Abstract
Males are generally predicted to care less for their young when they have more additional mating opportunities, lower paternity, or when their mates care more. We tested these predictions using male provisioning as a proxy for paternal care in two temperate populations of house wrens (Troglodytes aedon) with divergent life histories. Males in the migratory, occasionally socially polygynous New York, USA (northern) population provisioned less when more local females were fertile. A similar relationship was only weakly supported in the resident, socially monogamous Buenos Aires Province, Argentina (southern) population, possibly due to the higher density of house wrens there. A relationship between male provisioning and level of paternity within the brood was supported in both populations, but in opposite directions: while males in the southern population provisioned less at broods containing more extra-pair young, males in the northern population provisioned such broods more, contradicting predictions. Males provisioned less when their mates provisioned more in both populations, in agreement with sexual conflict theory. Additionally, the populations both exhibited a positive relationship between male provisioning and nestling age, but differed in the direction of the relationships of male provisioning with date and brood size. Our results suggest that even within a species, life history differences may be accompanied by differences in the determinants of behavior such as paternal care.

Similar content being viewed by others
References
Akaike H (1974) A new look at the statistical model identification. IEEE Trans Automat Contr AC-19:716–723
Alonzo SH (2010) Social and coevolutionary feedbacks between mating and parental investment. Trends Ecol Evol 25:99–108
American Ornithologists’ Union (1998) Checklist of North American birds, 7th edn. American Ornithologists’ Union, Washington, DC, pp 480–481
Arnqvist G, Rowe L (2005) Sexual conflict. Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton, NJ
Bart J, Tornes A (1989) Importance of monogamous male birds in determining reproductive success: evidence for house wrens and a review of male-removal studies. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 24:109–116
Barton K (2011) MuMIn: model selection and model averaging based on information criteria (AICC and alike). R package version 0.13.21. http://mumin.r-forge.r-project.org/. Accessed 12 April 2011
Bateman AJ (1948) Intra-sexual selection in Drosophila. Heredity 2:349–368
Bates D, Maechler M (2009) lme4: linear mixed-effects models using S4 classes. R package version 0.999375-31. http://lme4.r-forge.r-project.org/. Accessed 3 November 2010
Birkhead TR, Møller AP (1992) Sperm competition in birds: evolutionary causes and consequences. Academic, San Diego, CA
Brumfield RT, Capparella AP (1996) Genetic differentiation and taxonomy in the house wren species group. Condor 98:547–556
Brylawski AMZ, Whittingham LA (2004) An experimental study of mate guarding and paternity in house wrens. Anim Behav 68:1417–1424
Burnham KP, Anderson DR (2002) Model selection and multimodal inference: a practical information—theoretic approach, 2nd edn. Springer-Verlag, New York
Clutton-Brock TH (1991) The evolution of parental care. Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton, NJ
Davies NB (1992) Dunnock behavior and social evolution. Oxford University Press, New York
R Development Core Team (2009) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna. http://www.R-project.org. Accessed 17 October 2010
Ens BJ, Chouldhury S, Black JM (1996) Mate fidelity and divorce in birds. In: Black JM (ed) Partnership in birds: the study of monogamy. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 344–401
Goodbred CO, Holmes RT (1996) Factors affecting food provisioning of nestling Black-throated Blue Warblers. Wilson Bull 108:467–479
Haggerty TM (1992) Effects of nestling age and brood size on nestling care in the Bachman’s Sparrow (Aimophila aestivalis). Am Midl Nat 128:115–125
Houston AI, Székely T, McNamara JM (2005) Conflict between parents over care. Trends Ecol Evol 20:33–38
Johnson LS, Kermott LH, Lein MR (1993) The cost of polygyny in the house wren Troglodytes aedon. J Anim Ecol 62:669–682
Johnson LS, Hicks BG, Masters BS (2002) Increased cuckoldry as a cost of breeding late for male house wrens (Troglodytes aedon). Behav Ecol 13:670–675
Johnson LS, Rauch RL, Dellone SN (2004) The process and causes of fledging in a cavity-nesting passerine bird, the house wren (Troglodytes aedon). Ethology 110:693–705
Kokko H (1999) Cuckoldry and the stability of biparental care. Ecol Lett 2:247–255
LaBarbera K, Llambías PE, Cramer ERA, Schaming TD, Lovette IJ (2010) Synchrony does not explain extrapair paternity rate variation in northern or southern house wrens. Behav Ecol 21:773–780
