Advertisement

Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology

, Volume 65, Issue 7, pp 1425–1435 | Cite as

The effects of preen oils and soiling on the UV–visible reflectance of carotenoid-pigmented feathers

  • Lorenzo Pérez-Rodríguez
  • Francois Mougeot
  • Gary R. Bortolotti
Original Paper

Abstract

Plumage coloration, particularly when carotenoid-based, is important in social signaling in birds. Although feather color is a relatively stable trait, individuals may modify it with “cosmetic” substances such as preen oils. In addition, dirt accumulation may influence plumage coloration and further affect signal perception by receivers. Here, we analyze the separate potential effects of preen oils and soil accumulation on the reflectance properties of carotenoid-pigmented feathers across the visual range of most bird species, which includes the ultraviolet (UV). Using the yellow portion of tail feathers of Bohemian waxwings (Bombycilla garrulus), we performed two separate experiments where: (a) preen oils and/or soil were removed, or (b) preen oils (from black-billed magpies Pica pica or eagle owls Bubo bubo) were added. Preen oil addition reduced brightness but increased UV hue and yellow chroma. UV chroma was reduced by the addition of magpie (but not owl) preen oil. Soil accumulation had little effect on plumage reflectance in the UV range but significantly reduced yellow chroma. According to models of avian vision, both of these effects are detectable by birds and biologically meaningful when compared with natural variation between the sexes and age classes. We conclude that preen oil and soil accumulation can significantly affect the UV–visible reflectance of carotenoid-based plumages. As such traits typically advertise individual quality, preening and soiling have the potential to modify the information content of carotenoid-based plumage traits and how these signals are perceived by receivers.

Keywords

Carotenoids Coloration Honest signals Preen waxes Uropygial gland Sexual selection 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to Elenis Crespo and Raspa de Prada (Centro de Recuperación de Fauna Silvestre “El Chaparrillo”) for their help during preen oil collection from eagle owls. Doris Gomez and Jesús M. Avilés kindly provided advice on some computational details of visual models. We also thank Jesús T. García for genetic sexing of the birds and Ismael Galván and two anonymous referees for their comments on the manuscript. L. P.-R. was supported by a postdoctoral contract (07/028-A) from Junta de Comunidades de Castilla-La Mancha (JCCM) and a “Juan de la Cierva” contract from the Spanish Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación (MICINN). Funding was also provided by Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada and the Stuart and Mary Houston Professorship in Ornithology (to G. R. B).

Supplementary material

265_2011_1153_MOESM1_ESM.doc (56 kb)
ESM 1 (DOC 56 kb)
265_2011_1153_MOESM2_ESM.doc (94 kb)
ESM 2 (DOC 94.5 kb)

