During tandem runs, one ant worker recruits another to an important resource. Here, we begin to investigate how dependent are tandem leaders and followers on visual cues by painting over their compound eyes to impair their vision. There are two ways in which Temnothorax albipennis might use vision during tandem running. First, the follower might track the movements of the leader by keeping it in sight. Our results suggest that the ants do not use vision in this way. For example, in all four classes of tandem run (those with either leader or follower, both, or neither of their participants with visual impairments) progress was most smooth at about 3 mm/s. This suggests that communication between leaders and followers during tandem runs is not based on vision and is purely tactile and pheromonal. Second, the leader and the follower might be using vision to navigate and our results support this possibility but also suggest that these ants have other methods of navigation. Ants with visual impairments were more likely to follow than to lead, but could occupy either role, even though they had many fully sighted nestmates. This might help to explain why the ants did not focus grooming on their most visually impaired nestmates. Wild-type tandem runs, with both participants fully sighted and presumably taking time to learn landmarks, were overall significantly slower, smoother, and a little less tortuous, than the other treatments. All four classes of tandem run significantly increased mean instantaneous speeds and mean absolute changes in instantaneous acceleration over their journeys. Moreover, tandems with sighted followers increased their speed with time more than the other treatments. In general, our findings suggest that eyesight is used for navigation during tandem running but that these ants also probably use other orientation systems during such recruitment and to learn how to get to new nest sites. Our results suggest that the ants’ methods of teaching and learning are very robust and flexible.
Communication Teaching Temnothorax albipennisNavigation
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.
We thank the following undergraduates for their help with this project; Clare E. Gray, Katy H. Moran, Sam Ellis and Saki Okuda. We also thank the School of Biological Sciences at the University of Bristol for summer studentships that supported these students. We also thank two anonymous reviewers. NRF and EJHR gratefully acknowledge EPSRC grant EP/D076226/1. NRF also wishes to thank the BBSRC (grant no. BB/G02166X/1) for their support. TOR and ABS-F gratefully acknowledge EPSRC grant EP/E061796/1.
Franks NR, Mallon EB, Bray HE, Hamilton MJ, Mischler TC (2003) Strategies for choosing between alternatives with different attributes: exemplified by house-hunting ants. Anim Behav 65:215–223. doi:10.1006/anbe.2002.2032CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pratt SC, Brooks SE, Franks NR (2001) The use of edges in visual navigation by the ant Leptothorax albipennis. Ethology 107:1125–1136CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pratt SC, Mallon EB, Sumpter DJT, Franks NR (2002) Quorum sensing, recruitment, and collective decision-making during colony emigration by the ant Leptothorax albipennis. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 52:117–127. doi:10.1007/s00265-002-0487-xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walcott C (2005) Multi-modal orientation cues in homing pigeons. Integr Comp Biol 45:574–581CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wehner R, Müller M (2006) The significance of direct sunlight and polarized skylight in the ant's celestial system of navigation. PNAS 103:12575–12579PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wehner R, Rossel S (1985) The bee's celestial compass: a case study in behavioural neurobiology. In: Hölldobler B, Lindaur M (eds) Experimental behavioural ecology and socio-biology. Germany Gustav Fischer Verlag, Stuttgart, pp 11–53Google Scholar
Wehner R, Michel B, Antonsen P (1996) Visual navigation in insects: coupling of egocentric and geocentric information. J Exp Biol 199:129–140PubMedGoogle Scholar