Skip to main content
Log in

Learning during competitive positioning in the nest: do nestlings use ideal free ‘foraging’ tactics?

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Begging behaviour of nestling birds may involve more than a simple, honest source of information for parents to use in provisioning. Many aspects of begging behaviour relate instead to sibling competition for food items within the nest, and we might expect evidence of adaptive learning and behavioural adjustment in response to experience of the competitive environment. In this study, we consider begging in different locations within the nest as analogous to foraging in different patches, varying in food availability. Using hand-feeding trials, we created zones of differing profitability within an artificial nest by adjusting either the prey size or number of items delivered, and allowed only indirect competition between pairs of southern grey shrike (Lanius meridionalis) nestlings. Nestlings demonstrated the ability to detect differences in zone profitability and position themselves accordingly. By the end of both the prey size and delivery rate trials nestlings had increased the amount of time spent in the high quality zone. Such movement in response to differences in load quality, as well as frequency, demonstrates the ability of nestlings to learn about their environment and to facultatively adjust their begging in order to maximise energetic rewards.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anderson DJ, Budde C, Apanius V, Martinez Gomez JE, Bird NM, Weathers WW (1993) Prey size influences female competitive dominance in nestling American kestrels (Falco sparverius). Ecology 74:367–376

    Google Scholar 

  • Budden AE (2001) Nestling begging in Southern grey shrikes. PhD Thesis, University of Wales, Bangor

  • Budden AE, Wright J (2001a) Begging in nestling birds. Curr Ornithol 16:83–118

    Google Scholar 

  • Budden AE, Wright J (2001b) Nestling diet, chick growth and breeding success in the Southern grey shrike. Proc 3rd Int Shrike Symp, The Ring 22:165–172

    Google Scholar 

  • Butchart SHM, Kilner RM, Fuisz T, Davies NB (2003) Differences in nestling begging calls of hosts and host-races of the common cuckoo, Cuculus canorus. Anim Behav 65:345–354

    Google Scholar 

  • Cotton PA, Kacelnik A, Wright J (1996) Chick begging as a signal: are nestlings honest? Behav Ecol 7:178–182

    Google Scholar 

  • Cotton PA, Wright J, Kacelnik A (1999) Chick begging strategies in relation to brood hierarchies and hatching asynchrony. Am Nat 153:412–420

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fretwell SD, Lucas HL (1970) On territorial behaviour and other factors influencing habitat distribution in birds. Acta Biotheor 19:16–36

    Google Scholar 

  • Godfray HCJ (1991) Signalling of need by offspring to their parents. Nature 352:328–330

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Godfray HCJ (1995a) Signalling of need between parents and young: parent-offspring conflict and sibling rivalry. Am Nat 146:1–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gottlander K (1987) Parental feeding behaviour and sibling competition in the pied flycatcher Ficedula hypoleuca. Ornis Scand 18:269–276

    Google Scholar 

  • Kacelnik A, Cotton PA, Stirling L, Wright J (1995) Food allocation among nestling starlings: sibling competition and the scope of parental choice. Proc R Soc Lond B 259:259–263

    Google Scholar 

  • Kedar H, Rodríguez-Gironés MA, Yedvab S, Lotem A, Winkler DW (2000) Experimental evidence for offspring learning in parent-offspring communication. Proc R Soc Lond B 267:1723–2727

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kölliker M, Richner H, Werner I, Heeb P (1998) Begging signals and biparental care: nestling choice between parental feeding locations. Anim Behav 55:215–222

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kölliker M, Richner H (2004) Navigation in a cup: chick positioning in great tit, Parus major, nests. Anim Behav 68:941–948

    Google Scholar 

  • Lessells CM, Poelman EH, Mateman AC, Cassey P (2005) Consistent feeding positions of great tit parents. Anim Behav

  • Lotem A (1998a) Differences in begging behaviour between barn swallows, Hirundo rustica, nestlings. Anim Behav 55:809–818

    Google Scholar 

  • Malacarne G, Cucco M, Bertolo E (1994) Sibling competition in asynchronously hatched broods of the Pallid Swift (Apus pallidus). Ethol Ecol Evol 6:293–300

    Google Scholar 

  • McRae SB, Weatherhead PJ, Montgomerie R (1993) American robin nestlings compete by jockeying for position. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 33:101–106

    Google Scholar 

  • Mei N (1994) Role of digestive afferents in food intake regulation, In: Legg CR, Booth DA (eds) Appetite: neural and behavioural bases. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Milinski M, Parker GA (1991) Competition for resources. In: Krebs JR, Davies NB (eds) Behavioural ecology: an evolutionary approach, 3rd edn. Blackwell, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Parker GA, Royle NJ, Hartley IR (2002) Begging scrambles with unequal chicks: interactions between need and competitive ability. Ecol Lett 5:206–215

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Price K, Ydenberg R (1995) Begging and provisioning in broods of asynchronously-hatched yellow-headed blackbird nestlings. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 37:201–208

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Price K, Harvey H, Ydenberg R (1996) Begging tactics of nestling yellow-headed blackbirds, Xanthocephalus xanthocephalus, in relation to need. Anim Behav 51:421–435

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodríguez-Gironés MA, Enquist M, Lachmann M (2001) Role of begging and sibling competition in foraging strategies of nestlings. Anim Behav 61:733–745

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rodríguez-Gironés MA, Zúñiga JM, Redondo T (2002) Feeding experience and relative size modify the begging strategies of nestling. Behav Ecol 13:782–785

    Google Scholar 

  • Royle NJ, Hartley IR, Parker GA (2002) Begging for control: when are offspring solicitation behaviours honest? Trends Ecol Evol 17:434–440

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Slagsvold T (1997) Brood division in birds in relation to offspring size: sibling rivalry and parental control. Anim Behav 54:1357–1368

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Smith HG, Montgomerie R (1991) Nestling American Robins compete with siblings by begging. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 29:307–312

    Google Scholar 

  • Stamps JA, Clark A, Arrowood P, Kus B (1989) Begging behaviour in budgerigars. Ethology 81:177–192

    Google Scholar 

  • Tregenza T (1995) Building on the ideal free distribution. Adv Ecol Res 26:253–307

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to the Mitrani Centre for Desert Ecology, Hazeva Research and Development Centre (HRDC), Hazeva Field School, Berry Pinshow, Sasha Dall and Dror Hawlena for logistical support, Kate Lessells for access to an unpublished MS and Arnon Lotem and anonymous reviewers for comments on a previous version of the paper. A.E.B. was funded by NERC PhD Studentship No. GT4/97/288/TS. This work was carried out under license and according to ethical guidelines at HRDC in Israel

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Amber E. Budden.

Additional information

Communicated by M. Soler

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Budden, A.E., Wright, J. Learning during competitive positioning in the nest: do nestlings use ideal free ‘foraging’ tactics?. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 58, 227–236 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-005-0940-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-005-0940-8

Keywords

Navigation