Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Do fledglings choose wisely? An experimental investigation into social foraging behaviour

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Many cooperative bird species have an extended period of post-fledging care. Despite the fact that this period of care can last up to several months, it remains a relatively understudied stage of chick development. This period, when young are actively begging but highly mobile, provides an opportunity for young to maximise the amount of care they receive by selectively choosing particular adults to beg from. In pied babblers Turdoides bicolor (a cooperatively breeding passerine), fledglings closely follow foraging adults and beg for food regularly (a behavioural interaction termed social foraging). Using a combination of natural observations and experimental manipulations, we found that fledgling pied babblers preferentially socially forage with adult care-givers who have high foraging success, since this results in young receiving more food. By supplementally feeding adults to artificially increase their foraging success, we increased the proportion of time that fledglings chose to socially forage with them, confirming that fledglings are selectively choosing dyadic interactions with the best adult foragers. These results indicate that pied babbler fledglings are sensitive to and can respond to short-term changes in adult foraging success, enabling them to maximize their nutritional intake, a behavioural adjustment that has long-term benefits in this system.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bell MBV, Radford AN, Rose R, Wade HM, Ridley AR (2009) The value of constant surveillance in a risky environment. Proc R Soc Lond B 276:2997–3005

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bengtsson H, Rydén O (1983) Parental feeding rate in relation to begging behaviour in asynchronously hatched broods of great tit Parus major: an experimental study. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 12:243–251

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boland CRJ, Heinsohn R, Cockburn A (1997) Experimental manipulation of brood reduction and parental care in cooperatively breeding white-winged choughs. J Anim Ecol 66:683–691

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burnham KP, Anderson DR (2002) Model selection and multimodel inference: a practical information-theoretic approach, 2nd edn. Springer, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Burnham KP, Anderson DR, Huyvaert KP (2011) AIC model selection and multimodel inference in behavioral ecology: some background, observations, and comparisons. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 65:23–35

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clutton-Brock TH, O’Riain MJ, Brotherton PNM, Gaynor D, Kansky R, Griffin AS, Manser M (1999) Selfish sentinels in cooperative mammals. Science 284:1640–1644

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Clutton-Brock TH, Brotherton PNM, O’Riain MJ, Griffin AS, Gaynor D, Kansky R, Sharpe L, McIlrath GM (2001) Contributions to cooperative rearing in meerkats. Anim Behav 61:705–710

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Danchin E, Giraldeau LA, Valone TJ, Wagner RH (2004) Public information: from noisy neighbours to cultural evolution. Science 305:487–491

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Eggers S, Griesser M, Ekman J (2004) Predator-induced plasticity in nest visitation rates in the Siberian jay (Perisoreus infaustus). Behav Ecol 16:309–315

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gilchrist JS (2004) Pup escorting in the communal breeding banded mongoose: behaviour, benefits, and maintenance. Behav Ecol 15:952–960

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gilchrist JS (2008) Aggressive monopolization of mobile carers by young of a cooperative breeder. Proc R Soc Lond B 275:2491–2498

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Godfray HCJ (1995) Signalling of need between parents and young: parent-offspring conflict and sibling rivalry. Am Nat 146:1–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Golabek KA, Ridley AR, Radford AN (2011) Food availability affects strength of seasonal territorial behaviour in a cooperatively breeding bird. Anim Behav 83:613–619

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Griffiths R, Double MC, Orr K, Dawson JG (1998) A DNA test to sex most birds. Mol Ecol 7:107–1075

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heinsohn RG (1991) Slow learning of foraging skills and extended parental care in cooperatively breeding white-winged choughs. Am Nat 137:864–881

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hodge SJ (2005) Helpers benefit offspring in both the short and long-term in the cooperatively breeding banded mongoose. Proc R Soc Lond B 272:2479–2482

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hodge SJ, Flower TP, Clutton-Brock TH (2007) Offspring competition and helper associations in cooperative meerkats. Anim Behav 74:957–964

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hurvich CM, Tsai C-L (1989) Regression and time series model selection in small samples. Biometrika 76:297–307

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Juliano SA, Gravel ME (2002) Predation and the evolution of prey behaviour: an experiment with the tree hole mosquitoes. Behav Ecol 13:301–311

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kacelnik A, Cotton PA, Stirling L, Wright J (1995) Food allocation among nestling starlings: sibling competition and the scope of parental choice. Proc R Soc Lond B 259:259–263

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Katz PL (1974) A long-term approach to foraging optimization. Am Nat 108:758–782

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kilner R (1995) When do canary parents respond to nestling signals of need? Proc R Soc Lond B 260:343–348

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Langen TA (1996) Social learning of a novel foraging skill by white-throated magpie-jays (Calocitta Formosa, Corvidae): a field experiment. Ethology 102:157–166

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Langen TA (2000) Prolonged offspring dependence and cooperative breeding in birds. Behav Ecol 11:367–377

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Langen TA, Vehrencamp SL (1999) How white-throated magpie-jay helpers contribute during breeding. Auk 116:131–140

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leedman AW, Magrath RD (2003) Long-term brood division and exclusive parental care in a cooperatively breeding passerine. Anim Behav 65:1093–1108

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lindström J (1999) Early development and fitness in birds and mammals. Trends Ecol Evol 14:343–348

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Manser MB, Avey G (2000) The effect of pup vocalisations on food allocation in a cooperative mammal, the meerkat (Suricata suricatta). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 48:429–437

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manser MB, Madden JR, Kunc HP, English S, Clutton-Brock TH (2008) Signals of need in a cooperatively breeding mammal with mobile offspring. Anim Behav 76:1805–1813

