Skip to main content
Log in

Resource quality or harem size: what influences male tenure at refuge sites in tree weta (Orthoptera: Anostostomatidae)?

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Rather than seeking females directly, males in many animal species locate and defend sites that contain spatially limited resources essential for female survival and reproduction. In these cases, resident males successfully repelling conspecific rivals will mate with sexually receptive females that seek to use the resident’s resources. Theory predicts that if resources are limiting in nature, are costly to procure, and if residency at the resource site increases male reproductive success, each site should be monopolised by a single adult male. Moreover, if females aggregate at these sites, males should be sedentary and monopolise harems. This predicts that males should reside at resource sites longer than females and male tenure should be positively correlated with harem size. I address these hypotheses using a wild population of the Wellington tree weta, Hemideina crassidens, a sexually dimorphic insect in which males use mandibular weapons in fights to control resource sites (galleries in trees) required by females for diurnal refuge. In a longitudinal study using artificial galleries, I show that male tenure in a gallery is positively related to harem size and, contrary to prediction, not gallery size per se. Moreover, contrary to prediction, females are more sedentary than males: males appear to move frequently between galleries to search for novel mates. I show experimentally that galleries represent mating sites to males: males prefer galleries housing adult females whereas females prefer unoccupied galleries. Females likely avoid male-occupied galleries because they incur injuries when interacting with males.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alcock J (1994) Postinsemination associations between males and females in insects: the mate-guarding hypothesis. Annu Rev Entomol 39:1–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bennington CC, Thayne WV (1994) Use and misuse of mixed model analysis of variance in ecological studies. Ecology 75:717–722

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bradbury JW, Vehrencamp SL (1977) Social organization and foraging in emballonurid bats III. Mating systems. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 2:1–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown WD, Crespi BJ, Choe JC (1997) Sexual conflict and the evolution of mating systems. In: Choe JC, Crespi BJ (eds) The evolution of mating systems in insects and arachnids. Cambridge Univ Press, Cambridge, UK, pp 130–145

    Google Scholar 

  • Darwin C (1874) The descent of man, and selection in relation to sex. J. Murray, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Davies NB (1991) Mating systems. In: Krebs JR, Davies NB (eds) Behavioural ecology: an evolutionary approach, 3rd edn. Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford, pp 263–294

    Google Scholar 

  • Dodson GN (1997) Resource defense mating system in antlered flies, Phytalmia spp (Diptera: Tephritidae). Ann Entomol Soc Am 90:496–504

    Google Scholar 

  • Emlen ST, Oring LW (1977) Ecology, sexual selection, and the evolution of mating systems. Science 197:215–223

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Field LH (2001) Aggression behaviour in New Zealand tree wetas. In: Field LH (ed) The biology of wetas, king crickets and their allies. CAB International, Wallingford, pp 333–349

    Google Scholar 

  • Field LH, Sandlant GR (1983) Aggression and mating behavior in the Stenopelmatidae (Orthoptera, Ensifera), with reference to New Zealand wetas. In: Gwynne DT, Morris GK (eds) Orthopteran mating systems-sexual competition in a diverse group of insects. Westview Press, Boulder, CO, pp 120–146

    Google Scholar 

  • Field LH, Deans NA (2001a) Sexual selection and secondary sexual characters of wetas and king crickets. In: Field LH (ed) The biology of wetas, king crickets and their allies. CAB International, Wallingford, pp 179–204

    Google Scholar 

  • Field LH, Jarman TH (2001b) Mating behaviour. In: Field LH (ed) The biology of wetas, king crickets and their allies. CAB International, Wallingford, pp 317–332

    Google Scholar 

  • Field LH, Sandlant GR (2001c) The gallery-related ecology of New Zealand tree wetas, Hemideina femorata and Hemideina crassidens (Orthoptera, Anostostomatidae). In: Field LH (ed) The biology of wetas, king crickets and their allies. CAB International, Wallingford, pp 243–257

    Google Scholar 

  • Fincke OM (1992) Consequences of larval ecology for territoriality and reproductive success of a neotropical damselfly. Ecology 73:449–462

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fincke OM, Hadrys H (2001) Unpredictable offspring survivorship in the damselfly, Megaloprepus coerulatus, shapes parental behavior, constrains sexual selection, and challenges traditional fitness estimates. Evolution 55:762–772

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fincke OM, Waage JK, Koenig WD (1997) Natural and sexual selection components of odonate mating patterns. In: Choe JC, Crespi BJ (eds) The evolution of mating systems in insects and arachnids. Cambridge Univ Press, Cambridge, UK, pp 58–74

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibbs GW (2001) Habitats and biogeography of New Zealand’s Deinacridine and tusked weta species. In: Field LH (ed) The biology of wetas, king crickets and their allies. CAB International, Wallingford, pp 35–55

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenfield MD (1997) Sexual selection in resource defense polygyny: lessons from territorial grasshoppers. In: Choe JC, Crespi BJ (eds) The evolution of mating systems in insects and arachnids. Cambridge Univ Press, Cambridge, UK, pp 75–88

