Skip to main content
Log in

Fitness benefits of multiple mating versus female mate choice in the cellar spider (Pholcus phalangioides)

Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Cite this article

Abstract

Recent studies have demonstrated that mating with multiple males can be beneficial for females and her offspring even if males contribute nothing but sperm. This was mainly established for species in which sperm from several males mix in the reproductive tract of the female, thus allowing sperm competition and/or female sperm choice. However, in species with last male sperm precedence, female re-mating decides against the previous male by strongly limiting his reproductive success. We tested the effect of female re-mating behaviour using the cellar spider Pholcus phalangioides, which shows strong last males sperm precedence and moderate levels of polyandry under natural situations. We predicted that females prevented from remating even though they are receptive would show reduced reproductive success compared to females that accept two copulations and females that reject a second male, since the latter two treatments were allowed to behave according to their decisions. However, if the number of matings per se had an effect on oviposition or on offspring performance, double-mated females should perform better compared to both treatments of once-mated females. We measured female fecundity and fertility over a period of 140 days, comparable to the species' natural reproductive peak season. Two thousand one hundred and fifty-two offspring from 67 first egg sacs were reared under two feeding levels. We registered development time and survival, and measured offspring adult size and mass. We found a positive effect of double mating, as in this treatment, oviposition probability was higher compared to the other treatments. Interestingly, adult female offspring of the DM treatment that were raised under low food level had a higher condition index compared to those from FS and RM, but development time, size and mass at adulthood were not affected by mating treatment. Female choice only seemed to affect hatching latency of the offspring. Overall, the main predictor of female reproductive output and success was female body size.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig 1.
Fig 2.

References

  • Arnqvist G, Nilsson T (2000) The evolution of polyandry: multiple mating and female fitness in insects. Anim Behav 60:145–164

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ball MA, Parker GA (2003) Sperm competition games: sperm selection by females. J Theor Biol 224:27–42

    Article  PubMed  MathSciNet  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bernasconi G, Keller L (2001) Female polyandry affects their sons' reproductive success in the red flour beetle Tribolium castaneum. J Evol Biol 14:186–193

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Birkhead TR, Møller AP, Sutherland WJ (1993) Why do females make it so difficult for males to fertilize their eggs? J Theor Biol 161:51–60

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown JL (1997) A theory of mate choice based on heterozygosity. Behav Ecol 8:60–65

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown WD, Bjork A, Schneider K, Pitnick S (2004) No evidence that polzandrz benefits femlaes in Drosophila melanogaster. Evolution 58:1242–1250

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Eady PE, Wilson N, Jackson M (2000) Copulating with multiple mates enhances female fecundity but not egg-to-adult survival in the bruchid beetle Callosobruchus maculatus. Evolution 54:2161–2165

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Eberhard WG (1996) Female control: sexual selection by cryptic female choice. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  • Elgar MA 1998 Sperm competition and sexual selection in spiders and other arachnids. In: Birkhead TR, Møller AP (eds) Sperm competition and sexual selection. Academic Press, San Diego, pp 307–340

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Evans JP, Magurran AE (2000) Multiple benefits of multiple mating in guppies. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 97:10074–10076

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Faul F, Erdfelder E (1992). GPOWER: A priori-, post hoc-, and compromise power analyses for MS-DOS [computer program]. Bonn University, Bonn, Germany

    Google Scholar 

  • Fedorka KM, Mousseau TA (2002) Material and genetic benefits of female multiple mating and polyandry. Anim Behav 64:361–367

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fleischman RR, Sakaluk SK (2004) No direct or indirect benefits to cryptic female choice in house crickets (Acheta domesticus). Behav Ecol 15:793–798

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fox CW, Rauter CM (2003) Bet-hedging and the evolution of multiple mating. Evol Ecol Res 5:273–286

    Google Scholar 

  • Halliday TR (1983) The study of mate choice. In: Bateson P (ed) Mate choice. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, MA, pp 3–22

