Abstract
Protandry, the earlier arrival of males than females to breeding areas, is widespread in birds, but its underlying mechanisms are far from well understood. The two, not mutually exclusive most highly supported hypotheses to explain avian protandry postulate that it has evolved from intrasexual male competition to acquire the best territories (“rank advantage” hypothesis) and/or to maximize the number of mates (“mate opportunity” hypothesis). We studied for two consecutive years the relative importance of both hypotheses in a population of pied flycatchers (Ficedula hypoleuca), a territorial songbird with a mixed mating strategy. We measured territory quality using a long-term dataset on nest occupation and breeding output, and we used molecular techniques to assess male fitness across the range of social and genetic mating options. Territory quality was unrelated to breeding date and had no influence on extra-pair paternity or social polygynous events. However, males breeding early increased their chances of becoming socially polygynous and/or of attaining extra-pair paternity and, as a consequence, increased their total reproductive success. These results support the “mate opportunity” hypothesis, suggesting that sexual selection is the main mechanism driving protandry in this population.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Alatalo RV, Lundberg A, Glynn C (1986) Female pied flycatchers choose territory quality and not male characteristics. Nature 323:152–153
Andersson M (1994) Sexual selection. Princeton University Press, Princeton
Arvidsson BL, Neergaard R (1991) Mate choice in the willow warbler: a field experiment. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 29:225–229
Askenmo CEH (1984) Polygyny and nest site selection in pied flycatcher. Anim Behav 32:972–980
Bêty J, Gauthier G, Giroux J-F (2003) Body condition, migration, and timing of reproduction in snow geese: a test of the condition-dependent model of optimal clutch size. Am Nat 162:110–121
Birkhead TR (1998) Sperm competition in birds. Rev Reprod 3:123–129
Birkhead TR, Møller AP (1992) Sperm competition in birds: evolutionary causes and consequences. London Academic Press.
Birkhead TR, Møller AP (1998) Sperm competition and sexual selection. London: Academic Press
Bitton P-P, O’Brien EL, Dawson RD (2007) Plumage brightness and age predict male extra-pair fertilization success in tree swallows Tachycineta bicolor. Anim Behav 74:1777–1784
Brown CR, Brown MB (2000) Weather-mediated natural selection on arrival time in cliff swallows (Petrochelidon pyrrhonota). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 47:339–345
Canal D, Dávila JA, de Nova PJC, Ferrero E, Potti J (2009) Polymorphic microsatellite markers isolated from a southern European population of pied flycatcher (Ficedula hypoleuca iberiae). Mol Ecol Res 9:1375–1379
Canal D, Potti J, Dávila JA (2011) Male phenotype predicts extra pair paternity in pied flycatchers. Behaviour 148:691–712
Carvalho MC, Queiroz PCD, Ruszczyk A (1998) Protandry and female size-fecundity variation in the tropical butterfly Brassolis sophorae. Oecologia 116:98–102
Crecco VA, Savoy TF (1985) Effects of biotic and abiotic factors on growth and relative survival of young American shad, Alosa sapidissima, in the Connecticut River. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 42:1640–1648
Coppack T, Tottrup AP, Spottiswoode C (2006) Degree of protandry reflects level of extrapair paternity in migratory songbirds. J Ornithol 147:260–265
Cooper NW, Murphy MT, Redmond LJ (2009) Age- and sex-dependent spring arrival dates of Eastern Kingbirds. J Field Ornithol 80:35–41
Cordero PJ, Wetton JH, Parkin DT (1999) Extra-pair paternity and male badge size in the house sparrow. J Avian Biol 30:97–102
Ellegren H (1992) Polymerase-chain-reaction (PCR) analysis of microsatellites—a new approach to studies of genetic relationships in birds. Auk 109:886–895
Fishman MA, Stone L, Lotem A (2003) Fertility assurance through extrapair fertilizations and male paternity defense. J Theor Biol 221:103–114
Forstmeier W (2002) Benefits of early arrival at breeding grounds vary between males. J Anim Ecol 71:1–9
Griffith SC, Owens IPF, Thuman AK (2002) Extra-pair paternity in birds: a review of interspecific variation and adaptive function. Mol Ecol 11:2195–2212
Hasselquist D (1998) Polygyny in great reed warblers: a long-term study of factors contributing to male fitness. Ecology 53:938–946
