Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology

, Volume 62, Issue 8, pp 1259–1265 | Cite as

Dance precision of Apis florea—clues to the evolution of the honeybee dance language?

  • Madeleine Beekman
  • Rosalyn S. Gloag
  • Naïla Even
  • Wandee Wattanachaiyingchareon
  • Benjamin P. Oldroyd
Original Paper

Abstract

All honeybee species make use of the waggle dance to communicate the direction and distance to both food sources and potential new nest sites. When foraging, all species face an identical problem: conveying information about profitable floral patches. However, profound differences in nesting biology (some nest in cavities while others nest in the open, often on a branch or a cliff face) may mean that species have different requirements when dancing to advertise new nest sites. In cavity nesting species, nest sites are a precise location in the landscape: usually a small opening leading to a cavity in a hollow tree. Dances for cavities therefore need to be as precise as possible. In contrast, when the potential nest site comprises a tree or perhaps seven a patch of trees, precision is less necessary. Similarly, when a food patch is advertised, dances need not be very precise, as floral patches are often large, unless they are so far away that recruits need more precise information to be able to locate them. In this paper, we study the dance precision of the open-nesting red dwarf bee Apis florea. By comparing the precision of dances for food sources and nest sites, we show that A. florea workers dance with the same imprecision irrespective of context. This is in sharp contrast with the cavity-nesting Apis mellifera that increases the precision of its dance when advertising a potential new home. We suggest that our results are in accordance with the hypothesis that the honeybees’ dance communication initially evolved to convey information about new nest sites and was only later adapted for the context of foraging.

Keywords

Apis florea Dance language Dance precision Foraging Nest-site selection Tuned-error hypothesis 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank members of the social insects lab at Sydney University and Sharoni Shafir for constructive comments on an earlier version of this manuscript. Sorasak Nak-eam collected most of the colonies we studied. We thank the Department of Biology at Naresuan University for the use of their facilities. MB is supported by the Australian Research Council. Additional financial support to MB and BPO was obtained from the University of Sydney.