References

  1. Andersson S, Prager M (2006) Quantifying colors. In: Hill EG, McGraw KJ (eds) Bird coloration, vol 1: mechanism and measurements. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, pp 41–89Google Scholar
  2. Avilés JM, Soler JJ (2009) Nestling coloration is adjusted to parent visual performance in altricial birds. J Evol Biol 22:376–386PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bleiweiss R (2005) Variation in ultraviolet reflectance by carotenoid bearing feathers of tanagers (Thraupini: Emberizinae: Passeriformes). Biol J Linn Soc 84:243–257CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bowmaker JK, Martin GR (1978) Visual pigments and colour vision in a nocturnal bird, Strix aluco (tawny owl). Vis Res 18:1125–1130PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Burtt EH, Ichida JM (1999) Occurrence of feather-degrading bacilli in the plumage of birds. Auk 116:364–372Google Scholar
  6. Cuthill IC (2006) Color perception. In: Hill EG, McGraw KJ (eds) Bird coloration, vol 1: mechanism and measurements. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, pp 3–40Google Scholar
  7. Delhey K, Peters A, Kempenaers B (2007) Cosmetic coloration in birds: occurrence, function, and evolution. Am Nat 169:S145–S158PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Delhey K, Peters A, Biedermann PHW, Kempenaers B (2008) Optical properties of the uropygial gland secretion: no evidence for UV cosmetics in birds. Naturwissenschaften 95:939–946PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Faivre B, Grégoire A, Préault M, Cézilly F, Sorci G (2003) Immune activation rapidly mirrored in a secondary sexual trait. Science 300:103PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Figuerola J, Senar JC (2005) Seasonal changes in carotenoid- and melanin-based plumage coloration in great tit Parus major. Ibis 147:797–802CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Folstad I, Karter AJ (1992) Parasites, bright males and the immunocompetence handicap. Am Nat 139:603–622CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Galván I, Amo L, Sanz JJ (2008) Ultraviolet-blue reflectance of some nestling plumage patches mediates parental favouritism in great tits Parus major. J Avian Biol 39:277–282CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Ghosh A, Bhattacharyya SP (1996) Endocrine factors in the regulation of the activity of the uropygial gland of avian skin. Proc Indian Natl Sci Acad B Biol Sci 66:227–236Google Scholar
  14. Goldstein DL (1988) Estimates of daily energy expenditure in birds: the time-energy budget as an integrator of laboratory and field studies. Am Zool 28:829–844Google Scholar
  15. Gomez D (2006) AVICOL, a program to analyse spectrometric data. Free program available at http://sites.google.com/site/avicolprogram/ or from the author at dodogomez@yahoo.fr. Accessed 14 June 2010
  16. Hart NS (2002) Vision in the peafowl (Aves: Pavo cristatus). J Exp Biol 205:3925–3935PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Hart NS, Hunt DM (2007) Avian visual pigments: characteristics, spectral tuning, and evolution. Am Nat 169:S7–S26PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hart NS, Partridge JC, Cuthill IC, Bennett ATD (2000) Visual pigments, oil droplets, ocular media and cone photoreceptor distribution in two species of passerine bird: the blue tit (Parus caeruleus L.) and the blackbird (Turdus merula L.). J Comp Physiol A 186:375–387PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hausmann F, Arnold KE, Marshall NJ, Owens IPF (2003) Ultraviolet signals in birds are special. Proc R Soc Lond B 270:61–67CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hill EG, McGraw KJ (eds) (2006a) Bird coloration, vol 2: function and evolution. Harvard University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  21. Hill EG, McGraw KJ (eds) (2006b) Bird coloration, vol 2: mechanisms and measurements. Harvard University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  22. Hudon J, Brush AH (1989) Probable dietary basis of a color variant of the cedar waxwing. J Field Ornithol 60:361–368Google Scholar
  23. Isaksson C, Örnborg J, Prager M, Andersson S (2008) Sex and age differences in reflectance and biochemistry of carotenoid-based colour variation in the great tit Parus major. Biol J Linn Soc 95:758–765CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Jacob J, Ziswiler V (1982) The uropygial gland. In: Farner DS, King JR, Parkes KC (eds) Avian biology, vol VI. Academic, New York, pp 199–324Google Scholar
  25. Lenouvel P, Gomez D, Théry M, Kreutzer M (2009) Do grooming behaviours affect properties of feathers in male domestic canaries, Serinus canaria? Anim Behav 77:1253–1260CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. López-Rull I, Pagán I, Macías García C (2010) Cosmetic enhancement of signal coloration: experimental evidence in the house finch. Behav Ecol 21:781–787CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Martínez-Padilla J, Mougeot F, Pérez-Rodríguez L, Bortolotti GR (2007) Nematode parasites reduce carotenoid-based signalling in male red grouse. Biol Lett 3:161–164PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Mays HL, McGraw KJ, Ritchison G, Cooper S, Rush V, Parker RS (2004) Sexual dichromatism in the yellow-breasted chat Icteria virens: spectrophotometric analysis and biochemical basis. J Avian Biol 35:125–134CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. McGraw KJ (2006) Mechanics of carotenoid-based coloration. In: Hill EG, McGraw KJ (eds) Bird coloration. vol 1: mechanism and measurements. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, pp 177–242Google Scholar
