Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

To flee or not to flee: predator avoidance by cheetahs at kills

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Mammalian carnivores are unusual because their primary competitors for food are often their primary predators. This relationship is most evident at persistent kills where dominant competitors are attracted to both the carcass (as a free meal) and to the killers (as potential prey). Cheetahs (Acinonyx jubatus) are frequent victims of kleptoparasitism, and cubs, and sometimes adults, are killed by lions (Panthera leo) or spotted hyenas (Crocuta crocuta). Between 1980 and 2002, we observed 639 kills made by cheetahs in Serengeti National Park, Tanzania. These kills were often visited by scavengers, including relatively innocuous species such as vultures and jackals and potentially dangerous species, like spotted hyenas and lions. We used cheetah behavior at kills to test a number of predictions about how cheetahs should minimize risk at kill sites given they face an increased risk of predation of themselves or their cubs. In particular, we examined the propensity of cheetahs of different age/sex classes to hide carcasses after making a kill, vigilance at kills, and the delay in leaving after finishing feeding with respect to ecological factors and scavenger presence. The behavior of single females at kills did not suggest that they were trying to avoid being killed, but the behavior of males, often found in groups, was in line with this hypothesis. In contrast, the behavior of mother cheetahs at kills appeared to be influenced greatly by the risk of cubs being killed. Our results suggest that cheetahs use several behavioral counterstrategies to avoid interspecific predation of self or cubs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bednekoff PA, Lima SL (1998) Re-examining safety in number: interaction between risk dilution and collective detection depend on predator targeting behaviour. Proc R Soc Lond 265:2021–2026

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blumenschine R (1986) Early hominoid scavenging opportunities: implications of carcass availability in the Serengeti and Ngorongoro ecosystems. BAR International Series 283, Oxford

  • Blumenschine R J, Caro TM (1986) Unit flesh weights of some East African bovids. Afr J Ecol 24:273–286

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown JS, Laundre JW, Gurung M (1999) The ecology of fear: optimal foraging, game theory and tropic interactions. J Mammal 80:385–399

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burney DA, Burney L (1979) Cheetah and man. Swara 2:24–29

    Google Scholar 

  • Carbone C, du Toit JT, Gordon IJ (1997) Feeding success in African wild dogs: does kleptoparasitism by spotted hyenas influence hunting group size? J Anim Ecol 66:318–326

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caro TM (1987) Cheetah mothers’ vigilance: looking out for prey or predators? Behav Ecol Sociobiol 20:351–361

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caro TM (1989) Determinants of asociality in felids. In: Standen V, Foley RA (eds) Comparative socioecology: the behavioural ecology of humans and other mammals. Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford, pp 41–74

    Google Scholar 

  • Caro TM (1994) Cheetahs of the Serengeti Plains. University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Caro TM (2005) Anti-predator defenses in birds and mammals. University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Clutton-Brock TH (1991) The evolution of parental care. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper SM (1991) Optimal hunting group size: the need for lions to defend their kills against loss to spotted hyaenas. Afr J Ecol 29:130–136

    Google Scholar 

  • Cullen J (1960) Some adaptations in the nesting behavior of terns. Proc XII Int Ornithol Congr 1958:153–157

    Google Scholar 

  • Dominguez-Rodrigo M (2001) A study of carnivore competition in riparian and open habitats of modern savannas and its implications for hominid behavioral modelling. J Hum Evol 40:77–98

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Donadio E, Buskirk SW (2006) Diet, morphology and interspecific killing in Carnivora. Am Nat 167:524–536

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • du Pienaar UV (1969) Predator–prey relationships amongst the larger mammals of the Kruger National Park. Koedoe 12:108–176

    Google Scholar 

  • Durant SM (1998) Competition refuges and coexistence: an example from Serengeti carnivores. J Anim Ecol 67:370–386

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Durant SM (2000a) Living with the enemy: avoidance of hyenas and lions by cheetahs in the Serengeti. Behav Ecol 11:621–632

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Durant SM (2000b) Predator avoidance, breeding experience and reproductive success in endangered cheetahs. Anim Behav 60:121–130

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Eaton RL (1974) The Cheetah: biology, ecology and behaviour of an endangered species. Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Elgar MA (1989) Predator vigilance and groups size in mammals and birds: a critical review of the empirical evidence. Biol Rev 64:13–33

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fanshawe JH, Fitzgibbon CD (1993) Factors influencing the hunting success of an African wild dog hunting group. Anim Behav 45:479–490

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frame G, Frame L (1981) Swift and enduring. Elsevier-Dutton, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Hilton GM, Ruxton GD, Cresswell W (1999) Choice of foraging area with respect to predation risk in redshanks: the effects of weather and predator activity. Oikos 87:295–302

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Houston DC (1975) Ecological isolations of African scavenging birds. Ardea 63:55–64

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelly MJ (2000) The Serengeti cheetah population: individual identification, demography and viability (PhD dissertation). University of California, Davis

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelly MJ, Durant SM (2000) Viability of the Serengeti cheetah population. Conserv Biol 14:786–797

