Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology

, Volume 64, Issue 12, pp 2007–2014 | Cite as

Female European green lizards (Lacerta viridis) prefer males with high ultraviolet throat reflectance

  • Katalin Bajer
  • Orsolya Molnár
  • János Török
  • Gábor Herczeg
Original Paper


The role of ultraviolet (UV) signals in intraspecific communication has been identified in a number of vertebrate taxa. In lizards, the signalling role of UV has only been shown in male–male competition and male mate choice. Here, we investigated whether male UV colour can be a basis of female association preference in European green lizards (Lacerta viridis), a species where males develop blue nuptial throat colouration with high UV reflectance. We experimentally manipulated the UV colour of male pairs, where the members of the pair did not differ significantly in body length, body weight, head size, throat UV chroma and brightness or throat blue chroma and brightness measured prior to colour manipulation. By providing these pairs of males to females (only visual stimuli could be perceived by the females), we assessed the role of UV in female association preference irrespective of other potentially important visual traits. We found that unmated but receptive females preferred males of higher UV reflectance. Our results show for the first time that UV colour can be an important male signal in female preference in reptiles.


Lacerta viridis Mate choice Mate preference Sexual selection Signalling UV 


  1. Andersson M (1994) Sexual selection. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  2. Andersson S, Amundsen T (1997) Ultraviolet colour vision and ornamentation in bluethroats. Proc R Soc Lond B 264:1587–1591CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Andersson S, Örnborg J, Andersson M (1998) Ultraviolet sexual dimorphism and assortative mating in blue tits. Proc R Soc Lond B 265:445–450CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Baird TA, Fox FS, McCoy K (1997) Population differences in the roles of size and coloration in intra- and intersexual selection in the collared lizard, Crotaphytus collaris: influence of habitat and social organization. Behav Ecol 8:506–517CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bennett ATD, Cuthill IC, Partridge JC, Maier EJ (1996) Ultraviolet vision and mate choice in zebra finches. Nature 380:433–435CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bennett ATD, Cuthill IC, Partridge JC, Lunau K (1997) Ultraviolet plumage colors predict mate preferences in starlings. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 94:8618–8621CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Boulcott PD, Walton K, Braithwaite VA (2005) The role of ultraviolet wavelengths in the mate-choice decisions of female three-spined sticklebacks. J Exp Biol 208:1453–1458CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Calsbeek R, Sinervo B (2002) Uncoupling direct and indirect components of female choice in the wild. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 99:14897–14902CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Censky EJ (1997) Female mate choice in the non-territorial lizard Ameiva plei (Teiidae). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 40:221–225CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cooper WE Jr, Vitt LJ (1993) Female mate choice of large male broad-headed skinks. Anim Behav 45:683–693CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cuthill IC, Partridge JC, Bennett ATD (2000) Avian UV vision and sexual selection. In: Espmark Y, Amundsen T, Rosenqvist G (eds) Animal signals: signalling and signal design in animal communication. Tapir Academic, Trondheim, pp 61–82Google Scholar
  12. Ellingson JM, Fleishman LJ, Loew ER (1995) Visual pigments and spectral sensitivity of the diurnal gecko Gonatodes albogularis. J Comput Phys 177:559–567Google Scholar
  13. Figuerola J, Senar JC (2005) Seasonal changes in carotenoid- and melanin-based plumage coloration in the great tit Parus major. Ibis 147:797–802CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Fitze PS, Le Galliard JF, Federici P, Richard M, Clobert J (2005) Conflict over multiple-partner mating between males and females of the polygynandrous common lizards. Evolution 59:2451–2459PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Fleishman LJ, Loew ER, Leal M (1993) Ultraviolet vision in lizards. Nature 365:397CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Fleishman LJ, Bowman M, Saunders D, Miller WE, Rury MJ, Loew ER (1997) The visual ecology of Puerto Rican anoline lizards: habitat light and spectral sensitivity. J Comp Physiol A 181:446–460CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Font E, de Lanuza GP, Samperdo C (2009) Ultraviolet reflectance and cryptic sexual dichromatism in the ocellated lizard, Lacerta (Timon) lepida (Squamata: Lacertidae). Biol J Linn Soc 97:766–780CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Gasc J-P, Cabela A, Crnobrnja-Isailovic J, Dolmen D, Grossenbacher K, Haffner P, Lescure J, Martens H, Martinez Rica JP, Maurin H, Oliveira ME, Sofianidou TS, Veith M, Zuiderwijk A (Eds) (1997) Atlas of amphibians and reptiles in Europe. Societas Europea Herpetologica & Museum National d’Histoire Naturelle (IEGB/SPN), ParisGoogle Scholar
