Skip to main content
Log in

Female egg investment in relation to male sexual traits and the potential for transgenerational effects in sexual selection

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Life-history theory predicts that individuals should increase their reproductive effort when the fitness return from reproduction is high. Females mated with high-quality males are therefore expected to have higher investment than females mated with low-quality males, which could bias estimates of paternal effects. Investigating the traits females use in their allocation decisions and the aspects of reproduction that are altered is essential for understanding how sexual selection is affected. We studied the potential for differential female allocation in a captive population of a precocial bird, the Chinese quail, Coturnix chinensis. Females paired with males with large sexual ornaments laid larger, but not more, eggs than females paired with males with small sexual ornaments. Furthermore, female egg mass was also significantly positively affected by male testis size, probably via some unknown effect of testis size on male phenotype. Testis size and ornament size were not correlated. Thus, both primary and secondary male sexual traits could be important components of female allocation decisions. Experimental manipulation of hormone levels during embryonic development showed that both male and female traits influencing female egg size were sensitive to early hormone exposure. Differences in prenatal hormone exposure as a result of maternal steroid allocation to eggs may explain some of the variation in reproductive success among individuals, with important implications for non-genetic transgenerational effects in sexual selection.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adkins-Regan E, Pickett P, Koutnik D (1982) Sexual differentiation in quail: conversion of androgen to estrogen mediates testosterone-induced demasculinization of copulation but not other male characteristics. Horm Behav 16:259–278

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andersson M (1994) Sexual selection. Princeton University Press, Princeton

  • Andersson S, Uller T, Lõhmus M, Sundström F (2004) Effects of egg yolk testosterone on growth and immunity in a precocial bird. J Evol Biol 17:501–505

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernardo J (1996) The particular maternal effect of propagule size, especially egg size: patterns, models, quality of evidence and interpretations. Am Zool 36:216–236

    Google Scholar 

  • Birkhead T, Schwabl H, Burke T (2000) Testosterone and maternal effects—integrating mechanisms and function. Trends Ecol Evol 15:86–87

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buchanan KL, Evans MR, Goldsmith AR, Bryant DM, Rowe LV (2001) Testosterone influences basal metabolic rate in male house sparrows: a new cost of dominance signalling? Proc R Soc Lond B 268:1337–1344

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Burley N (1986) Sexual selection for aesthetic traits in species with biparental care. Am Nat 127:415–445

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burley N (1988) The differential allocation hypothesis: an experimental test. Am Nat 132:611–628

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christians JK (2002) Avian egg size: variation within species and inflexibility within individuals. Biol Rev 77:1–26

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark MM, Galef BG Jr (1998) Perinatal influences on the reproductive behavior of adult rodents. In: Mousseau TA, Fox CW (eds) Maternal effects as adaptations. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 261–271

  • Clark MM, Tucker L, Galef BG Jr (1992) Stud males and dud males: intra-uterine position effects on the reproductive success of male gerbils. Anim Behav 43:215–221

    Google Scholar 

  • Cunningham EJA, Russell AF (2000) Egg investment is influenced by male attractiveness in the mallard. Nature 404:74–76

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dickhoff WW, Brown CL, Sullivan CV, Bern HA (1990) Fish and amphibian models for developmental endocrinology. J Exp Zool [Suppl 4]:90–97

    Google Scholar 

  • Dufty AM, Clobert J, Møller AP (2002) Hormones, developmental plasticity, and adaptation. Trends Ecol Evol 17:190–196

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gil D (2003) Golden eggs: maternal manipulation of offspring phenotype by egg androgen in birds. Ardeola 50:281–294

    Google Scholar 

  • Gil D, Graves J, Hazon N, Wells A (1999) Male attractiveness and differential testosterone investment in zebra finch eggs. Science 286:126–128

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gil D, Leboucher G, Lacroix A, Cue R, Kreutzer M (2004) Female canaries produce eggs with greater amounts of testosterone when exposed to preferred male song. Horm Behav 45:64–70

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hackl R, Bromundt V, Daisley J, Kotrschal K, Möstl E (2003) Distribution and origin of steroid hormones in the yolk of Japanese quail eggs (Coturnix coturnix japonica). J Comp Physiol B 173:327–331

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hoyo J del, Elliott A, Sargatal J (1994) Handbook of the birds of the world, vol 2. New world vultures to guinea fowl. Lynx, Barcelona

  • Jennions MD, Petrie M (2000) Why do female mate multiply? A review of the genetic benefits. Biol Rev 75:21–64

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kimball RT, Ligon JD (1999) Evolution of avian plumage dichromatism from a proximate perspective. Am Nat 154:182–193

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kolm N (2001) Females produce larger eggs for large males in a paternal mouth-brooding fish. Proc R Soc Lond B 268:2229–2234

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kotiaho JS, Simmons LW, Hunt J, Tomkins JL (2003) Males influence maternal effects that promote sexual selection: a quantitative genetic experiment with dung beetles Onthophagus taurus. Am Nat 161:852–859

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lovern MB, Wade J (2003) Yolk testosterone varies with sex in eggs of the lizard, Anolis carolinensis. J Exp Zool 295A:206–210

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mazuc J, Chastel O, Sorci G (2003) No evidence for differential maternal allocation to offspring in the house sparrow. Behav Ecol 14:340–346

