Species-specificity and individual variation in the song of male Nathusius’ pipistrelles (Pipistrellus nathusii)

We’re sorry, something doesn't seem to be working properly.

Please try refreshing the page. If that doesn't work, please contact support so we can address the problem.

Abstract

Sequences of the advertisement calls produced by male Nathusius’ pipistrelles (Pipistrellus nathusii) during the autumn mating period were recorded from individuals at two separate sites in Antrim, Northern Ireland, in August 2004. Several male roosts were found at these sites in close proximity to a single maternity roost, each containing approximately 200 adult females and their young. Analysis of measured parameters of four identified call types revealed that there were significant differences in call structure between sites and between individuals. Playback experiments, performed outside the adult female and juvenile roost sites, comprised of experimental advertisement call sequences of P. nathusii, Pipistrellus pygmaeus and Pipistrellus pipistrellus and control sound recorded without bats present (silence). Response was measured by simultaneously recording ultrasound during playbacks and counting the number of echolocation pulses identified as those of P. nathusii above a predetermined amplitude threshold. Significantly greater numbers of P. nathusii echolocation pulses were recorded during playback of male P. nathusii advertisement calls than during playback of congeners’ advertisement calls and control sound. The number of echolocation pulses recorded was similar during playback of P. pipistrellus and P. pygmaeus advertisement calls and silence. We suggest that, due to call complexity, male P. nathusii advertisement calls should be classified as ‘song’. Species-specificity and individual variation suggests that the songs of male P. nathusii have the potential to play a role in mate attraction and mate assessment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

References

  1. Ahlén I (1990) Identification of bats in flight. Swedish Society for the Conservation of Nature and the Swedish Youth Association for Environmental Studies and Conservation, Stockholm

  2. Andersson S (1994) Costs of sexual advertising in the lekking Jackson’s widowbird. Condor 96:1–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. AOU (American Ornithologists’ Union) (1985) Thirty-fifth supplement to the American Ornithologists’ Union check-list of North American birds. Auk 102:680–686

    Google Scholar 

  4. Backwell PRY, Passmore NI (1990) Suitable approach perches affect female phonotaxis in an arboreal frog. Herpetologica 46:11–14

    Google Scholar 

  5. Backwell PRY, Passmore NI (1991) Advertisement calls and female phonotaxis in Natal dwarf Afrixalus. J Afr Zool 4:275–280

    Google Scholar 

  6. Baker MC, Cunningham MA (1985) The biology of bird-song dialects. Behav Brain Sci 8:85–133

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Barlow KE, Jones G (1996) Pipistrellus nathusii (Chiroptera: Vespertilionidae) in Britain in the mating season. J Zool 240:767–773

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Barlow KE, Jones G (1997) Differences in song-flight calls and social calls between two phonic types of the vespertilionid bat Pipistrellus pipistrellus. J Zool 241:315–324

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Barratt EM, Deaville R, Burland TM, Bruford MW, Jones G, Racey PA, Wayne RK (1997) DNA answers the call of pipistrelle bat species. Nature 387:138–139

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Becker PH (1982) The coding of species-specific characteristics in bird sounds. In: Kroodsma DE, Miller EH (eds) Acoustic communication in birds, vol 1. Academic, New York, pp 213–252

    Google Scholar 

  11. Behr O, von Helversen O (2004) Bat serenades—complex courtship songs of the sac-winged bat (Saccopteryx bilineata). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 56:106–115

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Bjerke TH, Bjerke TH (1981) Song dialects in the redwing, Turdus iliacus. Ornis Scand 12:40–50

    Google Scholar 

  13. Boughman JW, Wilkinson GS (1998) Greater spear-nosed bats discriminate group mates by vocalizations. Anim Behav 55:1717–1732

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Bradbury JW, Vehrencamp SL (1998) Principles of animal communication. Sinauer, Sunderland, MA

    Google Scholar 

  15. Catchpole CK (1987) Bird song, sexual selection and female choice. Trends Ecol Evol 2:94–97

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Catchpole CK, Slater PJB (1995) Bird song: biological themes and variations. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  17. Channing A, Moyer D, Burger M (2002) Cryptic species of sharp-nosed reed frogs in the Hyperolius nasutus complex: advertisement call differences. Afr Zool 21:91–99

