Skip to main content
Log in

To court or not to court: reproductive decisions by male fiddler crabs in response to fluctuating food availability

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

For males, courting and foraging are often behavioral alternatives, which take time and consume energy. When males have a possibility of mating with receptive females, there may be a behavioral trade-off between courtship and feeding; the outcome of which may be affected by male physiological condition and food availability. Although many mathematical models and empirical studies suggest that the expression of male courtship signals are condition-dependent, decisions about courtship and mating strategies in relation to food availability have not attracted much attention. In this study, we tested whether daily changes in food availability affect males’ decisions about whether to court. We conducted experiments with the fiddler crab Uca lactea by providing males with additional food every other day. In food-supplemented enclosures, males did not increase courtship activity on the days when food was supplemented. However, they built more courtship structures (semidomes) and waved more on the days when they were not given additional food. Male size had a strong influence on the number of days the males courted. We also tested whether the frequency of surface mating, as an alternative reproductive tactic, decreased when food was supplemented. Contrary to our expectation, the number of males that exhibited the surface-mating tactic increased when food was supplemented whereas the number of mate-searching females did not change. Our findings in this field study suggest that reproductive decisions by male fiddler crabs are affected by fluctuating food availability and present body condition, and the alternative mating tactic of this species may be more frequently used by males under good condition.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abrahams MV (1993) The trade-off between foraging and courting in male guppies. Anim Behav 45:673–681

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andersson M (1994) Sexual selection. Princeton University Press, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Backwell PRY, Jennions MD, Christy JH, Schober U (1995) Pillar building in the fiddler crab Uca beebei: evidence for a condition-dependent ornament. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 36:185–192

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Choe JC, Crespi BJ (eds) (1997) The evolution of mating systems in insects and arachnids. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

  • Cotton S, Fowler K, Pomiankowski A (2004) Do sexual ornaments demonstrate heightened condition-dependent expression as predicted by handicap hypothesis? Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 271:771–783

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • David P, Bjorksten T, Fowler K, Pomiankowski A (2000) Condition-dependent signaling of genetic variation in stalk-eyed flies. Nature 406:186–188

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • deRivera CE, Vehrencamp SL (2001) Male versus female mate searching in fiddler crabs: a comparative analysis. Behav Ecol 12:182–191

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gass CL (1985) Behavioral foundations of adaptation. In: Bateson PPG, Klopfer P (eds) Perspectives in ethology, vol. 6: mechanisms. Plenum, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Goshima S, Murai M (1998) Mating investment of male fiddler crabs, Uca lactea. Anim Behav 36:1249–1251

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Griffith SC, Owens IPF, Burke T (1999) Environmental determination of a sexually selected trait. Nature 400:358–360

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Griffiths SW (1996) Sex differences in the trade-off between feeding and mating in the guppy. J Fish Biol 48:891–898

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jennions MD, Backwell PRY (1998) Variation in courtship rate in the fiddler crab Uca annulipes: is it related to male attractiveness? Behav Ecol 6:605–611

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnstone RA (1995) Sexual selection, honest advertisement and the handicap principle: reviewing the evidence. Biol Rev 70:1–65

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kim TW, Choe JC (2003) The effect of food availability on the semilunar courtship rhythm in the fiddler crab Uca lactea (Brachyura:Ocypodidae). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 55:210–217

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim TW, Kim KW, Srygley RB, Choe JC (2004a) Semilunar courtship rhythm of the fiddler crab Uca lactea in a habitat with great tidal variation. J Ethol 22:63–68

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim TW, Christy JH, Choe JC (2004b) Semidome building as sexual signaling in the fiddler crab Uca lactea (De Haan) (Brachyura: Ocypodidae). J Crustac Biol 24:673–679

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim TW, Kim TK, Hong SK, Choe JC (2006) Surface mating as an alternative mating strategy in the fiddler crab Uca lactea. J Ecol Field Biol 29:49–53

    Google Scholar 

  • Koga T, Backwell PRY, Jennions MD, Christy JH (1998) Elevated predation risk changes mating behaviour and courtship in a fiddler crab. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 265:1385–1390

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kolluru GR, Grether GF (2005) The effects of resource availability on alternative mating tactics in guppies (Poecilia reticulata). Behav Ecol 16:294–300

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kotiaho JS, Alatalo RV, Mappes J, Nielsen MG, Parri S, Rivero A (1998) Energetic costs of size and sexual signaling in a wolf spider. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 265:2203–2209

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morrell LJ (2004) Are behavioral trade-offs all they seem? Counter-intuitive resolution of the conflict between two behaviours. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 56:539–545

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murai M, Goshima S, Henmi Y (1987) Analysis of the mating system of the fiddler crab, Uca lactea. Anim Behav 35:1334–1342

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stamhuis EJ, Videler JJ, de Wilde PAWJ (1998) Optimal foraging in the thalassinidean shrimp Callianassa subterranean—improving food quality by grain size selection. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 228:197–208

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stearns SC (1992) The evolution of life histories. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Thornhill R (1981) Panorpa (Mecoptera: Panorpidae) scorpionflies: Systems for understanding recourse defense polygyny and alternative male reproductive effort. Ann Rev Ecolog Syst 12:355–386

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yamaguchi T (2001) The mating system of the fiddler crab, Uca lactea (Decapoda, Brachyura, Ocypodidae). Crustaceana 74:389–399

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zar JH (1999) Biostatistical analysis. 4th ed. Prentice Hall, New Jersey

  • Zucker N (1984) Delayed courtship in the fiddler crab Uca musica terpsichores. Anim Behav 32:735–742

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

T. W. Kim is grateful to the Aitsu Marine Station of Kumamoto University for the supporting facilities and convenience during the study. We are very thankful to Mark Abrahams, Susan Lappan, Virginia Weaver, Dennise Pope, and five anonymous reviewers for the valuable comments on the manuscript. This research was supported by Shilla Chemical and Brain Korea 21 research fellowship from the Korean Ministry of Education and Human Resource Development. Amore Pacific Research and Cultural Foundation provided a special research fund during the publication of this study. Jae C. Choe was funded by Ewha Womans University.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jae C. Choe.

Additional information

Communicated by P. Backwell

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kim, T.W., Sakamoto, K., Henmi, Y. et al. To court or not to court: reproductive decisions by male fiddler crabs in response to fluctuating food availability. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 62, 1139–1147 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-007-0542-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-007-0542-8

Keywords

Navigation