Llambías PE (2009) Why monogamy? Comparing house wren breeding systems in two hemispheres. Dissertation, Cornell University
Llambías PE, Fernández GJ (2009) Effects of nestboxes on the breeding biology of southern house wrens Troglodytes aedon bonariae in the southern temperate zone. Ibis 151:113–121
Magrath MJL, Elgar MA (1997) Paternal care declines with increased opportunity for extra-pair matings in Fairy Martins. Proc R Soc Lond B 264:1731–1736
Magrath MJL, Komdeur J (2003) Is male care compromised by additional mating opportunity? Trends Ecol Evol 18:424–430
Norris K (1993) Seasonal variation in the reproductive success of blue tits: an experimental study. J Anim Ecol 62:287–294
Nur N (1984) Feeding frequencies of nestling blue tits (Parus caeruleus): costs, benefits and a model of optimal feeding fequency. Oecologia 65:125–137
Olson VA, Liker A, Freckleton RP, Székely T (2008) Parental conflict in birds: comparative analyses of offspring development, ecology and mating opportunities. Proc R Soc B 275:301–307
Ricklefs RE, White SC (1981) Growth and energetics of chicks of the sooty tern (Sterna fuscata) and common tern (S. hirundo). Auk 98:361–378
Royle NJ, Hartley IR, Parker GA (2002) Sexual conflict reduces offspring fitness in zebra finches. Nature 416:733–736
Schwagmeyer PL, Mock DW, Parker GA (2002) Biparental care in house sparrows: negotiation or sealed bid? Behav Ecol 13:713–721
Seki M, Wakano JY, Ihara Y (2007) A theoretical study on the evolution of male parental care and female multiple mating: effects of female mate choice and male care bias. J Theor Biol 247:281–296
Sheldon BC (2002) Relating paternity to paternal care. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B 357:341–350
Townsend DS (1986) The costs of male parental care and its evolution in a neotropical frog. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 19:187–195
Trivers RL (1972) Parental investment and sexual selection. In: Campbell B (ed) Sexual selection and the descent of man, 1871–1971. Aldine, Chicago, pp 136–179
van Dijk RE, Brinkhuizen DM, Székely T, Komdeur J (2010) Parental care strategies in Eurasian penduline tit are not related to breeding densities and mating opportunities. Behaviour 147:1551–1565
Wedell N, Kvarnemo C, Lessells CM, Tregenza T (2006) Sexual conflict and life histories. Anim Behav 71:999–1011
Westneat DF, Sherman PW (1993) Parentage and the evolution of parental behavior. Behav Ecol 4:66–77
Whittingham LA, Taylor PD, Robertson RJ (1992) Confidence of paternity and male parental care. Am Nat 139:1115–1125
Winkler DW (1987) A general model for parental care. Am Nat 130:526–543
Wood S (2010) gamm4: generalized additive mixed models using mgcv and lme4. R package version 0.1-0. http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=gamm4. Accessed 2 February 2011
Wright J, Cuthill I (1989) Manipulation of sex differences in parental care. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 25:171–181
Yezerinac SM, Weatherhead PJ (1997) Reproductive synchrony and extra-pair mating strategy in a socially monogamous bird, Dendroica petechia. Anim Behav 54:1393–1403
Acknowledgments
This study was funded by the Fuller Evolutionary Biology Program at the Cornell Lab of Ornithology (KL), a Howard Hughes Summer Scholarship (KL), a National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellowship (KL), a Mario Einaudi Center International Research Travel Grant (PEL), an Organization of American States Graduate Fellowship (PEL), the Scientific Research Society (PEL), an American Ornithologists’ Union Research Grant (PEL), and an Andrew W. Mellon Student Research Grant (PEL). G. Fernández, M. Mermoz, V. Ferretti, and P. Rodriguez provided field assistance, the Whisky-Michelli family generously allowed us to work on their ranches, and M. Beade provided logistical support. L. Stenzler, E.R.A. Cramer, A. Talaba, D. Morin, C. Makarewich, and B. Winger provided laboratory assistance and advice. J.P. Kelley and C. Tarwater lent statistical advice. I. Stewart, two anonymous reviewers, and the lab groups of E.A. Lacey, R. Bowie, R. Caldwell, and D. Elias made valuable comments on earlier versions.
Ethical standards
Experiments in this study comply with the current laws of the countries in which they were performed.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Communicated by T. Bakker
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
LaBarbera, K., Lovette, I.J. & Llambías, P.E. Mating opportunities, paternity, and sexual conflict: paternal care in northern and southern temperate house wrens. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 66, 253–260 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-011-1273-4
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-011-1273-4


