Advertisement

Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology

, Volume 65, Issue 4, pp 569–579 | Cite as

Blinkered teaching: tandem running by visually impaired ants

  • Elizabeth L. Franklin
  • Thomas O. Richardson
  • Ana B. Sendova-Franks
  • Elva J. H. Robinson
  • Nigel R. Franks
Original Paper

Abstract

During tandem runs, one ant worker recruits another to an important resource. Here, we begin to investigate how dependent are tandem leaders and followers on visual cues by painting over their compound eyes to impair their vision. There are two ways in which Temnothorax albipennis might use vision during tandem running. First, the follower might track the movements of the leader by keeping it in sight. Our results suggest that the ants do not use vision in this way. For example, in all four classes of tandem run (those with either leader or follower, both, or neither of their participants with visual impairments) progress was most smooth at about 3 mm/s. This suggests that communication between leaders and followers during tandem runs is not based on vision and is purely tactile and pheromonal. Second, the leader and the follower might be using vision to navigate and our results support this possibility but also suggest that these ants have other methods of navigation. Ants with visual impairments were more likely to follow than to lead, but could occupy either role, even though they had many fully sighted nestmates. This might help to explain why the ants did not focus grooming on their most visually impaired nestmates. Wild-type tandem runs, with both participants fully sighted and presumably taking time to learn landmarks, were overall significantly slower, smoother, and a little less tortuous, than the other treatments. All four classes of tandem run significantly increased mean instantaneous speeds and mean absolute changes in instantaneous acceleration over their journeys. Moreover, tandems with sighted followers increased their speed with time more than the other treatments. In general, our findings suggest that eyesight is used for navigation during tandem running but that these ants also probably use other orientation systems during such recruitment and to learn how to get to new nest sites. Our results suggest that the ants’ methods of teaching and learning are very robust and flexible.

Keywords

Communication Teaching Temnothorax albipennis Navigation 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We thank the following undergraduates for their help with this project; Clare E. Gray, Katy H. Moran, Sam Ellis and Saki Okuda. We also thank the School of Biological Sciences at the University of Bristol for summer studentships that supported these students. We also thank two anonymous reviewers. NRF and EJHR gratefully acknowledge EPSRC grant EP/D076226/1. NRF also wishes to thank the BBSRC (grant no. BB/G02166X/1) for their support. TOR and ABS-F gratefully acknowledge EPSRC grant EP/E061796/1.

Supplementary material

265_2010_1057_MOESM1_ESM.doc (68 kb)
ESM 1 (DOC 68 kb)

References

  1. Aron S, Deneubourg JL, Pasteels JM (1988) Visual cues and trail-following idiosyncrasy in Leptothorax unifasciatus: an orientation process during foraging. Insect Soc 35:355–366CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Benhamou S (2004) How to reliably estimate the tortuosity of an animal's path: straightness, sinuosity, or fractal dimension? J Theol Biol 229:209–220CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Faraway JJ (2006) Extending the linear model with R: generalized linear, mixed effects and nonparametric regression models. Chapman & Hall/CRC, LondonGoogle Scholar
  4. Fent K, Wehner R (1985) Ocelli: a celestial compass in the desert ant cataglyphis. Science 228:192–194. doi: 10.1126/science.228.4696.192 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Fraenkel G, Gunn DL (1961) The orientation of animals. Dover Publications, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  6. Franks NR, Richardson T (2006) Teaching in tandem-running ants. Nature 439:153PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Franks NR, Mallon EB, Bray HE, Hamilton MJ, Mischler TC (2003) Strategies for choosing between alternatives with different attributes: exemplified by house-hunting ants. Anim Behav 65:215–223. doi: 10.1006/anbe.2002.2032 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Franks NR, Dornhaus A, Best CS, Jones EL (2006) Decision-making by small and large house-hunting ant colonies: one size fits all. Anim Behav 72:611–616. doi: 10.1016/j.anbehav.2005.11.019 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Franks NR, Richardson TO, Keir S, Inge SJ, Bartumeus F, Sendova-Franks AB (2010) Ant search strategies after interrupted tandem runs. J Exp Biol 213:1697–1708PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Hölldobler B, Wilson E (1990) The ants. Springer, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  11. Maindonald J, Braun WJ (2007) Data analysis and graphics using R – an example-based approach. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  12. Mallon E, Franks NR (2000) Ants estimate area using Buffon's needle. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 267:765–770CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Maschwitz U, Lenz S, Buschinger A (1986) Individual specific trails in the ant Leptothorax affinis (Formicidae: Myrmicinae). Cell Mol Life Sci 42:1173–1174CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Mcleman MA, Pratt SC, Franks NR (2002) Navigation using visual landmarks by the ant Leptothorax albipennis. Insect Soc 49:203–208CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Möglich M (1978) Social organization of nest emigration in Leptothorax. Insect Soc 25:205–225CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Möglich M, Maschwitz U, Hölldobler B (1974) Tandem calling: a new kind of signal in ant communication. Science 186:1046–1047PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Müller M, Wehner R (1988) Path integration in desert ants, Cataglyphis fortis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 85:5287–5590PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Pratt SC (2008) Efficiency and regulation of recruitment during colony emigration by the ant Temnothorax. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 62:1369–1376. doi: 10.1007/s00265-008-0565-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Pratt SC, Brooks SE, Franks NR (2001) The use of edges in visual navigation by the ant Leptothorax albipennis. Ethology 107:1125–1136CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Pratt SC, Mallon EB, Sumpter DJT, Franks NR (2002) Quorum sensing, recruitment, and collective decision-making during colony emigration by the ant Leptothorax albipennis. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 52:117–127. doi: 10.1007/s00265-002-0487-x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Richardson TO, Sleeman PA, McNamara JM, Houston AI, Franks NR (2007) Teaching with evaluation in ants. Curr Biol 17:1520–1526. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2007.08.032 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Sendova-Franks AB, Franks NR (1993) Task allocation in ant colonies within variable environments. (A study of temporal polyethism: experimental). Bull Math Biol 55:75–96CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Sims DW, Righton D, Pitchford JW (2007) Minimizing errors in identifying Lévy flight behaviour of organisms. J Anim Ecol 76:222–229PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Walcott C (2005) Multi-modal orientation cues in homing pigeons. Integr Comp Biol 45:574–581CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Wehner R, Müller M (2006) The significance of direct sunlight and polarized skylight in the ant's celestial system of navigation. PNAS 103:12575–12579PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Wehner R, Rossel S (1985) The bee's celestial compass: a case study in behavioural neurobiology. In: Hölldobler B, Lindaur M (eds) Experimental behavioural ecology and socio-biology. Germany Gustav Fischer Verlag, Stuttgart, pp 11–53Google Scholar
  27. Wehner R, Michel B, Antonsen P (1996) Visual navigation in insects: coupling of egocentric and geocentric information. J Exp Biol 199:129–140PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Wittlinger M, Wehner R, Wolf H (2006) The ant odometer: stepping on stilts and stumps. Science 312:1965–1967. doi: 10.1126/science.1126912 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Elizabeth L. Franklin
    • 1
  • Thomas O. Richardson
    • 1
    • 2
  • Ana B. Sendova-Franks
    • 2
  • Elva J. H. Robinson
    • 1
    • 3
  • Nigel R. Franks
    • 1
  1. 1.School of Biological SciencesUniversity of BristolBristolUK
  2. 2.Department of Engineering Design and MathematicsUniversity of the West of EnglandBristolUK
  3. 3.York Centre for Complex Systems Analysis, Department of BiologyUniversity of YorkYorkUK

Personalised recommendations