Hastings J (1989) Protandry in western cicada killer wasps, (Sphecius grandis, Hymenoptera: Sphecidae): an empirical study of emergence time and mating opportunity. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 25:255–260
Holzapfel CM, Bradshaw WE (2002) Protandry: the relationship between emergence time and male fitness in the pitcher-plant mosquito. Ecology 83:607–611
Huk T, Winkel W (2008) Testing the sexy son hypothesis. A research framework for empirical approaches. Behav Ecol 19:456–461
Jonzén N, Hedenström A, Lundberg P (2007) Climate change and the optimal arrival of migratory birds. Proc R Soc B 274:269–274
Kempenaers B, Geert R, Dhondt A (1997) Extrapair paternity in the blue tit (Parus caeruleus): female choice, male characteristics, and offspring quality. Behav Ecol 8:481–492
Ketterson ED, Nolan VJ (1976) Geographic variation and its climatic correlates in the sex ratio of eastern-wintering dark-eyed juncos (Junco hyemalis hyemalis). Ecology 57:679–693
Kissner KJ, Weatherhead PJ, Francis CM (2003) Sexual size dimorphism and timing of spring migration in birds. J Evol Biol 16:154–162
Kokko H (1999) Competition for early arrival in migratory birds. J Anim Ecol 68:940–950
Kokko H, Gunnarsson TG, Morrell LJ, Gill JA (2006) Why do female migratory birds arrive later than males? J Anim Ecol 75:1293–1303
Kleckner CA, Hawley WA, Bradshaw WE, Holzapfel CM, Fisher IJ (1995) Protandry in Aedes sierrensis: the significance of temporal variation in female fecundity. Ecology 76:1242–1250
Langefors A, Hasselquist D, von Schantz T (1998) Extra-pair fertilizations in the sedge warbler. J Avian Biol 29:134–144
Leder EH, Karaiskou N, Primmer CR (2008) Seventy new microsatellites for the pied flycatcher, Ficedula hypoleuca and amplification in other passerine birds. Mol Ecol Res 8:874–880
Lifjeld JT, Slagsvold T (1988) Female pied flycatchers Ficedula hypoleuca choose male characteristics in homogeneous habitats. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 22:27–36
Lifjeld JT, Slagsvold T, Ellegren H (1997) Experimental mate switching in pied flycatchers: male copulatory access and fertilization success. Anim Behav 53:1225–1232
Ligon JD (1999) The evolution of avian breeding systems. Oxford ornithology series. Oxford University Press, New York
Lozano GA (1994) Size, condition, and territory ownership in male tree swallows (Tachycineta bicolor). Can J Zool 72:330–333
Lozano GA, Perreault S, Lemon RE (1996) Age, arrival date and reproductive success of male American redstarts Setophaga ruticilla. J Avian Biol 27:164–170
Lundberg A, Alatalo RV (1992) The pied flycatcher. Poyser, London
Michl G, Török J, Griffith SC, Sheldon BC (2002) Experimental analysis of sperm competition mechanisms in a wild bird population. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 99:5466–5470
Møller AP (1994) Phenotype-dependent arrival time and its consequences in a migratory bird. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 35:115–122
Møller AP (2004) Protandry, sexual selection and climate change. Glob Change Biol 10:2028–2035
Møller AP, Brohede J, Cuervo JJ, de Lope F, Primmer C (2003) Extrapair paternity in relation to sexual ornamentation, arrival date and condition in a migratory bird. Behav Ecol 14:707–712
Møller AP, Balbontín J, Cuervo JJ, Hermosell IG, de Lope F (2009) Individual differences in protandry, sexual selection, and fitness. Behav Ecol 20:433–440
Morbey Y (2000) Protandry in Pacific salmon. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 57:1252–1257
Morbey YE, Ydenberg RC (2001) Protandrous arrival timing to breeding areas: a review. Ecol Lett 4:663–673
Morton ML, Sherman PW (1978) Effects of a spring snowstorm on behavior, reproduction, and survival of Belding’s ground squirrels. Can J Zool 56:2578–2590
Myers JP (1981) A test of three hypotheses for latitudinal segregation of the sexes in wintering birds. Can J Zool 59:1527–1534
Neto JM, Hansson B, Hasselquist D (2010) Low frequency of extra-pair paternity in Savi’s warblers (Locustella luscinioides). Behaviour 147:1413–1429
Newton I (2006) Can conditions experienced during migration limit the population levels of birds? J Ornithol 147:146–166
Newton I (2008) The ecology of bird migration. Academic Press, London
Olsson M, Madsen T (1996) Costs of mating with infertile males selects for late emergence in female sand lizards. Copeia 2:462–464
Potti J, Montalvo S (1991) Male arrival and female mate choice in Pied Flycatchers (Ficedula hypoleuca) in central Spain. Ornis Scand 22:45–54
Potti J, Blanco G, Lemus JÁ, Canal D (2007) Infectious offspring: how birds acquire and transmit an avian polyomavirus in the wild. PLoS One 2(12):e1276. doi:101371/journalpone0001276
Primmer G, Anders M, Ellegren H (1996) New microsatellites from the pied flycatcher Ficedula hypoleuca and the swallow Hirundo rustica genomes. Hereditas 124:281–283
Rätti O, Lundberg A, Tegelström H, Alatalo RV (2001) No evidence for effects of breeding density and male removal on extrapair paternity in the pied flycatcher. Auk 118:147–155
Reudink MW, Marra PP, Kyser TK, Boag PT, Langin KM, Ratcliffe LM (2009) Non-breeding season events influence sexual selection in a long-distance migratory bird. Proc R Soc B 276:1619–1626. doi:10.1098/rspb.2008.1452
Reynolds JD, Colwell MA, Cooke F (1986) Sexual selection and spring arrival times of red-necked and Wilson’s phalaropes. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 18:303–310
Rubolini D, Spina F, Saino N (2004) Protandry and sexual dimorphism in trans-Saharan migratory birds. Behav Ecol 15:592–601
Saino N, Rubolini D, Serra L, Caprioli M, Morganti M, Ambrosini R, Spina F (2010) Sex-related variation in migration phenology in relation to sexual dimorphism: a test of competing hypotheses for the evolution of protandry. J Evol Biol 23:2054–2065. doi:10.1111/j.1420-9101.2010.02068
Sanz JJ (2001) Experimentally reduced male attractiveness increases parental care in the pied flycatcher Ficedula hypoleuca. Behav Ecol 12:171–176
Sergio F, Newton I (2003) Occupancy as a measure of territory quality. J Anim Ecol 72:857–865
Sirkiä PM, Laaksonen T (2009) Distinguishing between male and territory quality: females choose multiple traits in the pied flycatcher. Anim Behav 78:1051–1060
Smith RJ, Moore FR (2005) Arrival timing and seasonal reproductive performance in a long-distance migratory landbird. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 57:231–239
Spottiswoode C, Tøttrup AP, Coppack T (2006) Sexual selection predicts advancement of avian spring migration in response to climate change. Proc R Soc B 273:3023–3029
Tennessen JA, Zamudio KR (2003) Early-male reproductive advantage, multiple paternity, and sperm storage in an amphibian aggregate breeder. Mol Ecol 12:1567–1576
Thornhill R, Alcock J (1983) The evolution of insect mating systems. Harvard University Press, Cambridge
Weatherhead PJ, Boag PT (1995) Pair and extra-pair mating success relative to male quality in red-winged blackbirds. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 37:81–91
Weatherhead PJ, Robertson RJ (1979) Offspring quality and the polygyny threshold: “the sexy son hypothesis”. Am Nat 11:201–208
Webster MS, Tarvin KA, Tuttle EM, Pruett-Jones S (2007) Promiscuity drives sexual selection in a socially monogamous bird. Evolution 61:2205–2211
Westneat DF, Stewart IRK (2003) Extra-pair paternity in birds: causes, correlates, and conflict. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 34:365–396
Wiklund C, Fagerström T (1977) Why do males emerge before females? A hypothesis to explain the incidence of protandry in butterflies. Oecologia 31:153–158
Wiklund C, Solbreck C (1982) Adaptive versus incidental explanations for the occurrence of protandry in a butterfly Heptidea sinapis L. Evolution 36:56–62
Acknowledgements
We thank Inés Valencia and Carlos Camacho for their dedicated assistance in the field and Airam Rodriguez for the valuable and long discussions on statistics and behavior. F. Stephen Dobson and an anonymous reviewer commented constructively on a first draft of the paper. Consejería de Medio Ambiente, Comunidad de Madrid and Delegación de Medio Ambiente, Junta de Castilla-La Mancha gave us working permissions. This work was supported by projects PAC05-006-2 (to J.A. Dávila) and CGL2006-07481/BOS. DC was supported by a grant from the Ministerio de Educación y Ciencia (I3P-BDP2005). RJ is supported by a Ramón y Cajal research contract (RYC-2009-03967) from the Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación. JP was supported during writing by project CGL2009-10652 (to J.C. Senar).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Communicated by S. Pruett-Jones
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Canal, D., Jovani, R. & Potti, J. Multiple mating opportunities boost protandry in a pied flycatcher population. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 66, 67–76 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-011-1253-8
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-011-1253-8