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGowan KJ, Woolfenden GE (1990) Contributions to fledgling feeding in the Florida scrub-jay. J Anim Ecol 59:691–707

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Midford PE, Hailman JP, Woolfenden GE (2000) Social learning of a novel foraging patch in families of free-living Florida scrub-jays. Anim Behav 59:1199–1207

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mock DW, Parker GA (1998) Siblicide, Family conflict and the evolutionary limits of selfishness. Anim Behav 56:1–10

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Radford AN, Ridley AR (2006) Recruitment calling: a novel form of extended parental care in an altricial species. Curr Biol 16:1700–1704

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Raihani NJ (2008) Cooperation and conflict in pied babblers. Dissertation, University of Cambridge

  • Raihani NJ, Ridley AR (2007a) Adult vocalisations during provisioning: offspring response and postfledging benefits in wild pied babblers. Anim Behav 74:1303–1309

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raihani NJ, Ridley AR (2007b) Parental aggression against dependent young results in task partitioning in a cooperative bird. Biol Lett 4:24–26

    Google Scholar 

  • Raihani NJ, Ridley AR (2008) Experimental evidence for teaching in wild pied babblers. Anim Behav 75:3–11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raihani NJ, Ridley AR, Browning LE, Nelson-Flower MJ, Knowles S (2008) Juvenile female aggression in cooperatively breeding pied babblers: causes and contexts. Ethology 114:452–458

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ridley AR (2007) Factors affecting offspring survival and development in a cooperative bird: social, maternal and environmental effects. J Anim Ecol 76:750–760

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ridley AR, Raihani NJ (2007a) Variable post-fledgling care in a cooperative bird: causes and consequences. Behav Ecol 18:994–1000

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ridley AR, Raihani NJ (2007b) Facultative response to a kleptoparasite by the cooperatively breeding pied babbler. Behav Ecol 18:324–330

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ridley AR, Raihani NJ (2008) Task partitioning increases reproductive output in a cooperative bird. Behav Ecol 19:1136–1142

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ridley AR, Thompson AM (2011) Heterospecific egg destruction by the wattled starling and its impact on pied babbler reproductive success. Ostrich 82:201–205

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Russell EM (2000) Avian life histories: is extended parental care a southern secret? Emu 100:377–399

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Russell AF, Clutton-Brock TH, Brotherton PNM, Sharpe LL, McIlrath GM, Dalerum FD, Cameron EZ, Barnard JA (2002) Factors affecting pup growth and survival in co-operatively breeding meerkats Suricata suricatta. J Anim Ecol 71:700–709

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Russell EM, Yom-Tov Y, Geffen E (2004) Extended parental care and delayed dispersal: northern, tropical and southern passerines compared. Behav Ecol 15:831–838

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sankamethawee W, Gale GA, Hardesty BE (2009) Post-fledging survival of the cooperatively breeding puff-throated bulbul (Alophoixus pallidus). Condor 111:675–683

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Suedkamp Wells KM, Ryan MR, Millspaugh JJ, Thompson FR III, Hubbard MW (2007) Survival of postfledging grassland birds in Missouri. Condor 109:781–794

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Symonds MRE, Moussalli A (2011) A brief guide to model selection, multimodel inference and model averaging in behavioural ecology using Akaike’s information criterion. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 65:13–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tarwater CE, Brawn JD (2010) The post-fledging period in a tropical bird: pattern of parental care and survival. J Avian Biol 41:479–487

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Terkel J (1994) Social transmission of pine cone feeding behaviour in the black rat. In: Galef BG, Mainardi M, Valsecchi P (eds) Behavioral aspects of feeding. Harwood Academic, Chur, pp 229–256

    Google Scholar 

  • Terkel J (1995) Cultural transmission in the black rat. Adv Study Behav 24:119–154

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thornton A (2008) Early body condition, time budgets and the acquisition of foraging skills in meerkats. Anim Behav 75:951–962

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thornton A, Hodge SJ (2009) The development of foraging microhabitat preferences in meerkats. Behav Ecol 20:103–110

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thornton A, McAuliffe K (2006) Teaching in wild meerkats. Science 313:227–229

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank the British Ecological Society and the DST/NRF Centre of Excellence at the Percy FitzPatrick Institute for funding this research. We are grateful to Prof. Tim Clutton-Brock and Prof. Marta Manser for the use of the facilities and land access at the Kuruman River Reserve, and the De Bruins and Kotzes for allowing us access to their land. We thank Prof. Phil Hockey for his continued support of the Pied Babbler Research Project and Mike Finnie for his support in this research. Comments from three anonymous reviewers greatly improved this manuscript.

Ethical standards

The experiments conducted in this study comply with the current laws of South Africa. This research was conducted under the ethical clearance from the Science Faculty Animal Ethics Board, University of Cape Town (R2012/2006/V15/AR) and with research permits being issued by the Northern Cape Conservation Authority.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Percy FitzPatrick Institute of African Ornithology, DST/NRF Centre of Excellence, University of Cape Town, Private Bag X3, Rondebosch, 7701, South Africa

    A. M. Thompson & A. R. Ridley

  2. Department of Biological Sciences, Macquarie University, Marsfield 2122, Sydney, NSW, Australia

    A. R. Ridley

Authors
  1. A. M. Thompson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. A. R. Ridley
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. M. Thompson.

Additional information

Communicated by M. Soler

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

ESM 1

(PDF 178 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Thompson, A.M., Ridley, A.R. Do fledglings choose wisely? An experimental investigation into social foraging behaviour. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 67, 69–78 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-012-1426-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-012-1426-0

Keywords

Search

Navigation