  30. McGraw KJ, Hill GE (2004) Plumage color as a dynamic trait: carotenoid pigmentation of male house finches Carpodacus mexicanus fades during the breeding season. Can J Zool 82:734–738CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Montgomerie R (2006a) Cosmetic and adventitious colors. In: Hill EG, McGraw KJ (eds) Bird coloration, vol 1: mechanism and measurements. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, pp 399–427Google Scholar
  32. Montgomerie R (2006b) Analyzing colors. In: Hill EG, McGraw KJ (eds) Bird coloration, vol 1: mechanism and measurements. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, pp 90–147Google Scholar
  33. Montgomerie R, Lyon B, Holder K (2001) Dirty ptarmigan: behavioral modification of conspicuous male plumage. Behav Ecol 12:429–438CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Mountjoy DJ (2005) Family Bombycillidae (Waxwings). In: del Hoyo J, Elliott A, Christie DA (eds) Handbook of the birds of the world, vol 10: Cuckoo-shrikes to thrushes. Lynx Edicions, Barcelona, pp 304–318Google Scholar
  35. Negro JJ, Margalida A, Hiraldo F, Heredia R (1999) The function of the cosmetic coloration of bearded vultures: when art imitates life. Anim Behav 58:F14–F17PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Ödeen A, Håstad O (2003) Complex distribution of avian color vision systems revealed by sequencing the SWS1 opsin from total DNA. Mol Biol Evol 20:855–861PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Oka N, Okuyama M (2000) Nutritional status of dead oiled rhinoceros auklets (Cerorhinca monocerata) in the southern Japan sea. Mar Pollut Bull 40:340–347CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Örnborg J, Andersson S, Griffith SC, Sheldon BC (2002) Seasonal changes in a ultraviolet structural colour signal in blue tits, Parus caeruleus. Biol J Linn Soc Lond 76:237–245CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Parejo D, Avilés JM, Rodríguez J (2010) Visual cues and parental favouritism in a nocturnal bird. Biol Lett 6:171–173PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Pérez-Rodríguez L (2008) Carotenoid-based ornamentation as a dynamic but consistent individual trait. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 62:995–1005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Piersma T, Dekker M, Damste JSS (1999) An avian equivalent of make-up? Ecol Lett 2:201–203CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Reneerkens J, Korsten P (2004) Plumage reflectance is not affected by preen wax composition in red knots Calidris canutus. J Avian Biol 35:405–409CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Saks L, McGraw KJ, Hõrak P (2003) How feather colour reflects its carotenoid content. Funct Ecol 17:555–561CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Shawkey MD, Hill GE (2005) Carotenoids need structural colours to shine. Biol Lett 1:121–124PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Shawkey MD, Pillai SR, Hill GE (2003) Chemical warfare? Effects of uropygial oil on feather-degrading bacteria. J Avian Biol 34:345–349CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Shawkey MD, Hill GE, McGraw KJ, Hood WR, Huggins K (2006) An experimental test of the contributions and condition-dependence of microstructure and carotenoids in yellow plumage colouration. Proc R Soc Lond B 273:2985–2991CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Sheldon BC, Andersson S, Griffith SC, Örnborg J, Sendecka J (1999) Ultraviolet colour variation influences blue tit sex ratios. Nature 402:874–877CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Siefferman L, Hill GE (2005) UV-blue structural coloration and competition for nest boxes in male eastern bluebirds. Anim Behav 69:67–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Surmacki A (2008) Preen waxes do not protect carotenoid plumage from bleaching by sunlight. Ibis 150:335–341CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Surmacki A, Nowakowski JK (2007) Soil and preen waxes influence the expression of carotenoid-based plumage colouration. Naturwissenschaften 94:829–835PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Vorobyev M (2003) Coloured oil droplets enhance colour discrimination. Proc R Soc Lond B 270:1255–1261CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Vorobyev M, Osorio D (1998) Receptor noise as a determinant of colour thresholds. Proc R Soc Lond B 265:351–358CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Vorobyev M, Osorio D, Bennett ATD, Marshall NJ, Cuthill IC (1998) Tetrachromacy, oil droplets and bird plumage colours. J Comp Physiol A 183:621–633PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Walther BA, Clayton DH (2005) Elaborate ornaments are costly to maintain: evidence for high maintenance handicaps. Behav Ecol 16:89–95CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Zahavi A, Zahavi A (1997) The handicap principle. A missing piece of Darwin’s puzzle. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  56. Zampiga E, Hoi H, Pilasto A (2004) Preening, plumage reflectance and female choice in budgerigars. Ethol Ecol Evol 16:339–349CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Lorenzo Pérez-Rodríguez
    • 1
    • 3
  • Francois Mougeot
    • 2
    • 3
  • Gary R. Bortolotti
    • 4
  1. 1.Departamento de Ecología EvolutivaMuseo Nacional de Ciencias Naturales (CSIC)MadridSpain
  2. 2.Estación Experimental de Zonas Áridas (CSIC)AlmeríaSpain
  3. 3.Instituto de Investigación en Recursos Cinegéticos, IREC (CSIC, UCLM, JCCM)Ciudad RealSpain
  4. 4.Department of BiologyUniversity of SaskatchewanSaskatoonCanada

Personalised recommendations