  19. Hamilton PS, Sullivan BK (2005) Female mate attraction in ornate tree lizards, Urosaurus ornatus: a multivariate analysis. Anim Behav 69:219–224CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hill GE, McGraw KJ (2006) Bird coloration, vol. 1. Mechanisms and measurements. Harvard University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  21. Hunt S, Bennett ATD, Cuthill IC, Griffith R (1998) Blue tits are ultraviolet tits. Proc R Soc Lond B 265:451–455CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Jawor JM, Breitwisch R (2004) Multiple ornaments in male northern cardinals, Cardinalis cardinalis, as indicators of condition. Ethology 110:113–126CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kemp DJ (2008) Female mating biases for bright ultraviolet iridescence in the butterfly Eurema hecabe (Pieridae). Behav Ecol 19:1–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Kopena R, López P, Martín J (2009) Lipophilic compounds from the femoral gland secretions of male Hungarian green lizards, Lacerta viridis. Z Naturforsch 64:434–440Google Scholar
  25. Korsten P, Limbourg T, Lessells CM, Komdeur J (2007) Effectiveness of a commonly-used technique for experimentally reducing plumage UV reflectance. J Avian Biol 38:399–403Google Scholar
  26. Kwiatowski MA, Sullivan BK (2002) Geographic variation in sexual selection among populations of an iguanid lizard, Sauromalus obesus (=ater). Evolution 56:2039–2051Google Scholar
  27. LeBas NR, Marshall J (2000) The role of colour in signalling and male choice in the agamid lizard, Ctenophorus ornatus. Proc R Soc Lond B 267:45–452CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. LeBas NR, Marshall J (2001) No evidence of female mate choice for a condition-dependent trait in the agamid lizard, Ctenophorus ornatus. Behaviour 138:965–980CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Li J, Zhang Z, Liu F, Liu Q, Gan W, Chen J, Lim MLM, Li D (2008) UVB-based mate-choice cues used by females of the jumping spider Phintella vittata. Curr Biol 18:699–703CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Loew ER, Govardovskii VI, Röhlich P, Szél A (1996) Microspectrophotometric and immunocytochemical identification of ultraviolet photoreceptors in geckos. Vis Neurosci 13:247–256CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. López P, Martín J (2005a) Chemical compounds from femoral gland secretions of male Iberian rock lizards, Lacerta monticola cyreni. Z Naturforsch 60:632–636Google Scholar
  32. López P, Martín J (2005b) Female Iberian wall lizards prefer male scents that signal a better cell-mediated immune response. Biol Lett 1:404–406CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. López P, Munoz A, Martín J (2002) Symmetry, male dominance and female mate preferences in the Iberian rock lizard, Lacerta monticola. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 52:342–347CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. López P, Amo L, Martín J (2006) Reliable signaling by chemical cues of male traits and health state in male lizards, Lacerta monticola. J Chem Ecol 32:473–488CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Martín J, Forsman A (1999) Social costs and development of nuptial coloration in male Psammodromus algirus lizards: an experiment. Behav Ecol 10:396–400CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Martín J, López P (2008) Female sensory bias may allow honest chemical signalling by male Iberian rock lizards. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 62:1927–1934CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Martín J, López P (2009) Multiple color signals may reveal multiple messages in male Schreiber's green lizards, Lacerta schreiberi. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 63:1743–1755CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. McGraw KJ, Mackillop EA, Dale J, Hauber ME (2002) Different colors reveal different information: how nutritional stress affects the expression of melanin- and structurally based ornamental plumage. J Exp Biol 205:3747–3755PubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Olsson M (1993) Nuptial coloration and predation risk in a model sand lizards, Lacerta agilis. Anim Behav 46:410–412CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Olsson M, Madsen T (1995) Female choice on male quantitative traits in lizards—why is it so rare? Behav Ecol Sociobiol 36:607–613CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Olsson M, Madsen T (1998) Sexual selection and sperm competition in reptiles. In: Birkhead TR, Møller AP (eds) Sperm competition and sexual selection. Academic, LondonGoogle Scholar
