Why do females have so few extra-pair offspring?
- First Online:
- 162 Downloads
It is generally accepted that if a female can improve her offspring’s genetics via extra-pair copulations (EPC), it is by copulating with extra-pair males whose phenotypes are more superior or whose genes are more compatible to hers than those of her bonded male. Here, we present a model that puts together uncertainties about the male genetic quality, a postcopulatory sperm bias in favor of the better or the more compatible genes, and costs that females pay by being choosy about extra-pair male quality. The model’s conclusions challenge traditional views of good genes explanations of EPC. When phenotypes give incomplete information about genotypes, a female choosing a phenotypically superior extra-pair male, may nevertheless find herself trading good genes of a bonded male for poor genes of an extra-pair male. Such “unfortunate sperm replacements” can limit the female involvement in EPC even when EPC are otherwise cost-free. The model also shows that even a female bonded to a phenotypically superior male may benefit by EPC, provided that sperm competition is biased toward sperm with more fit or more compatible genes. Furthermore, if choosiness is sufficiently costly, a female may even do best by copulating with a random extra-pair male.
KeywordsExtra-pair copulations EPC Female strategies Costs Mathematical model Sperm bias Old males Good genes Compatible genes
- Akçay E, Roughgarden J (2007) Extra-pair paternity in birds: review of the genetic benefits. Evol Ecol Res 9:855–868Google Scholar
- Dominey WR (1984) Altarnative mating tactics and evolutionarily stable strategies. Am Zool 24:385–396Google Scholar
- Fisher RA (1930) The genetical theory of natural selection. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
- Gowaty PA (1996) Battles of the sexes and origins of monogamy. In: Black JM (ed) Partnerships in birds: the study of monogamy. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 21–52Google Scholar
- Marshall J, McNamara J, Houston A (2010) The state of Darwinian theory. Behav Ecol Soc. doi:10.1007/s00265-010-1121-y
- Whittingham LA, Dunn PO (2001) Male parental care and paternity in birds. Curr Ornithol 16:257–298Google Scholar