Skip to main content
Log in

Informative content of multiple plumage-coloured traits in female and male European Rollers

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Animals may assess the quality of other individuals by using information that different ornaments may provide. The European Roller (Coracias garrulus) is a socially monogamous species in which males and females display highly conspicuous plumage colouration. According to the mutual selection hypothesis, we predicted that, in this species, plumage coloration could signal individual quality in both sexes because both female and male rollers invest a considerable amount of time caring for their offspring. We used spectrophotometric measurements to investigate the information content of multiple plumage colour traits. We found that the roller is actually a sexually dimorphic and dichromatic species. Different plumage colours from different origins were correlated within individual. Head and back brightness correlated with body condition in both sexes, and in males, head brightness correlated with the number of fledglings in successful nests, while head green-yellow saturation correlated with parental provisioning. Meanwhile, in females, back brightness was related to the number of fledglings in successful nests and to parental provisioning rate. In addition, there was a positive assortative mating in relation to weight, body condition, head green-yellow saturation and back brightness. Finally, we found a positive correlation between parent and offspring coloration. Altogether, these results suggest that multiple colour traits may act as quality indicators in the roller and that they may be used by the two sexes to assess potential mate quality.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Amundsen T (2000) Why are female birds ornamented? Trends Ecol Evol 15:149–155

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Amundsen T, Pärn H (2006) Female coloration: review of functional and non-functional hypothesis. In: Hill GE, McGraw KJ (eds) Bird coloration, vol. II: function and evolution. Harvard University Press, Harvard, pp 280–348

    Google Scholar 

  • Amundsen T, Forsgren E, Hansen LTT (1997) On the function of female ornaments: male bluethroats prefer colourful females. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 264:1579–1586

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andersson M (1994) Sexual selection. Princeton University Press, New Jersey

    Google Scholar 

  • Andersson S, Örnborg J, Andersson M (1998) Ultraviolet sexual dimorphism and assortative mating in blue tits. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 265:445–450

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andersson S, Pryke SR, Örnborg J, Lawes MJ, Andersson M (2002) Multiple receivers, multiple ornaments, and a trade-off between agonistic and epigamic signaling in a widowbird. Am Nat 160:683–691

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Avilés JM (2006) Carraca europeaCoracias garrulus. In: Carrascal LM, Salvador A (eds). Enciclopedia Virtual de los Vertebrados Españoles. Museo Nacional de Ciencias Naturales. http://www.vertebradosibericos.org

  • Avilés JM, Sánchez JM, Sánchez A, Parejo D (1999) Breeding biology of the Roller Coracias garrulus in farming areas of the southwest Iberian Peninsula. Bird Study 46:217–223

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Avilés JM, Sánchez JM, Parejo D (2000) Nest-site selection and breeding success in the Roller (Coracias garrulus) in the Southwest of the Iberian península. Journal für Ornithologie 141:345–350

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Avilés JM, Solís E, Valencia J, de la Cruz C, Sorci G (2008) Female and male plumage brightness correlate with nesting failure in azure-winged magpies. J Avian Biol 39:257–261

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Badyaev AV, Hill GE (2000) Evolution of sexual dichromatism: contribution of carotenoid-versus melanin-based coloration. Biol J Linn Soc 69:153–172

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bize P, Gasparini J, Klopfenstein A, Altwegg R, Roulin A (2006) Melanin-based coloration is a nondirectionally selected sex-specific signal of offspring development in the Alpine swift. Evolution 60:2370–2380

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cramp S, Simmons KEL (1988) The birds of the western Palearctic, vol. V. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Cuthill IC, Partridge JC, Bennett ATD, Church SC, Hart NS, Hunt S (2000) Ultraviolet vision in birds. Adv Stud Behav 29:159–214

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Darwin C (1871) The descent of man and selection in relation to sex. London, Murray

    Google Scholar 

  • Doucet SM (2002) Structural plumage coloration, male body size, and condition in the blue-black grassquit. Condor 104:30–38

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doucet SM, Montgomerie R (2003) Multiple sexual ornaments in satin bowerbirds: ultraviolet plumage and bowers signal different aspects of male quality. Behav Ecol 14:503–509

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eaton MD (2005) Human vision fails to distinguish widespread sexual dichromatism among sexually “monochromatic” birds. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 102:10942–10946

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Emlen DJ, Hunt J, Simmons LW (2005) Evolution of sexual dimorphism and male dimorphism in the expression of beetle horns: phylogenetic evidence for modularity, evolutionary lability, and constraint. Am Nat 166:S42–S68

