Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology

, Volume 65, Issue 5, pp 921–933 | Cite as

Sexual coercion by male chimpanzees shows that female choice may be more apparent than real

  • Martin N. Muller
  • Melissa Emery Thompson
  • Sonya M. Kahlenberg
  • Richard W. Wrangham
Original Paper

Abstract

The extent to which active female mating preferences influence male reproductive success in mammals is unclear, particularly for promiscuously breeding species like chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes). Previous studies from multiple long-term study sites have shown that female chimpanzees mate more restrictively around ovulation, and this has been taken as evidence for female choice. However, none of these studies rigorously evaluated the alternative hypothesis that restrictive mating results not from unconstrained choice, but in response to coercive mate guarding, in which males use punishment and intimidation to reduce female promiscuity and promote their own mating interests. Nor did they consider evidence for the potential genetic or phenotypic benefits that females might be choosing. Using 11 years of data from the Kanyawara community in Kibale National Park, Uganda, we previously demonstrated that males achieve elevated mating success with those females toward whom they direct high levels of aggression. Here we extend those findings to show that even female copulatory approaches, which have previously been attributed to female choice, are correlated with male aggression. Specifically, individual females at our site initiated periovulatory copulations most frequently with the males who were most aggressive toward them throughout their cycles. Those males showed high rates of aggression toward females throughout estrus, despite achieving high copulation rates, demonstrating a continuing conflict of interest over the exclusivity of mating access. Because sexual coercion is potentially widespread in primates and other mammals, our results stress the importance of considering the influence of male aggression in studies of female choice.

Keywords

Female choice Sexual coercion Coercive mate guarding Mating preferences Mixed mating strategy 

