Skip to main content
Log in

Social system and reproduction of helpers in a cooperatively breeding cichlid fish (Julidochromis ornatus) in Lake Tanganyika: field observations and parentage analyses

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

It is suggested that some fish of the genus Julidochromis, substrate-brooding Tanganyikan cichlids with biparental care, breed cooperatively with helpers. We studied the social system of J. ornatus in the wild and analysed genetic parentage using microsatellites. Within the studied population three patterns of social system were identified: monogamous pairs (61%, 44 of 72 groups), pairs with helpers (29%, 21), and polygamous harems with helpers (controlled by either a large female or large male owner; 10%, 7). In cooperatively breeding groups, the number of helpers at each nest ranged from 1 to 6 (median 1), and male helpers were more numerous than female helpers. In both sexes, the body size was different among individuals of different social status (harem owner > breeder > helper). Helpers and harem owners of both sexes exhibited brood defence although its frequency was low. The molecular analysis revealed that (1) the helpers were mostly unrelated to dominant breeders, (2) many helpers of both sexes contributed genetically to the next generations, (3) male helpers had high siring success (41% of young in total), and (4) large young unrelated to group members were detected at 30% of observed nests, which may be due to breeder (or helper) replacements and immigration of young. We discuss the implications of these results for understanding the complex social system of this species, especially the low reproductive skew in comparison with other cooperatively breeding cichlids.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Akane A, Matsubara K, Shiono H (1992) Investigation of algorithm for the calculation of probability of paternity likelihood using personal computer program, including the application to parentage testing in the deceased party. Jpn J Legal Med 46:254–265

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Awata S, Kohda M (2004) Parental roles and the amount of care in a bi-parental substrate brooding cichlid: the effect of size differences within pairs. Behaviour 141:1135–1149

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Balshine S, Leach B, Neat F, Reid H, Taborsky M, Werner N (2001) Correlates of group size in a cooperatively breeding cichlid fish (Neolamprologus pulcher). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 50:134–140

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Balshine-Earn S, Neat FC, Reid H, Taborsky M (1998) Paying to stay or paying to breed? Field evidence for direct benefits of helping behavior in a cooperatively breeding fish. Behav Ecol 9:432–438

    Google Scholar 

  • Barlow GW (1991) Mating systems among cichlid fishes. In: Keenleyside MHA (ed) Cichlid fishes: behaviour, ecology and evolution. Chapman and Hall, London, pp 173–190

    Google Scholar 

  • Bergmüller R, Taborsky M (2005) Experimental manipulation of helping in a cooperative breeder: helpers ‘pay to stay’ by pre-emptive appeasement. Anim Behav 69:19–28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bergmüller R, Heg D, Taborsky M (2005) Helpers in a cooperatively breeding cichlid stay and pay or disperse and breed, depending on ecological constraints. Proc R Soc Lond B 272:325–331

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burke T, Davies NB, Bruford MW, Hatchwell BJ (1989) Parental care and mating behaviour of polyandrous dunnocks Prunella modularis related to paternity by DNA fingerprinting. Nature 338:249–251

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cant MA (1998) A model for the evolution of reproductive skew without reproductive suppression. Anim Behav 55:163–169

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Davies NB (1992) Dunnock behaviour and social evolution. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Dierkes P, Taborsky M, Kohler U (1999) Reproductive parasitism of broodcare helpers in a cooperatively breeding fish. Behav Ecol 10:510–515

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Essen-Möller E (1938) Die Beweiskraft der Ähnlichkeit im Vaterschaftsnachweis. Theoretische Grundlagen. Mitt Anth Ges Wien 68:9–53

    Google Scholar 

  • Faaborg J, Parker PG, DeLay L, de Vries T, Bednarz JC, Maria Paz S, Naranjo J, Waite TA (1995) Confirmation of cooperative polyandry in the Galapagos hawk (Buteo galapagoensis). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 36:83–90

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldizen AW, Buchan JC, Putland DA, Goldizen AR, Krebs EA (2000) Patterns of mate-sharing in a population of Tasmanian native hens Gallinula mortierii. Ibis 142:40–47

    Google Scholar 

  • Heg D, Bachar Z, Brouwer L, Taborsky M (2004) Predation risk is an ecological constraint for helper dispersal in a cooperatively breeding cichlid. Proc R Soc Lond B 271:2367–2374

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jamieson IG (1997) Testing reproductive skew models in a communally breeding bird, the pukeko, Porphyrio porphyrio. Proc R Soc Lond B 264:335–340

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jamieson IG, Quinn JS, Rose PA, White BN (1994) Shared paternity among non-relatives is a result of an egalitarian mating system in a communally breeding bird, the pukeko. Proc R Soc Lond B 257:271–277

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnstone RA (2000) Models of reproductive skew: a review and synthesis. Ethology 106:5–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keller L, Reeve HK (1994) Partitioning of reproduction in animal societies. Trends Ecol Evol 9:98–102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kohda M, Yanagisawa Y, Sato T, Nakaya K, Niimura Y, Matsumoto K, Ochi H (1996) Geographical colour variation in cichlid fishes at the southern end of Lake Tanganyika. Environ Biol Fish 45:237–248

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kohler U (1998) Zur Struktur und Evolution des Sozialsystems von Neolamprologus multifasciatus (Cichlidae, Pisces), dem kleinsten Schneckenbuntbarsch des Tanganjikasees. Aachen, Shaker

    Google Scholar 

  • Kondo T (1986) Feeding habits of Lamprologus savoryi (Teleostei: Cichlidae) with reference to its social behaviour. Physiol Ecol Jpn 23:1–15