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fargallo JA, Laaksonen T, Korpimäki E, Wakamatsu K (2007) A melanin-based trait reflects environmental growth conditions of nestling male Eurasian kestrels. Evol Ecol 21:157–171

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fridolfsson AK, Ellegren H (1999) A simple and universal method for molecular sexing of non-ratite birds. J Avian Biol 30:116–121

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grafen A (1990) Sexual selection unhandicapped by the Fisher process. J Theor Biol 144:473–516

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Goldsmith TH (1980) Hummingbirds see near ultraviolet light. Science 207:786–788

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Green R (1979) Sampling design and statistical methods for environmental biologists. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffith SC, Owens IPF, Burke T (1999) Environmental determination of sexually selected trait. Nature 400:358–360

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Griffith SC, Parker TH, Olson VA (2006) Melanin- versus carotenoid-based sexual signals: is the difference really so black and red? Anim Behav 71:749–763

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton WD, Zuk M (1982) Heritable true fitness and bright birds: a role for parasites? Science 218:384–387

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Heywood JS (1989) Sexual selection by the handicap mechanism. Evolution 43:1387–1397

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hill GE (1990) Female house finches prefer colourful males: sexual selection for a condition-dependent trait. Anim Behav 40:563–572

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hill GE (2006) Environmental regulation of ornamental coloration. In: Hill GE, McGraw KJ (eds) Bird coloration, vol. 1: Mechanism and measurements. Harvard University Press, Harvard, pp 507–560

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill GE, Doucet SM, Buchholz R (2005) The effect of coccidial infection on iridescent plumage coloration in wild turkeys. Anim Behav 69:387–394

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hill GE, McGraw KJ (2006a) Preface. In: Hill GE, McGraw KJ (eds) Bird coloration, vol. 1: Mechanism and measurements. Harvard University Press, Harvard, pp vii–viii

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill GE, McGraw KJ (2006b) Bird coloration, vol. 1: Mechanism and measurements. Harvard University Press, Harvard

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoelzer GA (1989) The good parent process of sexual selection. Anim Behav 38:1067–1078

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huxley JS (1914) The courtship habits of the great crested grebe (Podiceps cristatus); with an addition to the theory of sexual selection. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 35:491–562

    Google Scholar 

  • Jawor JM, Breitwisch R (2004) Multiple ornaments in male northern cardinals, Cardinalis cardinalis, as indicators of condition. Ethology 110:113–126

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnsen TS, Hengeveld JD, Blank JL, Yasukawa K, Nolan V (1996) Epaulet brightness and condition in female redwinged blackbirds. Auk 113:356–362

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnsen A, Delhey K, Andersson S, Kempenaers B (2003) Plumage colour in nestling blue tits: sexual dichromatism, condition dependence and genetic effects. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 270:1263–1270

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnstone RA (1997) The tactics of mutual mate choice and competitive search. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 40:51–59

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnstone RA, Reynolds JD, Deutsch JC (1996) Mutual mate choice and sex differences in choosiness. Evolution 50:1382–1391

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keyser AJ, Hill GE (1999) Condition-dependent variation in the blue-ultraviolet coloration of a structurally based plumage ornament. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 266:771–777

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keyser A, Hill GE (2000) Structurally based plumage coloration is an honest signal of quality in male blue grosbeaks. Behav Ecol 11:202–209

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kodric-Brown A, Brown JH (1984) Truth in advertising: the kinds of traits favored by sexual selection. Am Nat 124:309–323

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kokko H, Johnstone RA (2002) Why is mutual mate choice not the norm? Operational sex ratios, sex roles and the evolution of sexually dimorphic and monomorphic signalling. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 357:319–330

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kraaijeveld K, Kraaijeveld-Smit FJL, Komdeur J (2007) The evolution of mutual ornamentation. Anim Behav 74:657–677

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lande R (1980) Sexual dimorphism, sexual selection, and adaptation in polygenic characters. Evolution 34:292–305

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ligon JD, Zwartjes PW (1995) Ornate plumage of male red junglefowl does not influence mate choice by females. Anim Behav 49:117–125

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGraw KJ, Hill GE (2000) Differential effects of endoparasitism on the expression of carotenoid- and melanin-based ornamental coloration. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 267:1525–1531

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • McGraw KJ, Mackillop EA, Dale J, Hauber ME (2002) Different colors reveal different information: how nutritional stress affects the expression of melanin- and structurally based ornamental plumage. J Exp Biol 205:3747–3755

