Dance precision of Apis florea—clues to the evolution of the honeybee dance language?
All honeybee species make use of the waggle dance to communicate the direction and distance to both food sources and potential new nest sites. When foraging, all species face an identical problem: conveying information about profitable floral patches. However, profound differences in nesting biology (some nest in cavities while others nest in the open, often on a branch or a cliff face) may mean that species have different requirements when dancing to advertise new nest sites. In cavity nesting species, nest sites are a precise location in the landscape: usually a small opening leading to a cavity in a hollow tree. Dances for cavities therefore need to be as precise as possible. In contrast, when the potential nest site comprises a tree or perhaps seven a patch of trees, precision is less necessary. Similarly, when a food patch is advertised, dances need not be very precise, as floral patches are often large, unless they are so far away that recruits need more precise information to be able to locate them. In this paper, we study the dance precision of the open-nesting red dwarf bee Apis florea. By comparing the precision of dances for food sources and nest sites, we show that A. florea workers dance with the same imprecision irrespective of context. This is in sharp contrast with the cavity-nesting Apis mellifera that increases the precision of its dance when advertising a potential new home. We suggest that our results are in accordance with the hypothesis that the honeybees’ dance communication initially evolved to convey information about new nest sites and was only later adapted for the context of foraging.
KeywordsApis florea Dance language Dance precision Foraging Nest-site selection Tuned-error hypothesis
We would like to thank members of the social insects lab at Sydney University and Sharoni Shafir for constructive comments on an earlier version of this manuscript. Sorasak Nak-eam collected most of the colonies we studied. We thank the Department of Biology at Naresuan University for the use of their facilities. MB is supported by the Australian Research Council. Additional financial support to MB and BPO was obtained from the University of Sydney.
- Akratanakul P (1977) The natural history of the dwarf honey bee, Apis florea F. in Thailand. PhD thesis Department of Entomology. Cornell University, Ithaca, pp 88Google Scholar
- Beekman M, Lew JB (2008) Foraging in honeybees—when does it pay to dance? Behav Ecol (in press). DOI 10.1093/beheco/arm117
- Gardner KE, Seeley TD, Calderone NW (2007) Hypotheses on the adaptiveness or non-adaptiveness of the directional imprecision in the honey bee’s waggle dance (Hymenoptera: Apidae: Apis mellifera). Entomol Gen 29:285–298Google Scholar
- Hölldobler B, Wilson EO (1990) The ants. Belknap, Cambridge MAGoogle Scholar
- Koeniger N, Koeniger G, Punchihewa RWK, Fabritius M, Fabritius M (1982) Observations and experiments on the dance communication in Apis florea in Sri Lanka. J Apic Res 21:45–52Google Scholar
- Michener CD (1974) The social behavior of the bees. A comparative study. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
- Oldroyd BP, Wongsiri S (2006) Asian honey bees. Biology, conservation and human interactions. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
- Punchihewa RWK, Koeniger N, Kevan PG, Gadawski RM (1985) Observations on the dance communication and natural foraging ranges of Apis cerana, Apis dorsata and Apis florea in Sri Lanka. J Apic Res 24:168–175Google Scholar
- Rinderer TE, Wongsiri S, Kuang B, Liu J, Oldroyd BP, Sylvester HA, Guzman de LI (1996) Comparative nest architecture of the dwarf honey bees. J Apic Res 35:19–26Google Scholar
- Seeley TD (1995) The wisdom of the hive. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
- von Frisch K (1967) The dance language and orientation of bees. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
- Winston ML (1987) The biology of the honey bee. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar