Pan troglodytes schweinfurthii. Anim Behav 77:873–885PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ian C. Gilby
    • 1
  • Lauren J. N. Brent
    • 2
  • Emily E. Wroblewski
    • 3
  • Rebecca S. Rudicell
    • 4
  • Beatrice H. Hahn
    • 5
    • 6
  • Jane Goodall
    • 7
  • Anne E. Pusey
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Evolutionary AnthropologyDuke UniversityDurhamUSA
  2. 2.Duke Institute for Brain Sciences, Center for Cognitive NeuroscienceDuke UniversityDurhamUSA
  3. 3.Department of Structural BiologyStanford University School of MedicineStanfordUSA
  4. 4.Department of MicrobiologyUniversity of Alabama at BirminghamBirminghamUSA
  5. 5.Department of MedicineUniversity of PennsylvaniaPhiladelphiaUSA
  6. 6.Department of MicrobiologyUniversity of PennsylvaniaPhiladelphiaUSA
  7. 7.The Jane Goodall InstituteViennaUSA

Personalised recommendations