Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology

, Volume 65, Issue 12, pp 2251–2260 | Cite as

Vocalizations by Alaskan moose: female incitation of male aggression

  • R. Terry Bowyer
  • Janet L. Rachlow
  • Kelley M. Stewart
  • Victor Van Ballenberghe
Original Paper


Evidence of female fomentation of male–male aggression as a mechanism of mate choice is rare, especially in mammals. Female choice of mates in polygynous species may be masked by intense male competition or by males attempting to restrict female choice. We studied protest moans of female Alaskan moose Alces alces gigas in interior Alaska, USA, from 1987 to 1990, to determine if moans incited male–male aggression. Alaskan moose exhibit a mating system in which one dominant male (the harem master) herds, defends, courts, and attempts to mate with females in his harem. Protest moans were given by females only in response to courtship. We hypothesized that if protest moans were related to females reducing harassment and exercising mate choice, females should give protest moans more frequently when courted by small males and less often when courted by large males, and that rates of male–male aggression would be elevated following protest moans. Harems were composed of one large male, with a mean of 4.4 females (median = 3 females); 10% of 132 harems included ≥10 females. The temporal pattern of protest moans from late August through November was associated with, but tended to lag behind, mating behavior. The rate of protest moans given by females decreased with increasing size of males courting them. Male–male aggression was significantly less during periods without protest moans than during periods in which protest moans occurred. These results indicate that female moose gave protest moans to reduce harassment by smaller males, and assure a mating opportunity with the most dominant male. Such a subtle mechanism of indirect mate choice by females may occur in other vertebrates in which choice is limited by a mating system in which male–male combat and male dominance over females reduces opportunities for female choice. The importance of female choice may be undervalued in studies of sexual selection in mammals.


Aggression Alaskan moose Alces alces gigas Female choice Harassment Incitation Vocalization 


