Skip to main content
Log in

The role of male harassment on female fitness for the dengue vector mosquito Aedes aegypti

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Sexual harassment studies in insects suggest that females can incur several kinds of costs from male harassment and mating. Here, we examined direct and indirect costs of male harassment on components of female fitness in the predominantly monandrous mosquito Aedes aegypti. To disentangle the costs of harassment versus the costs of mating, we held females at a low or high density with males whose claspers were modified to prevent insemination and compared these to females held with normal males and to those held with females or alone. A reduced longevity was observed when females were held under high-density conditions with males or females, regardless if male claspers had been modified. There was no consistent effect of harassment on female fecundity. Net reproductive rate (R 0) was higher in females held at low density with normal males compared to females held with males in the other treatments, even though only a small number of females showed direct evidence of remating. Indirect costs and benefits that were not due to harassment alone were observed. Daughters of females held with normal males at high density had reduced longevity compared to daughters from females held without conspecifics. However, their fitness (R 0) was higher compared to females in all other treatments. Overall, our results indicate that A. aegypti females do not suffer a fitness cost from harassment of males when kept at moderate densities, and they suggest the potential for benefits obtained from ejaculate components.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Arnqvist G, Andrés JA (2006) The effects of experimentally induced polyandry on female reproduction in a monandrous mating system. Ethology 112:748–756

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arnqvist G, Nilsson T (2000) The evolution of polyandry: multiple mating and female fitness in insects. Anim Behav 60:145–164

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Arnqvist G, Rowe L (2005) Sexual conflict. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  • Arnqvist G, Edvardsson M, Friberg U, Nilsson T (2000) Sexual conflict promotes speciation in insects. P Natl Acad Sci USA 97:10460–10464

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bateman PW, Ferguson JWH, Yetman CA (2006) Courtship and copulation, but not ejaculate, reduce the longevity of female field crickets (Gryllus bimaculatus). J Zool 268:341–346

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Begon M, Townsend CR, Harper JL (1996) Ecology: from individuals to ecosystems. Blackwell, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Benjamini Y, Hochberg Y (1995) Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. J Roy Stat Soc B 57:289–300

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernardo J (1996) Maternal effects in animal ecology. Amer Zool 36:83–105

    Google Scholar 

  • Blanckenhorn WU, Hosken DJ, Martin OY, Reim C, Teuschl Y, Ward PI (2002) The costs of copulating in the dung fly Sepsis cynipsea. Behav Ecol 13:353–358

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cator LJ, Harrington LC (2011) The harmonic convergence of fathers predicts the mating success of sons in the yellow fever mosquito. Anim Behav 82:629–633

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cator LJ, Arthur BJ, Ponlawat A, Harrington LC (2011) Behavioral observations and sound recordings of free-flight mating swarms of Ae. aegypti in Thailand. J Med Entomol 48:941–946

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Chapman T, Liddle LF, Kalb JM, Wolfner MF, Partridge L (1995) Cost of mating in Drosophila melanogaster females is mediated by male accessory gland products. Nature 373:241–244

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Clements AN (1999) The biology of mosquitoes. CABI, Wallingford

    Google Scholar 

  • Clutton-Brock TH, Parker GA (1995) Sexual coercion in animal societies. Anim Behav 49:1345–1365

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cox DR (1972) Regression models and life tables (with Discussion). J Roy Stat Soc B 34(2):187–220

    Google Scholar 

  • Craig GB (1967) Mosquitoes: female monogamy induced by male accessory gland substance. Science 156:1499–1501

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Crudgington HS, Siva-Jothy MT (2000) Genital damage, kicking and early death. Nature 407:855–856

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • den Hollander M, Gwynne DT (2009) Female fitness consequences of male harassment and copulation in seed beetles, Callosobruchus maculatus. Anim Behav 78:1061–1070

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eberhard WG (1985) Sexual selection and animal genitalia. Harvard University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Eberhard WG (1996) Female control: sexual selection by cryptic female choice. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  • Eberhard WG (2004) Male–female conflict and genitalia: failure to confirm predictions in insects and spiders. Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc 79:121–186

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ferguson HM, John B, Ng’habi K, Knols BG (2005) Redressing the sex imbalance in knowledge of vector biology. Trends Ecol Evol 20:202–209

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ferguson HM, Dornhaus A, Beeche A, Borgemeister C, Gottlieb M, Mulla MS, Gimnig JE, Fish D, Killeen GF (2010) Ecology: a prerequisite for malaria elimination and eradication. PLoS Med 7:e1000303

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Garcia-Rejon J, Lorono-Pino MA, Farfan-Ale JA, Flores-Flores L, Del Pilar Rosado-Paredes E, Rivero-Cardenas N, Najera-Vazquez R, Gomez-Carro S, Lira-Zumbardo V, Gonzalez-Martinez P, Lozano-Fuentes S, Elizondo-Quiroga D, Beaty BJ, Eisen L (2008) Dengue virus-infected Aedes aegypti in the home environment. Am J Trop Med Hyg 79:940–950

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gay L, Eady PE, Vasudev R, Hosken DJ, Tregenza T (2009) Costly sexual harassment in a beetle. Physiol Entom 34:86–92

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grech K, Maung LA, Read AF (2007) The effect of parental rearing conditions on offspring life history in Anopheles stephensi. Malar J 6:130

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gwadz RW, Craig GB Jr, Hickey WA (1971) Female sexual behavior as the mechanism rendering Aedes aegypti refractory to insemination. Biol Bull 140:201–214

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Harrington LC, Edman JD, Scott TW (2001) Why do female Aedes aegypti (Diptera: Culicidae) feed preferentially and frequently on human blood? J Med Entomol 38:411–422

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Harrington LC, Scott TW, Lerdthusnee K, Coleman RC, Costero A, Clark GG, Jones JJ, Kitthawee S, Kittayapong P, Sithiprasasna R, Edman JD (2005) Dispersal of the dengue vector Aedes aegypti within and between rural communities. Am J Trop Med Hyg 72:209–220

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hartberg WK (1971) Observations on the mating behaviour of Aedes aegypti in nature. Bull World Health Organ 45:847–850

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Helinski MEH, Harrington LC (2011) Male mating history and body size influence female fecundity and longevity of the dengue vector Aedes aegypti. J Med Entomol 48:202–211

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Helinski MEH, Valerio L, Facchinelli L, Scott TW, Ramsey J, Harrington LC (2012) Evidence of polyandry for Aedes aegypti in semifield enclosures. Am J Trop Med Hyg 86:635–641

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Howell PI, Knols BG (2009) Male mating biology. Malar J 8(Suppl 2):S8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jennions MD, Petrie M (2000) Why do females mate multiply? A review of the genetic benefits. Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc 75:21–64

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jones TM (1974) Sexual activities during single and multiple co-habitations in Aedes aegypti mosquitoes. J Entomol 48:185–194

    Google Scholar 

  • Mahmood F, Reisen WK (1980) Anopheles culicifacies the occurrence of multiple insemination under laboratory conditions. Entomol Exp Appl 27:69–76

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morrow EH, Arnqvist G, Pitnick S (2003) Adaptation versus pleiotropy: why do males harm their mates? Behav Ecol 14:802–806

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mousseau TA, Fox CW (1998) The adaptive significance of maternal effects. Trends Ecol Evol 13:403–407

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Muhlhauser C, Blanckenhorn WU (2002) The cost of avoiding matings in the dung fly Sepsis cynipsea. Behav Ecol 13:359–365

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parker GA (2006) Sexual conflict over mating and fertilization: an overview. Phil Trans R Soc B 361:235–259

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Perich MJ, Davila G, Turner A, Garcia A, Nelson M (2000) Behavior of resting Aedes aegypti (Culicidae: Diptera) and its relation to ultra-low volume adulticide efficacy in Panama City, Panama. J Med Entomol 37:541–546