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Konings A (1998) Tanganyika cichlids in their natural habitat. Cichlid Press, El Paso, Texas

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuwamura T (1997) The evolution of parental care and mating systems among Tanganyikan cichlids. In: Kawanabe H, Hori M, Nagoshi M (eds) Fish communities in Lake Tanganyika. Kyoto University Press, Kyoto, Japan, pp 57–86

    Google Scholar 

  • Limberger D (1983) Pairs and harems in a cichlid fish, Lamprologus brichardi. Z Tierpsychol 62:115–144

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin E, Taborsky M (1997) Alternative male mating tactics in a cichlid, Pelvicachromis pulcher: a comparison of reproductive effort and success. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 41:311–319

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Munehara H, Awata S, Katoh R, Kohda M, Sunobe T (2001) Primer sequences and cross-species amplification for parentage discrimination of Tanganyikan cichlid fishes. Bull Fac Fish Hokkaido Univ 52:131–133

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Munehara H, Takenaka O (2000) Microsatellite markers and multiple paternity in a paternal care fish, Hexagrammos otakii. J Ethol 18:101–104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ota M, Matsuzawa T, Fukushima H, Yonemura I, Hasekura H (1986) Personal computer program calculating the probability of paternity considering the recombination rates between HLA-A and B loci. Jpn J Legal Med 40:774–781

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Põldmaa T, Montgomerie R, Boag P (1995) Mating system of the cooperatively breeding noisy miner Manorina melanocephala, as revealed by DNA profiling. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 37:137–143

    Google Scholar 

  • Reeve HK, Emlen ST, Keller L (1998) Reproductive sharing in animal societies: reproductive incentives or incomplete control by dominant breeders? Behav Ecol 9:267–278

    Google Scholar 

  • Rice WR (1989) Analyzing tables of statistical tests. Evolution 43:223–225

    Google Scholar 

  • SAS Institute, Inc. (1998) Statview for Macintosh, version 5.0. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC

  • Schradin C, Lamprecht J (2002) Causes of female emigration in the group-living cichlid fish Neolamprologus multifasciatus. Ethology 108:237–248

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skubic E, Taborsky M, McNamara JM, Houston AI (2004) When to parasitize? A dynamic optimization model of reproductive strategies in a cooperative breeder. J Theor Biol 227:487–501

    Article  PubMed  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Stiver KA, Dierkes P, Taborsky M, Balshine S (2004) Dispersal patterns and status change in a co-operatively breeding cichlid Neolamprologus pulcher: evidence from microsatellite analyses and behavioural observations. J Fish Biol 65:91–105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sunobe T (2000) Social structure, nest guarding and interspecific relationships of the cichlid fish (Julidochromis marlieri) in Lake Tanganyika. Afr Study Monogr 21:83–89

    Google Scholar 

  • Sunobe T, Munehara H (2003) Mating system and kin relationship between adults and young in the shell-brooding cichlid fish Neolamprologus meeli in Lake Tanganyika. J Ethol 21:87–92

    Google Scholar 

  • Taborsky M (1984) Broodcare helpers in the cichlid fish Lamprologus brichardi: their costs and benefits. Anim Behav 32:1236–1252

    Google Scholar 

  • Taborsky M (1985) Breeder-helper conflict in a cichlid fish with broodcare helpers: an experimental analysis. Behaviour 95:45–75

    Google Scholar 

  • Taborsky M (1994) Sneakers, satellites, and helpers: parasitic and cooperative behavior in fish reproduction. Adv Study Behav 23:1–100

    Google Scholar 

  • Taborsky M (1999) Conflict or cooperation: what determines optimal solutions to competition in fish reproduction? In: Almada VC, Oliveira RF, Goncalves EJ (eds) Behaviour and conservation of littoral fishes. ISPA, Lisbon, pp 301–349

    Google Scholar 

  • Taborsky M (2001) The evolution of bourgeois, parasitic, and cooperative reproductive behaviors in fishes. J Hered 92:100–110

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Taborsky M, Limberger D (1981) Helpers in fish. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 8:143–145

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vehrencamp SL (1983) Optimal degree of skew in cooperative societies. Am Zool 23:327–335

    Google Scholar 

  • Whittingham LA, Dunn PO, Magrath RD (1997) Relatedness, polyandry and extra-group paternity in the cooperatively-breeding white-browed scrubwren (Sericornis frontalis). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 40:261–270

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yamagishi S, Kohda M (1996) Is the cichlid fish Julidochromis marlieri polyandrous? Ichthyol Res 43:469–471

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank the staff of Lake Tanganyika Research Unit for assistance in the field. We are also grateful to Tatiana Czeschlik, Mark Abrahams, Michael Taborsky, and two anonymous referees for helpful comments and suggestions on the manuscript, and Andrew Rossiter, Karen D. Crow, John Bower, Masaoki Takagi, Kazunori Matsumoto, and Natori Yasuo for advice and comments on a previous version of this manuscript. This study was financially supported by a Grant-in-Aid for Overseas Scientific Research (no. 10041178) from the Japanese Ministry of Education, Science, Sports, and Culture.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Satoshi Awata.

Additional information

Communicated by M. Abrahams

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Awata, S., Munehara, H. & Kohda, M. Social system and reproduction of helpers in a cooperatively breeding cichlid fish (Julidochromis ornatus) in Lake Tanganyika: field observations and parentage analyses. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 58, 506–516 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-005-0934-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-005-0934-6

Keywords

Navigation