  1. Altmann J (1974) Observational study of behavior: sampling methods. Behaviour 49:227–267PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Andersson M, Simmons LW (2006) Sexual selection and mate choice. Trends Ecol Evol 21:296–302PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Balmford A (1991) Mate choice on leks. Trends Ecol Evol 6:87–92PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Berger J (1989) Female reproductive potential and its apparent evaluation by male mammals. J Mammal 70:347–358CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Berger J (1992) Facilitation of reproductive synchrony by gestation adjustment in gregarious mammals: a new hypothesis. Ecology 73:323–329CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Beuchner HK, Schloeth R (1965) Ceremonial mating behavior in Uganda kob (Adenota kob thomasi Neuman). Z Tierpsychol 22:209–225CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bowyer RT (1986) Antler characteristics as related to social status of male southern mule deer. Southwest Nat 31:289–298CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bowyer RT, Kitchen DW (1987) Sex and age-class differences in vocalizations of Roosevelt elk during rut. Am Midl Nat 118:225–235CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bowyer RT, Van Ballenberghe V, Rock KR (1994) Scent marking by Alaskan moose: characteristics and spatial distribution of rubbed trees. Can J Zool 72:2186–2192CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bowyer RT, Van Ballenberghe V, Kie JG (1998) Timing and synchrony of parturition in Alaskan moose: long-terms versus proximal effects of climate. J Mammal 79:1332–1344CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bowyer RT, Van Ballenberghe V, Kie JG, Maier JAK (1999) Birth-site selection in Alaskan moose: maternal strategies for coping with a risky environment. J Mammal 80:1070–1083CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Bowyer RT, Stewart KM, Kie JG, Gasaway WC (2001) Fluctuating asymmetry in antlers of Alaskan moose: size matters. J Mammal 82:814–824CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Bowyer RT, Stewart KM, Pierce BM, Hundertmark KJ, Gasaway WC (2002) Geographical variation in antler morphology of Alaska moose: putative effects of habitat and genetics. Alces 38:155–165Google Scholar
  14. Bowyer RT, Van Ballenberghe V, Kie JG (2003) Moose (Alces alces). In: Feldhamer GA, Thompson BC, Chapman JA (eds) Wild mammals of North America: biology, management, and conservation, 2nd edn. The Johns Hopkins Univ Press, Baltimore, pp 931–964Google Scholar
  15. Bowyer RT, Bleich VC, Manteca X, Whiting JC, Stewart KM (2007) Sociality, mate choice, and timing of mating in American bison (Bison bison): effects of large males. Ethology 113:1048–1060CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Bro-Jørgensen J (2002) Overt female mate competition and preference for central males in a lekking antelope. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 99:9290–9293PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Bro-Jørgensen J (2003) No peace for estrous topi cows on leks. Behav Ecol 14:521–525CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Bro-Jørgensen J (2008) The impact of lekking on the spatial variation in payoffs to resource-defending topi bulls, Damaliscus lunatus. Anim Behav 75:1229–1234CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Bro-Jørgensen J (2011) Intra- and intersexual conflicts and cooperation in the evolution of mating strategies: lessons learnt from ungulates. Evol Biol 38:28–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Bro-Jørgensen J, Durant SM (2003) Mating strategies of topi bulls: getting in the centre of attention. Anim Behav 65:585–594CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Byers JA, Moodie JD, Hall N (1994) Pronghorn females choose vigorous mates. Anim Behav 47:33–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Byers JA, Wiseman PA, Jones L, Roffe TJ (2005) A large cost of female mate sampling in pronghorn. Am Nat 166:661–668PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Byers JA, Byers AA, Dunn SA (2006) A dry summer diminishes mate search effort by pronghorn females: evidence for a significant cost of mate search. Ethology 112:74–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Byers JA, Hevets E, Podos J (2010) Female mate choice based upon male motor performance. Anim Behav 79:771–778CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Ciuti S, Apollonio M (2011) Do antlers honestly advertise the phenotypic quality of fallow buck (Dama dama) in a lekking population? Ethology 117:133–144CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Clutton-Brock TH, McAuliffe K (2009) Female mate choice in mammals. Quart Rev Biol 84:3–27PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Clutton-Brock TH, Albon SD, Gibson RM, Guinness FE (1979) The logical stag: adaptive aspects of fighting in red deer (Cervus elaphus L.). Anim Behav 27:211–225CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Clutton-Brock TH, Guinness FE, Albon SD (1982) Red deer: behavior and ecology of two sexes. Univ Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  29. Coltman DW, Festa-Bianchet M, Jorgenson JT, Strobeck C (2002) Age-dependent sexual selection in bighorn rams. Proc Biol Sci 269:165–172PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Conover WJ, Iman RL (1981) Rank transformations as a bridge between parametric and nonparametric statistics. Am Stat 35:120–124Google Scholar
