Strategic exploitation in a socially parasitic bee: a benefit in waiting?
- 126 Downloads
Social parasitism has evolved at least ten times in the allodapine bees but studies that explore the parasite’s integration and exploitation of host colonies are lacking. Using colony content and dissection data, we examine how Inquilina schwarzi affects the social organisation of its host Exoneura robusta. Our samples include three critical periods in the host life cycle: initial formation of dominance hierarchies in late autumn, commencement of oviposition by host queens in late winter, and development of secondary reproductives in late spring. I. schwarzi preferentially parasitises larger host colonies in autumn, but during autumn and winter, the parasite appears to be socially invisible, living in the nest without disrupting the normal functioning of these colonies. Inquilines begin egg laying much later than their hosts, and by late spring, they have disrupted host reproductive hierarchies, leading to lower skew in ovarian sizes of their host nestmates. Living invisibly within the host nest for the first 6 months and waiting until well after host reproduction has begun before disrupting their social organisation appear to be unique among social insects. Such a change in strategy may be facilitated by the different social systems found in allodapine bees, with the social parasites possibly disrupting the reproductive hierarchies during spring to prevent or reduce the normal dispersal of some host females from their natal nests.
KeywordsInquiline Social parasitism Allodapine bee
We thank Narelle Joyce, Meg Schwarz and Nathan Smith for help with fieldwork. We also thank Tom Chapman and Jocelyn Smith for comments on previous versions of this paper. This work was supported by an ARC Discovery Grant to M. Schwarz, S. Cooper, B. Crespi and T. Chapman (DPO346322) and complied with the current laws of Australia.
- Bourke AFG, Franks NR (1995) Social evolution in ants. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
- Fisher RM (1984) Dominance by a bumble bee social parasite (Psithyrus citrinus) over workers of its host (Bombus impatiens). Anim Behav 32:303–304Google Scholar
- Hogendoorn K, Schwarz MP (1998) Guarding specialisation in pre-reproductive colonies in the allodapine bee Exoneura bicolor. Ethol Ecol Evol 10:67–77Google Scholar
- Hölldobler B, Wilson EO (1990) The ants. Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
- Michener CD (1970) Social parasites among African allodapine bees (Hymenoptera, Anthophoridae, Ceratinini). Zool J Linn Soc 49:199–215Google Scholar
- Michener CD (2000) The bees of the world. The John Hopkins University Press, BaltimoreGoogle Scholar
- Reyes SG, Michener CD (1990) Observations on a parasitic allodapine bee and its hosts in Java and Malaysia. Trop Zool 3:139–149Google Scholar
- Schmid-Hempel P (1998) Parasites in social insects. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
- Schwarz MP, Silberbauer LX, Hurst PS (1997) Intrinsic and extrinsic factors associated with social evolution in allodapine bees. In: Choe JC, Crespi BJ (eds) The evolution of social behaviour in insects and arachnids. Princeton University Press, Princeton, pp 333–346Google Scholar
- Sudd JH, Franks NR (1987) The behavioural ecology of ants. Chapman and Hall, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- Wilson EO (1971) The insect societies. Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar