Advertisement

Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology

, Volume 65, Issue 9, pp 1709–1714 | Cite as

Kill before being killed: an experimental approach supports the predator-removal hypothesis as a determinant of intraguild predation in top predators

  • Rui LourençoEmail author
  • Vincenzo Penteriani
  • Maria del Mar Delgado
  • Michela Marchi-Bartolozzi
  • João Eduardo Rabaça
Original Paper

Abstract

Intraguild predation (IGP) has been explained in terms of competitor-removal, food-stress and predator-removal hypotheses. Only the first two hypotheses have been fairly well studied. To test the predator-removal hypothesis as a force determining IGP in avian predators, we performed a field experiment to simulate the presence of an IG predator (eagle owl Bubo bubo dummy) in the surrounding of the nests of four potential IG prey (black kite Milvus migrans, red kite Milvus milvus, booted eagle Aquila pennata and common buzzard Buteo buteo). To discard the possibility that an aggressive reaction towards the eagle owl was not related to the presence of the IG predator, we also presented a stuffed tawny owl Strix aluco, which is a potential competitor but cannot be considered an IG predator of the studied diurnal raptors considered in the experiment. While almost always ignoring the tawny owl, raptors chiefly showed an interspecific aggressive behaviour towards their IG predator. Our results seem to support the predator-removal hypothesis, as the IG prey may take advantage of the diurnal inactivity of the IG predator to remove it from their territory. However, the recorded behaviour may be also considered as a special variety of mobbing (i.e. a prey’s counter-strategy against its predator), where the mobber is sufficiently powerful to escalate predator harassment into deliberate killing attempts. In their turn, eagle owls can respond with an IG predatory behaviour aimed at removing IG prey species which are highly aggressive mobbers.

Keywords

Bubo bubo Interspecific aggression Interspecific competition Mobbing Raptors Superpredation 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We thank F. Goytre, C. Lee-Ray and Tiffany for their help in field work, S. Santos for statistical advice and revision, and E. Korpimäki, J. Valkama and an anonymous referee for useful comments that improved the manuscript. The study was funded by a research project from the Consejería de Medio Ambiente, Junta de Andalucía (EXPTE.:700/2005/M/00./). RL was supported by a doctoral degree grant from Fundação para a Ciência e Tecnologia, Portugal (BD/27434/2006), VP by a grant from the Ministry of Education and Science, C.S.I.C. (Proyectos Intramurales Especiales), and a grant from the Spanish Secretaría General de Universidades, Ministry of Education (Salvador de Madariaga Program), and MMD by a postdoctoral grant from the Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation and a post-doctoral grant from the Academy of Finland.