  31. Cox CR, Le Boeuf B (1977) Female incitation of male competition: a mechanism in sexual selection. Am Nat 111:317–335CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Darwin C (1871) The decent of man and selection in relation to sex. Murray, LondonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Eberhard WG, Cordero C (2003) Sexual conflict and female choice. Trends Ecol Evol 18:438–439CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Garel M, Solberg EJ, Sæther B-E, Grøtan V, Tufto J, Heim M (2009) Age, size, and spatiotemporal variation in ovulation patterns of a seasonal breeder, the Norwegian moose. Am Nat 173:89–104PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Hauser MD (1993) Rhesus monkey copulation calls: honest signals for female choice? Proc Biol Sci 254:93–96PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Hirth DH (1977) Social behavior of white-tailed deer in relation to habitat. Wildl Monogr 53:1–55Google Scholar
  37. Hunt J, Breuker CJ, Sadowski JA, Moore AJ (2009) Male–male competition, female mate choice and their interaction: determining total sexual selection. J Evol Biol 22:13–26PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Jennings DJ, Gammell MP, Carlin CM, Hayden TJ (2002) Does lateral presentation of the palmate antlers during fights by fallow deer (Dama dama L.) signify dominance or submission? Ethology 108:389–401CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Keech MA, Bowyer RT, Ver Hoef JM, Boertje RD, Dale BW, Stephenson TR (2000) Life-history consequences of maternal condition in Alaska moose. J Wildl Manag 64:450–462CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Kokko H, Brooks R, Jennions M, Morley J (2003) The evolution of mate choice and mating biases. Proc Biol Sci 270:653–664PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Leuthold W (1966) Variations in territorial behavior of Uganda kob Adenota kob thomasi (Neuman 1896). Behaviour 27:215–258Google Scholar
  42. Lovari S, Bartolommei P, Meschi F, Pezzo F (2008) Going out to mate: excursion behavior of female roe deer. Ethology 114:886–898CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Lovari S, Pellizzi B, Boesi R, Fusani L (2009) Mating dominance amongst Himalayan tahr: blonds do better. Behav Process 81:20–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Maestripieri D, Leoni M, Raza SS, Hirsch EJ, Whitham JC (2005) Female copulation calls in guinea boboons: evidence for postcopulaton female choice? Int J Primatol 26:737–758CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Maher CR, Byers JA (1987) Age-related changes in the reproductive effort of male bison. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 21:91–96CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Mainguy J, Côté SD (2008) Age- and state-dependent reproductive effort in male mountain goats, Oreanmos americanus. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 62:935–943CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Malo AF, Roldan ERS, Garde J, Soler AJ, Gomendio M (2005) Antlers honestly advertise sperm production and quality. Proc Biol Sci 272:149–157PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Massei G, Bowyer RT (1999) Scent marking in fallow deer: effects of lekking behavior on rubbing and wallowing. J Mammal 80:633–638CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. McCullough DR (1969) The tule elk: its history, behavior, and ecology. Univ Calif Publ Zool 88:1–209Google Scholar
  50. McElligott AG, Hayden TJ (2000) Lifetime mating success, sexual selection and life history of fallow bucks (Dama dama). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 48:203–210CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. McElligott AG, Gammell MP, Harty HC, Paini DR, Murphy DT, Walsh JT, Hayden TJ (2001) Sexual size dimorphism in fallow deer (Dama dama): do larger, heavier males gain greater mating success? Behav Ecol Sociobiol 49:266–272CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. McElligott AG, Birrer M, Vannoni E (2006) Retraction of the mobile descended larynx during groaning enables fallow bucks (Dama dama) to lower their formant frequencies. J Zool 270:340–345CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Miquelle DG (1990) Why don't bull moose eat during the rut? Behav Ecol Sociobiol 27:145–151CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Miquelle DG, Peek JM, Van Ballenberghe V (1992) Sexual segregation in Alaskan moose. Wildl Monogr 122:1–57Google Scholar
  55. Molvar EM, Bowyer RT (1994) Costs and benefits of group living in a recently social ungulate: the Alaskan moose. J Mammal 75:621–630CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Monteith KL, Schmitz LE, Jenks JA, Delger JA, Bowyer RT (2009) Growth of male white-tailed deer: consequences of maternal effects. J Mammal 90:651–660CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Montgomerie R, Thornhill R (1989) Fertility advertisement in birds: a means of inciting male-male competition? Ethology 81:209–220CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Moore AJ, Moore PJ (1999) Balancing sexual selection through opposing mate choice and male competition. Proc Biol Sci 266:711–716CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Mysterud A, Langvatin R, Stenseth NC (2005) Aging and reproductive effort in male moose under variable levels of intrasexual competition. J Anim Ecol 74:742–745CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Mysterud A, Bonenfant C, Loe LE, Langvatn R, Yoccoz NG, Stenseth NC (2008) The timing of male reproductive effort relative to female ovulation in a capital breeder. J Anim Ecol 77:469–477PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Parker GA (2006) Sexual conflict over mating and fertilization: an overview. Phil Trans Biol Sci 361:235–259CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Peek JM, LeResche RE, Stevens DR (1974) Dynamics of moose aggregations in Alaska, Minnesota, and Montana. J Mammal 55:126–137CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Peek JM, Van Ballenberghe V, Miquelle DG (1986) Intensity of interactions between rutting bull moose in central Alaska. J Mammal 