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • McGraw KJ, Hudon J, Hill GE, Parker RS (2005) A simple and inexpensive chemical test for behavioral ecologists to determine the presence of carotenoid pigments in animal tissues. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 57:391–397

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Møller AP, Pomiankowski A (1993) Why have birds got multiple sexual ornaments. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 32:167–176

    Google Scholar 

  • Mundy NI (2006) Genetic basis of color variation in wild birds. In: Hill GE, McGraw KJ (eds) Bird coloration, vol. 1: Mechanisms and measurements. Harvard University Press, Harvard, pp 469–506

    Google Scholar 

  • Ödeen A, Håstad O (2003) Complex distribution of avian color vision systems revealed by sequencing the SWS1 opsin from total DNA. Mol Biol Evol 20:855–861

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Omland KE (1996) Female mallard mating preferences for multiple male ornaments. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 39:353–36

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parejo D, Silva N, Avilés JM (2007) Within-brood size differences affect innate and acquired immunity in roller Coracias garrulus nestlings. J Avian Biol 38:717–725

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Potti J, Merino S (1996) Decreased levels of blood trypanosome infection correlate with female expression of a male secondary sexual trait: Implications for sexual selection. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 263:1199–1204

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roulin A (1999) Nonrandom pairing by male barn owls (Tyto alba) with respect to a plumage trait. Behav Ecol 10:688–695

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roulin A, Dijkstra C (2003) Genetic and environmental components of variation in eumelanin and phaeomelanin sex-traits in the barn owl. Heredity 90:359–364

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Servedio MR, Lande R (2006) Population genetic models of male and mutual mate choice. Evolution 60:674–685

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Siefferman L, Hill GE (2003) Structural and melanin coloration indicate parental effort and reproductive success in male eastern bluebirds. Behav Ecol 14:855–861

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Siefferman L, Hill GE (2005a) Evidence for sexual selection on structural plumage coloration of female eastern bluebirds. Evolution 59:1819–1828

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Siefferman L, Hill GE (2005b) Blue structural coloration of male eastern bluebirds Sialia sialis predicts incubation provisioning to females. J Avian Biol 36:488–493

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Solís E, Avilés JM, de la Cruz C, Valencia J, Sorci G (2008) Winter male plumage coloration correlates with breeding status in a cooperative breeding species. Behav Ecol 19:391–397

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trivers RL (1972) Parental investment and sexual selection. In: Campbell B (ed) Sexual selection and the descent of man 1871–1971. Aldine, Chicago, IL, pp 136–179

    Google Scholar 

  • Veiga JP, Puerta M (1996) Nutritional constraints determine the expression of a sexual trait in the house sparrow, Passer domesticus. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 263:229–234

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Von Schantz TV, Bensch S, Grahn M, Hasselquist D, Wittzell H (1999) Good genes, oxidative stress and condition-dependent sexual signals. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 266:1–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • West-Eberhard MJ (1979) Sexual selection, social competition, and evolution. P Am Phil Soc 123:222–234

    Google Scholar 

  • Zahavi A (1975) Mate selection—a selection for a handicap. J Theor Biol 53:205–214

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zahavi A, Zahavi A (1997) The Handicap Principle: a missing piece of Darwin’s puzzle. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Zuk M, Thornhill R, Ligon JD, Johnson K, Austad S, Ligon S, Thornhill N, Costin C (1990) The role of male ornaments and courtship behavior in female choice of red jungle fowl. Am Nat 136:459–473

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zuk M, Ligon JD, Thornhill R (1993) Effects of experimental manipulation of male secondary sex characters on female mate preference in red jungle fowl. Anim Behav 44:999–1006

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank all the people who collaborated in data collection either in the field (L. Derousse, M. Guillemin, M. Kauffman, M. Kriloff, C. Landsmann, V. Lartigot, X. Mandine and G. Martinerie) or in the laboratory (J. M. Gasent). We also thank I. Cuthill and one anonymous referee for constructive comments that improved our manuscript. Fieldwork was done under the permission of the Junta de Extremadura and in compliance with the Spanish laws. This research work was partially supported by a doctoral grant to NS by the European Social Fund, an I3P contract to DP funded by the European Social Fund and by the Spanish Ministerio de Educación y Ciencia-FEDER, Secretaría de Estado de Universidades e Investigación, (project ref. CGL2005-04654/BOS).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Deseada Parejo.

Additional information

Communicated by I. Cuthill

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Silva, N., Avilés, J.M., Danchin, E. et al. Informative content of multiple plumage-coloured traits in female and male European Rollers. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 62, 1969–1979 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-008-0628-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-008-0628-y

Keywords

Navigation