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kelly MJ, Laurensen MK, FitzGibbon CD, Collins DA, Durant SM, Frame GW, Bertram BCR, Caro TM (1998) Demography of the Serengeti cheetah (Acinonyx jubatus) population: the first 25 years. J Zool 244:473–488

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kruuk H (1967) Competition for food between vultures in East Africa. Ardea 55:171–192

    Google Scholar 

  • Laurenson MK (1994) High juvenile mortality in cheetahs (Acinonyx jubatus) and its consequences for maternal care. J Zool 234:387–408

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laurenson MK (1995) Implications of high offspring mortality for cheetah population dynamics. In: Sinclair ARE, Arcese P (eds) Serengeti II: dynamics, management and conservation of an ecosystem University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp 385–399

    Google Scholar 

  • Lima S (1988) Initiation and termination of feeding in dark-eyed juncos influences of predation risk and energy reserves. Oikos 53:3–11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lima S (1998) Stress and decision making under the risk of predation: recent developments from behavior, reproductive and ecological perspectives. Adv Stud Behav 27:215–290

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lima SL, Dill LM (1990) Behavioural decisions made under the risk of predation: a review and prospectus. Can J Zool 68:619–640

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin J, Lopez P, Cooper WE (2003) When to come out from a refuge: balancing predation risk and foraging opportunities in an alpine lizard. Ethology 109:77–87

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Montgomerie RD, Weatherhead PJ (1988) Risks and rewards of nest defense by parent birds. Q Rev Biol 63:167–187

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Packer C (1986) The ecology of sociality in felids. In: Rubenstien DL, Wrangham RW (eds) Ecological aspects of social evolution: birds and mammals. Princeton University Press, Princeton, pp 429–451

    Google Scholar 

  • Palomares F, Caro TM (1999) Interspecific killing among mammalian carnivores. Am Nat 154:492–508

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Payne RW, Lane PW, Ainsley AE, Bicknell KE, Digby PGN, Harding SA, Lech PK, Simpson HR, Todd AD, Verrier PJ, White RP, Gower JC, Tunnicliffe Wilson G, Paterson LJ (1987) GENSTAT 5 Reference manual. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Schaller G (1972) The Serengeti lion: a study of predator–prey relations. University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Sih A (1986) Antipredator responses and the perception of danger by mosquito larvae. Ecology 67:434–441

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sih A (1987) Predators and prey lifestyles: an evolutionary and ecological overview. In: Kerfoot WC, Sih A (eds) Predation: direct and indirect impacts on aquatic communities. University Press of New England, Hanover, pp 203–224

    Google Scholar 

  • Stander PE, Haden PJ, Kaqece, Ghau (1997) The ecology and asociality in Namibian leopards. J Zool 242:343–364

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sunquist ME, Sunquist FC (1989) Ecological constraints on predation by large felids. In: Gittleman JL (ed) Carnivore behavior, ecology and evolution. Cornell University Press, Ithaca, pp 283–301

    Google Scholar 

  • Swetitzer RA, Berger J (1992) Size-related effects of predatoni on habitat use and behavior of porcupines (Erethizon drsatum). Ecology 73:867–875

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Switalski TA (2003) Coyote foraging ecology and vigilance in response to gray wolf reintroduction in Yellowstone National Park. Can J Zool 81:985–993

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vine I (1973) Detection of prey flocks by predators. J Theor Biol 40:207–210

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Werner EE, Gilliam JF, Hall DJ, Mittlebach GG (1983) An experimental test of the effects of predation risk on habitat use in fish. Ecology 64:1540–1548

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Winkler DW (1987) A general model for parental care. Am Nat 130:526–543

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yamane A, Emoto J, Ota N (1997) Factors affecting feeding order and social tolerance to kittens in the group living feral cat. App Anim Behav Sci 52:119–127

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

We thank the Tanzania Commission for Science and Technology, Tanzania Wildlife Research Institute, and Tanzania National Parks for permission. We thank Lindsay Turnbull, Isla Graham, Jos Milner, Jane Wisbey, Ian and Ghislaine Sayers, John Shemkunde, and Sultana Bashir for help with data collection. Funding was provided to JSH by the National Science Foundation and the University of California, to SMD by Wildlife Conservation Society, Frankfurt Zoological Society, National Geographic Society, Peoples Trust for Endangered Species, the Howard Buffett Foundation and the Times Christmas Appeal 1998, and to TMC by the Royal Society and the National Geographic Society. SMD is grateful to everyone at SWRC, SENAPA, the late Hugo van Lawick and his team, Frankfurt Zoological Society, Greg and Maria Russell, and Ndutu lodge for logistical support during fieldwork. This study was conducted in full compliance with the laws and regulations governing scientific study in Tanzania.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J. S. Hunter.

Additional information

Communicated by T. Bakker

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hunter, J.S., Durant, S.M. & Caro, T.M. To flee or not to flee: predator avoidance by cheetahs at kills. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 61, 1033–1042 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-006-0336-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-006-0336-4

Keywords

Navigation