Skip to main content
Log in

Experimental assessment of ecological and phenotypic factors affecting male mating success and polyandry in northern watersnakes, Nerodia sipedon

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

To resolve conflicting field observations regarding the action of sexual selection, we used breeding experiments and paternity analysis of the 927 resulting offspring to assess how male size, condition, tail length, genetic similarity to the female, and variation in operational sex ratio (OSR) affected male reproductive success and the incidence of polyandry in northern watersnakes (Nerodia sipedon). Only size affected male mating success. Large males were more successful, but only when male size varied substantially and competition among males was intense (i.e., male-biased OSR). The conditional nature of the size advantage may explain why studies of free-living watersnakes have produced inconsistent results regarding the relationship between male size and mating success. Size differences between males did not affect the proportion of offspring each male sired within multiply sired litters. We found positive size-assortative mating, but only when the OSR was female biased, suggesting that smaller males had improved access to females when competition among males was reduced, but that competition with larger males still restricted mating opportunities of small males to less preferred, smaller females. Most litters (58%) were multiply sired and larger females were more likely to produce multiply sired litters, similar to free-living watersnakes. There was no association between the incidence of multiple paternity and OSR, however, suggesting that polyandry is not simply a function of opportunity, with females passively waiting for males to court them.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Barry FE, Weatherhead PJ, Philipp DP (1992) Multiple paternity in a wild population of northern water snakes, Nerodia sipedon. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 30:193–199

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blouin-Demers G, Gibbs HL, Weatherhead PJ (2005) Genetic evidence for sexual selection in black ratsnakes (Elaphe obsoleta). Anim Behav 69:225–234

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blouin-Demers G, Weatherhead PJ (2002) Implications of movement patterns for gene flow in black rat snakes (Elaphe obsoleta). Can J Zool 80:1162–1172

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown GP, Weatherhead PJ (1999) Female distribution affects mate searching and sexual selection in male northern water snakes (Nerodia sipedon). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 47:9–16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown GP, Weatherhead PJ (2000) Thermal ecology and sexual size dimorphism in northern water snakes, Nerodia sipedon. Ecol Monogr 70:311–330

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown GP, Weatherhead PJ (2004) Sexual abstinence and the cost of reproduction in adult male watersnakes, Nerodia sipedon. Oikos 104:269–276

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cooper WE Jr, Vitt LJ (1997) Maximizing male reproductive success in the broad-headed skink (Eumeces laticeps): preliminary evidence for mate guarding, size assortative paiting, and opportunistic extra-pair mating. Amphibia-Reptilia 18:59–73

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Emlen ST, Oring LW (1977) Ecology, sexual selection, and the evolution of animal mating systems. Science 197:215–223

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gibbs HL, Weatherhead PJ (2001) Insights into population ecology and sexual selection in snakes through the application of DNA-based genetic markers. J Hered 92:173–179

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gibson AR, Falls JB (1975) Evidence for multiple insemination in the common garter snake, Thamnophis sirtalis. Can J Zool 53:1362–1368

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Goodnight KL, Quellar DC (1999) Computer software for performing likelihood tests of pedigree relationship using genetic markers. Mol Ecol 8:1231–1234

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gregory PT (1974) Patterns of spring emergence of the red-sided garter snakes (Thamnophis sirtalis parietalis) in the Interlake of Manitoba. Can J Zool 53:238–245

    Google Scholar 

  • Hosmer DW, Lemeshow S (2000) Applied logistic regression, 2nd edn. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Iman RL, Conover WJ (1979) The use of the rank transform in regression. Technometrics 21:499–509

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jennions MD, Petrie M (2000) Why do females mate multiply? A review of the genetic benefits. Biol Rev 74:21–64

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Joy JE, Crews D (1988) Male mating success in red-sided garter snakes: size is not important. Anim Behav 36:1839–1841

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kissner KJ, Weatherhead PJ (2005) Phenotypic effects on survival of neonatal northern watersnakes. J Anim Ecol 74:259–265

    Google Scholar 

  • Lombardo MP (1998) On the evolution of sexually transmitted diseases in birds. J Av Biol 29:314–321

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lombardo MP (2000) Microbes in tree swallow semen. J Wildl Dis 36:460–468

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Madsen T, Shine R (1992) Temporal variability in sexual selection acting on reproductive tactics and body size in snakes. Am Nat 141:167–171

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Madsen T, Shine R, Loman J, Hakansson T (1992) Why do female adders copulate so frequently? Nature 355:440–441