  42. Pearn SM, Bennett AT, Cuthill IC (2001) Ultraviolet vision, fluorescence and mate choice in a parrot, the budgerigar Melopsittacus undulatus. Proc R Soc Lond B 268:2273–2279CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Penteriani V, Alonso-Alvarez C, del Mar DM, Sergio F, Ferrer M (2006) Brightness variability in the white badge of the eagle owl Bubo bubo. J Avian Biol 37:110–116Google Scholar
  44. Rick IP, Bakker TCM (2008) UV wavelengths make female three-spined sticklebacks (Gasterosteus aculeatus) more attractive for males. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 62:439–445CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Ruby D (1984) Male breeding success and differential access to females in Anolis carolinensis. Herpetologica 40:272–280Google Scholar
  46. Salvador A, Veiga JP (2001) Male traits and pairing success in the lizard Psammodromus algirus. Herpetologica 57:77–86Google Scholar
  47. Salvador A, Díaz JA, Veiga JP, Bloor P, Brown RP (2008) Correlates of reproductive success in male lizards of the alpine species Iberolacerta cyreni. Behav Ecol 19:169–176CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Saveliev SS, Bulakhova NA, Kuranova VN (2006) Reproductive activity of Lacerta agilis and Zootoca vivipara (Reptilia: Sauria: Lacertidae) in western Siberia. In: Vences M, Köhler J, Ziegler T, Böhme W (eds) Herpetologia Bonnensis II. Proceedings of the 13th Congress of the Societas Europaea Herpetologica, pp 133–137Google Scholar
  49. Senar JC, Figuerola J, Doménech J (2003) Plumage coloration and nutritional condition in the great tit, Parus major: the roles of carotenoids and melanins differ. Naturwissenschaften 90:234–237PubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. Siebeck UE (2004) Communication in coral reef fish: the role of ultraviolet colour patterns in damselfish territorial behaviour. Anim Behav 68:273–282CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Siefferman L, Hill GE (2005) Evidence for sexual selection on structural plumage coloration in female eastern bluebirds (Sialia sialis). Evolution 59:1819–1828PubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. Sillman AJ, Govardovskii RJ, Röhlich JA, Southard A, Loew ER (1997) The photoreceptors and visual pigments of the garter snake (Thamnophis sirtalis): a microspectrophotometric, scanning electron microscopic and immunocytochemical study. J Comp Physiol A 181:89–101CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. Simmons LW, Bailey WJ (1993) Agonistic communication between males of a zaprochiline katydid (Orthoptera: Tettigoniidae). Behav Ecol 4:364–368CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Smith EJ, Partridge JC, Parsons KN, White EM, Cuthill IC, Bennett ATD, Church SC (2002) Ultraviolet vision and mate choice in the guppy (Poecilia reticulata). Behav Ecol 13:11–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Stamps JA (1983) Sexual selection, sexual dimorphism and territoriality. In: Huey RB, Pianka ER, Schoener TW (eds) Lizard ecology: studies of a model organism. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, pp 169–204Google Scholar
  56. Stapley J, Whiting MJ (2006) Ultraviolet signals fighting ability in a lizard. Biol Lett 22:169–172CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Tokarz RR (1995) Mate choice in lizards: a review. Herp Monogr 9:17–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Václav R, Prokop P, Fekiač V (2007) Expression of breeding coloration in European green lizards (Lacerta viridis): variation with morphology and tick infestation. Can J Zool 85:1199–1206CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Vorobyev M (2003) Coloured oil droplets enhance colour discrimination. Proc R Soc Lond B 270:1255–1261CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. West-Eberhard MJ (1983) Sexual selection, social competition, and speciation. Q Rev Biol 58:155–183CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Whiting MJ, Stuart-Fox DM, O’Connor D, Firth D, Bennett NC, Blomberg SP (2006) Ultraviolet signals ultra-aggression in a lizard. Anim Behav 72:353–363CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Katalin Bajer
    • 1
  • Orsolya Molnár
    • 1
  • János Török
    • 1
  • Gábor Herczeg
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Behavioural Ecology Group, Department of Systematic Zoology and EcologyEötvös Loránd UniversityBudapestHungary
  2. 2.Ecological Genetics Research Unit, Department of BiosciencesUniversity of HelsinkiHelsinkiFinland

Personalised recommendations