Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology

, Volume 63, Issue 4, pp 581–590 | Cite as

Complex call in male rock hyrax (Procavia capensis): a multi-information distributing channel

  • Lee KorenEmail author
  • Eli Geffen
Original Paper


Chemicals such as those used for scent marking, or visual cues such as color badges, can transmit information pertaining to different aspects of individual, group and species recognition and attributes. Here, we show that complex acoustic cues, such as calls also have the capacity for such information transfer. Although songs are usually attributed to birds, rock hyraxes (Procavia capensis) engage in a rich and complex vocalizing behavior that we term ‘singing’. Previous studies on various species have shown that a specific vocalization can closely reflect a specific attribute. Using a series of multiple regressions, we show that a single complex vocalization by the adult male rock hyrax closely reflects numerous individual traits, possibly encoding various types of biologically important information (multiple-messages hypothesis). Our study reveals that hyrax songs provide accurate information regarding body weight, size and condition, social status and hormonal state of the singer. We also show that these independent data are sent in a sequential manner, a pattern that probably allows a better partition of the messages embedded in the song. Our results imply that animals, through complex individual vocalizations, can potentially advertise multiple individual attributes in the same manner as that produced by chemical scent marking.


Acoustic communication Advertisement Multiple messages Social status Steroid hormone levels 



We are obliged to B. Sanzenbacher, I. Aravot, and E. Tauber for their extensive help with the trapping of the hyraxes, as well as to the many project students, field guides and park rangers who helped in the field. We wish to thank the Nature and Parks Authority for permission to work at the Ein Gedi Nature Reserve and the Ein Gedi Field School for their hospitality and logistic help. We especially wish to thank G. Koren and T. Karaskov for teaching us the hair-testing protocol. Finally, we are grateful to H. deVries for his assistance with the rank determination, to C.K. Hemerlijk for sharing with us the Matrix Tester program, to N. Amir for helping with the formant analyses, to A. Lotem, B. Lyon, G. Roemer for their critical input, and to N. Paz for editorial assistance. This study was supported by two grants from the Israel Academy of Sciences and Humanities (ISF 577/99 and 488/05).

Supplementary material

265_2008_693_MOESM1_ESM.wav (284 kb)
Online sound file of Fig. 1 (WAV 290 kb)


