Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Combined use of pheromone trails and visual landmarks by the common garden ant Lasius niger

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study investigated the relative importance of pheromone trails and visual landmarks on the ability of Lasius niger foragers to relocate a previously used food source. Colonies formed foraging trails to a 1-M sucrose feeder. Sections of this trail were then presented back to the same colony after variable time intervals. Individual outgoing foragers were observed to determine if they walked for 15 cm in the direction of the feeder or not. On newly established pheromone trails formed by 500 ant passages, 77% of the foragers walked in the correct direction vs 31% for control foragers (no trail pheromone). Pheromone trails decayed to the control levels in 20–24 h. Trails formed with fewer ant passages (125 or 30) decayed quicker. The use of visual landmarks was investigated by using trails with outgoing foragers from the colony that established the trail, either in the same room or in a different room, with different visual landmarks, to that used during trail establishment. Approximately 20% more ants walked in the correct direction in the same room vs the different room. This difference decreased to around 10% 2 h after trail establishment, indicating that the ants in the different room were learning the new visual cues to navigate by. Our results show that visual landmarks and pheromone trails are approximately equally useful in initially guiding L. niger foragers to food locations and that these two information sources have a complementary function.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Akino T, Yamaoka R (2005) Trail discrimination signal of Lasius japonicus (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Chemoecology 15:21–30

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Aron S, Beckers R, Deneubourg JL, Pasteels JM (1993) Memory and chemical communication in the orientation of two mass-recruiting ant species. Insect Soc 40:369–380

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beckers R, Goss S, Deneubourg JL, Pasteels JM (1989) Colony size, communication and ant foraging strategy. Psyche 96:239–256

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beckers R, Deneubourg JL, Goss S (1992) Trail laying behaviour during food recruitment in the ant Lasius niger (L.). Insect Soc 39:59–72

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beckers R, Deneubourg JL, Goss S (1993) Modulation of trail laying in the ant Lasius niger (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) and its role in the collective selection of a food source. J Insect Behav 6:751–759

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bestmann HJ, Kern F, Schafer D, Witschel MC (1992) 3,4-Dihydroisocoumarins, a new class of ant trail pheromones. Angew Chem Int Ed 31:795–796

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bradshaw JWS, Howse PE (1984) Sociochemicals of ants. In: Bell WJ, Cardé RT (eds) Chemical ecology of insects. Chapman and Hall, London, p 450

    Google Scholar 

  • Brun R (1914) Die Raumorientierung der Ameisen. G. Fischer, Jena

    Google Scholar 

  • Çamlitepe Y, Stradling DJ (1995) Wood ants orient to magnetic fields. Pro R Soc Lond B 261:37–41

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carthy JD (1951) The orientation of two allied species of British ant I: visual direction finding in Acanthomyops (Lasius) niger. Behaviour 2:275–303

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Collett TS, Collett M (2004) How do insects represent familiar terrain. J Physiol-Paris 98:259–264

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Devigne C, Detrain C (2002) Collective exploration and area marking in the ant Lasius niger. Insect Soc 49:357–362

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dussutour A, Fourcassié V, Helbing D, Deneubourg JL (2004) Optimal traffic organization in ants under crowded conditions. Nature 428:70–73

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ehmer B (1999) Orientation in the ant Paraponera clavata. J Insect Behav 12:711–722

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Franks NR, Richardson T (2006) Teaching in tandem-running ants. Nature 439:153–153

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fukushi T, Wehner R (2004) Navigation in wood ants Formica japonica: context dependent use of landmarks. J Exp Biol 207:3431–3439

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Giurfa M, Núñez JA (1992) Honeybees mark with scent and reject recently visited flowers. Oecologia 89:113–117

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gotwald WH Jr (1995) Army ants: the biology of social predation. Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NY

    Google Scholar 

  • Guillaume O (2002) The importance of chemical communication in the social behaviour of cave salamanders. Comparison between a strict (Proteus anguinus L., Proteidae) and a facultative (Euproctus asper D., Salamandridae) cave dweller. B Soc Zool Fr 127:263–272

    Google Scholar 

  • Hölldobler B (1999) Multimodal signals in ant communication. J Comp Physiol 184:129–141

