Advertisement

Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology

, Volume 67, Issue 3, pp 349–359 | Cite as

Seasonal changes in the structure of rhesus macaque social networks

  • Lauren J. N. BrentEmail author
  • Ann MacLarnon
  • Michael L. Platt
  • Stuart Semple
Original Paper

Abstract

Social structure emerges from the patterning of interactions between individuals and plays a critical role in shaping some of the main characteristics of animal populations. The topological features of social structure, such as the extent to which individuals interact in clusters, can influence many biologically important factors, including the persistence of cooperation, and the rate of spread of disease. Yet, the extent to which social structure topology fluctuates over relatively short periods of time in relation to social, demographic, or environmental events remains unclear. Here, we use social network analysis to examine seasonal changes in the topology of social structures that emerge from socio-positive associations in adult female rhesus macaques (Macaca mulatta). Behavioral data for two different association types (grooming and spatial proximity) were collected for females in two free-ranging groups during two seasons: the mating and birth seasons. Stronger dyadic bonds resulted in social structures that were more tightly connected (i.e., of greater density) in the mating season compared to the birth season. Social structures were also more centralized around a subset of individuals and more clustered in the mating season than those in the birth season, although the latter differences were mostly driven by differences in density alone. Our results suggest a degree of temporal variation in the topological features of social structure in this population. Such variation may feed back on interactions, hence affecting the behaviors of individuals, and may therefore be important to take into account in studies of animal behavior.

Keywords

Social structure Social network analysis Network topology Rhesus macaques 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We thank the Caribbean Primate Research Center (CPRC) for the permission to undertake research on Cayo Santiago, along with Bonn Aure and Jacqueline Buhl who assisted in the data collection. We also thank Roger Mundry for his permission to use the PSAM software and Robert Seyfarth; Dan Blumstein, an anonymous reviewer; and associate editor Joan Silk for their helpful comments on earlier versions of the manuscript. This project was funded by fellowships awarded to LJNB by the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada, the University of Roehampton, and the Duke Center for Interdisciplinary Decision Sciences. Additional funds were provided by the International Primatological Society, the Leakey Trust, and NIMH grant no. R01-089484-01. The CPRC is supported by a grant no. 8-P40 OD012217-25 from the National Center for Research Resources (NCRR) and the Office of Research Infrastructure Programs (ORIP) of the National Institutes of Health.

Ethical standards

This study was approved by the IACUC of the University of Puerto Rico and by the Ethics Committee of the University of Roehampton.

References

  1. Altmann J (1974) Observational study of behavior: sampling methods. Behaviour 49:227–267PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Barrett L, Henzi PS (2002) Constraints on relationship formation among female primates. Behaviour 139:263–289CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Barrett L, Henzi PS, Weingrill T, Lycett JE, Hill RA (1999) Market forces predict grooming reciprocity in female baboons. Proc R Soc Lond B 266:665–670CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Borgatti SP, Everett MG, Freeman LC (2002) UCINET for Windows: software for social network analysis. Analytic Technologies, Harvard, MassachusettsGoogle Scholar
  5. Brent LJN, Lehmann J, Ramos-Fernández G (2011) Social network analysis in the study of nonhuman primates: a historical perspective. Am J Primatol 73:720–730PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Butts C (2010) Tools for social network analysis. In, R package version 2.2 URL http://erzuli.ss.uci.edu/R.stuff
  7. Chapais B, Gauthier C, Prud’homme J (1995) Dominance competition through affiliation and support in Japanese macaques: an experimental study. Int J Primatol 16:521–536CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cheney DL, Seyfarth RM (1990) How monkeys see the world: inside the mind of another species. Chicago University Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  9. Chikazawa D, Gordon TP, Bean CA, Bernstein IS (1979) Mother-daughter dominance reversals in rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta). Primates 20:301–305CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Clutton-Brock T, Sheldon BC (2010) Individuals and populations: the role of long-term, individual-based studies of animals in ecology and evolutionary biology. Trends Ecol Evol 25:562–573PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cords M (1997) Friendships, alliances, reciprocity and repair. In: Whiten A, Byrne RW (eds) Machiavellian intelligence II: extensions and evaluations. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 24–49CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Corner LAL, Pfeiffer DU, Morris RS (2003) Social-network analysis of Mycobacterium bovis transmission among captive brushtail possums (Trichosurus vulpecula). Prev Vet Med 59:147–167PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Crofoot MC, Rubenstein DI, Maiya AS, Berger-Wolf TY (2011) Aggression, grooming and group-level cooperation in white-faced capuchins (Cebus capucinus): insights from social networks. Am J Primatol S1:821–833CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Croft DP, James R, Ward AJW, Botham MS, Mawdsley D, Krause J (2005) Assortative interactions and social networks in fish. Oecologia 143:211–219PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Croft DP, James R, Thomas P, Hathaway C, Mawdsley D, Laland KN, Krause J (2006) Social structure and co-operative interactions in a wild population of guppies (Poecilia reticulata). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 59:644–650CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Croft DP, James R, Krause J (2008) Exploring animal social networks. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  17. Darden SK, James R, Ramnarine IW, Croft DP (2009) Social implications of the battle of the sexes: sexual harassement disrupts female sociality and social recognition. Proc R Soc Lond B 276:2651–2656CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Engh AL, Beehner JC, Bergman TJ, Whitten PL, Hoffmeier RR, Seyfarth RM, Cheney DL (2006) Behavioural and hormonal responses to predation in female chacma baboons (Papio hamadryas ursinus). Proc R Soc Lond B 273:707–712CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Fehl K, van der Post DJ, Semmann D (2011) Co-evolution of behaviour and social network structure promotes human cooperation. Ecol Lett 14:546–551PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Flack JC, Krakauer DC (2006) Encoding power in communication networks. Am Nat 168:E87–E102PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Flack JC, Girvan M, de Waal FBM, Krakauer DC (2006) Policing stabilizes construction of social niches in primates. Nature 439:426–429PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Foster EA, Franks DW, Morrell LJ, Balcomb KC, Parsons KM, van Ginneken A, Croft DP (2012) Social network correlates of food availability in an endangered population of killer whales, Orcinus orca. Anim Behav 83:731–736CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Godfrey SS, Bull CM, James R, Murray K (2009) Network structure and parasite transmission in a group living lizard, the gidgee skink, Egernia stokesii. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 63:1045–1056CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hadidian J, Bernstein IS (1979) Female reproductive cycles and birth data from an Old World monkey colony. Primates 20:429–442CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hamede RK, Bashford J, McCallum H, Jones M (2009) Contact networks in a wild Tasmanian devil (Sarcophilus harrisii) population: using social network analysis to reveal seasonal variability in social behaviour and its implications for transmission of devil facial tumour disease. Ecol Lett 12:1147–1157PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Hanby JP (1980) Relationships in six groups of rhesus monkeys I: networks. Am J Phys Anthropol 52:549–564CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Hanneman RA, Riddle M (2005) Introduction to social network methods. University of California, RiversideGoogle Scholar
  28. Hemelrijk CK (1999) An individual-orientated model of the emergence of despotic and egalitarian societies. Proc R Soc Lond B 266:361–369CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Hemelrijk CK, Meier C, Martin RD (1999) ‘Friendship’ for fitness in chimpanzees? Anim Behav 58:1223–1229PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Henkel S, Heistermann M, Fischer J (2010) Infants as costly social tools in male Barbary macaque networks. Anim Behav 79:1199–1204CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Hill DA (1987) Social relationships between adult male and female rhesus macaques. 1. Sexual Consortships. Primates 28:439–456CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Hinde RA (1976) Interactions, relationships and social structure. Man 11:1–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Hrdy SB (1976) Care and exploitation of nonhuman primate infants by conspecifics other than the mother. In: Rosenblatt JS, Hinde RA, Shaw E, Bier C (eds) Advances in the study of behavior, vol 6. Academic, New York, pp 101–158Google Scholar