References

  1. Akratanakul P (1977) The natural history of the dwarf honey bee, Apis florea F. in Thailand. PhD thesis Department of Entomology. Cornell University, Ithaca, pp 88Google Scholar
  2. Beckers R, Deneubourg JL, Gross S, Pasteels JM (1990) Collective decision making through food recruitment. Insectes Soc 37:258CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Beekman M, Doyen L, Oldroyd BP (2005) Increase in dance imprecision with decreasing foraging distance in the honey-bee Apis mellifera L. is partly explained by physical constraints. J Comp Physiol A 191:1107–1113CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Beekman M, Lew JB (2008) Foraging in honeybees—when does it pay to dance? Behav Ecol (in press). DOI  10.1093/beheco/arm117
  5. Beekman M, Ratnieks FLW (2000) Long range foraging by the honeybee Apis mellifera L. Funct Ecol 14:490–496CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Beekman M, Sumpter DJT, Seraphides N, Ratnieks FLW (2004) Comparing foraging behaviour of small and large honey bee colonies by decoding waggle dances made by foragers. Funct Ecol 18:829–835CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Detrain C, Deneubourg JL (2002) Complexity of environment and parsimony of decision rules in insect societies. Biol Bull 202:268–274PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Dyer FC (1985) Mechanisms of dance orientation in the Asian honey bee Apis florea. J Comp Physiol A 157:183–198CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Dyer FC (2002) The biology of the dance language. Annu Rev Entomol 47:917–949PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Dyer FC, Seeley TD (1989) On the evolution of the dance language. Am Nat 133:580–590CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Dyer FC, Seeley TD (1991) Dance dialects and foraging range in three Asian honey bee species. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 28:227–233CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Esch HE, Zhang S, Srinivasan MV, Tautz J (2001) Honeybee dances communicate distances measured by optic flow. Nature 411:581–583PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Gardner KE, Seeley TD, Calderone NW (2007) Hypotheses on the adaptiveness or non-adaptiveness of the directional imprecision in the honey bee’s waggle dance (Hymenoptera: Apidae: Apis mellifera). Entomol Gen 29:285–298Google Scholar
  14. Haldane JBS, Spurway H (1954) A statistical analysis of communication in ‘Apis mellifera’ and a comparison with communication in other animals. Insectes Soc 1:247–283CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hölldobler B, Wilson EO (1990) The ants. Belknap, Cambridge MAGoogle Scholar
  16. Koeniger N, Koeniger G, Punchihewa RWK, Fabritius M, Fabritius M (1982) Observations and experiments on the dance communication in Apis florea in Sri Lanka. J Apic Res 21:45–52Google Scholar
  17. Lindauer M (1955) Schwarmbienen auf Wohnungssuche. Z vergl Physiol 37:263–324CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Lindauer M (1956) Über die verständigung bei Indischen Bienen. Z vergl Physiol 38:521–557CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Michener CD (1974) The social behavior of the bees. A comparative study. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  20. Nieh JC (1999) Stingless-bee communication. Am Sci 87:428–435CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Nieh JC (2004) Recruitment communication in stingless bees (Hymenoptera, Apidae, Meliponini). Apidologie 35:159–182CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Oldroyd BP, Wongsiri S (2006) Asian honey bees. Biology, conservation and human interactions. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  23. Punchihewa RWK, Koeniger N, Kevan PG, Gadawski RM (1985) Observations on the dance communication and natural foraging ranges of Apis cerana, Apis dorsata and Apis florea in Sri Lanka. J Apic Res 24:168–175Google Scholar
  24. Raffiudin R, Crozier RH (2007) Phylogenetic analysis of honey bee behavioral evolution. Mol Phyl Evol 43:543–552CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Rinderer TE, Wongsiri S, Kuang B, Liu J, Oldroyd BP, Sylvester HA, Guzman de LI (1996) Comparative nest architecture of the dwarf honey bees. J Apic Res 35:19–26Google Scholar
  26. Seeley TD (1995) The wisdom of the hive. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  27. Seeley TD, Visscher PK (1988) Assessing the benefits of cooperation in honeybee foraging: search costs, forage quality, and competitive ability. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 22:229–237CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Srinivasan MV, Zhang S, Altwein M, Tautz J (2000) Honeybee navigation: nature and calibration of the ‘odometer’. Science 287:851–853PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Tanner DA, Visscher PK (2006) Do honey bees tune error in their dances in nectar-foraging and house-hunting. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 59:571–576CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Tautz J, Zhang S, Spaethe J, Brockmann A, Si A, Srinivasan MV (2004) Honeybee odometry: performance in varying natural terrain. PLoS Biol 2:915–923CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Towne WF, Gould JL (1988) The spatial precision of the honeybee’s dance communication. J Insect Behav 1:129–155CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Visscher PK, Seeley TD (1982) Foraging strategy of honeybee colonies in a temperate deciduous forest. Ecology 63:1790–1801CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. von Frisch K (1967) The dance language and orientation of bees. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  34. Waddington KD, Visscher PK, Herbert TJ, Raveret Richter M (1994) Comparisons of forager distributions from matched honey bee colonies in suburban environments. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 35:423–429CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Weidenmüller A, Seeley TD (1999) Imprecision in waggle dances of the honeybee (Apis mellifera) for nearby food sources: error or adaptation. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 46:190–199CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Winston ML (1987) The biology of the honey bee. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Madeleine Beekman
    • 1
  • Rosalyn S. Gloag
    • 1
  • Naïla Even
    • 1
  • Wandee Wattanachaiyingchareon
    • 2
  • Benjamin P. Oldroyd
    • 1
  1. 1.Behaviour and Genetics of Social Insects Lab, School of Biological Sciences A12University of SydneySydneyAustralia
  2. 2.Department of Biology, Faculty of ScienceNaresuan UniversityPhitsanulokThailand

Personalised recommendations