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ponlawat A, Harrington LC (2007) Age and body size influence male sperm capacity of the dengue vector Aedes aegypti (Diptera: Culicidae). J Med Entomol 44:422–426

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rodriguez-Munoz R, Bretman A, Slate J, Walling CA, Tregenza T (2010) Natural and sexual selection in a wild insect population. Science 328:1269–1272

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ronn J, Katvala M, Arnqvist G (2006) The cost of mating and egg production in Callosobruchus seed beetles. Anim Behav 72:335–342

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rossi BH, Nonacs P, Pitts-Singer TL (2010) Sexual haressment by males reduces female fecundity in the alfalfa leafcutting bee, Megachile rotundata. Anim Behav 79:165–171

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roth LM (1948) A study of mosquito behavior. An experimental laboratory study of the sexual behavior of Aedes aegypti (Linnaeus). Am Midl Nat 40:265–352

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sakurai G, Kasuya E (2008) The costs of harassment in the adzuki bean beetle. Anim Behav 75:1367–1373

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scott TW, Chow E, Strickman D, Kittayapong P, Wirtz RA, Lorenz LH, Edman JD (1993) Blood-feeding patterns of Aedes aegypti (Diptera: Culicidae) collected in a rural Thai village. J Med Entomol 30:922–927

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Scott TW, Amerasinghe PH, Morrison AC, Lorenz LH, Clark GG, Strickman D, Kittayapong P, Edman JD (2000) Longitudinal studies of Aedes aegypti (Diptera: Culicidae) in Thailand and Puerto Rico: blood feeding frequency. J Med Entomol 37:89–101

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Shutt B, Stables L, Aboagye-Antwi F, Moran J, Tripet F (2010) Male accessory gland proteins induce female monogamy in anopheline mosquitoes. Med Vet Entomol 24:91–94

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Spielman A (1964) The mechanics of copulation in Aedes aegypti. Biol Bull 127:324–344

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Styer LM, Minnick SL, Sun AK, Scott TW (2007) Mortality and reproductive dynamics of Aedes aegypti (Diptera: Culicidae) fed human blood. Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis 7:86–98

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tripet F, Toure YT, Dolo G, Lanzaro GC (2003) Frequency of multiple inseminations in field-collected Anopheles gambiae females revealed by DNA analysis of transferred sperm. Am J Trop Med Hyg 68:1–5

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Watson PJ, Arnqvist G, Stallmann RR (1998) Sexual conflict and the energetic costs of mating and mate choice in water striders. Am Nat 151:46–58

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wendell MD, Wilson TG, Higgs S, Black WC (2000) Chemical and gamma-ray mutagenesis of the white gene in Aedes aegypti. Insect Mol Biol 9:119–125

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wolf JB, Wade MJ (2009) What are maternal effects (and what are they not)? Philos Trans R Soc Lond B 364:1107–1115

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolfner MF (1997) Tokens of love: functions and regulation of Drosophila male accessory gland products. Insect Biochem Mol Biol 27:179–192

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yuval B (2006) Mating systems of blood-feeding flies. Ann Rev Entomol 51:413–440

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We are thankful to all members of the Harrington laboratory at Cornell for their support, to Elizabeth Glennon and Melissa Hardstone for assisting with egg collection and counting, and to Laura Sirot, Lauren Cator, and anonymous reviewers for constructive comments on our manuscript. This study was supported by the Foundation for the National Institutes of Health through the Grand Challenges in Global Health Initiative (GC7 #316), and by NIH/NIAID grant R01AI095491.

Ethical standards

All experiments comply with the current laws of the country in which they were performed.

Conflicts of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michelle E. H. Helinski.

Additional information

Communicated by G. Wilkinson

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

ESM 1

DOC 248 kb

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Helinski, M.E.H., Harrington, L.C. The role of male harassment on female fitness for the dengue vector mosquito Aedes aegypti . Behav Ecol Sociobiol 66, 1131–1140 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-012-1365-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-012-1365-9

Keywords

Navigation