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hölldobler B, Wilson EO (1990) The ants. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson D, Ratnieks FLW (2006) Communication in ants. Curr Biol 16:R570–R574

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jackson DE, Martin SJ, Holcolme M, Ratnieks FLW (2006) Longevity and detection of persistent foraging trails in Pharaoh’s ants, Monomorium pharaonis (L.). Anim Behav 71:351–359

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jeanson R, Ratnieks FLW, Deneubourg JL (2003) Pheromone trail decay rates on different substrates in the Pharaoh’s ant, Monomorium pharaonis. Physiol Entomol 28:192–198

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kamil AC, Roitblat HL (1985) The ecology of foraging behaviour: implications for animal learning and memory. Annu Rev Psych 36:141–169

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lubbock J (1884) Ants, bees and wasps. Appleton, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Marks RJ (1977) Laboratory studies of plant searching behaviour by Coccinella septempunctata L. larvae. Bull Entomol Res 67:235–241

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nelson CR, Jorgensen CD, Black HL, Whiting J (1991) Maintenance of foraging trails by the tropical ant Paraponera clavata (Insecta: Formicidae: Ponerinae). Insect Soc 38:221–228

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • R Development Core Team (2008) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. ISBN 3-900051-07-0, URL http://www.R-project.org

  • Ratnieks FLW (2006) Can humans learn from insect societies. Nova Acta Leopold 345:97–116

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson EH, Jackson D, Holcolme M, Ratnieks FLW (2005) ‘No entry’ sign on ant pheromone trails. Nature 438:422

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosengren R (1977a) Foraging strategy of wood ants (Formica rufa group) I. Age polyethism and topgraphic traditions. Acta Zool Fenn 149:2–30

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosengren R (1977b) Foraging strategy of wood ants (Formica rufa group) II. Nocturnal orientation and diel periodicity. Acta Zool Fenn 150:1–30

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosengren R, Fortelius W (1986) Orstreue in foraging ants of the Formica rufa group — hierarchy of orienting cues and long-term-memory. Insect Soc 33:306–337

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salo O, Rosengren R (2001) Memory of location and site recognition in the ant Formica uralensis (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Ethology 107:737–752

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmitt U, Bertsch A (1990) Do foraging bumblebees scent-mark food sources and does it matter. Oecologia 82:137–144

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seeley TD (1998) Thoughts on information and integration in honeybee colonies. Apidologie 29:67–80

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Traniello JFA (1989) Chemical trail systems, orientation, and territorial interactions in the ant Lasius neoniger. J Insect Behav 2:339–354

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Venables WN, Ripley BD (2002) Modern applied statistics with S, 4th edn. Springer, New York. ISBN 0-387-95457-0

    Google Scholar 

  • von Frisch K (1967) The dance language and orientation of bees. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass

    Google Scholar 

  • Wehner R (1993) Desert ant navigation: how can miniature brains solve complex tasks. J Comp Physiol A 189:579–588

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yamaoka R, Akino T (1994) Ecological importance of cuticular hydrocarbons secreted from the tarsus of ants. In: Lenoir A, Arnold G, Lepage M (eds) Les Insectes Sociaux. Université Paris-Nord, Paris, p 222

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Duncan Jackson for commenting on the manuscript. SE was supported by an Industrial CASE Ph.D. studentship from BBSRC and Rentokil-Initial Plc.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Laboratory of Apiculture and Social Insects, Department of Animal and Plant Sciences, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, S10 2TN, UK

    Sophie E. F. Evison

  2. Department of Animal and Plant Sciences, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, S10 2TN, UK

    Owen L. Petchey & Andrew P. Beckerman

  3. Laboratory of Apiculture and Social Insects, Department of Biological & Environmental Science, University of Sussex, Falmer, Brighton, BN1 9QG, UK

    Francis L. W. Ratnieks

Authors
  1. Sophie E. F. Evison
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Owen L. Petchey
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Andrew P. Beckerman
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Francis L. W. Ratnieks
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sophie E. F. Evison.

Additional information

Communicated by L. Sundström

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Evison, S.E.F., Petchey, O.L., Beckerman, A.P. et al. Combined use of pheromone trails and visual landmarks by the common garden ant Lasius niger . Behav Ecol Sociobiol 63, 261–267 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-008-0657-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-008-0657-6

Keywords

Search

Navigation