Skip to main content
Log in

Sperm traits in the quacking frog (Crinia georgiana), a species with plastic alternative mating tactics

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In species where males use alternative reproductive tactics and male phenotypes are confronted with different risks of sperm competition, theory predicts that between-male-type differences in sperm expenditure may evolve. In the frog Crinia georgiana big males can monopolize females, whereas small males often engage in polyandrous matings. Consequently, big males may experience a lower risk of sperm competition than do small males. We tested if the predictions from theoretical models can be applied to the mating system of C. georgiana. Our results showed that small males do not have larger testes relative to their body size compared to their larger counterparts and that the efficiency with which sperm number, size, motility, and longevity are produced by the testes does not differ between small and large males in the predicted way. These results are not in alignment with predictions from a loaded raffle model of sperm competition on sperm expenditure in males with alternative phenotypes. The plasticity in mating tactics used by C. georgiana males and a high intraseasonal variation in male densities may have prevented the evolution of enhanced sperm performance in smaller males. A fair raffle in the sperm competition game played by C. georgiana males could also explain the observed patterns in sperm traits. Future investigations determining the parameters responsible for the deviation from theoretical predictions in this system will test the degree to which current theoretical models can indeed be applied to species with plastic reproductive tactics.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anderson MJ, Dixson AF (2002) Motility and the midpiece in primates. Nature 416:496

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ball MA, Parker GA (1996) Sperm competition games: external fertilization and ‘adaptive’ infertility. J Theor Biol 180:141–150

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ball MA, Parker GA (1997) Sperm competition games: inter- and intra-species results of a continuous external fertilization model. J Theor Biol 186:459–466

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ball MA, Parker GA (2000) Sperm competition games: a comparison of loaded raffle models and their biological implications. J Theor Biol 206:487–506

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Birkhead TR, Møller AP (1998) Sperm competition and sexual selection. Academic, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Birkhead TR, Fletcher F, Pellatt EJ, Staples A (1995) Ejaculate quality and the success of extra-pair copulations in the zebra finch. Nature 377:422–423

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Birkhead TR, Pellatt EJ, Brekke P, Yeates R, Castillo-Juarez H (2005) Genetic effects on sperm design in the zebra finch. Nature 434:383–387

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Burness G, Casselman SJ, Schulte-Hostedde AI, Moyes CD, Montgomerie R (2004) Sperm swimming speed and energetics vary with sperm competition risk in bluegill (Lepomis macrochirus). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 56:65–70

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Byrne PG (2002a) Climatic correlates of breeding, simultaneous polyandry and potential for sperm competition in the frog Crinia georgiana. J Herpetol 36:125–129

    Google Scholar 

  • Byrne PG (2002b) The evolutionary significance of sperm competition in Australian anuran amphibians (PhD dissertation). The University of Western Australia, Perth

  • Byrne PG (2004) Male sperm expenditure under sperm competition risk and intensity in quacking frogs. Behav Ecol 15:857–863

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Byrne PG, Roberts JD (2004) Intrasexual selection and group spawning in quacking frogs (Crinia georgiana). Behav Ecol 15:872–882

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Byrne PG, Roberts JD, Simmons LW (2002) Sperm competition selects for increased testis mass in Australian frogs. J Evol Biol 15:347–355

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Byrne PG, Simmons LW, Roberts JD (2003) Sperm competition and the evolution of gamete morphology in frogs. Proc R Soc Lond B 270:2079–2086

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fleming IA (1998) Pattern and variability in the breeding system of Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar), with comparisons to other salmonids. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 55:59–76

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gage MJG, Stockley P, Parker GA (1995) Effects of alternative male mating strategies on characteristics of sperm production in the Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar): theoretical and empirical investigations. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B 350:391–399

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gage MJG, Macfarlane CP, Yeates S, Shackleton R, Parker GA (2002) Relationships between sperm morphometry and sperm motility in the Atlantic salmon. J Fish Biol 61:1528–1539

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gage MJG, Macfarlane CP, Yeates S, Ward RG, Searle JB, Parker GA (2004) Spermatozoal traits and sperm competition in Atlantic salmon. Curr Biol 14:44–47

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Garant D, Dodson JJ, Bernatchez L (2003) Differential reproductive success and heritability of alternative reproductive tactics in wild Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar L.). Evolution 57:1133–1141

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gross M (1996) Alternative reproductive strategies and tactics: diversity within sexes. Trends Ecol Evol 11:92–98

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harcourt AH, Harvey PH, Larson SG, Short RV (1981) Testis weight, body weight and breeding system in primates. Nature 293:55–57

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hettyey A, Roberts JD (2006) Sperm traits of the quacking frog, Crinia georgiana: within and among population variation in a species with a high risk of sperm competition. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 59:389–396

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hosken DF (1998) Testes mass in megachiropteran bats varies in accordance with sperm competition theory. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 44:169–177

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lank DB, Smith CM, Hanotte O, Burke T, Cooke T (1995) Genetic polymorphism for alternative mating behaviour in lekking male ruff Philomachus pugnax. Nature 378:59–62

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Leach B, Montgomerie R (2000) Sperm characteristics associated with different male reproductive tactics in bluegills (Lepomis macrochirus). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 49:31–37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee MSY, Jamieson BGM (1992) The ultrastructure of the spermatozoa of three species of myobatrachid frogs (Anura, Amphibia) with phylogenetic considerations. Acta Zool 73:213–222

