Skip to main content
Log in

Post-ejection nest-desertion of common cuckoo hosts: a second defense mechanism or avoiding reduced reproductive success?

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Hosts of the common cuckoo (Cuculus canorus), an avian brood parasite, develop antiparasite defense mechanisms to increase their reproductive success. Ejection of the parasite egg and desertion of the parasitized nest are the most typical adaptations in response to brood parasitism, but nest desertion may also occur in response to partial clutch reduction, independently from parasitism. Some great reed warblers (Acrocephalus arundinaceus) showed both mechanisms in the same incidence of cuckoo parasitism: in 18% of successful ejections of the parasite eggs, they deserted their nests. We studied if such cases of post-ejection nest-desertion are caused by brood parasitism or reduced clutch value. We experimentally parasitized clutches consisting of five or three host eggs with two painted conspecific eggs to mimic parasitic eggs, as multiple parasitism is frequent in the area. Although hosts ejected these parasitic eggs in both clutch categories (100% and 67% for the larger and smaller inital clutch sizes, respectively), we found that after manipulation, post-ejection nest-desertion frequently occurred at small (3-egg) clutches (40%), but rarely at large (5-egg) clutches (17%). The same phenomenon also occurred when unparasitized 3-egg clutches were reduced by two eggs, but not when 5-egg clutches were reduced in the same way. A logistic regression model revealed that only initial clutch size affected nest desertion of parasitized nests in our experiments. Therefore, we conclude that post-ejection nest-desertion is not a second antiparasite mechanism, which might serve as a redundant antiparasite defense, but a reaction to typically small and further decreased clutch size.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alvarez F (1994) A gens of cuckoo Cuculus canorus parasitizing rufous bush chat Cercotrichas galactotes. J Avian Biol 25:239–243

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alvarez F (1999) Attractive non-mimetic stimuli in cuckoo Cuculus canorus eggs. Ibis 141:142–144

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson DR (2008) Model based inference in the life sciences: a primer on evidence. Springer, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Antonov A, Stokke BG, Moksnes A, Kleven O, Honza M, Røskaft E (2006) Eggshell strength of an obligate brood parasite: a test of the puncture resistance hypothesis. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 60:11–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Antonov A, Stokke BG, Moksnes A, Røskaft E (2007) First evidence of regular common cuckoo, Cuculus canorus, parasitism on eastern olivaceous warblers, Hippolais icterina elaeica. Naturwiss 94:307–312

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Antonov A, Stokke BG, Moksnes A, Røskaft E (2008) Does the cuckoo benefit from laying unusually strong eggs? Anim Behav 76:1893–1900

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bártol I, Karcza Z, Moskát C, Røskaft E, Kisbenedek T (2002) Responses of great reed warblers Acrocephalus arundinaceus to experimental brood parasitism: the effects of a cuckoo Cuculus canorus dummy and egg mimicry. J Avian Biol 33:420–425

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brooke M de L, Davies NB (1988) Egg mimicry by cuckoos Cuculus canorus in relation to discrimination by hosts. Nature 35:630–632

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burnham KP, Anderson DR (2002) Model selection and multimodal inference. A practical information-theoretic approach. Springer, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Davies NB (2000) Cuckoos, cowbirds and other cheats. T. & A.D. Poyser, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Davies NB, Brooke M de L (1988) Cuckoos versus reed warblers: adaptations and counteradaptations. Anim Behav 36:262–284

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dawkins NB, Krebs JR (1979) Arms races between and within species. Proc R Soc Lond B 205:489–511

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dyrcz A, Halupka K (2007) Why does the frequency of nest parasitism by the cuckoo differ considerably between two populations of warblers living in the same habitat? Ethology 113:200–213

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guigueno MF, Sealy SG (2009) Nest sanitation plays a role in egg burial by yellow warblers. Ethology 115:247–256

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hansson B, Bensch S, Hasselquist D (1997) Infanticide in great reed warblers: secondary females destroy eggs of primary females. Anim Behav 54:297–304

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hargitai R, Moskát C, Bán M, Gil D, López-Rull I, Solymos E (2010) Eggshell characteristics and yolk composition in the common cuckoo Cuculus canorus: are they adapted to brood parasitism? J Avian Biol 41:177–185

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hauber ME, Sherman PW (2001) Self-referent phenotype matching: theoretical considerations and empirical evidence. Trends Neurosci 24:609–616

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hauber ME, Moskát C, Bán M (2006) Experimental shift in hosts' acceptance threshold of inaccurate-mimic brood parasite eggs. Biol Lett 2:177–180

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Higuchi H (1998) Host use and egg color of Japanese cuckoos. In: Rothstein SI, Robinson SK (eds) Parasitic birds and their hosts. Studies in coevolution. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 80–93