    Google Scholar 

  18. Ciechanowski M, Jarzembowski T (2004) The size and number of harems in the polygynous bat Pipistrellus nathusii (Keyserling and Blasius, 1839) (Chiroptera: Vespertilionidae). Mamm Biol 69(4):277–280

    Google Scholar 

  19. Clayton NS (1990) Subspecies recognition and song learning in zebra finches. Anim Behav 40:1009–1017

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Davidson SM, Wilkinson GS (2002) Geographic and individual variation in vocalizations by male Saccopteryx bilineata (Chiroptera: Emballonuridae). J Mamm 83:526–535

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Davidson S, Wilkinson GS (2004) Function of male song in the greater white-lined bat, Saccopteryx bilineata. Anim Behav 67:883–891

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Falls JB, d’Agincourt LG (1982) Why do meadowlarks switch song types? Can J Zool 60:3400–3408

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Furmankiewicz J, Szkudlarek R (2001) The mating roosts of Nathusius’ pipistrelle males Pipistrellus nathusii (Keyserling and Blasius 1839) in Wroclaw (SW Poland). In: Woloszyn BW (ed) Distribution, ecology, paleontology and systematics of bats. Bats & man: million years of coexistence. Chiropterological Information Center, Krakow, pp 47–57

    Google Scholar 

  24. Gerell-Lundberg K, Gerell R (1994) The mating behaviour of the pipistrelle and the Nathusius’ pipistrelle (Chiroptera)—a comparison. Folia Zool 43:315–324

    Google Scholar 

  25. Häussler U, Nagel A, Braun M, Arnold A (1999) External characters discriminating species of European pipistrelles, Pipistrellus pipistrellus (Schreber 1774) and P. pygmaeus (Leach 1825). Myotis 37:27–40

    Google Scholar 

  26. Houtman AM (1992) Female zebra finches choose extra-pair copulations with genetically attractive mates. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 249:3–6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Jarzembowski T, Stepniewska A (1998) Migration of the Nathusius’ pipistrelle Pipistrellus nathusii along Baltic coast. In: 11th international bat research conference, Departamento de Zoologia, Universidade de Brasilia, Pirenopolis, 41

  28. Jones G, van Parijs SM (1993) Biomodal echolocation in pipistrelle bats: are cryptic species present? Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 251:119–125

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Kapteyn K, Lina PHC (1994) First record of a nursery roost of Nathusius’ pipistrelle, Pipistrellus nathusii, in the Netherlands. Lutra 37:106–109

    Google Scholar 

  30. Krebs JR, Ashcroft R, Webber M (1978) Song repertoires and territory defence in great tit. Nature 271:539–542

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Laiolo P, Rolando A, Delestrade A, Sanctis A (2001) Geographic diversification in the call repertoire of the genus Pyrrhocorax (Aves, Corvidae). Can J Zool 79:1568–1576

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Lambrechts M, Dhondt AA (1988) Male quality and territory quality in the great tit Parus major. Anim Behav 36:596–601

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Lambrechts MM, Dhondt AA (1990) A relationship between the composition and size of great tit song repertoires. Anim Behav 39:213–218

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Lundberg K (1989) Social organization and survival of the pipistrelle bat (Pipistrellus pipistrellus), and a comparison of advertisement behaviour in three polygynous bat species. Ph.D. Thesis, Lund University

  35. Lundberg K, Gerell R (1986) Territorial advertisment and mate attraction in the bat Pipistrellus pipistrellus. Ethology 71(2):115–124

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Matessi G, Dabelsteen T, Pilastro A (2000) Responses to playback of different subspecies songs in the Reed Bunting Emberizas. schoeniclus. J Avian Biol 31:96–101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Nuechterlein GL (1981) Courtship behavior and reproductive isolation between Western Grebe color morphs. Auk 98:335–349

    Google Scholar 

  38. Pallett JR, Passmore NI (1988) The significance of multi-note advertisement calls in a reed frog. Hyperolius tuberilinguis. Bioacoustics 1:13–23

    Google Scholar 

  39. Racey PA (1974) Ageing and assesment of reproductive status of pipistrelle bats (P. pipistrellus). J Zool 173:264–271

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Russ JM, O’Neill JK, Montgomery WI (1998a) Nathusius’ pipistrelle (Pipistrellus nathusii), Keyserling and Blasius 1839) breeding in Ireland. J Zool 245:345–349

