Advertisement

Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology

, Volume 61, Issue 7, pp 1033–1042 | Cite as

To flee or not to flee: predator avoidance by cheetahs at kills

  • J. S. Hunter
  • S. M. Durant
  • T. M. Caro
Original Paper

Abstract

Mammalian carnivores are unusual because their primary competitors for food are often their primary predators. This relationship is most evident at persistent kills where dominant competitors are attracted to both the carcass (as a free meal) and to the killers (as potential prey). Cheetahs (Acinonyx jubatus) are frequent victims of kleptoparasitism, and cubs, and sometimes adults, are killed by lions (Panthera leo) or spotted hyenas (Crocuta crocuta). Between 1980 and 2002, we observed 639 kills made by cheetahs in Serengeti National Park, Tanzania. These kills were often visited by scavengers, including relatively innocuous species such as vultures and jackals and potentially dangerous species, like spotted hyenas and lions. We used cheetah behavior at kills to test a number of predictions about how cheetahs should minimize risk at kill sites given they face an increased risk of predation of themselves or their cubs. In particular, we examined the propensity of cheetahs of different age/sex classes to hide carcasses after making a kill, vigilance at kills, and the delay in leaving after finishing feeding with respect to ecological factors and scavenger presence. The behavior of single females at kills did not suggest that they were trying to avoid being killed, but the behavior of males, often found in groups, was in line with this hypothesis. In contrast, the behavior of mother cheetahs at kills appeared to be influenced greatly by the risk of cubs being killed. Our results suggest that cheetahs use several behavioral counterstrategies to avoid interspecific predation of self or cubs.

Keywords

Predator avoidance Interspecific competition Intraguild predation Kleptoparasitism 

Notes

Acknowledgment

We thank the Tanzania Commission for Science and Technology, Tanzania Wildlife Research Institute, and Tanzania National Parks for permission. We thank Lindsay Turnbull, Isla Graham, Jos Milner, Jane Wisbey, Ian and Ghislaine Sayers, John Shemkunde, and Sultana Bashir for help with data collection. Funding was provided to JSH by the National Science Foundation and the University of California, to SMD by Wildlife Conservation Society, Frankfurt Zoological Society, National Geographic Society, Peoples Trust for Endangered Species, the Howard Buffett Foundation and the Times Christmas Appeal 1998, and to TMC by the Royal Society and the National Geographic Society. SMD is grateful to everyone at SWRC, SENAPA, the late Hugo van Lawick and his team, Frankfurt Zoological Society, Greg and Maria Russell, and Ndutu lodge for logistical support during fieldwork. This study was conducted in full compliance with the laws and regulations governing scientific study in Tanzania.