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill DE, Sealy SG (1994) Desertions of nests parasitized by cowbirds: have clay-coloured sparrows evolved an anti-parasite defence? Anim Behav 48:1063–1070

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Honza M, Moskát C (2005) Antiparasite behaviour in response to experimental brood parasitism in the great reed warbler: a comparison of single and multiple parasitism. Ann Zool Fenn 42:627–633

    Google Scholar 

  • Honza M, Moskát C (2008) Egg rejection behaviour in the great reed warbler (Acrocephalus arundinaceus): the effect of egg type. J Ethol 26:389–395

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Honza M, Picman J, Grim T, Novák V, Capek MJr, Mrlik V (2001) How to hatch from an egg of great structural strength. A study of the common cuckoo. J Avian Biol 32:249–255

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Honza M, Procházka P, Stokke BG, Moksnes A, Røskaft E, Capek MJr, Mrlík V (2004) Are blackcaps current winners in the evolutionary struggle against the common cuckoo? J Ethol 22:175–180

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Honza M, Kuiper SM, Cherry MI (2005) Behaviour of African turdid hosts towards experimental parasitism with artificial red-chested cuckoo Cuculus solitarius eggs. J Avian Biol 36:517–522

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hosoi SA, Rothstein SI (2000) Nest desertion and cowbird parasitism: evidence for evolved responses and evolutionary lag. Anim Behav 59:823–840

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kemal RE, Rothstein SI (1988) Mechanisms of avian egg recognition: adaptive responses to eggs with broken shells. Anim Behav 36:175–183

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kilner RM (2006) The evolution of egg colour and patterning in birds. Biol Rev 81:383–406

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kosciuch KL, Parker TH, Sandercock BK (2006) Nest desertion by a cowbird host: an antiparasite behavior or a response to egg loss? Behav Ecol 17:917–924

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krüger O (2007) Cuckoos, cowbirds and hosts: adaptations, trade-offs and constraints. Phil Trans R Soc B 362:1873–1886

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lahti DC, Lahti AR (2002) How precise is egg discrimination in weaverbirds? Anim Behav 63:1135–1142

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee J-W, Yoo J-C (2004) Effect of host egg color dimorphism on interactions between the vinous-throated parrotbill (Paradoxornis webbianus) and common cuckoo (Cuculus canorus). Korean J Biol Sci 8:77–80

    Google Scholar 

  • Lotem A, Nakamura H, Zahavi A (1992) Rejection of cuckoo eggs in relation to host age: a possible evolutionary equilibrium. Behav Ecol 3:128–132

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lotem A, Nakamura H, Zahavi A (1995) Constraints on egg discrimination and cuckoo-host co-evolution. Anim Behav 49:1185–1209

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lovászi P, Moskát C (2004) Break-down of arms race between the red-backed shrike (Lanius collurio) and common cuckoo (Cuculus canorus). Behaviour 141:245–262

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moksnes A, Røskaft E (1995) Egg-morph and host preferences in the common cuckoo (Cuculus canorus): an analysis of cuckoo and host eggs from European museum collections. J Zool Lond 236:625–648

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moksnes A, Røskaft E, Braa AT, Korsnes L, Lampe H, Pedersen HC (1991) Behavioural responses of potential hosts towards artificial cuckoo eggs and dummies. Behaviour 116:64–89

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moksnes A, Røskaft E, Korsnes L (1993) Rejection of cuckoo (Cuculus canorus) eggs by meadow pipits (Anthus pratensis). Behav Ecol 4:120–127

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moskát C, Honza M (2002) European cuckoo Cuculus canorus parasitism and host's rejection behaviour in a heavily parasitized great reed warbler Acrocephalus arundinaceus population. Ibis 144:614–622

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moskát C, Hauber ME (2007) Conflict between egg recognition and rejection decisions in common cuckoo (Cuculus canorus) hosts. Anim Cogn 10:377–386

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Moskát C, Székely T, Kisbenedek T, Karcza Z, Bártol I (2003) The importance of nest cleaning in egg rejection behaviour of great reed warblers Acrocephalus arundinaceus. J Avian Biol 34:16–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moskát C, Hansson B, Barabás L, Bártol I, Karcza Z (2008a) Common cuckoo Cuculus canorus parasitism, antiparasite defence and gene flow in closely located populations of great reed warblers Acrocephalus arundinaceus. J Avian Biol 39:663–671

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moskát C, Székely T, Cuthill IC, Kisbenedek T (2008b) Hosts' responses to parasitic eggs: which cues elicit hosts' egg discrimination? Ethology 114:186–194

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moskát C, Hauber ME, Avilés JM, Bán M, Hargitai R, Honza M (2009) Increased host tolerance of multiple cuckoo eggs leads to higher fledging success of the brood parasite. Anim Behav 77:1281–1290