    Google Scholar 

  • Hellriegel B, Ward PI (1998) Complex female reproductive tract morphology: its possible use in postcopulatory female choice. J Theor Biol 190:179–186

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hosken DJ, Blanckenhorn WU (1999) Female multiple mating, inbreeding avoidance and fitness: it is not only the magnitude of costs and benefits that counts. Behav Ecol 10:462–464

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hosken DJ, Stockley P (2003) Benefits of Polyandry: a life history perspective. Evol Biol 33:173–194

    Google Scholar 

  • Jakob EM, Dingle H (1990) Food level and life history characteristics in a pholcid spider (Holocnemus pluchei). Psyche 97:95–110

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jennions MD, Petrie M (2000) Why do females mate multiply? A review of the genetic benefits. Biol Rev 75:21–64

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Keller L, Reeve HK (1995) Why do females mate with multiple males? the sexually selected sperm hypothesis. Adv Stud Behav 24:291–315

    Google Scholar 

  • Konior M, Radwan J, Kolodziejczyk M (2001) Polyandry increases offspring fecundity in the bulb mite. Evolution 55:1893–1896

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • LaMunyon CW (1997) Increased fecundity, as a function of multiple mating, in an arctiid moth, Utethesisa ornatrix. Ecol Entomol 22:69–73

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewontin RC (1966) On the measurement of relative variability. Syst Zool 15:141–142

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mayntz D, Toft S (2001) Nutrient composition of the prey's diet affects growth and survivorship of a generalist predator. Oecologia 127:207–213

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McKean KA, Nunney L (2001) Increased sexual activity reduces male immune function in Drosophila melanogaster. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 98:7904–7909

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Miyashita K (1988) Development of Pholcus phalangioides (Fuesslin) (Araneae, Pholcidae) under long and short photoperiods. J Arachnol 16:126–129

    Google Scholar 

  • Murie JO (1995) Mating behavior of Columbian ground squirrels. I. Multiple mating by females and multiple paternity. Can J Zool 73:1819–1826

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Osikowski A, Rafinski J (2001) Multiple insemination increases reproductive success of female Montandon's newts (Triturus montandoni, Caudata, Salamandridae). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 49:145–149

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pai A, Yan G (2003) Rapid female multiple mating in red flour beetles (Tribolium castaneum). Can J Zool 81:888–896

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pitcher TE., Neff BD, Roff FH, Rowe L (2003) Multiple mating and sequential mate choice in guppies: females trade up. Proc R Soc Lond Ser B 270:1623–1629

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ridley M (1988) Mating frequency and fecundity in insects. Biol Rev 63:509–549

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rolff J, Siva-Jothy MT (2002) Copulation corrupt immunity: a mechanism for a cost of mating in insects. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 99:9916–9918

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rooney J, Lewis SM (2002) Fitness advantage from nuptial gifts in female fireflies. Ecol Entomol 27:373–377

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rütten KB, Schulz I, Olek K, Uhl G (2001) Polymorphic microsatellite markers in the spider Pholcus phalangioides isolated from a library enriched for CA repeats. Mol Ecol Notes 1:255–257

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schäfer MA, Uhl G (2002) Determinants of paternity success in the spider Pholcus phalangioides (Pholcidae: Araneae): the role of male and female behaviour. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 51:368–377

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schäfer MA, Uhl G 2005. Sequential mate encounters: female but not male body size influences female remating decisions in a spider. Behav Ecol 16:461–466

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sheldon BC (1993) Sexually transmitted disease in birds: occurrence and evolutionary significance. Phil Trans R Soc Lond B 339:491–497

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Simmons LW (1988) The contribution of multiple mating and spermatophore consumption to the lifetime reproductive success of female field crickets (Gryllus bimaculatus). Ecol Entomol 13:57–69

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simmons LW (2001) Sperm competition and its evolutionary consequences in the Insects. Monographs in behavior and ecology. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  • Simmons LW (2003) The evolution of polyandry: patterns of genotypic variation in female mating frequency, male fertilization success and a test of the sexy–sperm hypothesis. J Evol Biol 16:624–634