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Madsen T, Shine R, Loman J, Hakansson T (1993) Determinants of mating success in male adders, Vipera berus. Anim Behav 45:491–499

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mason RT, Crews D (1985) Female mimicry in garter snakes. Nature 316:59–60

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Olsson M (1993) Male preference for large females and assortative mating for body size in the sand lizard (Lacerta agilis). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 32:337–341

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olsson M, Madsen T, Shine R, Gullberg A, Tegelström H (1994) Rewards of promiscuity. Nature 372:230

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olsson M, Shine R, Gullberg A, Madsen T, Tegelström H (1996) Sperm selection by females. Nature 383:585

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Prosser MR (1999) Sexual selection in northern water snakes, Nerodia sipedon sipedo. PhD thesis, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON

  • Prosser MR, Gibbs HL, Weatherhead PJ (1999) Microgeographic population genetic structure in the northern water snake, Nerodia sipedon sipedon, detected using microsatellite DNA loci. Mol Ecol 8:329–333

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Prosser MR, Weatherhead PJ, Gibbs HL, Brown GP (2002) Genetic analysis of the mating system and opportunity for sexual selection in northern water snakes (Nerodia sipedon). Behav Ecol 13:800–807

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Queller DC, Goodnight KF (1989) Estimating relatedness using genetic markers. Evolution 43:258–275

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • SAS (1999) SAS user's guide: statistics, Version, 8th edn. Statistical Analysis Systems, Cary, North Carolina

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz JM, McCracken GF, Burghardt GM (1989) Multiple paternity in wild populations of the garter snake, Thamnophis sirtalis. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 25:269–273

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seutin G, White BN, Boag PT (1991) Preservation of avian blood and tissue samples for DNA analysis. Can J Zool 69:82–90

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Shine R (1993) Sexual dimorphism in snakes. In: Seigel RA, Collins JT (eds) Snakes: ecology and behavior. McGraw-Hill, New York, pp 49–86

    Google Scholar 

  • Shine R, Bonnet X (2000) Snakes: a new “model organism” in ecological research? TREE 15:221–222

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Shine R, Olsson MM, Moore IT, LeMaster MP, Mason RT (1999) Why do male snakes have longer tails than females? Proc R Soc Lond B 266:2147–2151

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shine R, Olsson MM, Moore IT, LeMaster MP, Greene M, Mason RT (2000) Body size enhances mating success in male garter snakes. Anim Behav 59:F4–F11

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Shine R, O'Connor D, LeMaster MP, Mason RT (2001) Pick on someone your own size: ontogenetic shifts in mate choice by male garter snakes result in size-assortative mating. Anim Behav 61:1133–1141

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stille B, Madsen T, Niklasson M (1986) Multiple paternity in the adder, Vipera berus. Oikos 47:173–175

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weatherhead PJ, Barry FE, Brown GP, Forbes MRL (1995) Sex ratios, mating behavior and sexual size dimorphism of the northern water snake, Nerodia sipedon. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 36:301–311

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weatherhead PJ, Brown GP, Prosser MR, Kissner KJ (1998) Variation in offspring sex ratios in the northern water snake (Nerodia sipedon). Can J Zool 76:2200–2206

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weatherhead PJ, Prosser MR, Gibbs HL, Brown GP (2002) Male reproductive success and sexual selection in northern water snakes determined by microsatellite DNA analysis. Behav Ecol 13:808–815

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Westneat DF, Rambo TB (2000) Copulation exposes female red-winged blackbirds to bacteria in male semen. J Av Biol 31:1–7

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank G. Blouin-Demers, G. Brown, E. O'Grady, M. Prosser, C. Verrault, F. Phelan, F. Connor, R. Green, S. Sommerer, J. Gilchrist, D. Bender, K. Metz, J. Svec, H. McCracken, T. Volk, A. Moenting, C. Yourth, P. Begin, S. Doucet and J. Jones for help constructing the enclosures and/or help in the field. We thank L. DeSousa, B. Woolfenden, M. Kasumovic and L. Blanchard for help in the laboratory and G. Brown and D. Bender for providing statistical advice. Financial support was provided by the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada, the province of Ontario, Carleton University, McMaster University and the University of Illinois

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Patrick J. Weatherhead.

Additional information

Communicated by W. Cooper

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kissner, K.J., Weatherhead, P.J. & Gibbs, H.L. Experimental assessment of ecological and phenotypic factors affecting male mating success and polyandry in northern watersnakes, Nerodia sipedon . Behav Ecol Sociobiol 59, 207–214 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-005-0026-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-005-0026-7

Keywords

Navigation