Skip to main content
Log in

Mating opportunities, paternity, and sexual conflict: paternal care in northern and southern temperate house wrens

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Males are generally predicted to care less for their young when they have more additional mating opportunities, lower paternity, or when their mates care more. We tested these predictions using male provisioning as a proxy for paternal care in two temperate populations of house wrens (Troglodytes aedon) with divergent life histories. Males in the migratory, occasionally socially polygynous New York, USA (northern) population provisioned less when more local females were fertile. A similar relationship was only weakly supported in the resident, socially monogamous Buenos Aires Province, Argentina (southern) population, possibly due to the higher density of house wrens there. A relationship between male provisioning and level of paternity within the brood was supported in both populations, but in opposite directions: while males in the southern population provisioned less at broods containing more extra-pair young, males in the northern population provisioned such broods more, contradicting predictions. Males provisioned less when their mates provisioned more in both populations, in agreement with sexual conflict theory. Additionally, the populations both exhibited a positive relationship between male provisioning and nestling age, but differed in the direction of the relationships of male provisioning with date and brood size. Our results suggest that even within a species, life history differences may be accompanied by differences in the determinants of behavior such as paternal care.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price includes VAT (Finland)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Akaike H (1974) A new look at the statistical model identification. IEEE Trans Automat Contr AC-19:716–723

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alonzo SH (2010) Social and coevolutionary feedbacks between mating and parental investment. Trends Ecol Evol 25:99–108

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • American Ornithologists’ Union (1998) Checklist of North American birds, 7th edn. American Ornithologists’ Union, Washington, DC, pp 480–481

    Google Scholar 

  • Arnqvist G, Rowe L (2005) Sexual conflict. Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  • Bart J, Tornes A (1989) Importance of monogamous male birds in determining reproductive success: evidence for house wrens and a review of male-removal studies. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 24:109–116

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barton K (2011) MuMIn: model selection and model averaging based on information criteria (AICC and alike). R package version 0.13.21. http://mumin.r-forge.r-project.org/. Accessed 12 April 2011

  • Bateman AJ (1948) Intra-sexual selection in Drosophila. Heredity 2:349–368

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bates D, Maechler M (2009) lme4: linear mixed-effects models using S4 classes. R package version 0.999375-31. http://lme4.r-forge.r-project.org/. Accessed 3 November 2010

  • Birkhead TR, Møller AP (1992) Sperm competition in birds: evolutionary causes and consequences. Academic, San Diego, CA

    Google Scholar 

  • Brumfield RT, Capparella AP (1996) Genetic differentiation and taxonomy in the house wren species group. Condor 98:547–556

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brylawski AMZ, Whittingham LA (2004) An experimental study of mate guarding and paternity in house wrens. Anim Behav 68:1417–1424

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burnham KP, Anderson DR (2002) Model selection and multimodal inference: a practical information—theoretic approach, 2nd edn. Springer-Verlag, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Clutton-Brock TH (1991) The evolution of parental care. Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  • Davies NB (1992) Dunnock behavior and social evolution. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • R Development Core Team (2009) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna. http://www.R-project.org. Accessed 17 October 2010

  • Ens BJ, Chouldhury S, Black JM (1996) Mate fidelity and divorce in birds. In: Black JM (ed) Partnership in birds: the study of monogamy. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 344–401

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodbred CO, Holmes RT (1996) Factors affecting food provisioning of nestling Black-throated Blue Warblers. Wilson Bull 108:467–479

    Google Scholar 

  • Haggerty TM (1992) Effects of nestling age and brood size on nestling care in the Bachman’s Sparrow (Aimophila aestivalis). Am Midl Nat 128:115–125

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Houston AI, Székely T, McNamara JM (2005) Conflict between parents over care. Trends Ecol Evol 20:33–38

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson LS, Kermott LH, Lein MR (1993) The cost of polygyny in the house wren Troglodytes aedon. J Anim Ecol 62:669–682

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson LS, Hicks BG, Masters BS (2002) Increased cuckoldry as a cost of breeding late for male house wrens (Troglodytes aedon). Behav Ecol 13:670–675

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson LS, Rauch RL, Dellone SN (2004) The process and causes of fledging in a cavity-nesting passerine bird, the house wren (Troglodytes aedon). Ethology 110:693–705

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kokko H (1999) Cuckoldry and the stability of biparental care. Ecol Lett 2:247–255

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • LaBarbera K, Llambías PE, Cramer ERA, Schaming TD, Lovette IJ (2010) Synchrony does not explain extrapair paternity rate variation in northern or southern house wrens. Behav Ecol 21:773–780

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Llambías PE (2009) Why monogamy? Comparing house wren breeding systems in two hemispheres. Dissertation, Cornell University