References

  1. Altmann J (1974) Observational study of behavior: sampling methods. Behav 49:227–267CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Andersson M (1994) Sexual Selection. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  3. Arcadi AC, Wrangham RW (1999) Infanticide in chimpanzees: review of cases and a new within-group observation from the Kanyawara study group in Kibale National Park. Primates 40:337–351CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Boesch C, Boesch-Achermann H (2000) The chimpanzees of the Tai Forest: behavioral ecology and evolution. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  5. Boesch C, Kohou G, Néné H, Vigilant L (2006) Male competition and paternity in wild chimpanzees of the Taï forest. Am J Phys Anthropol 130:103–115PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Brewer Marsden S, Marsden D, Emery Thompson M (2006) Demographic and female life history parameters of free-ranging chimpanzees at the Chimpanzee Rehabilitation Project, River Gambia National Park. Int J Primatol 27:321–410Google Scholar
  7. Byers JA, Waits L (2006) Good genes sexual selection in nature. PNAS 103:16343–16345PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Clarke P, Pradhan G, van Schaik CP (2009) Intersexual conflict in primates: infanticide, paternity allocation, and the role of coercion. In: Muller MN, Wrangham RW (eds) Sexual coercion in primates and humans: an evolutionary perspective on male aggression against females. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, pp 42–77Google Scholar
  9. Clutton-Brock T, McAuliffe K (2009) Female mate choice in mammals. Q Rev Biol 84:3–27PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Clutton-Brock TH, Harvey PH (1976) Evolutionary rules and primate societies. In: Bateson PP, Hinde RA (eds) Growing points in ethology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 195–237Google Scholar
  11. Clutton-Brock TH, Parker GA (1995) Sexual coercion in animal societies. Anim Behav 49:1345–1365CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Deschner T, Heistermann M, Hodges K, Boesch C (2003) Timing and probability of ovulation in relation to sex skin swelling in wild West African chimpanzees, Pan troglodytes verus. Anim Behav 66:551–560CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Dixson AF (1998) Primate sexuality: comparative studies of the prosimians, monkeys, apes, and human beings. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  14. Duffy KG, Wrangham RW, Silk J (2007) Male chimpanzees exchange political support for mating opportunities. Curr Biol 17:586–587CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Emery Thompson M (2005) Reproductive endocrinology of wild female chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes schweinfurthii): methodological considerations and the role of hormones in sex and conception. Am J Primatol 67:137–158PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Emery Thompson M, Wrangham RW (2008) Male mating interest varies with female fecundity in chimpanzees. Int J Primatol 29:885–905CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Emery Thompson M, Muller MN, Kahlenberg S, Wrangham RW (2010) Social and ecological correlates of stress in wild female chimpanzees. Horm Behav 58:440–449PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Goodall J (1986) The chimpanzees of Gombe: patterns of behavior. Harvard University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  19. Hemelrijk C (1990) A matrix partial correlation test used in investigations of reciprocity and other social interaction patterns at group level. J Theoret Biol 143:405–420CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hill GE (2006) Female mate choice for ornamental coloration. In: Hill GE, McGraw KJ (eds) Bird coloration: function and evolution. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, pp 137–200Google Scholar
  21. Hrdy SB (1979) Infanticide among animals: a review, classification, and examination of the implications for the reproductive strategies of females. Ethol Sociobiol 1:13–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hrdy SB (1981) The woman that never evolved. Harvard Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  23. Johnson MH, Everitt BJ (1988) Essential reproduction. Blackwell Scientific Publications, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  24. Kappeler P, van Schaik CP (2004) Sexual selection in primates: review and selective preview. In: Kappeler P, van Schaik CP (eds) Sexual selection in primates: new and comparative perspectives. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 3–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Matsumoto-Oda A (1999) Female choice in the opportunistic mating of wild chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes schweinfurthii) at Mahale. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 46:258–266CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Mays HL, Albrecht T, Liu M, Hill GE (2008) Female choice for genetic complementarity in birds: a review. Genetica 134:147–158PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Mays HLJ, Hill GE (2004) Choosing mates: good genes versus genes that are a good fit. Trends Ecol Evol 19:554–559PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Muller MN (2002) Agonistic relations among Kanyawara chimpanzees. In: Boesch C, Hohmann G, Marchant L (eds) Behavioural diversity in chimpanzees and bonobos. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 112–124CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Muller MN, Emery Thompson M, Wrangham RW (2006) Male chimpanzees prefer mating with old females. Curr Biol 16:2234–2238PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Muller MN, Kahlenberg SM, Emery Thompson M, Wrangham RW (2007) Male coercion and the costs of promiscuous mating for females chimpanzees. Proc Biol Sci 274:1009–1014PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Muller MN, Kahlenberg SM, Wrangham RW (2009a) Male aggression against females and sexual coercion in chimpanzees. In: Muller MN, Wrangham RW (eds) Sexual coercion in primates and humans: an evolutionary perspective on male aggression against females. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, pp 184–217Google Scholar
  32. Muller MN, Kahlenberg SM, Wrangham RW (2009b) Male aggression and sexual coercion of females in primates. In: Muller MN, Wrangham RW (eds) Sexual coercion in primates and humans: an evolutionary perspective on male aggression against females. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, pp 3–22Google Scholar