  1. Altmann J (1974) Observational study of behavior—sampling methods. Behavior 49:227–267CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Andersson M (1994) Sexual selection. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  3. Bee MA, Perrill SA, Owen PC (1999) Size assessment in simulated territorial encounters between male green frogs (Rana clamitans). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 45:177–184CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bruckert L, Lienard JS, Lacroix A, Kreutzer M, Leboucher G (2006) Women use voice parameters to assess men’s characteristics. Proc R Soc B 273:83–89PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Candolin U (2003) The use of multiple cues in mate choice. Biol Rev 78:575–595PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Charlton BD, Reby D, McComb K (2007) Female red deer prefer the roars of larger males. Biol Lett 3:382–385PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Creel S, Creel NM, Mills MGL, Monfort SL (1997) Rank and reproduction in cooperatively breeding African wild dogs: behavioral and endocrine correlates. Behav Ecol 8:298–306CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Crockford C, Boesch C (2005) Call combinations in wild chimpanzees. Behavior 142:397–421CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Davidson SM, Wilkinson GS (2004) Function of male song in the greater white-lined bat, Saccopteryx bilineata. Anim Behav 67:883–891CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Eberle M, Kappeler PM (2004) Selected polyandry: female choice and inter-sexual conflict in a small nocturnal solitary primate (Microcebus murinus). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 57:91–100CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Emlen ST, Oring LW (1977) Ecology, sexual selection, and evolution of mating systems. Science 197:215–223PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Fischer J, Hammerschmidt K, Cheney DL, Seyfarth RM (2002) Acoustic features of male baboon loud calls: Influences of context, age, and individuality. J Acoust Soc Am 111:1465–1474PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Fischer J, Kitchen DM, Seyfarth RM, Cheney DL (2004) Baboon loud calls advertise male quality: acoustic features and their relation to rank, age, and exhaustion. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 56:140–148CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Fitch WT (1997) Vocal tract length and formant frequency dispersion correlate with body size in rhesus macaques. J Acoust Soc Am 102:1213–1222PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Fitch WT (2000a) The phonetic potential of nonhuman vocal tracts: comparative cineradiographic observations of vocalizing animals. Phonetica 57:205–218CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Fitch WT (2000b) Skull dimensions in relation to body size in nonhuman mammals: The causal bases for acoustic allometry. Zool-Anal Complex Sy 103:40–58Google Scholar
  17. Fitch WT, Hauser MD (2002) Unpacking ‘honesty’: vertebrate vocal production and the evolution of acoustic signals. In: Simmons A, Fay RR, Popper AN (eds) Acoustic communication. Springer, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  18. Fourie PB (1977) Acoustic communication in rock hyrax, Procavia capensis. J Comp Ethol 44:194–219Google Scholar
  19. Galeotti P, Saino N, Sacchi R, Moller AP (1997) Song correlates with social context, testosterone and body condition in male barn swallows. Anim Behav 53:687–700CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Gammell MP, De Vries H, Jennings DJ, Carlin CM, Hayden TJ (2003) David's score: a more appropriate dominance ranking method than Clutton-Brock et al.'s index. Anim Behav 66:601–605CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Garamszegi LZ (2005) Bird song and parasites. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 59:167–180CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Gerhardt HC (1992) Multiple messages in acoustic signals. Semin Neuroscience 4:391–400CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Gil D, Gahr M (2002) The honesty of bird song: multiple constraints for multiple traits. Trends Ecol Evol 17:133–141CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Grether GF (1996) Sexual selection and survival selection on wing coloration and body size in the rubyspot damselfly Hetaerina americana. Evolution 50:1939–1948CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hamilton WD, Zuk M (1982) Heritable true fitness and bright birds—a role for parasites. Science 218:384–387PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Hasson O (1994) Cheating signals. J Theor Biol 167:223–238CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Hebets EA, Papaj DR (2005) Complex signal function: developing a framework of testable hypotheses. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 57:197–214CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Hoeck HN, Klein H, Hoeck P (1982) Flexible social organization in hyrax. J Comp Ethol 59:265–298Google Scholar
  29. Johnston RE (2003) Chemical communication in rodents: from pheromones to individual recognition. J Mammal 84:1141–1162CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Johnstone RA (1996) Multiple displays in animal communication: ‘backup signals’ and ‘multiple messages’. Phil Trans R Soc B 351:329–338CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Koren L, Mokady O, Karaskov T, Klein J, Koren G, Geffen E (2002) A novel method using hair for determining hormonal levels in wildlife. Anim Behav 63:403–406CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Koren L, Mokady O, Geffen E (2008) Social status and cortisol levels in singing rock hyraxes. Horm Behav 54:212–216PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Krauss RM, Freyberg R, Morsella E (2002) Inferring speakers’ physical attributes from their voices. J Exp Soc Psychol 38:618–625CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Leboucher G, Pallot K (2004) Is he all he says he is? Intersexual eavesdropping in the domestic canary, Serinus canaria. Anim Behav 68:957–963CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Lindstrom K, Lundstrom J (2000) Male greenfinches (Carduelis chloris) with brighter ornaments have higher virus infection clearance rate. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 48:44–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Mager JN, Walcott C, Piper WH (2007) Male common loons, Gavia immer, communicate body mass and condition through dominant frequencies of territorial yodels. Anim Behav 73:683–690CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. McElligott AG, Hayden TJ (1999) Context-related vocalization rates of fallow bucks, Dama dama. Anim Behav 58:1095–1104PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Mendelssohn H (1965) Breeding in the Syrian hyrax. Int Zoo Yearbook 5:116–125CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Morton ES (1977) Occurrence and significance of motivation structural rules in some bird and mammal sounds. Am Nat 111:855–869CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Peake TM, Terry AMR, McGregor PK, Dabelsteen T (2001) Male great tits eavesdrop on simulated male-to-male vocal interactions. Proc R Soc B 268:1183–1187PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Reby D, McComb K (2003a) Anatomical constraints generate honesty: acoustic cues to age and weight in the roars of red deer stags. Anim Behav 65:519–530CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Reby D, McComb K (2003b) Vocal communication and reproduction in deer. In: Advances in the Study of Behavior, Vol 33, vol 33, pp 231–264Google Scholar
  43. Rehsteiner U, Geisser H, Reyer HU (1998) Singing and mating success in water pipits: one specific song element makes all the difference. Anim Behav 55:1471–1481PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Rohwer S, Ewald PW (1981) The cost of dominance and advantage of subordination in a badge signaling system. Evolution 35:441–454CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Rowe C (1999) Receiver psychology and the evolution of multicomponent signals. Anim Behav 58:921–931PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Savalli UM (1994) Tail length affects territory ownership in the yellow-shouldered widowbird. Anim Behav 48:105–111CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Simmons LW, Zuk M, Rotenberry JT (2005) Immune function reflected in calling song characteristics in a natural population of the cricket Teleogryllus commodus. Anim Behav 69:1235–1241CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Skerratt LF (2003) Clinical response of captive common wombats (Vombatus ursinus) infected with Sarcoptes scabiei var. wombati. J Wildlife Dis 39:179–192Google Scholar
  49. Spencer KA, Buchanan KL, Goldsmith AR, Catchpole CK (2003) Song as an honest signal of developmental stress in the zebra finch (Taeniopygia guttata). Horm Behav 44:132–139PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Theodor O, Costa M (1967) Ectoparasites, vol 1. The Israel Academy of Sciences and Humanities, JerusalemGoogle Scholar
  51. Titze IR (2000) Principles of vocal production. National Center for Voice and Speech, Iowa CityGoogle Scholar
  52. Zahavi A (1977) Cost of honesty—(further remarks on handicap principle). J Theor Biol 67:603–605PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of ZoologyTel Aviv UniversityTel AvivIsrael

Personalised recommendations