  • Llambías PE, Fernández GJ (2009) Effects of nestboxes on the breeding biology of southern house wrens Troglodytes aedon bonariae in the southern temperate zone. Ibis 151:113–121

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Magrath MJL, Elgar MA (1997) Paternal care declines with increased opportunity for extra-pair matings in Fairy Martins. Proc R Soc Lond B 264:1731–1736

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Magrath MJL, Komdeur J (2003) Is male care compromised by additional mating opportunity? Trends Ecol Evol 18:424–430

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Norris K (1993) Seasonal variation in the reproductive success of blue tits: an experimental study. J Anim Ecol 62:287–294

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nur N (1984) Feeding frequencies of nestling blue tits (Parus caeruleus): costs, benefits and a model of optimal feeding fequency. Oecologia 65:125–137

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olson VA, Liker A, Freckleton RP, Székely T (2008) Parental conflict in birds: comparative analyses of offspring development, ecology and mating opportunities. Proc R Soc B 275:301–307

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ricklefs RE, White SC (1981) Growth and energetics of chicks of the sooty tern (Sterna fuscata) and common tern (S. hirundo). Auk 98:361–378

    Google Scholar 

  • Royle NJ, Hartley IR, Parker GA (2002) Sexual conflict reduces offspring fitness in zebra finches. Nature 416:733–736

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Schwagmeyer PL, Mock DW, Parker GA (2002) Biparental care in house sparrows: negotiation or sealed bid? Behav Ecol 13:713–721

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seki M, Wakano JY, Ihara Y (2007) A theoretical study on the evolution of male parental care and female multiple mating: effects of female mate choice and male care bias. J Theor Biol 247:281–296

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sheldon BC (2002) Relating paternity to paternal care. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B 357:341–350

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Townsend DS (1986) The costs of male parental care and its evolution in a neotropical frog. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 19:187–195

    Google Scholar 

  • Trivers RL (1972) Parental investment and sexual selection. In: Campbell B (ed) Sexual selection and the descent of man, 1871–1971. Aldine, Chicago, pp 136–179

    Google Scholar 

  • van Dijk RE, Brinkhuizen DM, Székely T, Komdeur J (2010) Parental care strategies in Eurasian penduline tit are not related to breeding densities and mating opportunities. Behaviour 147:1551–1565

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wedell N, Kvarnemo C, Lessells CM, Tregenza T (2006) Sexual conflict and life histories. Anim Behav 71:999–1011

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Westneat DF, Sherman PW (1993) Parentage and the evolution of parental behavior. Behav Ecol 4:66–77

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whittingham LA, Taylor PD, Robertson RJ (1992) Confidence of paternity and male parental care. Am Nat 139:1115–1125

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Winkler DW (1987) A general model for parental care. Am Nat 130:526–543

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wood S (2010) gamm4: generalized additive mixed models using mgcv and lme4. R package version 0.1-0. http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=gamm4. Accessed 2 February 2011

  • Wright J, Cuthill I (1989) Manipulation of sex differences in parental care. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 25:171–181

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yezerinac SM, Weatherhead PJ (1997) Reproductive synchrony and extra-pair mating strategy in a socially monogamous bird, Dendroica petechia. Anim Behav 54:1393–1403

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This study was funded by the Fuller Evolutionary Biology Program at the Cornell Lab of Ornithology (KL), a Howard Hughes Summer Scholarship (KL), a National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellowship (KL), a Mario Einaudi Center International Research Travel Grant (PEL), an Organization of American States Graduate Fellowship (PEL), the Scientific Research Society (PEL), an American Ornithologists’ Union Research Grant (PEL), and an Andrew W. Mellon Student Research Grant (PEL). G. Fernández, M. Mermoz, V. Ferretti, and P. Rodriguez provided field assistance, the Whisky-Michelli family generously allowed us to work on their ranches, and M. Beade provided logistical support. L. Stenzler, E.R.A. Cramer, A. Talaba, D. Morin, C. Makarewich, and B. Winger provided laboratory assistance and advice. J.P. Kelley and C. Tarwater lent statistical advice. I. Stewart, two anonymous reviewers, and the lab groups of E.A. Lacey, R. Bowie, R. Caldwell, and D. Elias made valuable comments on earlier versions.

Ethical standards

Experiments in this study comply with the current laws of the countries in which they were performed.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Katie LaBarbera.

Additional information

Communicated by T. Bakker

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

LaBarbera, K., Lovette, I.J. & Llambías, P.E. Mating opportunities, paternity, and sexual conflict: paternal care in northern and southern temperate house wrens. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 66, 253–260 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-011-1273-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-011-1273-4

Keywords

Navigation