  33. Muller MN, Wrangham RW (2004) Dominance, aggression and testosterone in wild chimpanzees: a test of the “Challenge Hypothesis”. Anim Behav 67:113–123CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Muller MN, Wrangham RW (2009) Sexual coercion in primates and humans: an evolutionary perspective on male aggression against females. Harvard University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  35. Murray CM, Wroblewski E, Pusey AE (2007) New case of intragroup infanticide in the chimpanzees of Gombe National Park. Int J Primatol 28:23–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Neff BD, Pitcher TE (2005) Genetic quality and sexual selection: an integrated framework for good genes and compatible genes. Mol Ecol 14:19–38PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Nikitopoulos E, Heistermann M, de Vries H, van Hoof JARAM, Sterck EM (2005) A pair choice test to identify female mating pattern relative to ovulation in longtailed macaques, Macaca fascicularis. Anim Behav 70:1283–1296CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Nishida T, Kawanaka K (1985) Within-group cannibalism by adult male chimpanzees. Primates 26:274–284CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Nunn CL (1999) The evolution of exaggerated sexual swellings in primates and the graded-signal hypothesis. Anim Behav 58:229–246PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Paul A (2002) Sexual selection and mate choice. Int J Primatol 23:877–904CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Pieta K (2008) Female mate preferences among Pan troglodytes schweinfurthii of Kanyawara, Kibale National Park, Uganda. Int J Primatol 29:845–864CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Roof KA, Hopkins WD, Izard MK, Hook M, Schapiro SJ (2005) Maternal age, parity, and reproductive outcome in captive chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes). Am J Primatol 67:199–207PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Royston J (1982) Basal body temperature, ovulation, and the risk of conception, with special reference to the lifetimes of sperm and egg. Biometrics 38:397–406PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Schwensow N, Eberle M, Sommer S (2008) Compatibility counts: MHC-associated mate choice in a wild promiscuous primate. Proc Biol Sci 275:555–564PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Setchell JM (2005) Do female mandrills prefer brightly colored males. Int J Primatol 26:715–735CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Sicotte P (1993) Inter-group encounters and female transfer in mountain gorillas: influence of group composition on male behavior. Am J Primatol 30:21–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Smuts BB, Smuts RW (1993) Male aggression and sexual coercion of females in nonhuman primates and other mammals: evidence and theoretical implications. Adv Study Behav 22:1–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Stumpf R (2004) Female Reproductive Strategies in Chimpanzees of the Taï Forest, Côte d’Ivoire. Ph.D. dissertation. Anthropology. Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NYGoogle Scholar
  49. Stumpf R, Boesch C (2005) Does promiscuous mating preclude female choice? Female sexual strategies in chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes verus) of the Taï National Park, Cote d'Ivoire. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 57:511–524CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Stumpf R, Boesch C (2006) The efficacy of female choice in chimpanzees of the Taï Forest, Côte d’Ivoire. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 60:749–765CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Swedell L, Schreier A (2009) Male aggression toward females in hamadryas baboons: conditioning, coercion, and control. In: Muller MN, Wrangham RW (eds) Sexual coercion in primates and humans: an evolutionary perspective on male aggression against females. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, pp 244–268Google Scholar
  52. Tutin CEG (1979) Mating patterns and reproductive strategies in a community of wild chimpanzees. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 6:39–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. van Noordwijk MA, van Schaik CP (2000) Reproductive patterns in eutherian mammals: adaptations against infanticide? In: van Schaik CP, Janson CH (eds) Infanticide by Males and Its Implications. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 322–360CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. van Schaik CP, Hodges JK, Nunn CL (2000) Paternity confusion and the ovarian cycles of female primates. In: van Schaik CP, Janson CH (eds) Infanticide by males and its implications. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge pp 361–387CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. van Schaik CP, Janson CH (2000) Infanticide by males and its implications. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, p 569CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. van Schaik CP, Pradhan GR, van Noordwijk MA (2004) Mating conflict in primates: infanticide, sexual harassment and female sexuality. In: Kappeler P, van Schaik CP (eds) Sexual selection in primates: new and comparative perspectives. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 131–150CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Wilcox AJ, Weinberg CR, Baird DD (1995) Timing of sexual intercourse in relation to ovulation: effects on the probability of conception, survival of the pregnancy, and sex of the baby. N Engl J Med 333:1517–1521PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Wrangham RW (2002) The cost of sexual attraction: is there a tradeoff in female Pan between sex appeal and received coercion? In: Boesch C, Hohmann G, Marchant L (eds) Behavioural diversity in chimpanzees and bonobos. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 204–215CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Wrangham RW, Muller MN (2009) Sexual coercion in humans and other primates: the road ahead. In: Muller MN, Wrangham RW (eds) Sexual coercion in primates and humans: an evolutionary perspective on male aggression against females. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, pp 451–468Google Scholar
  60. Zinner DP, Nunn CL, van Schaik CP, Kappeler PM (2004) Sexual selection and exaggerated sexual swellings of female primates. In: Kappeler P, van Schaik CP (eds) Sexual selection in primates: new and comparative perspectives. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 71–78CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Martin N. Muller
    • 1
  • Melissa Emery Thompson
    • 1
  • Sonya M. Kahlenberg
    • 2
  • Richard W. Wrangham
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of AnthropologyUniversity of New MexicoAlbuquerqueUSA
  2. 2.Department of BiologyBates CollegeLewistonUSA
  3. 3.Department of Human Evolutionary BiologyHarvard UniversityCambridgeUSA

Personalised recommendations