Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology

, Volume 59, Issue 1, pp 133–142 | Cite as

The use of waggle dance information by honey bees throughout their foraging careers

Original Article

Abstract

We studied the extent to which worker honey bees acquire information from waggle dances throughout their careers as foragers. Small groups of foragers were monitored from time of orientation flights to time of death and all in-hive behaviors relating to foraging were recorded. In the context of a novice forager finding her first food source, 60% of the bees relied, at least in part, on acquiring information from waggle dances (being recruited) rather than searching independently (scouting). In the context of an experienced forager whose foraging has been interrupted, 37% of the time the bees resumed foraging by following waggle dances (being reactivated) rather than examining the food source on their own (inspecting). And in the context of an experienced forager engaged in foraging, 17% of the time the bees initiated a foraging trip by following a waggle dance. Such dance following was observed much more often after an unsuccessful than after a successful foraging trip. Successful foragers often followed dances just briefly, perhaps to confirm that the kind of flowers they had been visiting were still yielding forage. Overall, waggle dance following for food discovery accounted for 12–25% of all interactions with dancers (9% by novice foragers and 3–16% by experienced foragers) whereas dance following for reactivation and confirmation accounted for the other 75–88% (26% for reactivation and 49–62% for confirmation). We conclude that foragers make extensive use of the waggle dance not only to start work at new, unfamiliar food sources but also to resume work at old, familiar food sources.

Keywords

Animal communication Honeybees Recruitment Scouting Waggle dance 

References

  1. Adam B (1987) Beekeeping at Buckfast Abbey. Northern Bee Books, Hebden Bridge, YorkshireGoogle Scholar
  2. Biesmeijer JC (2003a) The occurrence and context of tremble dancing in free-foraging honey bees (Apis mellifera). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 53:411–416Google Scholar
  3. Biesmeijer JC (2003b) The occurrence and context of the shaking signal in honey bees (Apis mellifera) exploiting natural food sources. Ethology 109:1009–1020CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Biesmeijer JC, de Vries H.(2001) Exploration and exploitation of food sources by social insect colonies: a revision of the scout-recruit concept. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 49:89–99CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Dornhaus A, Chittka L (2004) Why do honey bees dance? Behav Ecol Sociobiol 55:395–401CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Dreller C (1998) Division of labor between scouts and recruits: genetic influence and mechanisms. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 43:191–196CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Dyer FC (2002) The biology of the dance language. Ann Rev Entomol 47:917–949CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Dyer FC, Seeley TD (1989) On the evolution of the dance language. Am Nat 133:580–590CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Farina WM, Wainselboim AJ (2001) Thermographic recordings show that honeybees may receive nectar from foragers even during short trophallactic contacts. Insectes Soc 48:360–362CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Esch HE, Zhang SW, Srinivasan MV, Tautz J (2001) Honeybee dances communicate distances measured by optic flow. Nature 411:581–583CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. von Frisch K (1923) Über die “Sprache” der Bienen, eine tierpsychologische Untersuchung. Zool J Physiol 40:1–186Google Scholar
  12. von Frisch K (1946) Die Tänze der Bienen. Österr Zool Z 1:1–48Google Scholar
  13. von Frisch K (1967) The dance language and orientation of bees. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MassachusettsGoogle Scholar
  14. von Frisch K (1968) The role of dances in recruiting bees to familiar sites. Anim Behav 16:531–533CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Gil M, Farina WM (2002) Foraging reactivation in the honeybee Apis mellifera L.: factors affecting the return to known nectar sources. Naturwissenschaften 89:322–325CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Gould JL (1976) The dance-language controversy. Q Rev Biol 51:211–244CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Gould JL, Towne WF (1987) Evolution of the dance language. Am Nat 130:317–338CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Johnson DL (1967) Communication among bees with field experience. Anim Behav 15:487–492CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Judd T (1995) The waggle dance of the honey bee: which bees following a dancer successfully acquire the information? J Insect Behav 8:343–354CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Lindauer M (1952) Ein Beitrag zur Frage der Arbeitsteilung im Bienenstaat. Z Vergl Physiol 34:299–345CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Michelsen A (2003) Signals and flexibility in the dance communication of honeybees. J Comp Physiol A 189:165–174Google Scholar
  22. zu Oettingen-Spielberg T (1949) Über das Wesen der Suchbiene. Z Vergl Physiol 31:454–489CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Riley JR, Greggers U, Smith AD, Reynolds DR, Menzel R (2005) The flight paths of honeybees recruited by the waggle dance. Nature 435:205–207CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Seeley TD (1983) Division of labor between scouts and recruits in honeybee foraging. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 12:253–259CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Seeley TD (1985) The information-center strategy of honeybee foraging. Fort Zool 31:75–90Google Scholar
  26. Seeley TD (1995) The wisdom of the hive: the social physiology of honey bee colonies. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MassachusettsGoogle Scholar
  27. Seeley TD, Towne WF (1992) Tactics of dance choice in honey bees: do foragers compare dances? Behav Ecol Sociobiol 30:59–69CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Seeley TD, Visscher PK (1988) Assessing the benefits of cooperation in honeybee foraging: search costs, forage quality, and competitive ability. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 22:229–237CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Sherman G, Visscher PK (2002) Honeybee colonies achieve fitness through dancing. Nature 419:920–922CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Siegel S, Castellan Jr NJ (1988) Nonparametric statistics for the behavioral sciences. McGraw Hill, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  31. Sokal RR, Rohlf FJ (1981) Biometry, 2nd edn. Freeman, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  32. Thom C, Seeley TD, Tautz J (2000) A scientific note on the dynamics of labor devoted to nectar foraging in a honey bee colony: number of foragers versus individual foraging activity. Apidologie 31:737–378CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Centre for Biodiversity & ConservationSchool of Biology, University of LeedsLeedsUK
  2. 2.Department of Neurobiology and BehaviorCornell UniversityIthacaUSA

Personalised recommendations