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levitan DR (2000) Sperm velocity and longevity trade off each other and influence fertilization in the sea urchin Lytechinus variegatus. Proc R Soc Lond B 267:531–534

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Maynard Smith J (1982) Evolution and the theory of games. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Møller AP, Briskie JV (1995) Extra-pair paternity, sperm competition and the evolution of testes size in birds. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 36:357–365

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore PJ, Harris WE, Montrose VT, Levin D, Moore AJ (2004) Constraints on evolution and postcopulatory sexual selection: trade-offs among ejaculate characteristics. Evolution 58:1773–1780

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Neff BD, Fu P, Gross MR (2003) Sperm investment and alternative mating tactics in bluegill sunfish (Lepomis macrochirus). Behav Ecol 14:634–641

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parker GA (1970) Sperm competition and its evolutionary consequences. Biol Rev 45:525–567

    Google Scholar 

  • Parker GA (1990a) Sperm competition games: raffles and roles. Proc R Soc Lond B 242:120–126

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parker GA (1990b) Sperm competition games: sneaks and extra-pair copulations. Proc R Soc Lond B 242:127–133

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parker GA (1993) Sperm competition games: sperm size and sperm number under adult control. Proc R Soc Lond B 253:245–254

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Parker GA (1998) Sperm competition and the evolution of ejaculates: towards a theory base. In: Birkhead TR, Møller AP (eds) Sperm competition and sexual selection. Academic, London, pp 3–54

    Google Scholar 

  • Parker GA, Ball MA, Stockley P, Gage MJG (1996) Sperm competition games: assessment of sperm competition intensity by group spawners. Proc R Soc Lond B 263:1291–1297

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parker GA, Ball MA, Stockley P, Gage MJG (1997) Sperm competition games: a prospective analysis of risk assessment. Proc R Soc Lond B 264:1793–1802

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pitnick S (1996) Investment in testes and the cost of making long sperm in Drosophila. Am Nat 148:57–80

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reyer H-U, Niederer B, Hettyey A (2003) Variation in fertilisation abilities between hemiclonal hybrid and sexual parental males of sympatric water frogs (Rana lessonae, R. esculenta, R. ridibunda). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 54:274–284

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rice WR (1989) Analyzing tables of statistical tests. Evolution 43:223–225

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roberts JD, Standish RJ, Byrne PG, Doughty P (1999) Synchronous polyandry and multiple paternity in the frog Crinia georgiana (Anura: Myobatrachidae). Anim Behav 57:721–726

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sasaki A, Ellner S (1997) Quantitative genetic variance maintained by fluctuating selection with overlapping generations: variance components and covariances. Evolution 51:682–696

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schärer L, Robertson DR (1999) Sperm and milt characteristics and male v. female gametic investment in the Caribbean reef fish, Thalassoma bifasciatum. J Fish Biol 55:329–343

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simmons LW, Tomkins JL, Hunt J (1999) Sperm competition games played by dimorphic male beetles. Proc R Soc Lond B 266:145–150

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sinervo B, Lively C (1996) The rock-paper-scissors game and the evolution of alternative male strageties. Nature 380:240–243

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Smith MJ, Roberts JD (2003a) No sexual size dimorphism in the frog Crinia georgiana (Anura: Myobatrachidae): An examination of pre- and postmaturational growth. J Herpetol 37:132–137

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith MJ, Roberts JD (2003b) An experimental examination of female preference patterns for components of the male advertisement call in the quacking frog, Crinia georgiana. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 55:144–150

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Snook RR (2005) Sperm in competition: not playing by the numbers. Trends Ecol Evol 20:48–53

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sokal RR, Rohlf FJ (1995) Biometry, 3rd edn. W. H. Freeman and Company, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Stockley P, Gage MJG, Parker GA, Møller AP (1996) Female reproductive biology and the coevolution of ejaculate characteristics in fish. Proc R Soc Lond B 263:451–458

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vladić TV, Afzelius BA, Bronnikov GE (2002) Sperm quality as reflected through morphology in salmon alternative life histories. Biol Reprod 66:98–105

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank Martin A. Dziminski for help with the field work and Leigh W. Simmons for comments that have led to substantial improvements in the manuscript. This study was supported by a Hungarian State Eötvös Fellowship financed by the Ministry of Education and promoted by the Hungarian Scholarship Board (grant to A. Hettyey), by an Australia-Europe Scholarship funded by the Australian Government through the Department of Education, Science and Training and promoted by the Australian Education International (grant to A. Hettyey and J. D. Roberts) and by a UWA Research Grant (grant to J. D. Roberts and P. Vercoe). Animal collections were made under permit from the Department of Conservation and Land Management (License No. SF004231) and all procedures were approved by the Animal Ethics Committee of the University of Western Australia (Approval Number 03/100/292). We declare that the experiments complied with the current laws in Australia.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Attila Hettyey.

Additional information

Communicated by J. Christensen-Dalsgaard

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hettyey, A., Roberts, J.D. Sperm traits in the quacking frog (Crinia georgiana), a species with plastic alternative mating tactics. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 61, 1303–1310 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-007-0361-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-007-0361-y

Keywords

Navigation