Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology

, Volume 62, Issue 1, pp 77–86 | Cite as

Relative importance of multiple plumage ornaments as status signals in golden whistlers (Pachycephala pectoralis)

  • Wouter F. D. van Dongen
  • Raoul A. Mulder
Original Paper


Status signals are traits that advertise an individual’s competitive abilities to conspecifics during aggressive disputes. Most studies of status signals in birds have focussed on melanin-based plumage signals, but recent research shows that carotenoid-based signals may also play a role in aggressive signaling. We assessed the relative importance of melanin- and carotenoid-based plumage patches as agonistic signals in a small passerine, the golden whistler (Pachycephala pectoralis). Display signals in male golden whistlers include an unpigmented white throat patch, a carotenoid-based yellow breast and nape band, and a melanin-based black chin-stripe. We found that only the white throat patch was correlated with contest-related attributes. Males possessing large throat patches defended larger territories and commenced breeding earlier. When caged males with either experimentally reduced, or unmanipulated throat patches were presented to conspecifics, those with experimentally reduced patches attracted less aggression from male subjects. Focal males also responded faster to caged males with throat patches similar in size to their own, suggesting that they may assess relative throat patch size before engaging in aggressive encounters. Females did not discriminate between “reduced” or “control” treatments. Our data strongly suggest that only the unpigmented throat patch functions as a status signal. As this signal is unlikely to have significant development costs, honesty may be maintained through social costs.


Golden whistlers Status signals Plumage coloration Social costs Simulated territory intrusions 



We are very grateful to Larissa Yocom, Saskia van Dongen, and Robert Ramiarison for their assistance with field work for this project. We thank Brian Elbers and Kees Müller for providing cages to house the captive whistlers, Staffan Andersson for conducting the carotenoid analysis of the whistler feathers, and Ian Gordon for his helpful statistics advice. Thank you to Grainne Maguire, Peter Dunn, and three anonymous referees for reading earlier drafts of this manuscript. This research was funded by the Holsworth Wildlife Research Fund, the Loftus-Hills Memorial Fund, the Stuart Leslie Bird Research Award, the Linnean Society of NSW, the Department of Zoology, University of Melbourne, and the David Hay Memorial Fund. Experiments were conducted under Animal Experimentation and Ethics Register 01011 from the University of Melbourne and permits from the Department of Sustainability and Environment, Australia.


  1. Andersson M (1994) Sexual selection. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  2. Badyaev AV, Hill GE (2000) Evolution of sexual dichromatism: contribution of carotenoid- versus melanin-based coloration. Biol J Linn Soc 69:153–172CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Balph MH, Balph DF, Romesburg HC (1979) Social status signalling in winter flocking birds: an examination of a current hypothesis. Auk 96:78–83Google Scholar
  4. Bradbury JB, Vehrencamp SL (1998) Principles of animal communication. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, MassachusettsGoogle Scholar
  5. Dowling DK, Mulder RA (2006) Combined influence of maternal and paternal quality on sex allocation in red-capped robins. J Evol Biol 19:440–449PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Environmental Systems Research Institute (1999) ArcView GIS 3.2. Redlands, CaliforniaGoogle Scholar
  7. Ferns PN, Hinsley SA (2004) Immaculate tits: head plumage pattern as an indicator of quality in birds. Anim Behav 67:261–272CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Garamszegi LZ, Rosivall B, Hegyi G, Szöllösi E, Török J, Eens M (2006) Determinants of male territorial behavior in a Hungarian collared flycatcher population: plumage traits of residents and challengers. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 60:663–671CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Griffith SC, Parker TH, Olson VA (2006) Melanin- versus carotenoid-based sexual signals: is the difference really so black and red? Anim Behav 71:749–763CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Hagelin JC (2002) The kinds of traits involved in male-male competition: a comparison of plumage, behavior, and body size in quail. Behav Ecol 13:32–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hansen AJ, Rohwer S (1986) Coverable badges and resource defence in birds. Anim Behav 34:69–76CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hasselquist D, Wasson MF, Winkler DW (2001) Humoral immunocompetence correlates with date of egg-laying and reflects work load in female tree swallows. Behav Ecol 12:93–97CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hill GE, Brawner WR (1998) Melanin-based plumage coloration in the house finch is unaffected by coccidial infection. Proc R Soc Lond B 265:1105–1109CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Järvi T, Walsø Ø, Bakken M (1987) Status signalling by Parus major: an experiment in deception. Ethology 76:334–342CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Jawor JM, Breitwisch R (2003) Melanin ornaments, honesty, and sexual selection. Auk 120:249–265CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Kose M, Mand R, Møller AP (1999) Sexual selection for white tail spots in the Barn Swallow in relation to habitat choice by feather lice. Anim Behav 58:1201–1205PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Maynard Smith J, Harper DG (1988) The evolution of aggression: can selection generate variability? Philos Trans R Soc Lond B 319:557–570CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. McGraw KJ, Hill GE (2000) Differential effects of endoparasitism on the expression of carotenoid- and melanin-based ornamental coloration. Proc R Soc Lond B 267:1525–1531CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Metz KJ, Weatherhead PJ (1992) Seeing red: uncovering coverable badges in red-winged blackbirds. Anim Behav 43:223–229CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Møller AP (1987) Social control of deception among status signalling house sparrows Passer domesticus. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 20:307–311CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Møller AP (1991) Parasites, sexual ornaments, and mate choice in the Barn Swallow. In: Loye JE, Zuk M (eds) Bird-parasite interactions: ecology, evolution, and behaviour. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 328–343Google Scholar
  22. Moss R, Parr R, Lambin X (1994) Effects of testosterone on breeding density, breeding success and survival of red grouse. Proc R Soc Lond B 258:175–180CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Pärt T, Qvarnström A (1997) Badge size in Collared Flycatchers predicts outcome of male competition over territories. Anim Behav 54:893–899CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Perrier G, de Lope F, Møller AP, Ninni P (2002) Structural coloration and sexual selection in the barn swallow, Hirundo rustica. Behav Ecol 13:728–736CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Pryke SR, Andersson S (2003) Carotenoid-based epaulettes reveal male competitive ability: experiments with resident and floater red-shouldered widowbirds. Anim Behav 66:217–224CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Pryke SR, Andersson S, Lawes Michael J, Piper SE (2002) Carotenoid signalling in captive and wild red-collared widowbirds: independent effects of badge size and colour. Behav Ecol 13:622–631CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Sanz JJ (1999) Seasonal variation in reproductive success and post-nuptial moult of blue tits in southern Europe: an experimental study. Oecologia 121:377–382CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Senar JC (1999) Plumage coloration as a signal of social status. In: Adams NJ, Slotow RH (eds) Proceedings of the 22nd International Ornithology Conference, Durban. Birdlife, Johannesburg, South Africa, pp 1669–1686Google Scholar
  29. Senar JC, Domenech J, Camerino M (2005) Female siskins choose mates by the size of the yellow wing stripe. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 57:465–469CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Slotow R, Alcock J, Rothstein SI (1993) Social status signalling in white-crowned sparrows: an experimental test of the social control hypothesis. Anim Behav 46:977–989CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Solberg EJ, Ringsby TH (1997) Does male badge size signal status in small island populations of house sparrows, Passer domesticus? Ethology 103:117–186Google Scholar
  32. Southwood TRE (1966) Ecological methods. Methuen, LondonGoogle Scholar
  33. Studd MV, Robertson RJ (1985) Evidence for reliable badges of status in territorial yellow warblers (Dendroica petechia). Anim Behav 33:1102–1113CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Tibbetts EA, Dale J (2004) A socially enforced signal of quality in a paper wasp. Nature 432:218–222PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Torres R, Velando A (2005) Male preference for female foot colour in the socially monogamous blue-footed booby, Sula nebouxii. Anim Behav 69:59–65CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. van Dongen WFD, Yocom LL (2005) Breeding biology of a migratory Australian passerine, the golden whistler (Pachycephala pectoralis). Aust J Zool 53:213–220CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Veiga JP (1995) Honest signaling and the survival cost of badges in the house sparrow. Evolution 49:570–572CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Veiga JP, Moreno J, Cordero PJ, Minguez E (2001) Territory size and polygyny in the spotless starling: resource-holding potential or social inertia? Can J Zool 79:1951–1956CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Verhulst S, Balen JHV, Tinbergen JM (1995) Seasonal decline in reproductive success of the Great Tit: variation in time or quality? Ecology 70:2392–2403CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Westneat DF (2006) No evidence of current sexual selection on sexually dimorphic traits in a bird with high variance in mating success. Am Nat 167:E171–E189CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Whiting MJ, Nagy KA, Bateman PW (2003) Evolution and maintenance of social status-signaling badges: experimental manipulations in lizards. In: Fox SF, McCoy JK, Baird TA (eds) Lizard social behavior. Johns Hopkins University Press, London, UK, pp 47–82Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of ZoologyUniversity of MelbourneMelbourneAustralia

Personalised recommendations