References

  1. Bednekoff PA, Lima SL (1998) Re-examining safety in number: interaction between risk dilution and collective detection depend on predator targeting behaviour. Proc R Soc Lond 265:2021–2026CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Blumenschine R (1986) Early hominoid scavenging opportunities: implications of carcass availability in the Serengeti and Ngorongoro ecosystems. BAR International Series 283, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  3. Blumenschine R J, Caro TM (1986) Unit flesh weights of some East African bovids. Afr J Ecol 24:273–286Google Scholar
  4. Brown JS, Laundre JW, Gurung M (1999) The ecology of fear: optimal foraging, game theory and tropic interactions. J Mammal 80:385–399CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Burney DA, Burney L (1979) Cheetah and man. Swara 2:24–29Google Scholar
  6. Carbone C, du Toit JT, Gordon IJ (1997) Feeding success in African wild dogs: does kleptoparasitism by spotted hyenas influence hunting group size? J Anim Ecol 66:318–326CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Caro TM (1987) Cheetah mothers’ vigilance: looking out for prey or predators? Behav Ecol Sociobiol 20:351–361CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Caro TM (1989) Determinants of asociality in felids. In: Standen V, Foley RA (eds) Comparative socioecology: the behavioural ecology of humans and other mammals. Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford, pp 41–74Google Scholar
  9. Caro TM (1994) Cheetahs of the Serengeti Plains. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  10. Caro TM (2005) Anti-predator defenses in birds and mammals. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  11. Clutton-Brock TH (1991) The evolution of parental care. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  12. Cooper SM (1991) Optimal hunting group size: the need for lions to defend their kills against loss to spotted hyaenas. Afr J Ecol 29:130–136Google Scholar
  13. Cullen J (1960) Some adaptations in the nesting behavior of terns. Proc XII Int Ornithol Congr 1958:153–157Google Scholar
  14. Dominguez-Rodrigo M (2001) A study of carnivore competition in riparian and open habitats of modern savannas and its implications for hominid behavioral modelling. J Hum Evol 40:77–98PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Donadio E, Buskirk SW (2006) Diet, morphology and interspecific killing in Carnivora. Am Nat 167:524–536PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. du Pienaar UV (1969) Predator–prey relationships amongst the larger mammals of the Kruger National Park. Koedoe 12:108–176Google Scholar
  17. Durant SM (1998) Competition refuges and coexistence: an example from Serengeti carnivores. J Anim Ecol 67:370–386CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Durant SM (2000a) Living with the enemy: avoidance of hyenas and lions by cheetahs in the Serengeti. Behav Ecol 11:621–632CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Durant SM (2000b) Predator avoidance, breeding experience and reproductive success in endangered cheetahs. Anim Behav 60:121–130PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Eaton RL (1974) The Cheetah: biology, ecology and behaviour of an endangered species. Van Nostrand Reinhold, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  21. Elgar MA (1989) Predator vigilance and groups size in mammals and birds: a critical review of the empirical evidence. Biol Rev 64:13–33PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Fanshawe JH, Fitzgibbon CD (1993) Factors influencing the hunting success of an African wild dog hunting group. Anim Behav 45:479–490CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Frame G, Frame L (1981) Swift and enduring. Elsevier-Dutton, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  24. Hilton GM, Ruxton GD, Cresswell W (1999) Choice of foraging area with respect to predation risk in redshanks: the effects of weather and predator activity. Oikos 87:295–302CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Houston DC (1975) Ecological isolations of African scavenging birds. Ardea 63:55–64Google Scholar
  26. Kelly MJ (2000) The Serengeti cheetah population: individual identification, demography and viability (PhD dissertation). University of California, DavisGoogle Scholar
  27. Kelly MJ, Durant SM (2000) Viability of the Serengeti cheetah population. Conserv Biol 14:786–797CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Kelly MJ, Laurensen MK, FitzGibbon CD, Collins DA, Durant SM, Frame GW, Bertram BCR, Caro TM (1998) Demography of the Serengeti cheetah (Acinonyx jubatus) population: the first 25 years. J Zool 244:473–488CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Kruuk H (1967) Competition for food between vultures in East Africa. Ardea 55:171–192Google Scholar
  30. Laurenson MK (1994) High juvenile mortality in cheetahs (Acinonyx jubatus) and its consequences for maternal care. J Zool 234:387–408CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Laurenson MK (1995) Implications of high offspring mortality for cheetah population dynamics. In: Sinclair ARE, Arcese P (eds) Serengeti II: dynamics, management and conservation of an ecosystem University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp 385–399Google Scholar
  32. Lima S (1988) Initiation and termination of feeding in dark-eyed juncos influences of predation risk and energy reserves. Oikos 53:3–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Lima S (1998) Stress and decision making under the risk of predation: recent developments from behavior, reproductive and ecological perspectives. Adv Stud Behav 27:215–290CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Lima SL, Dill LM (1990) Behavioural decisions made under the risk of predation: a review and prospectus. Can J Zool 68:619–640CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Martin J, Lopez P, Cooper WE (2003) When to come out from a refuge: balancing predation risk and foraging opportunities in an alpine lizard. Ethology 109:77–87CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Montgomerie RD, Weatherhead PJ (1988) Risks and rewards of nest defense by parent birds. Q Rev Biol 63:167–187CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Packer C (1986) The ecology of sociality in felids. In: Rubenstien DL, Wrangham RW (eds) Ecological aspects of social evolution: birds and mammals. Princeton University Press, Princeton, pp 429–451Google Scholar
  38. Palomares F, Caro TM (1999) Interspecific killing among mammalian carnivores. Am Nat 154:492–508CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Payne RW, Lane PW, Ainsley AE, Bicknell KE, Digby PGN, Harding SA, Lech PK, Simpson HR, Todd AD, Verrier PJ, White RP, Gower JC, Tunnicliffe Wilson G, Paterson LJ (1987) GENSTAT 5 Reference manual. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  40. Schaller G (1972) The Serengeti lion: a study of predator–prey relations. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  41. Sih A (1986) Antipredator responses and the perception of danger by mosquito larvae. Ecology 67:434–441CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Sih A (1987) Predators and prey lifestyles: an evolutionary and ecological overview. In: Kerfoot WC, Sih A (eds) Predation: direct and indirect impacts on aquatic communities. University Press of New England, Hanover, pp 203–224Google Scholar
  43. Stander PE, Haden PJ, Kaqece, Ghau (1997) The ecology and asociality in Namibian leopards. J Zool 242:343–364CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Sunquist ME, Sunquist FC (1989) Ecological constraints on predation by large felids. In: Gittleman JL (ed) Carnivore behavior, ecology and evolution. Cornell University Press, Ithaca, pp 283–301Google Scholar
  45. Swetitzer RA, Berger J (1992) Size-related effects of predatoni on habitat use and behavior of porcupines (Erethizon drsatum). Ecology 73:867–875CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Switalski TA (2003) Coyote foraging ecology and vigilance in response to gray wolf reintroduction in Yellowstone National Park. Can J Zool 81:985–993CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Vine I (1973) Detection of prey flocks by predators. J Theor Biol 40:207–210PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Werner EE, Gilliam JF, Hall DJ, Mittlebach GG (1983) An experimental test of the effects of predation risk on habitat use in fish. Ecology 64:1540–1548CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Winkler DW (1987) A general model for parental care. Am Nat 130:526–543CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Yamane A, Emoto J, Ota N (1997) Factors affecting feeding order and social tolerance to kittens in the group living feral cat. App Anim Behav Sci 52:119–127CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Wildlife, Fish and Conservation BiologyUniversity of California, DavisDavisUSA
  2. 2.Institute of ZoologyZoological Society of LondonLondonUK
  3. 3.Tanzania Wildlife Research InstituteArushaTanzania

Personalised recommendations