Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology

, Volume 65, Issue 2, pp 183–195

Spatial and temporal heterogeneities in the contact behaviour of rabbits

  • Maija K. Marsh
  • Michael R. Hutchings
  • Steven R. McLeod
  • Piran C. L. White
Original Paper

DOI: 10.1007/s00265-010-1024-y

Cite this article as:
Marsh, M.K., Hutchings, M.R., McLeod, S.R. et al. Behav Ecol Sociobiol (2011) 65: 183. doi:10.1007/s00265-010-1024-y


It is becoming increasingly evident that the social behaviour of many group-living species is more complex than previously assumed and that free mixing of individuals, even within social groups, is rare. This has important implications for ecological processes, such as disease transmission, which are dependent on interactions between individuals. European wild rabbits (Oryctolagus cuniculus) have been considered traditionally as highly sociable animals that mix freely within groups but interact less frequently between groups. We deployed proximity logging devices to quantify the intra- and inter-group contact behaviour of free-living wild rabbits in two populations in a temperate region of Australia. Altogether, 126 rabbits were fitted with proximity loggers at least once during the study. Radio-tracking was carried out alongside proximity data collection to determine the space use of rabbit social groups within the study sites. On average, a rabbit made only 1.54 ± 0.23 (SE) (median = 0.54) contacts per day with each other rabbit carrying a proximity logger in its social group, and the mean daily contact duration was 202 ± 38 s/day (SE) (median = 29 s). Despite the high degree of home range overlap between the neighbouring social groups, inter-group contacts were highly infrequent and brief. Our results demonstrated considerable spatial and temporal heterogeneities in the contact behaviour between individual rabbits, both between populations and between and within social groups in the same population. Such variations in the social organisation of rabbits are likely to create complex patterns of disease transmission through direct contact and may contribute towards observed heterogeneities in the effects of disease on wild rabbit populations.


Australia Heterogeneity Home range Rabbit haemorrhagic disease virus Social interaction Social organisation Wildlife disease 

Supplementary material

265_2010_1024_MOESM1_ESM.doc (30 kb)
Appendix S1Population abundance estimation (DOC 30 kb)
265_2010_1024_MOESM2_ESM.doc (49 kb)
Table S1CAPTURE models for abundance estimation (DOC 49 kb)
265_2010_1024_MOESM3_ESM.doc (95 kb)
Fig. S1Abundance of the total rabbit population and adults only within Oaky Creek and Valpine over the study year. (DOC 95 kb)
265_2010_1024_MOESM4_ESM.doc (34 kb)
Fig. S2Cluster analysis plots for (a) Oaky Creek data period 1, (b) Oaky Creek data period 2, (c) Valpine data period 1, and (d) Valpine data period 2 used to confirm the social group allocation for rabbits with scarce spatial data. (DOC 34 kb)

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Maija K. Marsh
    • 1
  • Michael R. Hutchings
    • 2
  • Steven R. McLeod
    • 3
  • Piran C. L. White
    • 1
  1. 1.Environment DepartmentUniversity of YorkYorkUK
  2. 2.Disease SystemsScottish Agricultural CollegeEdinburghUK
  3. 3.Vertebrate Pest Research UnitNew South Wales Department of Primary IndustriesOrangeAustralia

Personalised recommendations