    Google Scholar 

  • Gwynne DT, Jamieson I (1998) Sexual selection and sexual dimorphism in a harem-polygynous insect, the alpine weta (Hemideina maori, Orthoptera Stenopelmatidae). Ethol Ecol Evol 10:393–402

    Google Scholar 

  • Hudson GV (1892) Manual of New Zealand entomology. West, Newman, London

  • Hudson GV (1920) On some examples of New Zealand insects illustrating the Darwinian principle of sexual selection. Transactions and Proceedings of the New Zealand Institute 52:431–438

    Google Scholar 

  • Jamieson IG, Forbes MR, McKnight EB (2000) Mark-recapture study of mountain stone weta Hemideina maori (Orthoptera: Anostostomatidae) on rock tor ‘islands’. NZ J Ecol 24:209–214

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelly CD (2005) Allometry and sexual selection of male weaponry in Wellington tree weta, Hemideina crassidens. Behav Ecol 16:145–152

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kelly CD (2006) The relationship between resource control, association with females and male weapon size in a male-dominance insect. Ethology DOI 10.1111/j.1439.0310.2006.01193.x

  • Kirkendall LR, Kent DS, Raffa KF (1997) Interactions among males, females and offspring in bark and ambrosia beetles: the significance of living tunnels for the evolution of social behaviour. In: Choe JC, Crespi BJ (eds) The evolution of social behavior in insects and arachnids. Cambridge Univ Press, Cambridge, UK, pp 181–215

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell PL (1980) Combat and territorial defense of Acanthocephala femorata (Hemiptera: Coreidae). Ann Entomol Soc Am 73:404–408

    Google Scholar 

  • Reid ML, Roitberg BD (1994) Benefits of prolonged male residence with mates and brood in pine engravers (Coleoptera: Scolytidae). Oikos 70:140–148

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shuster SM, Wade MJ (2003) Mating systems and strategies. Princeton Univ Press, Princeton, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  • Simmons LW (2001) Sperm competition and its evolutionary consequences in the insects. Princeton Univ Press, Princeton, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  • Spencer AM (1995) Sexual maturity in the male tree weta Hemideina crassidens (Orthoptera: Stenopelamatidae). In: Zoology. Victoria University of Wellington, Wellington, New Zealand, pp 84

  • Stamps JA (1994) Territorial behavior: testing the assumptions. Adv Study Behav 23:173–232

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stringer IAN, Cary PRL (2001) Postembryonic development and related changes. In: Field LH (ed) The biology of wetas, king crickets and their allies. CAB International, Wallingford, pp 399–426

    Google Scholar 

  • Switzer PV (1993) Site fidelity in predictable and unpredictable habitats. Evol Ecol 7:533–555

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Switzer PV (1997) Factors affecting site fidelity in a territorial animal, Perithemis tenera. Anim Behav 53:865–877

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Switzer PV (2002) Territory quality, habitat selection, and competition in the amberwing dragonfly, Perithemis tenera (Say) (Odonata: Libellulidae): Population patterns as a consequence of individual behavior. J Kans Entomol Soc 75:145–157

    Google Scholar 

  • Trewick SA, Morgan-Richards M (2000) Artificial weta roosts: A technique for ecological study and population monitoring of Tree Weta (Hemideina) and other invertebrates. New Zealand Journal of Ecology 24:201–208

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsubaki Y, Ono T (1986) Competition for territorial sites and alternative mating tactics in the dragonfly, Nannophya pygmaea Rambur (Odonata: Libellulidae). Behaviour 97:234–252

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wade MJ (1995) The ecology of sexual selection: Mean crowding of females and resource-defense polygyny. Evol Ecol 9:118–124

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wells KD (1977) Territoriality and male mating success in the green frog (Rana clamitans). Ecology 58:750–762

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilkinson GS, Dodson GN (1997) Function and evolution of antlers and eye stalks in flies. In: Choe JC, Crespi BJ (eds) The evolution of mating systems in insects and arachnids. Cambridge Univ Press, Cambridge, UK, pp 310–328

    Google Scholar 

  • Zar JH (1999) Biostatistical analysis, 4th edn. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

I thank Darryl Gwynne, Maydianne Andrade and three anonymous referees for the comments on the manuscript. I also thank George Gibbs for the valuable discussion and insight as well as Steve Ward of the New Zealand Department of Conservation for the logistical support and discussion whilst this work was conducted on Maud Island. This study was supported by grants from NSERC (Canada) and National Geographic Society to Darryl Gwynne.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Clint D. Kelly.

Additional information

Communicated by M. Siva-Jothy

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kelly, C.D. Resource quality or harem size: what influences male tenure at refuge sites in tree weta (Orthoptera: Anostostomatidae)?. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 60, 175–183 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-005-0154-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-005-0154-0

Keywords

Navigation