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore AJ, Wolf JB, Brodie ED (1998) The influence of direct genetic and indirect genetic effects on the evolution of behavior: social and sexual selection meet maternal effects. In: Mousseau TA, Fox CW (eds) Maternal effects as adaptations. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 22–41

  • Moore IT, Perfito N, Wada H, Sperry TS, Wingfield JC (2002) Latitudinal variation in plasma testosterone levels in birds of the genus Zonotrichia. Gen Comp Endocrinol 129:13–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Müller W, Eising CM, Dijkstra C, Groothuis TGG (2002) Sex differences in yolk hormones depend on maternal social status in Leghorn chickens (Gallus gallus domesticus). Proc R Soc Lond B 269:2249–2255

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Møller AP, Alatalo R (1999) Good genes effects in sexual selection. Proc R Soc Lond B 266:85–91

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Møller AP, Jennions MD (2001) How important are direct fitness benefits of sexual selection? Naturwissenschaften 88:401–415

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nishibori M, Tsudzuki M, Hayashi T, Yamamoto Y, Yasue H (2002) Complete nucleotide sequence of the Coturnix chinensis (blue-breasted quail) mitochondrial genome and a phylogenetic analysis with related species. J Hered 93:439–444

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Owens IPF, Short RV (1995) Hormonal basis of sexual dimorphism in birds: implications for new theories of sexual selection. Trends Ecol Evol 10:44–47

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Petrie M, Williams A (1993) Peahens lay more eggs for peacocks with larger trains. Proc R Soc Lond B 251:127–131

    Google Scholar 

  • Petrie M, Schwabl H, Brande-Lavridsen N, Burke T (2001) Maternal investment—sex differences in avian yolk hormone levels. Nature 412:498

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pizzari T (2003) Food, vigilance, and sperm: the role of male direct benefits in the evolution of female preference in a polygamous bird. Behav Ecol 14:593–601

    Google Scholar 

  • Quinn GP, Keough MJ (2002) Experimental design and data analysis for biologists. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

  • Qvarnström A, Forsgren E (1998) Should females prefer dominant males? Trends Ecol Evol 13:498–501

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Qvarnström A, Price T (2001) Maternal effects, paternal effects, and sexual selection. Trends Ecol Evol 16:95–100

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rodríguez-Teijeiro JD, Puigcerver M, Gallego S, Cordero PJ, Parkin DT (2003) Pair bonding and multiple paternity in the polygamous common quail Coturnix coturnix. Ethology 109:291–302

    Google Scholar 

  • Roff DA (1992) The evolution of life histories. Chapman & Hall, New York

  • Rohde PA, Johnsen A, Lifjeld JT (1999) Parental care and sexual selection in the bluethroat, Luscinia s. svecica: a field-experimental test of the differential allocation hypothesis. Ethology 105:651–663

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rowe L, Houle D (1996) The lek paradox and the capture of genetic variance by condition dependent traits. Proc R Soc Lond B 263:1415–1421

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryan BC, Vandenbergh JG (2002) Intrauterine position effects. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 26:665–678

    Google Scholar 

  • Saal FS vom (1989) Sexual differentiation in litter-bearing mammals: influence of sex of adjacent fetuses in utero. J Anim Sci 67:1824–1840

    Google Scholar 

  • Saether SA, Fiske P, Kalas JA (1999) Pushy males and choosy females: courtship disruption and mate choice in the lekking great snipe. Proc R Soc Lond B 266:1227–1234

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwabl H (1993) Yolk is a source of maternal testosterone for developing birds. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 90:11446–11450

    Google Scholar 

  • Sheldon BC (2000) Differential allocation: tests, mechanisms and implications. Trends Ecol Evol 15:397–401

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sockman KW, Schwabl H (2000) Yolk androgens reduce offspring survival. Proc R Soc Lond B 267:1451–1456

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Staub NL, De Beer M (1997) The role of androgens in female vertebrates. Gen Comp Endocrinol 108:1–24

    Google Scholar 

  • Stearns SC (1992) The evolution of life histories. Oxford University Press, New York

  • Uller T, Massot M, Richard M, Lecomte J, Clobert J (2004) Long-lasting fitness consequences of prenatal sex ratio in a lizard. Evolution 58:2511–2516

    Google Scholar 

  • Vézina F, Williams TD (2002) Metabolic costs of egg production in the European starling (Sturnus vulgaris). Physiol Biochem Zool 75:377–385

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wedell N, Gage MJG, Parker GA (2002) Sperm competition, male prudence and sperm-limited females. Trends Ecol Evol 17:313–320

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams TD (1994) Intraspecific variation in egg size and egg composition in birds: effects on offspring fitness. Biol Rev 68:35–59

    Google Scholar 

  • Young RL, Badyaev AV (2004) Evolution of sex-biased maternal effects in birds. I. Sex-specific resource allocation among simultaneously growing oocytes. J Evol Biol 17:1355–1366

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to Mare Lõhmus and Fredrik Sundström for providing us with the quails. T.U. is grateful to Emma Cunningham for discussions about maternal effects and differential allocation. Rupert Marshall and two anonymous reviewers provided valuable comments that helped us improve the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tobias Uller.

Additional information

Communicated by C. Brown

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Uller, T., Eklöf, J. & Andersson, S. Female egg investment in relation to male sexual traits and the potential for transgenerational effects in sexual selection. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 57, 584–590 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-004-0886-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-004-0886-2

Keywords

Navigation