References

  1. Alcock J (1998) Animal behavior: an evolutionary approach. Sinauer Associates, SunderlandGoogle Scholar
  2. Bates D, Maechler M (2009) lme4 — Linear mixed-effects models using S4 classes. Version 0.999375-31. http://lme4.r-forge.r-project.org/
  3. Bolker BM, Brooks ME, Clark CJ, Geange SW, Poulsen JR, Stevens MHH, White JSS (2008) Generalized linear mixed models: a practical guide for ecology and evolution. Trends Ecol Evol 24:127–135. doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2008.10.008 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Caro TM, Stoner CJ (2003) The potential for interspecific competition among African carnivores. Biol Conserv 110:67–75. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3207(02)00177-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Crooks KR, Soulé ME (1999) Mesopredator release and avifaunal extinctions in a fragmented system. Nature 400:563–566. doi: 10.1038/23028 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Hakkarainen H, Korpimäki E (1996) Competitive and predatory interactions among raptors: an observational and experimental study. Ecology 77:1134–1142. doi: 10.2307/2265582 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Heithaus MR (2001) Predator–prey and competitive interactions between sharks (order Selachii) and dolphins (suborder Odontoceti): a review. J Zool 253:53–68. doi: 10.1017/S0952836901000061 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Johnson CN, Isaac JL, Fisher DO (2007) Rarity of a top predator triggers continent-wide collapse of mammal prey: dingoes and marsupials in Australia. Proc R Soc B 274:341–346. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2006.3711 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Korpimäki E, Norrdahl K (1989) Avian predation on mustelids in Europe 1: occurrence and effects of body size variation and life traits. Oikos 55:205–215CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Krüger O (2002) Interactions between common buzzard Buteo buteo and goshawk Accipiter gentilis: trade-offs revealed by a field experiment. Oikos 96:441–452. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0706.2002.960306.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Linnell JDC, Strand O (2000) Interference interactions, co-existence and conservation of mammalian carnivores. Divers Distri 6:169–176. doi: 10.1046/j.1472-4642.2000.00069.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Lourenço R, Santos SM, Rabaça JE, Penteriani V (2011) Superpredation patterns in four large European raptors. Pop Ecol 53:175–185. doi: 10.1007/s10144-010-0199-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Mikkola H (1976) Owls killing and killed by other owls and raptors in Europe. Br Birds 69:144–154Google Scholar
  14. Palomares F, Caro TM (1999) Interspecific killing among mammalian carnivores. Am Nat 153:492–508. doi: 10.1086/303189 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Pavey CR, Smyth AK (1998) Effects of avian mobbing on roost use and diet of powerful owls, Ninox strenua. Anim Behav 55:313–318. doi: 10.1006/anbe.1997.0633 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Penteriani V, Delgado MM, Alonso-Alvarez C, Sergio F (2007) The importance of visual cues for nocturnal species: eagle owls signal by badge brightness. Behav Ecol 18:143–147. doi: 10.1093/beheco/arl060 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Penteriani V, Lourenço R, Delgado MM (2008) El fenómeno de la colonización de Doñana por parte del búho real: patrones espacio-temporales de la población y efectos sobre las comunidades de aves y mamíferos. Final Report, C.S.I.C. – Junta de Andalucía, EXPTE.:700/2005/M/00.Google Scholar
  18. Pettifor RA (1990) The effects of avian mobbing on a potential predator, the European kestrel, Falco tinnunculus. Anim Behav 39:821–827. doi: 10.1016/S0003-3472(05)80945-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Polis GA, Myers CA, Holt RD (1989) The ecology and evolution of intraguild predation: potential competitors that eat each other. Ann Rev Ecol Syst 20:297–330. doi: 10.1146/annurev.es.20.110189.001501 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. R Development Core Team (2009) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. ISBN 3-900051-07-0, URL: http://www.R-project.org
  21. Ritchie EG, Johnson CN (2009) Predator interactions, mesopredator release and biodiversity conservation. Ecol Lett 12:982–998. doi: 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2009.01347.x PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Schmitz OJ, Hambäck PA, Beckerman AP (2000) Trophic cascades in terrestrial systems: a review of the effects of carnivore removals on plants. Am Nat 155:141–153. doi: 10.1086/303311 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Sergio F, Hiraldo F (2008) Intraguild predation in raptor assemblages: a review. Ibis 150(s1):132–145. doi: 10.1111/j.1474-919X.2008.00786.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Sergio F, Marchesi L, Pedrini P (2003) Spatial refugia and the coexistence of a diurnal raptor with its intraguild owl predator. J Anim Ecol 72:232–245. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2656.2003.00693.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Sergio F, Marchesi L, Pedrini P, Penteriani V (2007) Coexistence of a generalist owl with its intraguild predator: distance-sensitive or habitat-mediated avoidance? Anim Behav 74:1607–1616. doi: 10.1016/j.anbehav.2006.10.022 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Sergio F, Blas J, Hiraldo F (2009) Predictors of floater status in a long-lived bird: a cross-sectional and longitudinal test of hypotheses. J Anim Ecol 78:109–118. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2656.2008.01484.x PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Serrano D (2000) Relationship between raptors and rabbits in the diet of Eagle Owls in southwestern Europe: competition removal or food stress? J Raptor Res 34:305–310Google Scholar
  28. Sih A, Crowley P, McPeek M, Petranka J, Strohmeier K (1985) Predation, competition, and prey communities: a review of field experiments. Ann Rev Ecol Syst 16:269–311. doi: 10.1146/annurev.es.16.110185.001413 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Slagsvold T (1982) Mobbing: goshawks attacking stuffed eagle owl. Br Birds 75:330–333Google Scholar
  30. Suárez S, Balbontín J, Ferrer M (2000) Nesting habitat selection by booted eagles Hieraaetus pennatus and implications for management. J Appl Ecol 37:215–223. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2664.2000.00503.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Sunde P, Overskaug K, Kvam T (1999) Intraguild predation of lynxes and foxes: evidence of interference competition? Ecography 22:521–523. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0587.1999.tb01281.x Google Scholar
  32. Sunde P, Bølstad MS, Desfor KB (2003) Diurnal exposure as a risk sensitive behaviour in tawny owls Strix aluco? J Avian Biol 34:409–418. doi: 10.1111/j.0908-8857.2003.03105.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Tella JL, Mañosa S (1993) Eagle owl predation on Egyptian vulture and northern goshawk: possible effects of a decrease in European rabbit availability. J Raptor Res 27:111–112Google Scholar
  34. Zar JH (1999) Biostatistical analysis. Prentice Hall, New JerseyGoogle Scholar
  35. Zuberogoitia I, Martínez JE, Martínez JA, Zabala J, Calvo JF, Azkona A, Pagán I (2008) The dho-gaza and mist net with Eurasian eagle-owl (Bubo bubo) lure: effectiveness in capturing thirtheen species of European raptors. J Raptor Res 42:48–51. doi: 10.3356/JRR-05-31.1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Rui Lourenço
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  • Vincenzo Penteriani
    • 1
    • 3
  • Maria del Mar Delgado
    • 1
    • 4
  • Michela Marchi-Bartolozzi
    • 5
  • João Eduardo Rabaça
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Conservation BiologyEstación Biológica de DoñanaSevilleSpain
  2. 2.LabOr — Laboratory of Ornithology and Institute of Mediterranean Agricultural and Environmental SciencesUniversity of ÉvoraÉvoraPortugal
  3. 3.Finnish Museum of Natural History, Zoological MuseumUniversity of HelsinkiHelsinkiFinland
  4. 4.Metapopulation Research Group, Department of BiosciencesUniversity of HelsinkiHelsinkiFinland
  5. 5.Bourne Bridge Cottages, Little AbingtonCambridgeUK

Personalised recommendations