  34. Jacoby DMP, Busawon DS, Sims DW (2010) Sex and social networking: the influence of male presence on social structure of female shark groups. Behav Ecol 21:808–818CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Kasper C, Voelkl B (2009) A social network analysis of primate groups. Primates 50:343–356PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Keeling MJ, Eames KTD (2005) Networks and epidemic models. J Roy Soc Interface 2:295–307CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Lehmann J, Boesch C (2009) Sociality of the dispersing sex: the nature of social bonds in West African female chimpanzees, Pan troglodytes. Anim Behav 77:377–387CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Lehmann J, Dunbar RIM (2009) Network cohesion, group size and neocortex size in female-bonded Old World primates. Proc R Soc Lond B 276:4417–4422CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Lusseau D (2003) The emergent properties of a dolphin social network. Proc R Soc Lond B 270:S186–S188CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Lusseau D, Wilson B, Hammond PS, Grellier K, Durban JW, Parsons KM, Barton TR, Thompson PM (2006) Quantifying the influence of sociality on population structure in bottlenose dolphins. J Anim Ecol 75:14–24PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Lusseau D, Whitehead H, Gero S (2008) Incorporating uncertainty into the study of animal social networks. Anim Behav 75:1809–1815CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Lyons DM, Mendoza SP, Mason WA (1992) Sexual segregation in squirrel monkeys (Saimiri sciureus): a transactional analysis of adult social dynamics. J Comp Psychol 106:323–330PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Madden JR, Drewe JA, Pearce GP, Clutton-Brock TH (2009) The social network structure of a wild meerkat population: 2. Intragroup interactions. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 64:81–95CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Maestripieri D (1994) Influence of infants on female social relationships in monkeys. Folia Primatol 63:192–202PubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Maryanski AR (1987) African ape social structure: is there strength in weak ties? Social Net 9:191–215CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. McComb K, Moss C, Durant SM, Baker L, Sayialel S (2001) Matriarchs as repositories of social knowledge in African elephants. Science 292:491–494PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Morrell LJ, Croft DP, Dyer JRG, Chapman BB, Kelley JL, Laland KN, Krause J (2008) Association patterns and foraging behaviour in natural and artificial guppy shoals. Anim Behav 76:855–864CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Mundry R (1999) Testing related samples with missing values: a permutation approach. Anim Behav 58:1143–1153PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Opsahl T (2009) Structure and evolution of weighted networks. University of London, LondonGoogle Scholar
  50. Ramos-Fernández G, Boyer G, Aureli F, Vick LG (2009) Association networks in spider monkeys (Ateles geoffroyi). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 63:999–1013CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Ryder TB, McDonald DB, Blake JG, Parker PG, Loiselle BA (2008) Social networks in the lek-mating wire-tailed manakin (Pipra filicauda). Proc R Soc Lond B 275:1367–1374CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Sade DS (1965) Some aspects of parent-offspring and sibling relations in a group of rhesus monkeys, with a discussion of grooming. Am J Phys Anthropol 23:1–17PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Scott J (2000) Social network analysis: a handbook. Sage Publications, LondonGoogle Scholar
  54. Seyfarth RM (1976) Social relationships among adult female baboons. Anim Behav 24:917–938CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Seyfarth RM (1977) A model of social grooming among adult female monkeys. J Theor Biol 65:671–698PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Sih A, Hanser SF, McHugh KA (2009) Social network theory: new insights and issues for behavioral ecologists. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 63:975–988CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Silk JB, Alberts SC, Altmann J (2006) Social relationships among adult female baboons (Papio cynocephalus) II. Variation in the quality and stability of social bonds. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 61:197–204CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Sueur C, Petit O, De Marco A, Jacobs AT, Watanabe K, Thierry B (2011) A comparative network analysis of social style in macaques. Anim Behav 82:845–852CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Sundaresan SR, Fischhoff IR, Dushoff J, Rubenstein DI (2007) Network metrics reveal differences in social organization between two fission-fusion species, Grevy’s zebra and onager. Oecologia 151:140–149PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Thierry B (1990) Feedback loop between kinship and dominance: the macaque model. J Theor Biol 145:511–522PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Voelkl B, Noë R (2008) The influence of social structure on the propagation of social information in artificial primate groups: a graph-based simulation approach. J Theor Biol 252:77–86PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Wallen K, Tannenbaum PL (1997) Hormonal modulation of sexual behavior and affiliation in rhesus monkeys. Ann NY Acad Sci 807:185–202PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Wasserman S, Faust K (1994) Social network analysis: methods and applications. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Watts DJ, Strogatz SH (1998) Collective dynamics of ‘small-world’ networks. Nature 393:440–442PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Wey T, Blumstein DT, Shen W, Jordan F (2008) Social network analysis of animal behaviour: a promising tool for the study of sociality. Anim Behav 75:333–344CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Whiten A, Horner V, de Waal FBM (2005) Conformity to cultural norms of tool use in chimpanzees. Nature 437:737–740PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Williams R, Lusseau D (2006) A killer whale social network is vulnerable to targeted removals. Biol Lett 2:497–500PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Wittig RA, Crockford C, Lehmann J, Whitten PL, Seyfarth RM, Cheney DL (2008) Focused grooming networks and stress alleviation in wild female baboons. Horm Behav 54:170–177PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Lauren J. N. Brent
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  • Ann MacLarnon
    • 1
  • Michael L. Platt
    • 2
    • 3
  • Stuart Semple
    • 1
  1. 1.Centre for Research in Evolutionary and Environmental AnthropologyUniversity of RoehamptonLondonUK
  2. 2.Duke Institute for Brain Sciences, Center for Cognitive NeuroscienceDuke UniversityDurhamUSA
  3. 3.Department of Neurobiology, Department of Evolutionary Anthropology, and Department of Psychology & NeuroscienceDuke UniversityDurhamUSA

Personalised recommendations