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moskát C, Bán M, Székely T, Komdeur J, Lucassen RWG, van Boheemen LA, Hauber ME (2010) Discordancy or template-based recognition? Dissecting the cognitive basis of the rejection of foreign eggs in hosts of avian brood parasites. J Exp Biol 213:1976–1983

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ortega CP, Cruz A (1988) Mechanisms of egg acceptance by marsh-dwelling blackbirds. Condor 90:349–358

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Payne R (2005) Cuckoos, Cuculidae. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Pianka ER (1976) Natural selection of optimal reproductive tactics. Am Zool 16:775–784

    Google Scholar 

  • Pozgayová M, Procházka P, Honza M (2009) Sex-specific defence behaviour against brood parasitism in a host with female-only incubation. Behav Process 81:34–38

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rothstein SI (1974) Mechanisms of avian egg recognition: possible learned and innate factors. Auk 91:796–807

    Google Scholar 

  • Rothstein SI (1975) An experimental and teleonomic investigation of avian brood parasitism. Condor 77:250–271

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rothstein SI (1982) Success and failures in avian egg and nestling recognition with comments on the utility of optimality reasoning. Amer Zool 22:547–560

    Google Scholar 

  • Rothstein SI (1986) A test of optimality: egg recognition in the eastern phoebe. Anim Behav 34:1109–1119

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rothstein SI, Robinson SK (1998) The evolution and ecology of brood parasitism. In: Rotstein SI, Robinson SK (eds) Parasitic birds and their hosts: studies in coevolution. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 3–56

    Google Scholar 

  • Sargent RC, Gross MR (1985) Parental investment decision rules and the Concorde fallacy. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 17:43–45

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Servedio M, Hauber ME (2006) To eject or to abandon? Life history traits of hosts and parasites interact to influence the fitness payoffs of alternative anti-parasite strategies. J Evol Biol 19:1585–1594

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Stokke BG, Honza M, Moksnes A, Røskaft E, Rudolfsen G (2002) Costs associated with recognition and rejection of parasitic eggs in two European passerines. Behaviour 139:629–644

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stokke BG, Rudolfsen G, Moksnes A, Røskaft E (2004) Rejection of conspecific eggs in chaffinches: the effect of age and clutch characteristics. Ethology 110:459–470

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strausberger BM, Burhans DE (2001) Nest desertion by field sparrows and its possible influence on the evolution of cowbird behavior. Auk 118:770–776

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Svennungsen TO, Holen OH (2010) Avian brood parasitism: information use and variation in egg-rejection behaviour. Evolution 64:1459–1469

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Székely T, Webb JN, Houston AI, McNamara JM (1996) An evolutionary approach to offspring desertion in birds. Curr Ornithol 13:271–330

    Google Scholar 

  • Takasu F (1998) Modelling the arms race in avian brood parasitism. Evol Ecol 12:969–987

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Takasu F, Moskát C, Munoz AR, Imanishi S, Nakamura H (2009) Adaptations in the common cuckoo (Cuculus canorus) to host eggs in a multiple-hosts system of brood parasitism. Biol J Linn Soc 98:291–300

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trnka A, Prokop P, Batáry P (2010) Infanticide or interference: does the great reed warbler selectively destroy eggs? Ann Zool Fennici 47:272–277

    Google Scholar 

  • Underwood TJ, Sealy SG (2006) Influence of shape on egg discrimination in American robins and gray catbirds. Ethology 112:164–173

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Valera F, Hoi H, Schleicher B (1997) Egg burial in Penduline Tits Remiz pendulinus: its role in nest desertion and female polyandry. Behav Ecol 8:20–27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Dijk RE, Szentirmai I, Komdeur J, Székely T (2007) Sexual conflict over parental care in Penduline Tits Remiz pendulinus: the process of clutch desertion. Ibis 149:530–534

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Winkler DW (1991) Parental investment decision rules in tree swallows: parental defense, abandonment, and the so-called Concorde Fallacy. Behav Ecol 2:133–142

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wyllie I (1981) The cuckoo. Batsford, London

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The study was supported by the Office of Academy-supported Research Groups Affiliated with Universities and Other Institutions of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences (to C.M.) and by the Groningen University Grant (to E.R. and M.B.). Timea Protovin, Michael G. Anderson, and István Zsoldos kindly helped in the fieldwork. We thank Hannah Dugdale (Groningen University, Netherlands/Sheffield University, UK) for her valuable comments on the manuscript. The Middle-Danube-Valley Inspectorate for Environmental Protection, Nature Conservation and Water Management provided permission for research.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Csaba Moskát.

Additional information

Communicated by M. Soler

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Moskát, C., Rosendaal, E.C., Boers, M. et al. Post-ejection nest-desertion of common cuckoo hosts: a second defense mechanism or avoiding reduced reproductive success?. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 65, 1045–1053 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-010-1109-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-010-1109-7

Keywords

Navigation