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Simmons LW, Siva-Jothy MT (1998) Sperm competition in insects: mechanisms and the potential for selection. In: Birkhead TR, Møller AP (eds) Sperm competition and sexual selection. Academic Press, San Diego, pp 341–434

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Siva-Jothy MT, Tsubaky Y, Hooper RE (1998) Decreased immune response as a proximate cost of copulation and oviposition in a damselfly. Physiol Entomol 23:274–277

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stockley P, Searle JB, Macdonald DW, Jones CS (1993) Female multiple mating behaviour in the common shrew as a strategy to reduce inbreeding. Proc R Soc Lond 254:173–179

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tregenza T, Wedell N (1998) Benefits of multiple mates in the cricket Gryllus bimaculatus. Evolution 52:1726–1730

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tregenza T, Wedell N, Hosken DJ, Ward PI (2003) Maternal effects on offspring depend on female mating pattern and offspring environment in Yellow Dung flies. Evolution 57:297–304

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Uetz GW, Bischoff J, Raver J (1992) Survivorship of wolf spiders (Lycosidae) reared on different diets. J Arachnol 20:207–211

    Google Scholar 

  • Uhl G (1994) Reproduktionsbiologie von Zitterspinnen. Ph.D. dissertation, Albert-Ludwigs Universität, Freiburg i.Br, Germany

  • Uhl G (1998) Mating behaviour in the cellar spider, Pholcus phalangioides, indicates sperm mixing. Anim Behav 56:1155–1159

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Uhl G, Huber BA, Rose W (1995) Male pedipalp morphology and copulatory mechanism in Pholcus phalangioides (Fuesslin, 1775) (Araneae, Pholicdae). Bull Br Arachnol Soc 10:1–9

    Google Scholar 

  • Uhl G, Schmitt S, Schäfer MA, Blanckenhorn W (2004) Food and sex specific growth strategies in a spider. Evol Ecol Res 6:1–18

    Google Scholar 

  • Vahed K (1998) The function of nuptial feeding in insects. A review of empirical studies. Biol Rev 73:43–78

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watson PJ (1991a) Multiple paternity and first mate sperm precedence in the sierra dome spider Linyphia litigiosa Keyserling (Linyphiidae). Anim Behav 41:135–148

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watson PJ (1991b) Multiple paternity as genetic bet-hedging in the female sierra dome spiders, Linyphia litigiosa (Linyphiidae). Anim Behav 41:343–360

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watson PJ (1993) Foraging advantage of polyandry for female sierra dome spiders (Linyphia litigosa: Linyphiidae) and assessment of alternative direct benefit hypotheses. Am Nat 141:440–465

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Watson PJ (1998) Multi-male mating and female choice increase offspring growth in the spider Neriene litigiosa (Linyphiidae). Anim Behav 55:387–403.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Zar JH (1999) Biostatistical analysis. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs

    Google Scholar 

  • Zeh JA, Zeh DW (1997) The evolution of polyandry. II. Post-copulatory defences against genetic incompatibility. Proc R Soc Lond Ser B 264:69–75

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank David Hosken, Jutta Schneider, Trine Bilde, Paul Watson and an anonymous referee for detailed comments and suggestions on previous drafts of the manuscript. We thank Klaus Reinhold for discussions on nested ANOVAs. Ute Grundtner and Bärbel Bauch kindly helped with rearing masses of spiderlings and fruitflies, which we gratefully acknowledge. This work was supported by the German Science Foundation (DFG Uh87/2-2). The experiments comply with the current laws of Germany

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gabriele Uhl.

Additional information

Communicated by M. Elgar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Uhl, G., Schmitt, S. & Schäfer, M.A. Fitness benefits of multiple mating versus female mate choice in the cellar spider (Pholcus phalangioides). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 59, 69–76 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-005-0010-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-005-0010-2

Keywords

Navigation