67:423–426CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Pemberton JM, Albon SD, Guinness FE, Clutton-Brock TH, Dover GA (1992) Behavioral estimates of male mating success tested by DNA fingerprinting in a polygynous mammal. Behav Ecol 3:66–75CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Pérez-Gonzáles J, Carranza J, Polo V (2010) Measuring female aggregation in ungulate mating-system research: a red deer case study. Wildl Res 37:301–310CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Pizzari T (2001) Indirect partner choice thorough manipulation of male behaviour by female fowl Gallus gallus domesticus. Proc Biol Sci 268:181–186PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Preston BT, Stevenson IR, Pemberton JM, Wilson K (2001) Dominant rams lose out by sperm depletion. A waning success in siring counters a ram's high score in competition for ewes. Nature 409:681–682PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Rachlow JL, Bowyer RT (1991) Interannual variation in timing and synchrony of parturition in Dall's sheep. J Mammal 72:487–492CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Rachlow JL, Bowyer RT (1994) Variability in maternal behavior by Dall's sheep: environmental tracking or adaptive strategy? J Mammal 75:328–337CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Réale D, Bousses P, Chapois JL (1996) Female-based mortality induced by male sexual harassment in a feral sheep population. Can J Zool 74:1812–1818CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Reby D, McComb K (2003) Anatomical constraints generate honesty: acoustic cues to age and weight in the roars of red deer stags. Anim Behav 65:519–530CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Rowe L, Day T (2006) Detecting sexual conflict and sexually antagonistic coevolution. Phil Trans Biol Sci 361:277–285CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Schmidt JI, Ver Hoef JM, Bowyer RT (2007) Antler size of Alaskan moose Alces alces gigas: effects of populating density, hunter harvest and use of guides. Wildl Biol 13:53–65CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Schwartz CC, Hundertmark KJ (1993) Reproductive characteristics of Alaskan moose. J Wildl Manag 57:454–468CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Schwartz CC, Regelin WL, Franzmann AW (1987) Seasonal weight dynamics of moose. Swedish Wildl Res Suppl 1:301–310Google Scholar
  76. Semple S (1998) The function of Barbary macaque copulation calls. Proc Biol Sci 265:287–291PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Sikes RS, Gannon WL, Animal Care and Use Committee of the American Society of Mammalogists (2011) Guidelines of the American Society of Mammalogists for the use of wild mammals in research. J Mammal 92:235–253CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Stenström D, Dahlblom S, Jones Fur C, Höglund J (2000) Rutting pit distribution and the significance of fallow deer (Dama dama) scrapes during the rut. Wildl Biol 6:23–29Google Scholar
  79. Stewart KM, Bowyer RT, Kie JG, Gasaway WC (2000) Antler size relative to body mass in moose: tradeoffs associated with reproduction. Alces 36:77–83Google Scholar
  80. Sullivan-Beckers L, Cocroft RB (2010) The importance of female choice, male-male competition, and signal transmission as causes of selection on male mating signals. Evolution 64:3158–3171PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Van Ballenberghe V (1983) Growth and development of moose antlers in Alaska. In: Brown RD (ed) Antler development in Cervidae. Caesar Kleberg Widl Res Inst, Kingsville, pp 37–48Google Scholar
  82. Van Ballenberghe V, Miquelle DG (1993) Mating in moose: timing, behavior and male access patterns. Can J Zool 71:1687–1690CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Van Ballenberghe V, Miquelle DG (1996) Rutting behavior of moose in central Alaska. Alces 32:109–130Google Scholar
  84. Vannoni E, McElligott AG (2007) Individual acoustic variation in fallow deer (Dama dama) common and harsh groans; a source-filter theory perspective. Ethology 113:223–234CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Vannoni E, McElligott AG (2009) Fallow bucks get hoarse: vocal fatigue as a possible signal to conspecifics. Anim Behav 78:3–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Weckerly FW (1998) Sexual size dimorphism: influence of mass and mating systems in the most dimorphic mammals. J Mammal 79:33–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Whittle CL, Bowyer RT, Clausen TP, Duffy LK (2000) Putative pheromones in urine of rutting male moose (Alces alces): evolution of honest advertisement? J Chem Ecol 26:2747–2762CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Wiley RH, Poston J (1996) Indirect mate choice, competition for mates, and coevolution of the sexes. Evolution 50:1371–1381CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Wong BBM, Candolin U (2005) How is female mate choice affected by male competition? Biol Rev 80:559–571PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Wyman MT, Mooring MS, McCowan B, Penedo MCT, Hart LA (2008) Amplitude of bison bellows reflects male quality, physical condition and motivation. Anim Behav 76:1625–1639CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Zar JH (1999) Biostatistical analysis. Prentice-Hall, Englewood CliffsGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • R. Terry Bowyer
    • 1
  • Janet L. Rachlow
    • 2
  • Kelley M. Stewart
    • 3
  • Victor Van Ballenberghe
    • 4
  1. 1.Department of Biological SciencesIdaho State UniversityPocatelloUSA
  2. 2.Department of Fish and Wildlife ResourcesUniversity of IdahoMoscowUSA
  3. 3.Natural Resources and Environmental SciencesUniversity of Nevada RenoRenoUSA
  4. 4.Department of Biology and WildlifeUniversity of Alaska FairbanksFairbanksUSA

Personalised recommendations