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Russ JM, Racey PA, Jones G (1998b) Intraspecific responses to distress calls of the pipistrelle bat, Pipistrellus pipistrellus. Anim Behav 55:705–713

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Russ JM, Hutson AM, Montgomery WI, Racey PA, Speakman JR (2001) The status of Nathusius’ pipistrelle (Pipistrellus nathusii) Keyserling and Blasius 1839) in the British Isles. J Zool 254:91–100

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Russ JM, Jones G, Mackie IJ, Racey PA (2004) Interspecific responses to distress calls in bats (Chiroptera: Vespertilionidae): a function for convergence in call design? Anim Behav 67:1005–1014

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Russ JM, Jones G, Racey PA (2005) Responses of soprano pipistrelles, Pipistrellus pygmaeus, to their experimentally modified distress calls. Anim Behav 70:393–404

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Russo D, Jones G (1999) The social calls of Kuhl’s pipistrelles Pipistrellus kuhlii (Kuhl 1819): structure and variation. J Zool 249:476–481

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Ryan MJ, Keddy-Hector A (1992) Directional patterns of female mate choice and the role of sensory biases. Am Nat 139:S4–S35

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Searcy WA, Andersson M (1986) Sexual selection and the evolution of song. Ann Rev Ecolog Syst 17:507–533

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Sender T, Roedenbeck I, Hampl S, Ferreri M, Simon M (2002) Revision of morphological identification of pipistrelle bat phonic types (Pipistrellus pipistrellus Schreber 1774). Myotis 40:11–17

    Google Scholar 

  49. Simmons LW (1987) Heritability of a male character chosen by females of the field cricket Gryllus bimaculatus (deGaer). Anim Behav 38:68–77

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Speakman JR, Racey PA (1991) No cost of echolocation for bats in flight. Nature 350:421–423

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. Strelkov PP (1997a) Breeding area and its position in range of migratory bats species (Chiroptera, Vespertilionidae) in east Europe and adjacent territories. Communication 1. Zool Z 76:1073–1082

    Google Scholar 

  52. Strelkov PP (1997b) Breeding area and its position in range of migratory bats species (Chiroptera, Vespertilionidae) in east Europe and adjacent territories. Communication 2. Zool Z 76:1381–1390

    Google Scholar 

  53. Vaughan N, Jones G, Harris S (1997) Identification of British bat species by multivariate analysis of echolocation call parameters. Bioacoustics 7:189–207

    Google Scholar 

  54. von Helversen O, von Helversen D (1994) Forces driving coevolution of song and song recognition in grasshoppers. Folia Zool 43:331–338

    Google Scholar 

  55. Von Helversen O, Holderied M (2003) Zur Unterscheidung von Zwergfledermaus (Pipistrellus pipistrellus) und Mückenfledermaus (Pipistrellus mediterraneus/pygmaeus) im Feld. Nyctalus 8:420–426

    Google Scholar 

  56. Yalden DW (1985) The identification of British bats London. The Mammal Society, London

    Google Scholar 

  57. Yasukawa K, Blank JL, Patterson CB (1980) Song repertoire and sexual selection in the red-winged blackbird. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 7:233–238

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Zahn A, Dippel B (1997) Male roosting habits, mating system and mating behaviour of Myotis myotis. J Zool 2243:659–674

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Zingg PE (1988) Search calls of echolocating Nyctalus leisleri and Pipistrellus savii (Mammalia: Chiroptera) recorded in Switzerland. Zeitschrift fur Saugetierkunde 53:281–293

    Google Scholar 

  60. Zuk M, Rotenberry JT, Simmons LW (2001) Geographical variation in calling song of the field cricket Teleogryllus oceanicus: the importance of spatial scale. J Evol Biol 14:731–741

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

J.R. was supported by a Royal Society Research Grant and P.A.R. by a Leverhulme Trust Research Grant F/00152/D. We thank Iain Mackie for providing useful comments on the manuscript and Mark Smyth for assisting with fieldwork.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J. M. Russ.

Additional information

Communicated by G. Wilkinson

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Russ, J.M., Racey, P.A. Species-specificity and individual variation in the song of male Nathusius’ pipistrelles (Pipistrellus nathusii). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 61, 669–677 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-006-0295-9

Download citation

Keywords

  • Advertisement call
  • Nathusius’ pipistrelles
  • Call type